A Two-Stage Framework for Power Transformer Asset Maintenance Management-Part II: Validation Results

A two-stage framework for transformer maintenance management is introduced and formulated in Part I of this two-part paper in the context of transmission asset management strategies (TAMS). The proposed model optimizes maintenance outage schedule over a predefined period of time by taking into accou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on power systems 2013-05, Vol.28 (2), p.1404-1414
Hauptverfasser: Abiri-Jahromi, Amir, Parvania, Masood, Bouffard, Francois, Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1414
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1404
container_title IEEE transactions on power systems
container_volume 28
creator Abiri-Jahromi, Amir
Parvania, Masood
Bouffard, Francois
Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud
description A two-stage framework for transformer maintenance management is introduced and formulated in Part I of this two-part paper in the context of transmission asset management strategies (TAMS). The proposed model optimizes maintenance outage schedule over a predefined period of time by taking into account the actual and expected transformer assets' condition dynamics in terms of failure rate and resource limitations in midterm horizons, as well as operating constraints, economic considerations and N-1 reliability in the shorter term. In Part II, a small six-bus system is first used to demonstrate how the two-stage maintenance framework works using a step-by-step procedure. Then, IEEE-RTS is used to investigate the performance of the proposed model in more detail. In addition, the impacts of varying the characteristics of the proposed midterm and short-term maintenance schedulers, such as flexibility in time horizon selection, on maintenance scheduling results and computational efficiency are investigated on IEEE-RTS. The numerical studies indicate that the proposed framework gives appropriate results in terms of economics and technical constraints at a reasonable computational cost.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2216904
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1462997936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6331587</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1520994054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-7f6e6d391bc5c15ffbaeb206213a79c2652f0f639dd667ade8f9e138989ddebb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtrGzEUhUVJoU7SP9BuBN10M44elkbqzoS4NSTEJE67FJqZqzDOjORKMib_vnJtssjqvs53ORyEvlAypZToq_Xqz8PjlBHKpoxRqcnsA5pQIVRFZK3P0IQoJSqlBfmEzlPaEEJkOUxQN8frfages30GvIh2hH2IL9iFiFdhDxGvo_WpjGPp5ylBxne29xm89S2U3hdwBJ-rlY0ZL5c_8G879J3NffD4AdJuyOkSfXR2SPD5VC_Q0-Jmff2rur3_ubye31YtZypXtZMgO65p04qWCucaCw0jklFua90yKZgjTnLddcW87UA5DZQrrcoGmoZfoO_Hv9sY_u4gZTP2qYVhsB7CLhkqGNF6RsSsSL-9k27CLvriztCZZFrXmsuiYkdVG0NKEZzZxn608dVQYg7Bm__Bm0Pw5hR8gb4eoR4A3gDJORWq5v8A5MJ_rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1462997936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Two-Stage Framework for Power Transformer Asset Maintenance Management-Part II: Validation Results</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Abiri-Jahromi, Amir ; Parvania, Masood ; Bouffard, Francois ; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud</creator><creatorcontrib>Abiri-Jahromi, Amir ; Parvania, Masood ; Bouffard, Francois ; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud</creatorcontrib><description>A two-stage framework for transformer maintenance management is introduced and formulated in Part I of this two-part paper in the context of transmission asset management strategies (TAMS). The proposed model optimizes maintenance outage schedule over a predefined period of time by taking into account the actual and expected transformer assets' condition dynamics in terms of failure rate and resource limitations in midterm horizons, as well as operating constraints, economic considerations and N-1 reliability in the shorter term. In Part II, a small six-bus system is first used to demonstrate how the two-stage maintenance framework works using a step-by-step procedure. Then, IEEE-RTS is used to investigate the performance of the proposed model in more detail. In addition, the impacts of varying the characteristics of the proposed midterm and short-term maintenance schedulers, such as flexibility in time horizon selection, on maintenance scheduling results and computational efficiency are investigated on IEEE-RTS. The numerical studies indicate that the proposed framework gives appropriate results in terms of economics and technical constraints at a reasonable computational cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2216904</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Aging ; Asset management ; Computational burden ; Computational efficiency ; Conferences ; Dynamics ; Economics ; failure rate ; Flexibility ; Linear programming ; Maintenance ; Maintenance engineering ; Maintenance management ; midterm and short-term maintenance planning ; mixed integer linear programming ; Operations research ; Power transformers ; Schedules ; Security ; Transformers ; transmission asset management ; Weibull distribution</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2013-05, Vol.28 (2), p.1404-1414</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) May 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-7f6e6d391bc5c15ffbaeb206213a79c2652f0f639dd667ade8f9e138989ddebb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-7f6e6d391bc5c15ffbaeb206213a79c2652f0f639dd667ade8f9e138989ddebb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6331587$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27923,27924,54757</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6331587$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abiri-Jahromi, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parvania, Masood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffard, Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud</creatorcontrib><title>A Two-Stage Framework for Power Transformer Asset Maintenance Management-Part II: Validation Results</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>A two-stage framework for transformer maintenance management is introduced and formulated in Part I of this two-part paper in the context of transmission asset management strategies (TAMS). The proposed model optimizes maintenance outage schedule over a predefined period of time by taking into account the actual and expected transformer assets' condition dynamics in terms of failure rate and resource limitations in midterm horizons, as well as operating constraints, economic considerations and N-1 reliability in the shorter term. In Part II, a small six-bus system is first used to demonstrate how the two-stage maintenance framework works using a step-by-step procedure. Then, IEEE-RTS is used to investigate the performance of the proposed model in more detail. In addition, the impacts of varying the characteristics of the proposed midterm and short-term maintenance schedulers, such as flexibility in time horizon selection, on maintenance scheduling results and computational efficiency are investigated on IEEE-RTS. The numerical studies indicate that the proposed framework gives appropriate results in terms of economics and technical constraints at a reasonable computational cost.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Asset management</subject><subject>Computational burden</subject><subject>Computational efficiency</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>failure rate</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Maintenance engineering</subject><subject>Maintenance management</subject><subject>midterm and short-term maintenance planning</subject><subject>mixed integer linear programming</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Power transformers</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Transformers</subject><subject>transmission asset management</subject><subject>Weibull distribution</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtrGzEUhUVJoU7SP9BuBN10M44elkbqzoS4NSTEJE67FJqZqzDOjORKMib_vnJtssjqvs53ORyEvlAypZToq_Xqz8PjlBHKpoxRqcnsA5pQIVRFZK3P0IQoJSqlBfmEzlPaEEJkOUxQN8frfages30GvIh2hH2IL9iFiFdhDxGvo_WpjGPp5ylBxne29xm89S2U3hdwBJ-rlY0ZL5c_8G879J3NffD4AdJuyOkSfXR2SPD5VC_Q0-Jmff2rur3_ubye31YtZypXtZMgO65p04qWCucaCw0jklFua90yKZgjTnLddcW87UA5DZQrrcoGmoZfoO_Hv9sY_u4gZTP2qYVhsB7CLhkqGNF6RsSsSL-9k27CLvriztCZZFrXmsuiYkdVG0NKEZzZxn608dVQYg7Bm__Bm0Pw5hR8gb4eoR4A3gDJORWq5v8A5MJ_rw</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Abiri-Jahromi, Amir</creator><creator>Parvania, Masood</creator><creator>Bouffard, Francois</creator><creator>Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>A Two-Stage Framework for Power Transformer Asset Maintenance Management-Part II: Validation Results</title><author>Abiri-Jahromi, Amir ; Parvania, Masood ; Bouffard, Francois ; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-7f6e6d391bc5c15ffbaeb206213a79c2652f0f639dd667ade8f9e138989ddebb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Asset management</topic><topic>Computational burden</topic><topic>Computational efficiency</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>failure rate</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Maintenance engineering</topic><topic>Maintenance management</topic><topic>midterm and short-term maintenance planning</topic><topic>mixed integer linear programming</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Power transformers</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Transformers</topic><topic>transmission asset management</topic><topic>Weibull distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abiri-Jahromi, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parvania, Masood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffard, Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abiri-Jahromi, Amir</au><au>Parvania, Masood</au><au>Bouffard, Francois</au><au>Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Two-Stage Framework for Power Transformer Asset Maintenance Management-Part II: Validation Results</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1404</spage><epage>1414</epage><pages>1404-1414</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>A two-stage framework for transformer maintenance management is introduced and formulated in Part I of this two-part paper in the context of transmission asset management strategies (TAMS). The proposed model optimizes maintenance outage schedule over a predefined period of time by taking into account the actual and expected transformer assets' condition dynamics in terms of failure rate and resource limitations in midterm horizons, as well as operating constraints, economic considerations and N-1 reliability in the shorter term. In Part II, a small six-bus system is first used to demonstrate how the two-stage maintenance framework works using a step-by-step procedure. Then, IEEE-RTS is used to investigate the performance of the proposed model in more detail. In addition, the impacts of varying the characteristics of the proposed midterm and short-term maintenance schedulers, such as flexibility in time horizon selection, on maintenance scheduling results and computational efficiency are investigated on IEEE-RTS. The numerical studies indicate that the proposed framework gives appropriate results in terms of economics and technical constraints at a reasonable computational cost.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2216904</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0885-8950
ispartof IEEE transactions on power systems, 2013-05, Vol.28 (2), p.1404-1414
issn 0885-8950
1558-0679
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1462997936
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Aging
Asset management
Computational burden
Computational efficiency
Conferences
Dynamics
Economics
failure rate
Flexibility
Linear programming
Maintenance
Maintenance engineering
Maintenance management
midterm and short-term maintenance planning
mixed integer linear programming
Operations research
Power transformers
Schedules
Security
Transformers
transmission asset management
Weibull distribution
title A Two-Stage Framework for Power Transformer Asset Maintenance Management-Part II: Validation Results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A11%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Two-Stage%20Framework%20for%20Power%20Transformer%20Asset%20Maintenance%20Management-Part%20II:%20Validation%20Results&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Abiri-Jahromi,%20Amir&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1404&rft.epage=1414&rft.pages=1404-1414&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2216904&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1520994054%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1462997936&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6331587&rfr_iscdi=true