The rule of law and the inevitability of discretion
Whatever the President's choice, he could have explained it to the country in rhetoric formally consistent with the Rule of Law, but the catastrophic economic implications of default would presumably-and perhaps legitimately-have dominated the Administration's thinking. [...]it must be ack...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Harvard journal of law and public policy 2013-01, Vol.36 (1), p.21 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 21 |
| container_title | Harvard journal of law and public policy |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Shane, Peter M |
| description | Whatever the President's choice, he could have explained it to the country in rhetoric formally consistent with the Rule of Law, but the catastrophic economic implications of default would presumably-and perhaps legitimately-have dominated the Administration's thinking. [...]it must be acknowledged that a government in which the "Rule of Law" is "conscientiously and systematically pursued" may, on rare and genuinely extraordinary occasions, still be a government in which other virtues take occasional priority.40 We want the Rule of Law-but perhaps not only the Rule of Law. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1470797988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A318106240</galeid><sourcerecordid>A318106240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g359t-3071d9a9c4e3661c059c8ab5226ed48c6e30b638b0f08aaedfb73fa0d7aac29c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0F1LwzAUBuAiCs7pfyh4JVhJkzQfl2OoGwy8mdflNDntMrpWm9SPf29kghuMwAmc87xJyFkyoUzyTBSSnicTkmuWcSXpZXLl_ZYQwnmuJglbbzAdxhbTvk5b-Eyhs2mIPdfhhwtQudaF79-hdd4MGFzfXScXNbQeb_72afL69LieL7LVy_NyPltlDSt0yBiRudWgDUcmRG5IoY2CqqBUoOXKCGSkEkxVpCYKAG1dSVYDsRLAUG3YNLndn_s29O8j-lBu-3Ho4pVlziWRWmql_lUDLZauq_swgNnF15YzlqucCMpJVNkJ1WCHA7R9h7WL7SP_cMLHZXHnzMnA3VEgmoBfoYHR-3K5WB7b-wNbjT5-to_Fu2YT_D5ywH8AOlSJWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1470797988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The rule of law and the inevitability of discretion</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Shane, Peter M</creator><creatorcontrib>Shane, Peter M</creatorcontrib><description>Whatever the President's choice, he could have explained it to the country in rhetoric formally consistent with the Rule of Law, but the catastrophic economic implications of default would presumably-and perhaps legitimately-have dominated the Administration's thinking. [...]it must be acknowledged that a government in which the "Rule of Law" is "conscientiously and systematically pursued" may, on rare and genuinely extraordinary occasions, still be a government in which other virtues take occasional priority.40 We want the Rule of Law-but perhaps not only the Rule of Law.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0193-4872</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2374-6572</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc</publisher><subject>Administrative discretion ; Attorneys ; Judicial reviews ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Presidents ; Public officials ; Rule of law ; Spectrum allocation</subject><ispartof>Harvard journal of law and public policy, 2013-01, Vol.36 (1), p.21</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy Winter 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27864</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shane, Peter M</creatorcontrib><title>The rule of law and the inevitability of discretion</title><title>Harvard journal of law and public policy</title><description>Whatever the President's choice, he could have explained it to the country in rhetoric formally consistent with the Rule of Law, but the catastrophic economic implications of default would presumably-and perhaps legitimately-have dominated the Administration's thinking. [...]it must be acknowledged that a government in which the "Rule of Law" is "conscientiously and systematically pursued" may, on rare and genuinely extraordinary occasions, still be a government in which other virtues take occasional priority.40 We want the Rule of Law-but perhaps not only the Rule of Law.</description><subject>Administrative discretion</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Spectrum allocation</subject><issn>0193-4872</issn><issn>2374-6572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0F1LwzAUBuAiCs7pfyh4JVhJkzQfl2OoGwy8mdflNDntMrpWm9SPf29kghuMwAmc87xJyFkyoUzyTBSSnicTkmuWcSXpZXLl_ZYQwnmuJglbbzAdxhbTvk5b-Eyhs2mIPdfhhwtQudaF79-hdd4MGFzfXScXNbQeb_72afL69LieL7LVy_NyPltlDSt0yBiRudWgDUcmRG5IoY2CqqBUoOXKCGSkEkxVpCYKAG1dSVYDsRLAUG3YNLndn_s29O8j-lBu-3Ho4pVlziWRWmql_lUDLZauq_swgNnF15YzlqucCMpJVNkJ1WCHA7R9h7WL7SP_cMLHZXHnzMnA3VEgmoBfoYHR-3K5WB7b-wNbjT5-to_Fu2YT_D5ywH8AOlSJWg</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Shane, Peter M</creator><general>Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc</general><general>Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>The rule of law and the inevitability of discretion</title><author>Shane, Peter M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g359t-3071d9a9c4e3661c059c8ab5226ed48c6e30b638b0f08aaedfb73fa0d7aac29c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Administrative discretion</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Spectrum allocation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shane, Peter M</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Harvard journal of law and public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shane, Peter M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The rule of law and the inevitability of discretion</atitle><jtitle>Harvard journal of law and public policy</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><pages>21-</pages><issn>0193-4872</issn><eissn>2374-6572</eissn><abstract>Whatever the President's choice, he could have explained it to the country in rhetoric formally consistent with the Rule of Law, but the catastrophic economic implications of default would presumably-and perhaps legitimately-have dominated the Administration's thinking. [...]it must be acknowledged that a government in which the "Rule of Law" is "conscientiously and systematically pursued" may, on rare and genuinely extraordinary occasions, still be a government in which other virtues take occasional priority.40 We want the Rule of Law-but perhaps not only the Rule of Law.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0193-4872 |
| ispartof | Harvard journal of law and public policy, 2013-01, Vol.36 (1), p.21 |
| issn | 0193-4872 2374-6572 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1470797988 |
| source | PAIS Index; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete; Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Administrative discretion Attorneys Judicial reviews Laws, regulations and rules Presidents Public officials Rule of law Spectrum allocation |
| title | The rule of law and the inevitability of discretion |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A02%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20rule%20of%20law%20and%20the%20inevitability%20of%20discretion&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20journal%20of%20law%20and%20public%20policy&rft.au=Shane,%20Peter%20M&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.pages=21-&rft.issn=0193-4872&rft.eissn=2374-6572&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA318106240%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1470797988&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A318106240&rfr_iscdi=true |