Acupuncture and Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial: e1001518
Background Depression is a significant cause of morbidity. Many patients have communicated an interest in non-pharmacological therapies to their general practitioners. Systematic reviews of acupuncture and counselling for depression in primary care have identified limited evidence. The aim of this s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS medicine 2013-09, Vol.10 (9) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | PLoS medicine |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | MacPherson, Hugh Richmond, Stewart Bland, Martin Brealey, Stephen Gabe, Rhian Hopton, Ann Keding, Ada Lansdown, Harriet Perren, Sara Sculpher, Mark Spackman, Eldon Torgerson, David Watt, Ian |
description | Background Depression is a significant cause of morbidity. Many patients have communicated an interest in non-pharmacological therapies to their general practitioners. Systematic reviews of acupuncture and counselling for depression in primary care have identified limited evidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate acupuncture versus usual care and counselling versus usual care for patients who continue to experience depression in primary care. Methods and Findings In a randomised controlled trial, 755 patients with depression (Beck Depression Inventory BDI-II score ≥20) were recruited from 27 primary care practices in the North of England. Patients were randomised to one of three arms using a ratio of 2:2:1 to acupuncture (302), counselling (302), and usual care alone (151). The primary outcome was the difference in mean Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores at 3 months with secondary analyses over 12 months follow-up. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. PHQ-9 data were available for 614 patients at 3 months and 572 patients at 12 months. Patients attended a mean of ten sessions for acupuncture and nine sessions for counselling. Compared to usual care, there was a statistically significant reduction in mean PHQ-9 depression scores at 3 months for acupuncture (-2.46, 95% CI -3.72 to -1.21) and counselling (-1.73, 95% CI -3.00 to -0.45), and over 12 months for acupuncture (-1.55, 95% CI -2.41 to -0.70) and counselling (-1.50, 95% CI -2.43 to -0.58). Differences between acupuncture and counselling were not significant. In terms of limitations, the trial was not designed to separate out specific from non-specific effects. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions In this randomised controlled trial of acupuncture and counselling for patients presenting with depression, after having consulted their general practitioner in primary care, both interventions were associated with significantly reduced depression at 3 months when compared to usual care alone. Trial Registration Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN63787732 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001518 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1442390514</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3100756381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_14423905143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjr1qAkEURgeJEKN5gxQXrN3M3R_XtZNVSRmCjZUMeg0jszPrvTuFb6-C9lbfKb4DR6kv1AlmJX6fQmRvXNI2dEhQayxw1lMDLPJqgtNy-vbktCzf1YfISeu00pUeqO1iH9vo911kAuMPUIfohZyz_h-OgWFJLZOIDR6sh1-2jeEL1IZpDgv4uymhsUJ30XccnLvhhq1xI9U_Gif0-dihGq9Xm_pn0nI4R5Ju98iWHeZ5mlW6wDx77XUFR8NLQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1442390514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acupuncture and Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial: e1001518</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>MacPherson, Hugh ; Richmond, Stewart ; Bland, Martin ; Brealey, Stephen ; Gabe, Rhian ; Hopton, Ann ; Keding, Ada ; Lansdown, Harriet ; Perren, Sara ; Sculpher, Mark ; Spackman, Eldon ; Torgerson, David ; Watt, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>MacPherson, Hugh ; Richmond, Stewart ; Bland, Martin ; Brealey, Stephen ; Gabe, Rhian ; Hopton, Ann ; Keding, Ada ; Lansdown, Harriet ; Perren, Sara ; Sculpher, Mark ; Spackman, Eldon ; Torgerson, David ; Watt, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>Background Depression is a significant cause of morbidity. Many patients have communicated an interest in non-pharmacological therapies to their general practitioners. Systematic reviews of acupuncture and counselling for depression in primary care have identified limited evidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate acupuncture versus usual care and counselling versus usual care for patients who continue to experience depression in primary care. Methods and Findings In a randomised controlled trial, 755 patients with depression (Beck Depression Inventory BDI-II score ≥20) were recruited from 27 primary care practices in the North of England. Patients were randomised to one of three arms using a ratio of 2:2:1 to acupuncture (302), counselling (302), and usual care alone (151). The primary outcome was the difference in mean Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores at 3 months with secondary analyses over 12 months follow-up. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. PHQ-9 data were available for 614 patients at 3 months and 572 patients at 12 months. Patients attended a mean of ten sessions for acupuncture and nine sessions for counselling. Compared to usual care, there was a statistically significant reduction in mean PHQ-9 depression scores at 3 months for acupuncture (-2.46, 95% CI -3.72 to -1.21) and counselling (-1.73, 95% CI -3.00 to -0.45), and over 12 months for acupuncture (-1.55, 95% CI -2.41 to -0.70) and counselling (-1.50, 95% CI -2.43 to -0.58). Differences between acupuncture and counselling were not significant. In terms of limitations, the trial was not designed to separate out specific from non-specific effects. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions In this randomised controlled trial of acupuncture and counselling for patients presenting with depression, after having consulted their general practitioner in primary care, both interventions were associated with significantly reduced depression at 3 months when compared to usual care alone. Trial Registration Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN63787732 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acupuncture ; Antidepressants ; Clinical trials ; Counseling ; Intervention ; Inventory ; Pragmatism ; Primary care ; Questionnaires ; Studies</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2013-09, Vol.10 (9)</ispartof><rights>2013 MacPherson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: MacPherson H, Richmond S, Bland M, Brealey S, Gabe R, et al. (2013) Acupuncture and Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 10(9): e1001518. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001518</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacPherson, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richmond, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bland, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brealey, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabe, Rhian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopton, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keding, Ada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lansdown, Harriet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perren, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sculpher, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spackman, Eldon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torgerson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watt, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Acupuncture and Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial: e1001518</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><description>Background Depression is a significant cause of morbidity. Many patients have communicated an interest in non-pharmacological therapies to their general practitioners. Systematic reviews of acupuncture and counselling for depression in primary care have identified limited evidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate acupuncture versus usual care and counselling versus usual care for patients who continue to experience depression in primary care. Methods and Findings In a randomised controlled trial, 755 patients with depression (Beck Depression Inventory BDI-II score ≥20) were recruited from 27 primary care practices in the North of England. Patients were randomised to one of three arms using a ratio of 2:2:1 to acupuncture (302), counselling (302), and usual care alone (151). The primary outcome was the difference in mean Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores at 3 months with secondary analyses over 12 months follow-up. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. PHQ-9 data were available for 614 patients at 3 months and 572 patients at 12 months. Patients attended a mean of ten sessions for acupuncture and nine sessions for counselling. Compared to usual care, there was a statistically significant reduction in mean PHQ-9 depression scores at 3 months for acupuncture (-2.46, 95% CI -3.72 to -1.21) and counselling (-1.73, 95% CI -3.00 to -0.45), and over 12 months for acupuncture (-1.55, 95% CI -2.41 to -0.70) and counselling (-1.50, 95% CI -2.43 to -0.58). Differences between acupuncture and counselling were not significant. In terms of limitations, the trial was not designed to separate out specific from non-specific effects. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions In this randomised controlled trial of acupuncture and counselling for patients presenting with depression, after having consulted their general practitioner in primary care, both interventions were associated with significantly reduced depression at 3 months when compared to usual care alone. Trial Registration Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN63787732 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary</description><subject>Acupuncture</subject><subject>Antidepressants</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Pragmatism</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1549-1277</issn><issn>1549-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjr1qAkEURgeJEKN5gxQXrN3M3R_XtZNVSRmCjZUMeg0jszPrvTuFb6-C9lbfKb4DR6kv1AlmJX6fQmRvXNI2dEhQayxw1lMDLPJqgtNy-vbktCzf1YfISeu00pUeqO1iH9vo911kAuMPUIfohZyz_h-OgWFJLZOIDR6sh1-2jeEL1IZpDgv4uymhsUJ30XccnLvhhq1xI9U_Gif0-dihGq9Xm_pn0nI4R5Ju98iWHeZ5mlW6wDx77XUFR8NLQw</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>MacPherson, Hugh</creator><creator>Richmond, Stewart</creator><creator>Bland, Martin</creator><creator>Brealey, Stephen</creator><creator>Gabe, Rhian</creator><creator>Hopton, Ann</creator><creator>Keding, Ada</creator><creator>Lansdown, Harriet</creator><creator>Perren, Sara</creator><creator>Sculpher, Mark</creator><creator>Spackman, Eldon</creator><creator>Torgerson, David</creator><creator>Watt, Ian</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Acupuncture and Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial</title><author>MacPherson, Hugh ; Richmond, Stewart ; Bland, Martin ; Brealey, Stephen ; Gabe, Rhian ; Hopton, Ann ; Keding, Ada ; Lansdown, Harriet ; Perren, Sara ; Sculpher, Mark ; Spackman, Eldon ; Torgerson, David ; Watt, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_14423905143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acupuncture</topic><topic>Antidepressants</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Pragmatism</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacPherson, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richmond, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bland, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brealey, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabe, Rhian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopton, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keding, Ada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lansdown, Harriet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perren, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sculpher, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spackman, Eldon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torgerson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watt, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacPherson, Hugh</au><au>Richmond, Stewart</au><au>Bland, Martin</au><au>Brealey, Stephen</au><au>Gabe, Rhian</au><au>Hopton, Ann</au><au>Keding, Ada</au><au>Lansdown, Harriet</au><au>Perren, Sara</au><au>Sculpher, Mark</au><au>Spackman, Eldon</au><au>Torgerson, David</au><au>Watt, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acupuncture and Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial: e1001518</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>9</issue><issn>1549-1277</issn><eissn>1549-1676</eissn><abstract>Background Depression is a significant cause of morbidity. Many patients have communicated an interest in non-pharmacological therapies to their general practitioners. Systematic reviews of acupuncture and counselling for depression in primary care have identified limited evidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate acupuncture versus usual care and counselling versus usual care for patients who continue to experience depression in primary care. Methods and Findings In a randomised controlled trial, 755 patients with depression (Beck Depression Inventory BDI-II score ≥20) were recruited from 27 primary care practices in the North of England. Patients were randomised to one of three arms using a ratio of 2:2:1 to acupuncture (302), counselling (302), and usual care alone (151). The primary outcome was the difference in mean Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores at 3 months with secondary analyses over 12 months follow-up. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. PHQ-9 data were available for 614 patients at 3 months and 572 patients at 12 months. Patients attended a mean of ten sessions for acupuncture and nine sessions for counselling. Compared to usual care, there was a statistically significant reduction in mean PHQ-9 depression scores at 3 months for acupuncture (-2.46, 95% CI -3.72 to -1.21) and counselling (-1.73, 95% CI -3.00 to -0.45), and over 12 months for acupuncture (-1.55, 95% CI -2.41 to -0.70) and counselling (-1.50, 95% CI -2.43 to -0.58). Differences between acupuncture and counselling were not significant. In terms of limitations, the trial was not designed to separate out specific from non-specific effects. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions In this randomised controlled trial of acupuncture and counselling for patients presenting with depression, after having consulted their general practitioner in primary care, both interventions were associated with significantly reduced depression at 3 months when compared to usual care alone. Trial Registration Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN63787732 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1001518</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-1277 |
ispartof | PLoS medicine, 2013-09, Vol.10 (9) |
issn | 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1442390514 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central |
subjects | Acupuncture Antidepressants Clinical trials Counseling Intervention Inventory Pragmatism Primary care Questionnaires Studies |
title | Acupuncture and Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial: e1001518 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A07%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acupuncture%20and%20Counselling%20for%20Depression%20in%20Primary%20Care:%20A%20Randomised%20Controlled%20Trial:%20e1001518&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=MacPherson,%20Hugh&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=9&rft.issn=1549-1277&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001518&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3100756381%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1442390514&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |