The interface between morphology and action planning: a comparison of two species of New World monkeys
Recent research with several species of nonhuman primates suggests sophisticated motor-planning abilities observed in human adults may be ubiquitous among primates. However, there is considerable variability in the extent to which these abilities are expressed across primate species. In the present...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal behaviour 2013-12, Vol.86 (6), p.1251-1258 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1258 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1251 |
container_title | Animal behaviour |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Zander, Stacey L. Weiss, Daniel J. Judge, Peter G. |
description | Recent research with several species of nonhuman primates suggests sophisticated motor-planning abilities observed in human adults may be ubiquitous among primates. However, there is considerable variability in the extent to which these abilities are expressed across primate species. In the present experiment, we explore whether the variability in the expression of anticipatory motor-planning abilities may be attributed to cognitive differences (such as tool use abilities) or whether they may be due to the consequences of morphological differences (such as being able to deploy a precision grasp). We compared two species of New World monkeys that differ in their tool use abilities and manual dexterity: squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus (less dexterous with little evidence for tool use) and tufted capuchins, Sapajus apella (more dexterous and known tool users). The monkeys were presented with baited cups in an untrained food extraction task. Consistent with the morphological constraint hypothesis, squirrel monkeys frequently showed second-order motor planning by inverting their grasp when picking up an inverted cup, while capuchins frequently deployed canonical upright grasping postures. Findings suggest that the lack of ability for precision grasping may elicit more consistent second-order motor planning, as the squirrel monkeys (and other species that have shown a high rate of second-order planning) have fewer means of compensating for inefficient initial postures. Thus, the interface between morphology and motor planning likely represents an important factor for understanding both the ontogenetic and phylogenetic origins of sophisticated motor-planning abilities.
•Two species of New World monkeys were provided with a food extraction task.•Both squirrel monkeys and capuchins showed second-order motor-planning abilities.•The expression of this effect was significantly greater in squirrel monkeys than in capuchins.•Morphological constraints may play a role in the expression of second-order motor planning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1465009444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347213004326</els_id><sourcerecordid>3146442191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2c1793a0d5499c0bc2bbdc0be9ffdb3973d9c0cbce969a5e3b8bbb8c92abb2ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QQy4njHJPDpxIyK-oOjCFpchydxpM06TMZm29N-b0u5dXe7lO-dyDkLXlKSU0PKuTaVVsJSblBGapYSnhFUnaEQJL5KKVewUjQghWZLlE3aOLkJo41oWpBihZrYEbOwAvpEasIJhC2Dxyvl-6Tq32GFpayz1YJzFfSetNXZxjyXWbtVLb0I8uwYPW4dDD9pA2K8fsMXfznd1NLI_sAuX6KyRXYCr4xyj-cvz7OktmX6-vj89ThOdk2pImKYTnklSFznnmijNlKrjBN40tcr4JKvjWSsNvOSygExVSqlKcyaVYiCzMbo9-Pbe_a4hDKJ1a2_jS0HzmJjwPM8jVRwo7V0IHhrRe7OSficoEftKRSuOlYp9pYJwESuNupuDrpFOyEVML-ZfEYi-tKjKSI7Rw4GAGHJjwIsQO7EaauNBD6J25p8ffwyRjY8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1465009444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The interface between morphology and action planning: a comparison of two species of New World monkeys</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zander, Stacey L. ; Weiss, Daniel J. ; Judge, Peter G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zander, Stacey L. ; Weiss, Daniel J. ; Judge, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research with several species of nonhuman primates suggests sophisticated motor-planning abilities observed in human adults may be ubiquitous among primates. However, there is considerable variability in the extent to which these abilities are expressed across primate species. In the present experiment, we explore whether the variability in the expression of anticipatory motor-planning abilities may be attributed to cognitive differences (such as tool use abilities) or whether they may be due to the consequences of morphological differences (such as being able to deploy a precision grasp). We compared two species of New World monkeys that differ in their tool use abilities and manual dexterity: squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus (less dexterous with little evidence for tool use) and tufted capuchins, Sapajus apella (more dexterous and known tool users). The monkeys were presented with baited cups in an untrained food extraction task. Consistent with the morphological constraint hypothesis, squirrel monkeys frequently showed second-order motor planning by inverting their grasp when picking up an inverted cup, while capuchins frequently deployed canonical upright grasping postures. Findings suggest that the lack of ability for precision grasping may elicit more consistent second-order motor planning, as the squirrel monkeys (and other species that have shown a high rate of second-order planning) have fewer means of compensating for inefficient initial postures. Thus, the interface between morphology and motor planning likely represents an important factor for understanding both the ontogenetic and phylogenetic origins of sophisticated motor-planning abilities.
•Two species of New World monkeys were provided with a food extraction task.•Both squirrel monkeys and capuchins showed second-order motor-planning abilities.•The expression of this effect was significantly greater in squirrel monkeys than in capuchins.•Morphological constraints may play a role in the expression of second-order motor planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.028</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>action planning ; adults ; Animal behavior ; Animal cognition ; Behavioral biology ; capuchin ; cognition ; end-state comfort ; humans ; monkeys ; Monkeys & apes ; Morphology ; motor planning ; new species ; phylogeny ; planning ; Saimiri sciureus ; second-order planning ; squirrel monkey</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 2013-12, Vol.86 (6), p.1251-1258</ispartof><rights>2013 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2c1793a0d5499c0bc2bbdc0be9ffdb3973d9c0cbce969a5e3b8bbb8c92abb2ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2c1793a0d5499c0bc2bbdc0be9ffdb3973d9c0cbce969a5e3b8bbb8c92abb2ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347213004326$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zander, Stacey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judge, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><title>The interface between morphology and action planning: a comparison of two species of New World monkeys</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><description>Recent research with several species of nonhuman primates suggests sophisticated motor-planning abilities observed in human adults may be ubiquitous among primates. However, there is considerable variability in the extent to which these abilities are expressed across primate species. In the present experiment, we explore whether the variability in the expression of anticipatory motor-planning abilities may be attributed to cognitive differences (such as tool use abilities) or whether they may be due to the consequences of morphological differences (such as being able to deploy a precision grasp). We compared two species of New World monkeys that differ in their tool use abilities and manual dexterity: squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus (less dexterous with little evidence for tool use) and tufted capuchins, Sapajus apella (more dexterous and known tool users). The monkeys were presented with baited cups in an untrained food extraction task. Consistent with the morphological constraint hypothesis, squirrel monkeys frequently showed second-order motor planning by inverting their grasp when picking up an inverted cup, while capuchins frequently deployed canonical upright grasping postures. Findings suggest that the lack of ability for precision grasping may elicit more consistent second-order motor planning, as the squirrel monkeys (and other species that have shown a high rate of second-order planning) have fewer means of compensating for inefficient initial postures. Thus, the interface between morphology and motor planning likely represents an important factor for understanding both the ontogenetic and phylogenetic origins of sophisticated motor-planning abilities.
•Two species of New World monkeys were provided with a food extraction task.•Both squirrel monkeys and capuchins showed second-order motor-planning abilities.•The expression of this effect was significantly greater in squirrel monkeys than in capuchins.•Morphological constraints may play a role in the expression of second-order motor planning.</description><subject>action planning</subject><subject>adults</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Behavioral biology</subject><subject>capuchin</subject><subject>cognition</subject><subject>end-state comfort</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>monkeys</subject><subject>Monkeys & apes</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>motor planning</subject><subject>new species</subject><subject>phylogeny</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>Saimiri sciureus</subject><subject>second-order planning</subject><subject>squirrel monkey</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QQy4njHJPDpxIyK-oOjCFpchydxpM06TMZm29N-b0u5dXe7lO-dyDkLXlKSU0PKuTaVVsJSblBGapYSnhFUnaEQJL5KKVewUjQghWZLlE3aOLkJo41oWpBihZrYEbOwAvpEasIJhC2Dxyvl-6Tq32GFpayz1YJzFfSetNXZxjyXWbtVLb0I8uwYPW4dDD9pA2K8fsMXfznd1NLI_sAuX6KyRXYCr4xyj-cvz7OktmX6-vj89ThOdk2pImKYTnklSFznnmijNlKrjBN40tcr4JKvjWSsNvOSygExVSqlKcyaVYiCzMbo9-Pbe_a4hDKJ1a2_jS0HzmJjwPM8jVRwo7V0IHhrRe7OSficoEftKRSuOlYp9pYJwESuNupuDrpFOyEVML-ZfEYi-tKjKSI7Rw4GAGHJjwIsQO7EaauNBD6J25p8ffwyRjY8</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Zander, Stacey L.</creator><creator>Weiss, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Judge, Peter G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>The interface between morphology and action planning: a comparison of two species of New World monkeys</title><author>Zander, Stacey L. ; Weiss, Daniel J. ; Judge, Peter G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2c1793a0d5499c0bc2bbdc0be9ffdb3973d9c0cbce969a5e3b8bbb8c92abb2ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>action planning</topic><topic>adults</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Behavioral biology</topic><topic>capuchin</topic><topic>cognition</topic><topic>end-state comfort</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>monkeys</topic><topic>Monkeys & apes</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>motor planning</topic><topic>new species</topic><topic>phylogeny</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>Saimiri sciureus</topic><topic>second-order planning</topic><topic>squirrel monkey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zander, Stacey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judge, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zander, Stacey L.</au><au>Weiss, Daniel J.</au><au>Judge, Peter G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The interface between morphology and action planning: a comparison of two species of New World monkeys</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1251</spage><epage>1258</epage><pages>1251-1258</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>Recent research with several species of nonhuman primates suggests sophisticated motor-planning abilities observed in human adults may be ubiquitous among primates. However, there is considerable variability in the extent to which these abilities are expressed across primate species. In the present experiment, we explore whether the variability in the expression of anticipatory motor-planning abilities may be attributed to cognitive differences (such as tool use abilities) or whether they may be due to the consequences of morphological differences (such as being able to deploy a precision grasp). We compared two species of New World monkeys that differ in their tool use abilities and manual dexterity: squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus (less dexterous with little evidence for tool use) and tufted capuchins, Sapajus apella (more dexterous and known tool users). The monkeys were presented with baited cups in an untrained food extraction task. Consistent with the morphological constraint hypothesis, squirrel monkeys frequently showed second-order motor planning by inverting their grasp when picking up an inverted cup, while capuchins frequently deployed canonical upright grasping postures. Findings suggest that the lack of ability for precision grasping may elicit more consistent second-order motor planning, as the squirrel monkeys (and other species that have shown a high rate of second-order planning) have fewer means of compensating for inefficient initial postures. Thus, the interface between morphology and motor planning likely represents an important factor for understanding both the ontogenetic and phylogenetic origins of sophisticated motor-planning abilities.
•Two species of New World monkeys were provided with a food extraction task.•Both squirrel monkeys and capuchins showed second-order motor-planning abilities.•The expression of this effect was significantly greater in squirrel monkeys than in capuchins.•Morphological constraints may play a role in the expression of second-order motor planning.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.028</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3472 |
ispartof | Animal behaviour, 2013-12, Vol.86 (6), p.1251-1258 |
issn | 0003-3472 1095-8282 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1465009444 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | action planning adults Animal behavior Animal cognition Behavioral biology capuchin cognition end-state comfort humans monkeys Monkeys & apes Morphology motor planning new species phylogeny planning Saimiri sciureus second-order planning squirrel monkey |
title | The interface between morphology and action planning: a comparison of two species of New World monkeys |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A12%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20interface%20between%20morphology%20and%20action%20planning:%20a%20comparison%20of%20two%20species%20of%20New%20World%20monkeys&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Zander,%20Stacey%20L.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1251&rft.epage=1258&rft.pages=1251-1258&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3146442191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1465009444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0003347213004326&rfr_iscdi=true |