What is important in present and future IOL materials & design?

IOL progress has followed 2 main lines: optical performance,and materials/design. This talk reviews their impact and possible future trends.IOL optics evolved from spheric monofocal to aspheric (+optionally toric) to multifocal; from refractive to diffractive multifocality, currently with several ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2013-08, Vol.91 (s252), p.0-0
1. Verfasser: BARRAQUER, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 0
container_issue s252
container_start_page 0
container_title Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)
container_volume 91
creator BARRAQUER, R
description IOL progress has followed 2 main lines: optical performance,and materials/design. This talk reviews their impact and possible future trends.IOL optics evolved from spheric monofocal to aspheric (+optionally toric) to multifocal; from refractive to diffractive multifocality, currently with several choices regarding add, bi‐ vs trifocality, etc. Additionally a number of designs attempt to reproduce the lens accommodative mechanism. However,none of the available options truly restores the physiological accommodation of the youth. The main drive for the evolution of IOL materials and designs has been implantability through an ever‐decreasing incision width. While this may have created some compromises regarding materials and optical quality/stability, it seems unlikely that this process could revert. Next major issue is the prevention of PCO. Aspects as the posterior square edges and hydrophobic materials are widely assumed as useful to prevent PCO. However, a general proof is difficult due to the numerous factors involved (IOl & non‐IOL) and the great variability of designs. IOL materials durability lags in a 3rd position of interest (apart from cases of IOL opacification) but is likely an emerging topic for the near future.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2013.4653.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1458519804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3127051201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-4e8480984f2f718f77ec2b23e81a97da011f41fe9b0c2932a79e7e14161835ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9LwzAQx4MoOKd_gwHBt9ZckzQpCGMMfwwGe1DRt5B1F23Z2pq0uP33tkz27L3c977c9w4-hFwDi6GvuzIGJWXEVarjhAGPRSp5vDsho6N_etTy45xchFAylkKaihGZvH_ZlhaBFtum9q2t-qGijceAvbTVmrqu7TzS-XJBt7ZFX9hNoLd0jaH4rCaX5Mz1Bl799TF5e3x4nT1Hi-XTfDZdRDkozSOBWmiWaeESp0A7pTBPVglHDTZTa8sAnACH2YrlScYTqzJUCAJS0Fyi5WNyc7jb-Pq7w9Casu581b80IKSWkGkm-i112Mp9HYJHZxpfbK3fG2BmoGVKM5AwAxUz0DIDLbPrk_eH5E-xwf1_Y2a6fBkU_wXC0W4K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1458519804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is important in present and future IOL materials &amp; design?</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>BARRAQUER, R</creator><creatorcontrib>BARRAQUER, R</creatorcontrib><description>IOL progress has followed 2 main lines: optical performance,and materials/design. This talk reviews their impact and possible future trends.IOL optics evolved from spheric monofocal to aspheric (+optionally toric) to multifocal; from refractive to diffractive multifocality, currently with several choices regarding add, bi‐ vs trifocality, etc. Additionally a number of designs attempt to reproduce the lens accommodative mechanism. However,none of the available options truly restores the physiological accommodation of the youth. The main drive for the evolution of IOL materials and designs has been implantability through an ever‐decreasing incision width. While this may have created some compromises regarding materials and optical quality/stability, it seems unlikely that this process could revert. Next major issue is the prevention of PCO. Aspects as the posterior square edges and hydrophobic materials are widely assumed as useful to prevent PCO. However, a general proof is difficult due to the numerous factors involved (IOl &amp; non‐IOL) and the great variability of designs. IOL materials durability lags in a 3rd position of interest (apart from cases of IOL opacification) but is likely an emerging topic for the near future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2013.4653.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Binoculars ; Materials durability ; Ophthalmology</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2013-08, Vol.91 (s252), p.0-0</ispartof><rights>2013 Acta Ophthalmologica</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1755-3768.2013.4653.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45575,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BARRAQUER, R</creatorcontrib><title>What is important in present and future IOL materials &amp; design?</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><description>IOL progress has followed 2 main lines: optical performance,and materials/design. This talk reviews their impact and possible future trends.IOL optics evolved from spheric monofocal to aspheric (+optionally toric) to multifocal; from refractive to diffractive multifocality, currently with several choices regarding add, bi‐ vs trifocality, etc. Additionally a number of designs attempt to reproduce the lens accommodative mechanism. However,none of the available options truly restores the physiological accommodation of the youth. The main drive for the evolution of IOL materials and designs has been implantability through an ever‐decreasing incision width. While this may have created some compromises regarding materials and optical quality/stability, it seems unlikely that this process could revert. Next major issue is the prevention of PCO. Aspects as the posterior square edges and hydrophobic materials are widely assumed as useful to prevent PCO. However, a general proof is difficult due to the numerous factors involved (IOl &amp; non‐IOL) and the great variability of designs. IOL materials durability lags in a 3rd position of interest (apart from cases of IOL opacification) but is likely an emerging topic for the near future.</description><subject>Binoculars</subject><subject>Materials durability</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkN9LwzAQx4MoOKd_gwHBt9ZckzQpCGMMfwwGe1DRt5B1F23Z2pq0uP33tkz27L3c977c9w4-hFwDi6GvuzIGJWXEVarjhAGPRSp5vDsho6N_etTy45xchFAylkKaihGZvH_ZlhaBFtum9q2t-qGijceAvbTVmrqu7TzS-XJBt7ZFX9hNoLd0jaH4rCaX5Mz1Bl799TF5e3x4nT1Hi-XTfDZdRDkozSOBWmiWaeESp0A7pTBPVglHDTZTa8sAnACH2YrlScYTqzJUCAJS0Fyi5WNyc7jb-Pq7w9Casu581b80IKSWkGkm-i112Mp9HYJHZxpfbK3fG2BmoGVKM5AwAxUz0DIDLbPrk_eH5E-xwf1_Y2a6fBkU_wXC0W4K</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>BARRAQUER, R</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>What is important in present and future IOL materials &amp; design?</title><author>BARRAQUER, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-4e8480984f2f718f77ec2b23e81a97da011f41fe9b0c2932a79e7e14161835ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Binoculars</topic><topic>Materials durability</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BARRAQUER, R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BARRAQUER, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is important in present and future IOL materials &amp; design?</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>s252</issue><spage>0</spage><epage>0</epage><pages>0-0</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>IOL progress has followed 2 main lines: optical performance,and materials/design. This talk reviews their impact and possible future trends.IOL optics evolved from spheric monofocal to aspheric (+optionally toric) to multifocal; from refractive to diffractive multifocality, currently with several choices regarding add, bi‐ vs trifocality, etc. Additionally a number of designs attempt to reproduce the lens accommodative mechanism. However,none of the available options truly restores the physiological accommodation of the youth. The main drive for the evolution of IOL materials and designs has been implantability through an ever‐decreasing incision width. While this may have created some compromises regarding materials and optical quality/stability, it seems unlikely that this process could revert. Next major issue is the prevention of PCO. Aspects as the posterior square edges and hydrophobic materials are widely assumed as useful to prevent PCO. However, a general proof is difficult due to the numerous factors involved (IOl &amp; non‐IOL) and the great variability of designs. IOL materials durability lags in a 3rd position of interest (apart from cases of IOL opacification) but is likely an emerging topic for the near future.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1755-3768.2013.4653.x</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-375X
ispartof Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2013-08, Vol.91 (s252), p.0-0
issn 1755-375X
1755-3768
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1458519804
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Binoculars
Materials durability
Ophthalmology
title What is important in present and future IOL materials & design?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A33%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20important%20in%20present%20and%20future%20IOL%20materials%20&%20design?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=BARRAQUER,%20R&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=s252&rft.spage=0&rft.epage=0&rft.pages=0-0&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2013.4653.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3127051201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1458519804&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true