A Sex Difference in Mental Rotation in Infants: Convergent Evidence
Quinn and Liben (2008) reported a sex difference on a mental rotation task in which 3‐ to 4‐month‐olds were familiarized with a shape in different rotations and then tested with a novel rotation of the familiar shape and its mirror image. As a group, males but not females showed a significant prefer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Infancy 2014-01, Vol.19 (1), p.103-116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 116 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Infancy |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Quinn, Paul C. Liben, Lynn S. |
description | Quinn and Liben (2008) reported a sex difference on a mental rotation task in which 3‐ to 4‐month‐olds were familiarized with a shape in different rotations and then tested with a novel rotation of the familiar shape and its mirror image. As a group, males but not females showed a significant preference for the mirror image, a pattern paralleled at the individual level (with most males but less than half the females showing the preference). Experiment 1 examined a possible explanation for this performance difference, namely, that females were more sensitive to the angular differences in the familiarized shape. Three‐ to 4‐month‐olds were given a discrimination task involving familiarization with a shape at a given rotation and preference testing with the shape in the familiarized versus a novel rotation. Females and males preferred the novel rotation, with no sex difference observed. This finding did not provide support for the suggestion that the sex difference in mental rotation is explained by differential sensitivity to angular rotation. Experiment 2 revealed that the sex difference in mental rotation is observed in 6‐ to 7‐month‐olds and 9‐ to 10‐month‐olds, suggesting that a sex difference in mental rotation is present at multiple ages during infancy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/infa.12033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1471918997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3169400811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3393-25673dc95a9c80991d7dea526364233284be58d059aa39b93f176dd13b061c9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QsssUNK8SOOY3ZVaEtFAfFSl5aTOMilOMVOS_v3OARYMpsZjc69o7kAnGI0wKEujK3UABNE6R7oYUZJxBFP99uZsAghlB6CI-8XYWIxwT2QDeGT3sIrU1XaaVtoaCy81bZRS_hYN6oxtW1X02BsG38Js9putHsNBBxtTNlKjsFBpZZen_z0PngZj56z62h2P5lmw1lUUCpoRFjCaVkIpkSRIiFwyUutGEloEhNKSRrnmqUlYkIpKnJBK8yTssQ0RwkuRE774KzzXbn6Y619Ixf12tlwUuKYY4FTIXigzjuqcLX3Tldy5cy7cjuJkWxDkm1I8jukAOMO_jRLvfuHlNO78fBXE3Ua4xu9_dMo9ybDg5zJ-d1EPtwEgrNUzukXkPh2Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1471918997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Sex Difference in Mental Rotation in Infants: Convergent Evidence</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Quinn, Paul C. ; Liben, Lynn S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Paul C. ; Liben, Lynn S.</creatorcontrib><description>Quinn and Liben (2008) reported a sex difference on a mental rotation task in which 3‐ to 4‐month‐olds were familiarized with a shape in different rotations and then tested with a novel rotation of the familiar shape and its mirror image. As a group, males but not females showed a significant preference for the mirror image, a pattern paralleled at the individual level (with most males but less than half the females showing the preference). Experiment 1 examined a possible explanation for this performance difference, namely, that females were more sensitive to the angular differences in the familiarized shape. Three‐ to 4‐month‐olds were given a discrimination task involving familiarization with a shape at a given rotation and preference testing with the shape in the familiarized versus a novel rotation. Females and males preferred the novel rotation, with no sex difference observed. This finding did not provide support for the suggestion that the sex difference in mental rotation is explained by differential sensitivity to angular rotation. Experiment 2 revealed that the sex difference in mental rotation is observed in 6‐ to 7‐month‐olds and 9‐ to 10‐month‐olds, suggesting that a sex difference in mental rotation is present at multiple ages during infancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-0008</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/infa.12033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ability tests ; Babies ; Cognitive ability ; Discrimination Learning ; Females ; Gender differences ; Gender Discrimination ; Males ; Preferences</subject><ispartof>Infancy, 2014-01, Vol.19 (1), p.103-116</ispartof><rights>Copyright © International Society on Infant Studies (ISIS)</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jan/Feb 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3393-25673dc95a9c80991d7dea526364233284be58d059aa39b93f176dd13b061c9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3393-25673dc95a9c80991d7dea526364233284be58d059aa39b93f176dd13b061c9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Finfa.12033$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Finfa.12033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liben, Lynn S.</creatorcontrib><title>A Sex Difference in Mental Rotation in Infants: Convergent Evidence</title><title>Infancy</title><addtitle>Infancy</addtitle><description>Quinn and Liben (2008) reported a sex difference on a mental rotation task in which 3‐ to 4‐month‐olds were familiarized with a shape in different rotations and then tested with a novel rotation of the familiar shape and its mirror image. As a group, males but not females showed a significant preference for the mirror image, a pattern paralleled at the individual level (with most males but less than half the females showing the preference). Experiment 1 examined a possible explanation for this performance difference, namely, that females were more sensitive to the angular differences in the familiarized shape. Three‐ to 4‐month‐olds were given a discrimination task involving familiarization with a shape at a given rotation and preference testing with the shape in the familiarized versus a novel rotation. Females and males preferred the novel rotation, with no sex difference observed. This finding did not provide support for the suggestion that the sex difference in mental rotation is explained by differential sensitivity to angular rotation. Experiment 2 revealed that the sex difference in mental rotation is observed in 6‐ to 7‐month‐olds and 9‐ to 10‐month‐olds, suggesting that a sex difference in mental rotation is present at multiple ages during infancy.</description><subject>Ability tests</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender Discrimination</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><issn>1525-0008</issn><issn>1532-7078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QsssUNK8SOOY3ZVaEtFAfFSl5aTOMilOMVOS_v3OARYMpsZjc69o7kAnGI0wKEujK3UABNE6R7oYUZJxBFP99uZsAghlB6CI-8XYWIxwT2QDeGT3sIrU1XaaVtoaCy81bZRS_hYN6oxtW1X02BsG38Js9putHsNBBxtTNlKjsFBpZZen_z0PngZj56z62h2P5lmw1lUUCpoRFjCaVkIpkSRIiFwyUutGEloEhNKSRrnmqUlYkIpKnJBK8yTssQ0RwkuRE774KzzXbn6Y619Ixf12tlwUuKYY4FTIXigzjuqcLX3Tldy5cy7cjuJkWxDkm1I8jukAOMO_jRLvfuHlNO78fBXE3Ua4xu9_dMo9ybDg5zJ-d1EPtwEgrNUzukXkPh2Cw</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Quinn, Paul C.</creator><creator>Liben, Lynn S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>A Sex Difference in Mental Rotation in Infants: Convergent Evidence</title><author>Quinn, Paul C. ; Liben, Lynn S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3393-25673dc95a9c80991d7dea526364233284be58d059aa39b93f176dd13b061c9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Ability tests</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender Discrimination</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liben, Lynn S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Infancy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quinn, Paul C.</au><au>Liben, Lynn S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Sex Difference in Mental Rotation in Infants: Convergent Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Infancy</jtitle><addtitle>Infancy</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>103-116</pages><issn>1525-0008</issn><eissn>1532-7078</eissn><abstract>Quinn and Liben (2008) reported a sex difference on a mental rotation task in which 3‐ to 4‐month‐olds were familiarized with a shape in different rotations and then tested with a novel rotation of the familiar shape and its mirror image. As a group, males but not females showed a significant preference for the mirror image, a pattern paralleled at the individual level (with most males but less than half the females showing the preference). Experiment 1 examined a possible explanation for this performance difference, namely, that females were more sensitive to the angular differences in the familiarized shape. Three‐ to 4‐month‐olds were given a discrimination task involving familiarization with a shape at a given rotation and preference testing with the shape in the familiarized versus a novel rotation. Females and males preferred the novel rotation, with no sex difference observed. This finding did not provide support for the suggestion that the sex difference in mental rotation is explained by differential sensitivity to angular rotation. Experiment 2 revealed that the sex difference in mental rotation is observed in 6‐ to 7‐month‐olds and 9‐ to 10‐month‐olds, suggesting that a sex difference in mental rotation is present at multiple ages during infancy.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/infa.12033</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-0008 |
ispartof | Infancy, 2014-01, Vol.19 (1), p.103-116 |
issn | 1525-0008 1532-7078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1471918997 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Ability tests Babies Cognitive ability Discrimination Learning Females Gender differences Gender Discrimination Males Preferences |
title | A Sex Difference in Mental Rotation in Infants: Convergent Evidence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Sex%20Difference%20in%20Mental%20Rotation%20in%20Infants:%20Convergent%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Infancy&rft.au=Quinn,%20Paul%20C.&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=103-116&rft.issn=1525-0008&rft.eissn=1532-7078&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/infa.12033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3169400811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1471918997&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |