Validation and Verification of Life Prediction Technology for Electromechanical Products

Validation and Verification of Life Prediction Technology for Electromechanical Products

Supporters of life prediction claim that this technology can provide enormous benefits to users. Among so many performance indicators of life prediction technology, the accuracy and stability of life prediction is of greatest concern. This article compares advantages and disadvantages of various per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied Mechanics and Materials 2011-06, Vol.58-60, p.1690-1695
Hauptverfasser: Qi, Xiao Ye, Chen, Juan, Wu, Wei, Liu, Bo Hong, Song, Chun Wen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1695
container_issue
container_start_page 1690
container_title Applied Mechanics and Materials
container_volume 58-60
creator Qi, Xiao Ye
Chen, Juan
Wu, Wei
Liu, Bo Hong
Song, Chun Wen
description Supporters of life prediction claim that this technology can provide enormous benefits to users. Among so many performance indicators of life prediction technology, the accuracy and stability of life prediction is of greatest concern. This article compares advantages and disadvantages of various performance indicators in the prediction of product’s life between life prediction algorithm based on statistical and that based on degradation path model.
doi_str_mv 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.58-60.1690
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1443593949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3104838201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-e298af1aaf9b1cd723f08dbc5b71406fcb060af707a624d8a2d65946a744e6523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1rwjAUhsM-YOr2Hwq72kVr0qRpciniPkDZLpx4F9I02Sq1cUlE_PeLdrBd7urAe948hzwAPCCYEZiz8eFwyLxqdBca06is02E8WSyygqUUZohyeAEGiNI8LQnLL8EQQ1yyAhG-vjovYMoxpjdg6P0GQkoQYQOwXsm2qWVobJfIrk5W2p3ofWBNMm-MTt6crht1jpZafXa2tR_HxFiXzFqtgrPbmMouPmtj19Z7FfwtuDay9fruZ47A--NsOX1O569PL9PJPFUYopDqnDNpkJSGV0jVZY4NZHWliqpEBFKjKkihNCUsJc1JzWRe04ITKktCNC1yPAL3PXfn7Nde-yA2du-6eFIgQnDBMSc8tiZ9SznrvdNG7Fyzle4oEBQnuyLaFb92RbQrol1RMEGhONmNjGnPCE52PsQv_zn1b8o3jwGMIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443593949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation and Verification of Life Prediction Technology for Electromechanical Products</title><source>Scientific.net Journals</source><creator>Qi, Xiao Ye ; Chen, Juan ; Wu, Wei ; Liu, Bo Hong ; Song, Chun Wen</creator><creatorcontrib>Qi, Xiao Ye ; Chen, Juan ; Wu, Wei ; Liu, Bo Hong ; Song, Chun Wen</creatorcontrib><description>Supporters of life prediction claim that this technology can provide enormous benefits to users. Among so many performance indicators of life prediction technology, the accuracy and stability of life prediction is of greatest concern. This article compares advantages and disadvantages of various performance indicators in the prediction of product’s life between life prediction algorithm based on statistical and that based on degradation path model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-9336</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1662-7482</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 303785149X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783037851494</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-7482</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.58-60.1690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zurich: Trans Tech Publications Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011-06, Vol.58-60, p.1690-1695</ispartof><rights>2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-e298af1aaf9b1cd723f08dbc5b71406fcb060af707a624d8a2d65946a744e6523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.scientific.net/Image/TitleCover/1287?width=600</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qi, Xiao Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Bo Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Chun Wen</creatorcontrib><title>Validation and Verification of Life Prediction Technology for Electromechanical Products</title><title>Applied Mechanics and Materials</title><description>Supporters of life prediction claim that this technology can provide enormous benefits to users. Among so many performance indicators of life prediction technology, the accuracy and stability of life prediction is of greatest concern. This article compares advantages and disadvantages of various performance indicators in the prediction of product’s life between life prediction algorithm based on statistical and that based on degradation path model.</description><issn>1660-9336</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><isbn>303785149X</isbn><isbn>9783037851494</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1rwjAUhsM-YOr2Hwq72kVr0qRpciniPkDZLpx4F9I02Sq1cUlE_PeLdrBd7urAe948hzwAPCCYEZiz8eFwyLxqdBca06is02E8WSyygqUUZohyeAEGiNI8LQnLL8EQQ1yyAhG-vjovYMoxpjdg6P0GQkoQYQOwXsm2qWVobJfIrk5W2p3ofWBNMm-MTt6crht1jpZafXa2tR_HxFiXzFqtgrPbmMouPmtj19Z7FfwtuDay9fruZ47A--NsOX1O569PL9PJPFUYopDqnDNpkJSGV0jVZY4NZHWliqpEBFKjKkihNCUsJc1JzWRe04ITKktCNC1yPAL3PXfn7Nde-yA2du-6eFIgQnDBMSc8tiZ9SznrvdNG7Fyzle4oEBQnuyLaFb92RbQrol1RMEGhONmNjGnPCE52PsQv_zn1b8o3jwGMIg</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Qi, Xiao Ye</creator><creator>Chen, Juan</creator><creator>Wu, Wei</creator><creator>Liu, Bo Hong</creator><creator>Song, Chun Wen</creator><general>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Validation and Verification of Life Prediction Technology for Electromechanical Products</title><author>Qi, Xiao Ye ; Chen, Juan ; Wu, Wei ; Liu, Bo Hong ; Song, Chun Wen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-e298af1aaf9b1cd723f08dbc5b71406fcb060af707a624d8a2d65946a744e6523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qi, Xiao Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Bo Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Chun Wen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>Applied Mechanics and Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qi, Xiao Ye</au><au>Chen, Juan</au><au>Wu, Wei</au><au>Liu, Bo Hong</au><au>Song, Chun Wen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation and Verification of Life Prediction Technology for Electromechanical Products</atitle><jtitle>Applied Mechanics and Materials</jtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>58-60</volume><spage>1690</spage><epage>1695</epage><pages>1690-1695</pages><issn>1660-9336</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><eissn>1662-7482</eissn><isbn>303785149X</isbn><isbn>9783037851494</isbn><abstract>Supporters of life prediction claim that this technology can provide enormous benefits to users. Among so many performance indicators of life prediction technology, the accuracy and stability of life prediction is of greatest concern. This article compares advantages and disadvantages of various performance indicators in the prediction of product’s life between life prediction algorithm based on statistical and that based on degradation path model.</abstract><cop>Zurich</cop><pub>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.58-60.1690</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-9336
ispartof Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011-06, Vol.58-60, p.1690-1695
issn 1660-9336
1662-7482
1662-7482
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1443593949
source Scientific.net Journals
title Validation and Verification of Life Prediction Technology for Electromechanical Products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A50%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20and%20Verification%20of%20Life%20Prediction%20Technology%20for%20Electromechanical%20Products&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Mechanics%20and%20Materials&rft.au=Qi,%20Xiao%20Ye&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=58-60&rft.spage=1690&rft.epage=1695&rft.pages=1690-1695&rft.issn=1660-9336&rft.eissn=1662-7482&rft.isbn=303785149X&rft.isbn_list=9783037851494&rft_id=info:doi/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.58-60.1690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3104838201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443593949&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true