Scar endometriosis after a caesarean section: a perhaps underestimated complication

The exact incidence of scar endometriosis is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of endometriosis in the abdominal wall following a caesarean section. Women who underwent surgery for scar endometriosis after a caesarean section and the total number of women with caesarean se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecological surgery 2013-11, Vol.10 (4), p.279-284
Hauptverfasser: Adriaanse, B. M. E., Natté, R., Hellebrekers, B. W. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 284
container_issue 4
container_start_page 279
container_title Gynecological surgery
container_volume 10
creator Adriaanse, B. M. E.
Natté, R.
Hellebrekers, B. W. J.
description The exact incidence of scar endometriosis is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of endometriosis in the abdominal wall following a caesarean section. Women who underwent surgery for scar endometriosis after a caesarean section and the total number of women with caesarean sections in The Haga Teaching Hospital, a gynaecologic centre in The Netherlands, were identified by the national obstetric registration and pathology archive in the period January 1995 to December 2008. Clinical data were collected from the existing hospital records. Twenty-nine women were diagnosed with scar endometriosis after a caesarean section, and 3,047 women underwent one or more caesarean sections, resulting in an incidence of scar endometriosis of 0.95 %. None of the women had a history of endometriosis. Symptoms were pain (94.0 %), cyclic with menstruation (50.0 %) and swelling of the scar (89.0 %). Mean time between caesarean delivery and symptoms was 4.1 years. No recurrence occurred. This study reveals a higher incidence of endometriosis in the scar of a caesarean section than described in current literature. To improve the detection rate, more attention to medical history and physical examination is mandatory. A higher incidence warrants research into the pathophysiology and prevention of endometriosis in the scar of a caesarean section.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10397-013-0807-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_C6C</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1448957588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3119643311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fc10016f0b6c0083834c32badcbc791eb5ec3dd400a656380fcf2833f8939b063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9VJp01Tb7L4BQseVs8hTSfaZbepSXvw35ulIl48zQfvO_PyMHYp4FoAVDdRANZVBgIzUFBleMQWQqYpB1Uc__aVPGVnMW4BUEGZL9hmY03g1Ld-T2PofOwiN26kwA23hqIJZHoeyY6d72_TcqDwYYbIp76lQHHs9makllu_H3adNQfZOTtxZhfp4qcu2dvD_evqKVu_PD6v7taZRSHHzNmUXEgHjbQAChUWFvPGtLaxVS2oKcli2xYARpYy5XXW5QrRqRrrBiQu2dV8dwj-c0pZ9NZPoU8vtSgKVZdVqVRSiVllg48xkNNDSKHDlxagD-z0zE4ndvrATmPy5LMnJm3_TuHP5X9N3_FCcec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1448957588</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scar endometriosis after a caesarean section: a perhaps underestimated complication</title><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Adriaanse, B. M. E. ; Natté, R. ; Hellebrekers, B. W. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adriaanse, B. M. E. ; Natté, R. ; Hellebrekers, B. W. J.</creatorcontrib><description>The exact incidence of scar endometriosis is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of endometriosis in the abdominal wall following a caesarean section. Women who underwent surgery for scar endometriosis after a caesarean section and the total number of women with caesarean sections in The Haga Teaching Hospital, a gynaecologic centre in The Netherlands, were identified by the national obstetric registration and pathology archive in the period January 1995 to December 2008. Clinical data were collected from the existing hospital records. Twenty-nine women were diagnosed with scar endometriosis after a caesarean section, and 3,047 women underwent one or more caesarean sections, resulting in an incidence of scar endometriosis of 0.95 %. None of the women had a history of endometriosis. Symptoms were pain (94.0 %), cyclic with menstruation (50.0 %) and swelling of the scar (89.0 %). Mean time between caesarean delivery and symptoms was 4.1 years. No recurrence occurred. This study reveals a higher incidence of endometriosis in the scar of a caesarean section than described in current literature. To improve the detection rate, more attention to medical history and physical examination is mandatory. A higher incidence warrants research into the pathophysiology and prevention of endometriosis in the scar of a caesarean section.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1613-2076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-2084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10397-013-0807-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Endometriosis ; Gynecology ; Interventional Radiology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Original Article ; Reproductive Medicine ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Gynecological surgery, 2013-11, Vol.10 (4), p.279-284</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fc10016f0b6c0083834c32badcbc791eb5ec3dd400a656380fcf2833f8939b063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fc10016f0b6c0083834c32badcbc791eb5ec3dd400a656380fcf2833f8939b063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10397-013-0807-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0807-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0807-3$$EView_record_in_Springer_Nature$$FView_record_in_$$GSpringer_Nature</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adriaanse, B. M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natté, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellebrekers, B. W. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Scar endometriosis after a caesarean section: a perhaps underestimated complication</title><title>Gynecological surgery</title><addtitle>Gynecol Surg</addtitle><description>The exact incidence of scar endometriosis is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of endometriosis in the abdominal wall following a caesarean section. Women who underwent surgery for scar endometriosis after a caesarean section and the total number of women with caesarean sections in The Haga Teaching Hospital, a gynaecologic centre in The Netherlands, were identified by the national obstetric registration and pathology archive in the period January 1995 to December 2008. Clinical data were collected from the existing hospital records. Twenty-nine women were diagnosed with scar endometriosis after a caesarean section, and 3,047 women underwent one or more caesarean sections, resulting in an incidence of scar endometriosis of 0.95 %. None of the women had a history of endometriosis. Symptoms were pain (94.0 %), cyclic with menstruation (50.0 %) and swelling of the scar (89.0 %). Mean time between caesarean delivery and symptoms was 4.1 years. No recurrence occurred. This study reveals a higher incidence of endometriosis in the scar of a caesarean section than described in current literature. To improve the detection rate, more attention to medical history and physical examination is mandatory. A higher incidence warrants research into the pathophysiology and prevention of endometriosis in the scar of a caesarean section.</description><subject>Endometriosis</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>1613-2076</issn><issn>1613-2084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9VJp01Tb7L4BQseVs8hTSfaZbepSXvw35ulIl48zQfvO_PyMHYp4FoAVDdRANZVBgIzUFBleMQWQqYpB1Uc__aVPGVnMW4BUEGZL9hmY03g1Ld-T2PofOwiN26kwA23hqIJZHoeyY6d72_TcqDwYYbIp76lQHHs9makllu_H3adNQfZOTtxZhfp4qcu2dvD_evqKVu_PD6v7taZRSHHzNmUXEgHjbQAChUWFvPGtLaxVS2oKcli2xYARpYy5XXW5QrRqRrrBiQu2dV8dwj-c0pZ9NZPoU8vtSgKVZdVqVRSiVllg48xkNNDSKHDlxagD-z0zE4ndvrATmPy5LMnJm3_TuHP5X9N3_FCcec</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Adriaanse, B. M. E.</creator><creator>Natté, R.</creator><creator>Hellebrekers, B. W. J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Scar endometriosis after a caesarean section: a perhaps underestimated complication</title><author>Adriaanse, B. M. E. ; Natté, R. ; Hellebrekers, B. W. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-fc10016f0b6c0083834c32badcbc791eb5ec3dd400a656380fcf2833f8939b063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Endometriosis</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adriaanse, B. M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natté, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellebrekers, B. W. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Gynecological surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adriaanse, B. M. E.</au><au>Natté, R.</au><au>Hellebrekers, B. W. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scar endometriosis after a caesarean section: a perhaps underestimated complication</atitle><jtitle>Gynecological surgery</jtitle><stitle>Gynecol Surg</stitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>279-284</pages><issn>1613-2076</issn><eissn>1613-2084</eissn><abstract>The exact incidence of scar endometriosis is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of endometriosis in the abdominal wall following a caesarean section. Women who underwent surgery for scar endometriosis after a caesarean section and the total number of women with caesarean sections in The Haga Teaching Hospital, a gynaecologic centre in The Netherlands, were identified by the national obstetric registration and pathology archive in the period January 1995 to December 2008. Clinical data were collected from the existing hospital records. Twenty-nine women were diagnosed with scar endometriosis after a caesarean section, and 3,047 women underwent one or more caesarean sections, resulting in an incidence of scar endometriosis of 0.95 %. None of the women had a history of endometriosis. Symptoms were pain (94.0 %), cyclic with menstruation (50.0 %) and swelling of the scar (89.0 %). Mean time between caesarean delivery and symptoms was 4.1 years. No recurrence occurred. This study reveals a higher incidence of endometriosis in the scar of a caesarean section than described in current literature. To improve the detection rate, more attention to medical history and physical examination is mandatory. A higher incidence warrants research into the pathophysiology and prevention of endometriosis in the scar of a caesarean section.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10397-013-0807-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1613-2076
ispartof Gynecological surgery, 2013-11, Vol.10 (4), p.279-284
issn 1613-2076
1613-2084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1448957588
source Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Endometriosis
Gynecology
Interventional Radiology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery
Original Article
Reproductive Medicine
Surgical Oncology
title Scar endometriosis after a caesarean section: a perhaps underestimated complication
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T06%3A37%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_C6C&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scar%20endometriosis%20after%20a%20caesarean%20section:%20a%20perhaps%20underestimated%20complication&rft.jtitle=Gynecological%20surgery&rft.au=Adriaanse,%20B.%20M.%20E.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=279-284&rft.issn=1613-2076&rft.eissn=1613-2084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10397-013-0807-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_C6C%3E3119643311%3C/proquest_C6C%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1448957588&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true