How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam
This paper assesses proponent activities to address tenure insecurity in light of actions required for effective and equitable implementation of REDD+. Field research was carried out at 19 REDD+ project sites and 71 villages in Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Results show propone...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World development 2014-03, Vol.55, p.37-52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 52 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | World development |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Sunderlin, William D. Larson, Anne M. Duchelle, Amy E. Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja Huynh, Thu Ba Awono, Abdon Dokken, Therese |
description | This paper assesses proponent activities to address tenure insecurity in light of actions required for effective and equitable implementation of REDD+. Field research was carried out at 19 REDD+ project sites and 71 villages in Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Results show proponents addressed tenure insecurity by demarcating village and forest boundaries and identifying legal right holders, but were limited in their ability to resolve local tenure challenges that were national in origin and scope. Still needed are national tenure actions, integration of national and local tenure efforts, clarification of international and national REDD+ policies, and conflict resolution mechanisms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1474193951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305750X13000193</els_id><sourcerecordid>3173617051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e3480b47bca6ee445d4b1ceec682158811302194566eace5638119b4890302ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUF1rGzEQFCWFOm7_QhHksT5Ha0n38ZQP200CgYTihL4JnbQuMj7Jke4c6l9fGbfPhYVddmdmmSHkK7ApMCgvN9P3ELfW4n46Y8CnDHLxD2QEdcUL2TRwRkaMM1lUkv38RM5T2jDGJG-qERnuwzvVEemP5WLxjT7HsAsefZ_ojbURU3L-F12hHzIkH9stdumKLvfOojdI1zF09Dbqg9tO6Fx3GEPwE7rS_qC90xP64G3WS8dRe0tfHfZed5_Jx7XeJvzyt4_Jy_flan5fPD7dPcxvHgvDa9kXyEXNWlG1RpeIQkgrWjCIpqxnIOsagLMZNEKWJWqDsuR51bSibrLdmUE-Jhcn3V0MbwOmXm3CEH1-qUBUAhreSMio8oQyMaQUca120XU6_lbA1DFitVH_IlbHiBWDXDwTr09EzB72DqNKxh1zsS6i6ZUN7n8SfwB-rYd2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1474193951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sunderlin, William D. ; Larson, Anne M. ; Duchelle, Amy E. ; Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja ; Huynh, Thu Ba ; Awono, Abdon ; Dokken, Therese</creator><creatorcontrib>Sunderlin, William D. ; Larson, Anne M. ; Duchelle, Amy E. ; Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja ; Huynh, Thu Ba ; Awono, Abdon ; Dokken, Therese</creatorcontrib><description>This paper assesses proponent activities to address tenure insecurity in light of actions required for effective and equitable implementation of REDD+. Field research was carried out at 19 REDD+ project sites and 71 villages in Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Results show proponents addressed tenure insecurity by demarcating village and forest boundaries and identifying legal right holders, but were limited in their ability to resolve local tenure challenges that were national in origin and scope. Still needed are national tenure actions, integration of national and local tenure efforts, clarification of international and national REDD+ policies, and conflict resolution mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WODEDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>climate change ; Conflict resolution ; Deforestation ; Emissions control ; Environmental policy ; equity ; forest degradation ; Land degradation ; Land tenure ; livelihoods ; property rights ; REDD ; Studies ; Tenure ; tenure security</subject><ispartof>World development, 2014-03, Vol.55, p.37-52</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e3480b47bca6ee445d4b1ceec682158811302194566eace5638119b4890302ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e3480b47bca6ee445d4b1ceec682158811302194566eace5638119b4890302ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sunderlin, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchelle, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Thu Ba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awono, Abdon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokken, Therese</creatorcontrib><title>How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam</title><title>World development</title><description>This paper assesses proponent activities to address tenure insecurity in light of actions required for effective and equitable implementation of REDD+. Field research was carried out at 19 REDD+ project sites and 71 villages in Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Results show proponents addressed tenure insecurity by demarcating village and forest boundaries and identifying legal right holders, but were limited in their ability to resolve local tenure challenges that were national in origin and scope. Still needed are national tenure actions, integration of national and local tenure efforts, clarification of international and national REDD+ policies, and conflict resolution mechanisms.</description><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>equity</subject><subject>forest degradation</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>livelihoods</subject><subject>property rights</subject><subject>REDD</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>tenure security</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUF1rGzEQFCWFOm7_QhHksT5Ha0n38ZQP200CgYTihL4JnbQuMj7Jke4c6l9fGbfPhYVddmdmmSHkK7ApMCgvN9P3ELfW4n46Y8CnDHLxD2QEdcUL2TRwRkaMM1lUkv38RM5T2jDGJG-qERnuwzvVEemP5WLxjT7HsAsefZ_ojbURU3L-F12hHzIkH9stdumKLvfOojdI1zF09Dbqg9tO6Fx3GEPwE7rS_qC90xP64G3WS8dRe0tfHfZed5_Jx7XeJvzyt4_Jy_flan5fPD7dPcxvHgvDa9kXyEXNWlG1RpeIQkgrWjCIpqxnIOsagLMZNEKWJWqDsuR51bSibrLdmUE-Jhcn3V0MbwOmXm3CEH1-qUBUAhreSMio8oQyMaQUca120XU6_lbA1DFitVH_IlbHiBWDXDwTr09EzB72DqNKxh1zsS6i6ZUN7n8SfwB-rYd2</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Sunderlin, William D.</creator><creator>Larson, Anne M.</creator><creator>Duchelle, Amy E.</creator><creator>Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja</creator><creator>Huynh, Thu Ba</creator><creator>Awono, Abdon</creator><creator>Dokken, Therese</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam</title><author>Sunderlin, William D. ; Larson, Anne M. ; Duchelle, Amy E. ; Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja ; Huynh, Thu Ba ; Awono, Abdon ; Dokken, Therese</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e3480b47bca6ee445d4b1ceec682158811302194566eace5638119b4890302ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>equity</topic><topic>forest degradation</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>livelihoods</topic><topic>property rights</topic><topic>REDD</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>tenure security</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sunderlin, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchelle, Amy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Thu Ba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awono, Abdon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokken, Therese</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sunderlin, William D.</au><au>Larson, Anne M.</au><au>Duchelle, Amy E.</au><au>Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja</au><au>Huynh, Thu Ba</au><au>Awono, Abdon</au><au>Dokken, Therese</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>55</volume><spage>37</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>37-52</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><coden>WODEDW</coden><abstract>This paper assesses proponent activities to address tenure insecurity in light of actions required for effective and equitable implementation of REDD+. Field research was carried out at 19 REDD+ project sites and 71 villages in Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Results show proponents addressed tenure insecurity by demarcating village and forest boundaries and identifying legal right holders, but were limited in their ability to resolve local tenure challenges that were national in origin and scope. Still needed are national tenure actions, integration of national and local tenure efforts, clarification of international and national REDD+ policies, and conflict resolution mechanisms.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-750X |
ispartof | World development, 2014-03, Vol.55, p.37-52 |
issn | 0305-750X 1873-5991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1474193951 |
source | PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | climate change Conflict resolution Deforestation Emissions control Environmental policy equity forest degradation Land degradation Land tenure livelihoods property rights REDD Studies Tenure tenure security |
title | How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T05%3A18%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20are%20REDD+%20Proponents%20Addressing%20Tenure%20Problems?%20Evidence%20from%20Brazil,%20Cameroon,%20Tanzania,%20Indonesia,%20and%20Vietnam&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Sunderlin,%20William%20D.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=55&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=37-52&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft.coden=WODEDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3173617051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1474193951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0305750X13000193&rfr_iscdi=true |