Finding the Forms of "Cleanness"
The Middle English poem Cleanness is regularly marked off into four-line units in its sole surviving manuscript, British Library Cotton Nero A.x, and I argue that reading Cleanness with attention to these divisions helps the poem emerge as a more complex piece of verbal and homiletic art. By suggest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in philology 2013-06, Vol.110 (3), p.459-481 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 481 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 459 |
container_title | Studies in philology |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Bahr, Arthur |
description | The Middle English poem Cleanness is regularly marked off into four-line units in its sole surviving manuscript, British Library Cotton Nero A.x, and I argue that reading Cleanness with attention to these divisions helps the poem emerge as a more complex piece of verbal and homiletic art. By suggesting reading strategies for the lines that they mark off, the stanza marks evoke the interpenetration of the visual and the verbal that the poem proposes more broadly. The author's words and the scribe's activity thus combine to shape the poem's interpretive potential. The crucial issue is therefore not whether Cleanness was intended by its author to be written or read in stanzas, but rather the fact that the poem's uniquely surviving physical form encourages us to consider whether it is so, and what that might mean for our engagement with its content—how we should go about finding, in short, the literary, codicological, and homiletic forms of Cleanness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/sip.2013.0019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1444601772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24392111</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24392111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-7e7604e36c6e024d8030eb2440037452e971e4fdffd58eb27b4b44de480c0c4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFaPHoVQz6kzO5NscpRiVCh4UM9Lm0w0oU3qbnrw37uhpZ7mMN97Dz6lbhHmSAk9-GY314A0B8D8TE0wYYqBMjpXEwDKYzKUXaor79tAaIMwUVHRdFXTfUXDt0RF77Y-6utottjIquvE-9m1uqhXGy83xztVn8XTx-IlXr49vy4el3FJpIfYiEmBhdIyFdBcZUAga80chg0nWnKDwnVV11WShYdZ85q5Es6ghDIEp-r-0Ltz_c9e_GDbfu-6MGmRmVNAY3Sg4gNVut57J7XduWa7cr8WwY4SbJBgRwl2lBB4PrW2Ug7bvZf_4gQpJ23fR1GjJyQCAAMhdneItX7o3WlDM-UaEekPIt9l7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1444601772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Finding the Forms of "Cleanness"</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Bahr, Arthur</creator><creatorcontrib>Bahr, Arthur</creatorcontrib><description>The Middle English poem Cleanness is regularly marked off into four-line units in its sole surviving manuscript, British Library Cotton Nero A.x, and I argue that reading Cleanness with attention to these divisions helps the poem emerge as a more complex piece of verbal and homiletic art. By suggesting reading strategies for the lines that they mark off, the stanza marks evoke the interpenetration of the visual and the verbal that the poem proposes more broadly. The author's words and the scribe's activity thus combine to shape the poem's interpretive potential. The crucial issue is therefore not whether Cleanness was intended by its author to be written or read in stanzas, but rather the fact that the poem's uniquely surviving physical form encourages us to consider whether it is so, and what that might mean for our engagement with its content—how we should go about finding, in short, the literary, codicological, and homiletic forms of Cleanness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-3738</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1543-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/sip.2013.0019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPHIBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chapel Hill: THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS</publisher><subject>Language history ; Literary criticism ; Middle English ; Narrative poetry ; Parallel lines ; Poetic meter ; Poetic themes ; Poetry ; Reading strategies ; Religious poetry ; Scribes ; Stanzas ; Syntax</subject><ispartof>Studies in philology, 2013-06, Vol.110 (3), p.459-481</ispartof><rights>2013 The University of North Carolina Press</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 The University of North Carolina Press.</rights><rights>Copyright The University of North Carolina Press Summer 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-7e7604e36c6e024d8030eb2440037452e971e4fdffd58eb27b4b44de480c0c4e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24392111$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24392111$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bahr, Arthur</creatorcontrib><title>Finding the Forms of "Cleanness"</title><title>Studies in philology</title><description>The Middle English poem Cleanness is regularly marked off into four-line units in its sole surviving manuscript, British Library Cotton Nero A.x, and I argue that reading Cleanness with attention to these divisions helps the poem emerge as a more complex piece of verbal and homiletic art. By suggesting reading strategies for the lines that they mark off, the stanza marks evoke the interpenetration of the visual and the verbal that the poem proposes more broadly. The author's words and the scribe's activity thus combine to shape the poem's interpretive potential. The crucial issue is therefore not whether Cleanness was intended by its author to be written or read in stanzas, but rather the fact that the poem's uniquely surviving physical form encourages us to consider whether it is so, and what that might mean for our engagement with its content—how we should go about finding, in short, the literary, codicological, and homiletic forms of Cleanness.</description><subject>Language history</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Middle English</subject><subject>Narrative poetry</subject><subject>Parallel lines</subject><subject>Poetic meter</subject><subject>Poetic themes</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Reading strategies</subject><subject>Religious poetry</subject><subject>Scribes</subject><subject>Stanzas</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><issn>0039-3738</issn><issn>1543-0383</issn><issn>1543-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFaPHoVQz6kzO5NscpRiVCh4UM9Lm0w0oU3qbnrw37uhpZ7mMN97Dz6lbhHmSAk9-GY314A0B8D8TE0wYYqBMjpXEwDKYzKUXaor79tAaIMwUVHRdFXTfUXDt0RF77Y-6utottjIquvE-9m1uqhXGy83xztVn8XTx-IlXr49vy4el3FJpIfYiEmBhdIyFdBcZUAga80chg0nWnKDwnVV11WShYdZ85q5Es6ghDIEp-r-0Ltz_c9e_GDbfu-6MGmRmVNAY3Sg4gNVut57J7XduWa7cr8WwY4SbJBgRwl2lBB4PrW2Ug7bvZf_4gQpJ23fR1GjJyQCAAMhdneItX7o3WlDM-UaEekPIt9l7Q</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Bahr, Arthur</creator><general>THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS</general><general>The University of North Carolina Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Finding the Forms of "Cleanness"</title><author>Bahr, Arthur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-7e7604e36c6e024d8030eb2440037452e971e4fdffd58eb27b4b44de480c0c4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Language history</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Middle English</topic><topic>Narrative poetry</topic><topic>Parallel lines</topic><topic>Poetic meter</topic><topic>Poetic themes</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Reading strategies</topic><topic>Religious poetry</topic><topic>Scribes</topic><topic>Stanzas</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bahr, Arthur</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Literature Online</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Studies in philology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bahr, Arthur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Finding the Forms of "Cleanness"</atitle><jtitle>Studies in philology</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>459-481</pages><issn>0039-3738</issn><issn>1543-0383</issn><eissn>1543-0383</eissn><coden>SPHIBP</coden><abstract>The Middle English poem Cleanness is regularly marked off into four-line units in its sole surviving manuscript, British Library Cotton Nero A.x, and I argue that reading Cleanness with attention to these divisions helps the poem emerge as a more complex piece of verbal and homiletic art. By suggesting reading strategies for the lines that they mark off, the stanza marks evoke the interpenetration of the visual and the verbal that the poem proposes more broadly. The author's words and the scribe's activity thus combine to shape the poem's interpretive potential. The crucial issue is therefore not whether Cleanness was intended by its author to be written or read in stanzas, but rather the fact that the poem's uniquely surviving physical form encourages us to consider whether it is so, and what that might mean for our engagement with its content—how we should go about finding, in short, the literary, codicological, and homiletic forms of Cleanness.</abstract><cop>Chapel Hill</cop><pub>THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS</pub><doi>10.1353/sip.2013.0019</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-3738 |
ispartof | Studies in philology, 2013-06, Vol.110 (3), p.459-481 |
issn | 0039-3738 1543-0383 1543-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1444601772 |
source | JSTOR |
subjects | Language history Literary criticism Middle English Narrative poetry Parallel lines Poetic meter Poetic themes Poetry Reading strategies Religious poetry Scribes Stanzas Syntax |
title | Finding the Forms of "Cleanness" |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A16%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finding%20the%20Forms%20of%20%22Cleanness%22&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20philology&rft.au=Bahr,%20Arthur&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=459-481&rft.issn=0039-3738&rft.eissn=1543-0383&rft.coden=SPHIBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/sip.2013.0019&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24392111%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1444601772&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24392111&rfr_iscdi=true |