Improved cone-beam computed tomography in supine and prone breast radiotherapy: Surface reconstruction, radiation exposure, and clinical workflow

Background and purpose Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) enables three-dimensional information of the scanned region and provides soft tissue images with good spatial resolution. Our aim was to optimize image acquisition settings for prone and supine breast radiotherapy with respect to contou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2013-11, Vol.189 (11), p.945-950
Hauptverfasser: De Puysseleyr, A., Mulliez, T., Gulyban, A., Bogaert, E., Vercauteren, T., Van Hoof, T., Van de Velde, J., Van Den Broecke, R., De Wagter, C., De Neve, W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and purpose Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) enables three-dimensional information of the scanned region and provides soft tissue images with good spatial resolution. Our aim was to optimize image acquisition settings for prone and supine breast radiotherapy with respect to contour accuracy, clinical practicalities, and radiation dose. Patients and methods CBCT images were acquired for both prone and supine anthropomorphic phantoms and a female cadaver in supine and prone set-up. CBCT protocols were investigated by altering the tube current, exposure time, range of projection views, field of view (FOV), and starting angle. For clinical practicalities, the frequency of the use of an offset CBCT isocenter was evaluated at 558 205°-CBCTs (37 patients; 13 prone and 24 supine) and 1272 360°-CBCTs (102 patients; 13 prone and 89 supine). Results Prone and supine breast CBCT images acquired with a bowtie filter, a small FOV, a range of projection views equaling 180°, a tube current of 20 mA and an exposure time of 32 ms, demonstrated adequate contour accuracy and an elimination of the offset CBCT isocenter procedure, while this occurred in 40.7 % for the old full-rotation protocol. Furthermore a 4.3-fold dose reduction was observed for the Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI w ) compared to the preset Chest M20 protocol. Conclusion The established 180° protocol demonstrated acceptable contour accuracy, eliminated the CBCT isocenter offset procedure and reduced patient radiation exposure.
ISSN:0179-7158
1439-099X
DOI:10.1007/s00066-013-0435-x