Coal Workers Pneumoconiosis and Related Risk Indices

Cross sectional epidemiological studies were carried out in three coal mines (Mines A, B and C), that produce differnt types of coal in order to examine the relationship between the prevalence of coal workers pneumoconiosis (CWP) and factors contributing to the development and seriousness of CWP. Se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Occupational Health 1996-04, Vol.38 (2), p.82-88
Hauptverfasser: Niu, Qiao, Liu, Tianwang, Li, Tang, Tang, Hanchao, Bai, Yuanping, Gao, Tianshu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 2
container_start_page 82
container_title Journal of Occupational Health
container_volume 38
creator Niu, Qiao
Liu, Tianwang
Li, Tang
Tang, Hanchao
Bai, Yuanping
Gao, Tianshu
description Cross sectional epidemiological studies were carried out in three coal mines (Mines A, B and C), that produce differnt types of coal in order to examine the relationship between the prevalence of coal workers pneumoconiosis (CWP) and factors contributing to the development and seriousness of CWP. Seven factors were taken into consideration and two of them were calculated as "risk indices". They concerned composition (including carbon, ash, volatile content of coal, free silica in coal dust and rock dust) and exposure factors (including dust concentration, duration of exposure and type of operation). Composition factors were:carbon 90%, ash 23.13%, volatile content 13.85%, free silica in coal dusts 2.58% and free silica in rock dusts 32.88% in Mine A. Carbon 82%, ash 8%, volatile content 28.5%, free silica in coal dusts 5.90% and free silica in rock dusts 33.0% in Mine B. Carbon 94%, ash 20.46%, volatile content 10.76%, free silica in coal dusts 2.04% and free silica in rock dusts 24.04% in Mine C. Differences in the coal dust concentration over a period of 20 to 30 years were not significant in the three mines. The rock dust concentration in Mine B was much higher than those in the other two mines. The CWP prevalence was 2.22% in Mine A, 13.20% in Mine B and 1.86% in Mine C. Analysis has shown that both composition and exposure factors were related to CWP prevalence, but the strength of the relationship between the factors was different in the three mines, especially in Mine B, where there was a high CWP prevalence, and the association of CWP with free silica and high volatile content was strong. It was interesting that, though the rank of coal in Mine B was much lower than those in Mine A and Mine C, the prevalence of CWP in Mine B was much higher than those in Mine A and Mine C. This result was in contrast with those reported before. The calculation of risk indices indicated that there was a positive correlation between the risk indices and exposure duration.
doi_str_mv 10.1539/joh.38.82
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1443716693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3105322321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-2c14600d0e8ec49861a893f179558c6a5b5de76bfa0c02a723a9b5543d1974b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oMBVy6m5uY1yVKKtZVCRRSXIZPJ0LTTSZ20SP-9aUdw5eJyzuI794XQLeAxcKoe1mE1pnIsyQUaAGUyV1zyy7OHXAHj12gUoy8xocALEHSA2CSYJvsM3cZ1MXtt3WEbbGh9iD5mpq2yN9eYvUvq4yabt5W3Lt6gq9o00Y1-dYg-pk_vk1m-WD7PJ4-L3DIBMicWmMC4wk46y5QUYKSiNRSKc2mF4SWvXCHK2mCLiSkINarknNEKVMFKSoforu-768LXwcW9XodD16aRGhij6QKhTtR9T9kuxNi5Wu86vzXdUQPWp7-k1EpTqSVJLOvZb9-44_-gflnOCKYSY4KxTLFpH9u69ADThLbxrfvbxtbF2WtQSmh8CpIk8lRnI4FiApj-AACfeWU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443716693</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coal Workers Pneumoconiosis and Related Risk Indices</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Niu, Qiao ; Liu, Tianwang ; Li, Tang ; Tang, Hanchao ; Bai, Yuanping ; Gao, Tianshu</creator><creatorcontrib>Niu, Qiao ; Liu, Tianwang ; Li, Tang ; Tang, Hanchao ; Bai, Yuanping ; Gao, Tianshu ; Shanxi Medical College ; Institute of Occupational Medicine of Datong ; Department of Public Health ; Coal Industry Administration of Shanxi Province</creatorcontrib><description>Cross sectional epidemiological studies were carried out in three coal mines (Mines A, B and C), that produce differnt types of coal in order to examine the relationship between the prevalence of coal workers pneumoconiosis (CWP) and factors contributing to the development and seriousness of CWP. Seven factors were taken into consideration and two of them were calculated as "risk indices". They concerned composition (including carbon, ash, volatile content of coal, free silica in coal dust and rock dust) and exposure factors (including dust concentration, duration of exposure and type of operation). Composition factors were:carbon 90%, ash 23.13%, volatile content 13.85%, free silica in coal dusts 2.58% and free silica in rock dusts 32.88% in Mine A. Carbon 82%, ash 8%, volatile content 28.5%, free silica in coal dusts 5.90% and free silica in rock dusts 33.0% in Mine B. Carbon 94%, ash 20.46%, volatile content 10.76%, free silica in coal dusts 2.04% and free silica in rock dusts 24.04% in Mine C. Differences in the coal dust concentration over a period of 20 to 30 years were not significant in the three mines. The rock dust concentration in Mine B was much higher than those in the other two mines. The CWP prevalence was 2.22% in Mine A, 13.20% in Mine B and 1.86% in Mine C. Analysis has shown that both composition and exposure factors were related to CWP prevalence, but the strength of the relationship between the factors was different in the three mines, especially in Mine B, where there was a high CWP prevalence, and the association of CWP with free silica and high volatile content was strong. It was interesting that, though the rank of coal in Mine B was much lower than those in Mine A and Mine C, the prevalence of CWP in Mine B was much higher than those in Mine A and Mine C. This result was in contrast with those reported before. The calculation of risk indices indicated that there was a positive correlation between the risk indices and exposure duration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-9145</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1348-9585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1348-9585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1539/joh.38.82</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: JAPAN SOCIETY FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Coal mines ; Coal mining ; Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis ; Dust ; Free silica ; Mines ; Occupational health ; Pneumoconiosis ; Public health ; Risk index ; Rocks ; Silica ; Volatile content</subject><ispartof>Journal of Occupational Health, 1996-04, Vol.38 (2), p.82-88</ispartof><rights>1996 Japan Society for Occupational Health</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-2c14600d0e8ec49861a893f179558c6a5b5de76bfa0c02a723a9b5543d1974b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-2c14600d0e8ec49861a893f179558c6a5b5de76bfa0c02a723a9b5543d1974b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1539%2Fjoh.38.82$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1539%2Fjoh.38.82$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niu, Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tianwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Hanchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Yuanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Tianshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanxi Medical College</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Institute of Occupational Medicine of Datong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Public Health</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coal Industry Administration of Shanxi Province</creatorcontrib><title>Coal Workers Pneumoconiosis and Related Risk Indices</title><title>Journal of Occupational Health</title><description>Cross sectional epidemiological studies were carried out in three coal mines (Mines A, B and C), that produce differnt types of coal in order to examine the relationship between the prevalence of coal workers pneumoconiosis (CWP) and factors contributing to the development and seriousness of CWP. Seven factors were taken into consideration and two of them were calculated as "risk indices". They concerned composition (including carbon, ash, volatile content of coal, free silica in coal dust and rock dust) and exposure factors (including dust concentration, duration of exposure and type of operation). Composition factors were:carbon 90%, ash 23.13%, volatile content 13.85%, free silica in coal dusts 2.58% and free silica in rock dusts 32.88% in Mine A. Carbon 82%, ash 8%, volatile content 28.5%, free silica in coal dusts 5.90% and free silica in rock dusts 33.0% in Mine B. Carbon 94%, ash 20.46%, volatile content 10.76%, free silica in coal dusts 2.04% and free silica in rock dusts 24.04% in Mine C. Differences in the coal dust concentration over a period of 20 to 30 years were not significant in the three mines. The rock dust concentration in Mine B was much higher than those in the other two mines. The CWP prevalence was 2.22% in Mine A, 13.20% in Mine B and 1.86% in Mine C. Analysis has shown that both composition and exposure factors were related to CWP prevalence, but the strength of the relationship between the factors was different in the three mines, especially in Mine B, where there was a high CWP prevalence, and the association of CWP with free silica and high volatile content was strong. It was interesting that, though the rank of coal in Mine B was much lower than those in Mine A and Mine C, the prevalence of CWP in Mine B was much higher than those in Mine A and Mine C. This result was in contrast with those reported before. The calculation of risk indices indicated that there was a positive correlation between the risk indices and exposure duration.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Coal mines</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis</subject><subject>Dust</subject><subject>Free silica</subject><subject>Mines</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Pneumoconiosis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Risk index</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Volatile content</subject><issn>1341-9145</issn><issn>1348-9585</issn><issn>1348-9585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oMBVy6m5uY1yVKKtZVCRRSXIZPJ0LTTSZ20SP-9aUdw5eJyzuI794XQLeAxcKoe1mE1pnIsyQUaAGUyV1zyy7OHXAHj12gUoy8xocALEHSA2CSYJvsM3cZ1MXtt3WEbbGh9iD5mpq2yN9eYvUvq4yabt5W3Lt6gq9o00Y1-dYg-pk_vk1m-WD7PJ4-L3DIBMicWmMC4wk46y5QUYKSiNRSKc2mF4SWvXCHK2mCLiSkINarknNEKVMFKSoforu-768LXwcW9XodD16aRGhij6QKhTtR9T9kuxNi5Wu86vzXdUQPWp7-k1EpTqSVJLOvZb9-44_-gflnOCKYSY4KxTLFpH9u69ADThLbxrfvbxtbF2WtQSmh8CpIk8lRnI4FiApj-AACfeWU</recordid><startdate>199604</startdate><enddate>199604</enddate><creator>Niu, Qiao</creator><creator>Liu, Tianwang</creator><creator>Li, Tang</creator><creator>Tang, Hanchao</creator><creator>Bai, Yuanping</creator><creator>Gao, Tianshu</creator><general>JAPAN SOCIETY FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199604</creationdate><title>Coal Workers Pneumoconiosis and Related Risk Indices</title><author>Niu, Qiao ; Liu, Tianwang ; Li, Tang ; Tang, Hanchao ; Bai, Yuanping ; Gao, Tianshu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4618-2c14600d0e8ec49861a893f179558c6a5b5de76bfa0c02a723a9b5543d1974b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Coal mines</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis</topic><topic>Dust</topic><topic>Free silica</topic><topic>Mines</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Pneumoconiosis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Risk index</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Volatile content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niu, Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tianwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Hanchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Yuanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Tianshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanxi Medical College</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Institute of Occupational Medicine of Datong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Public Health</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coal Industry Administration of Shanxi Province</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of Occupational Health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niu, Qiao</au><au>Liu, Tianwang</au><au>Li, Tang</au><au>Tang, Hanchao</au><au>Bai, Yuanping</au><au>Gao, Tianshu</au><aucorp>Shanxi Medical College</aucorp><aucorp>Institute of Occupational Medicine of Datong</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Public Health</aucorp><aucorp>Coal Industry Administration of Shanxi Province</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coal Workers Pneumoconiosis and Related Risk Indices</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Occupational Health</jtitle><date>1996-04</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>82-88</pages><issn>1341-9145</issn><issn>1348-9585</issn><eissn>1348-9585</eissn><abstract>Cross sectional epidemiological studies were carried out in three coal mines (Mines A, B and C), that produce differnt types of coal in order to examine the relationship between the prevalence of coal workers pneumoconiosis (CWP) and factors contributing to the development and seriousness of CWP. Seven factors were taken into consideration and two of them were calculated as "risk indices". They concerned composition (including carbon, ash, volatile content of coal, free silica in coal dust and rock dust) and exposure factors (including dust concentration, duration of exposure and type of operation). Composition factors were:carbon 90%, ash 23.13%, volatile content 13.85%, free silica in coal dusts 2.58% and free silica in rock dusts 32.88% in Mine A. Carbon 82%, ash 8%, volatile content 28.5%, free silica in coal dusts 5.90% and free silica in rock dusts 33.0% in Mine B. Carbon 94%, ash 20.46%, volatile content 10.76%, free silica in coal dusts 2.04% and free silica in rock dusts 24.04% in Mine C. Differences in the coal dust concentration over a period of 20 to 30 years were not significant in the three mines. The rock dust concentration in Mine B was much higher than those in the other two mines. The CWP prevalence was 2.22% in Mine A, 13.20% in Mine B and 1.86% in Mine C. Analysis has shown that both composition and exposure factors were related to CWP prevalence, but the strength of the relationship between the factors was different in the three mines, especially in Mine B, where there was a high CWP prevalence, and the association of CWP with free silica and high volatile content was strong. It was interesting that, though the rank of coal in Mine B was much lower than those in Mine A and Mine C, the prevalence of CWP in Mine B was much higher than those in Mine A and Mine C. This result was in contrast with those reported before. The calculation of risk indices indicated that there was a positive correlation between the risk indices and exposure duration.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>JAPAN SOCIETY FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH</pub><doi>10.1539/joh.38.82</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1341-9145
ispartof Journal of Occupational Health, 1996-04, Vol.38 (2), p.82-88
issn 1341-9145
1348-9585
1348-9585
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1443716693
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; J-STAGE Free; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Carbon
Coal mines
Coal mining
Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis
Dust
Free silica
Mines
Occupational health
Pneumoconiosis
Public health
Risk index
Rocks
Silica
Volatile content
title Coal Workers Pneumoconiosis and Related Risk Indices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A23%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coal%20Workers%20Pneumoconiosis%20and%20Related%20Risk%20Indices&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Occupational%20Health&rft.au=Niu,%20Qiao&rft.aucorp=Shanxi%20Medical%20College&rft.date=1996-04&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=82-88&rft.issn=1341-9145&rft.eissn=1348-9585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1539/joh.38.82&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3105322321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443716693&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true