How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam

This paper assesses proponent activities to address tenure insecurity in light of actions required for effective and equitable implementation of REDD+. Field research was carried out at 19 REDD+ project sites and 71 villages in Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Results show propone...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World development 2014-03, Vol.55, p.37-52
Hauptverfasser: Sunderlin, William D., Larson, Anne M., Duchelle, Amy E., Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja, Huynh, Thu Ba, Awono, Abdon, Dokken, Therese
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 52
container_issue
container_start_page 37
container_title World development
container_volume 55
creator Sunderlin, William D.
Larson, Anne M.
Duchelle, Amy E.
Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja
Huynh, Thu Ba
Awono, Abdon
Dokken, Therese
description This paper assesses proponent activities to address tenure insecurity in light of actions required for effective and equitable implementation of REDD+. Field research was carried out at 19 REDD+ project sites and 71 villages in Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Results show proponents addressed tenure insecurity by demarcating village and forest boundaries and identifying legal right holders, but were limited in their ability to resolve local tenure challenges that were national in origin and scope. Still needed are national tenure actions, integration of national and local tenure efforts, clarification of international and national REDD+ policies, and conflict resolution mechanisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1474193951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305750X13000193</els_id><sourcerecordid>3173617051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e3480b47bca6ee445d4b1ceec682158811302194566eace5638119b4890302ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUF1rGzEQFCWFOm7_QhHksT5Ha0n38ZQP200CgYTihL4JnbQuMj7Jke4c6l9fGbfPhYVddmdmmSHkK7ApMCgvN9P3ELfW4n46Y8CnDHLxD2QEdcUL2TRwRkaMM1lUkv38RM5T2jDGJG-qERnuwzvVEemP5WLxjT7HsAsefZ_ojbURU3L-F12hHzIkH9stdumKLvfOojdI1zF09Dbqg9tO6Fx3GEPwE7rS_qC90xP64G3WS8dRe0tfHfZed5_Jx7XeJvzyt4_Jy_flan5fPD7dPcxvHgvDa9kXyEXNWlG1RpeIQkgrWjCIpqxnIOsagLMZNEKWJWqDsuR51bSibrLdmUE-Jhcn3V0MbwOmXm3CEH1-qUBUAhreSMio8oQyMaQUca120XU6_lbA1DFitVH_IlbHiBWDXDwTr09EzB72DqNKxh1zsS6i6ZUN7n8SfwB-rYd2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1474193951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sunderlin, William D. ; Larson, Anne M. ; Duchelle, Amy E. ; Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja ; Huynh, Thu Ba ; Awono, Abdon ; Dokken, Therese</creator><creatorcontrib>Sunderlin, William D. ; Larson, Anne M. ; Duchelle, Amy E. ; Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja ; Huynh, Thu Ba ; Awono, Abdon ; Dokken, Therese</creatorcontrib><description>This paper assesses proponent activities to address tenure insecurity in light of actions required for effective and equitable implementation of REDD+. Field research was carried out at 19 REDD+ project sites and 71 villages in Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Results show proponents addressed tenure insecurity by demarcating village and forest boundaries and identifying legal right holders, but were limited in their ability to resolve local tenure challenges that were national in origin and scope. Still needed are national tenure actions, integration of national and local tenure efforts, clarification of international and national REDD+ policies, and conflict resolution mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WODEDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>climate change ; Conflict resolution ; Deforestation ; Emissions control ; Environmental policy ; equity ; forest degradation ; Land degradation ; Land tenure ; livelihoods ; property rights ; REDD ; Studies ; Tenure ; tenure security</subject><ispartof>World development, 2014-03, Vol.55, p.37-52</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e3480b47bca6ee445d4b1ceec682158811302194566eace5638119b4890302ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e3480b47bca6ee445d4b1ceec682158811302194566eace5638119b4890302ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sunderlin, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchelle, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Thu Ba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awono, Abdon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokken, Therese</creatorcontrib><title>How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam</title><title>World development</title><description>This paper assesses proponent activities to address tenure insecurity in light of actions required for effective and equitable implementation of REDD+. Field research was carried out at 19 REDD+ project sites and 71 villages in Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Results show proponents addressed tenure insecurity by demarcating village and forest boundaries and identifying legal right holders, but were limited in their ability to resolve local tenure challenges that were national in origin and scope. Still needed are national tenure actions, integration of national and local tenure efforts, clarification of international and national REDD+ policies, and conflict resolution mechanisms.</description><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>equity</subject><subject>forest degradation</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>livelihoods</subject><subject>property rights</subject><subject>REDD</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>tenure security</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUF1rGzEQFCWFOm7_QhHksT5Ha0n38ZQP200CgYTihL4JnbQuMj7Jke4c6l9fGbfPhYVddmdmmSHkK7ApMCgvN9P3ELfW4n46Y8CnDHLxD2QEdcUL2TRwRkaMM1lUkv38RM5T2jDGJG-qERnuwzvVEemP5WLxjT7HsAsefZ_ojbURU3L-F12hHzIkH9stdumKLvfOojdI1zF09Dbqg9tO6Fx3GEPwE7rS_qC90xP64G3WS8dRe0tfHfZed5_Jx7XeJvzyt4_Jy_flan5fPD7dPcxvHgvDa9kXyEXNWlG1RpeIQkgrWjCIpqxnIOsagLMZNEKWJWqDsuR51bSibrLdmUE-Jhcn3V0MbwOmXm3CEH1-qUBUAhreSMio8oQyMaQUca120XU6_lbA1DFitVH_IlbHiBWDXDwTr09EzB72DqNKxh1zsS6i6ZUN7n8SfwB-rYd2</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Sunderlin, William D.</creator><creator>Larson, Anne M.</creator><creator>Duchelle, Amy E.</creator><creator>Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja</creator><creator>Huynh, Thu Ba</creator><creator>Awono, Abdon</creator><creator>Dokken, Therese</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam</title><author>Sunderlin, William D. ; Larson, Anne M. ; Duchelle, Amy E. ; Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja ; Huynh, Thu Ba ; Awono, Abdon ; Dokken, Therese</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e3480b47bca6ee445d4b1ceec682158811302194566eace5638119b4890302ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>equity</topic><topic>forest degradation</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>livelihoods</topic><topic>property rights</topic><topic>REDD</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>tenure security</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sunderlin, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchelle, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Thu Ba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awono, Abdon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokken, Therese</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sunderlin, William D.</au><au>Larson, Anne M.</au><au>Duchelle, Amy E.</au><au>Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja</au><au>Huynh, Thu Ba</au><au>Awono, Abdon</au><au>Dokken, Therese</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>55</volume><spage>37</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>37-52</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><coden>WODEDW</coden><abstract>This paper assesses proponent activities to address tenure insecurity in light of actions required for effective and equitable implementation of REDD+. Field research was carried out at 19 REDD+ project sites and 71 villages in Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Results show proponents addressed tenure insecurity by demarcating village and forest boundaries and identifying legal right holders, but were limited in their ability to resolve local tenure challenges that were national in origin and scope. Still needed are national tenure actions, integration of national and local tenure efforts, clarification of international and national REDD+ policies, and conflict resolution mechanisms.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-750X
ispartof World development, 2014-03, Vol.55, p.37-52
issn 0305-750X
1873-5991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1474193951
source PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects climate change
Conflict resolution
Deforestation
Emissions control
Environmental policy
equity
forest degradation
Land degradation
Land tenure
livelihoods
property rights
REDD
Studies
Tenure
tenure security
title How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T05%3A18%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20are%20REDD+%20Proponents%20Addressing%20Tenure%20Problems?%20Evidence%20from%20Brazil,%20Cameroon,%20Tanzania,%20Indonesia,%20and%20Vietnam&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Sunderlin,%20William%20D.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=55&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=37-52&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft.coden=WODEDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3173617051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1474193951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0305750X13000193&rfr_iscdi=true