Monopolizing Force? Police Legitimacy and Public Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Violence

Why do people believe that violence is acceptable? In this article, the authors study people's normative beliefs about the acceptability of violence to achieve social control (as a substitute for the police, for self-protection and the resolution of disputes) and social change (through violent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology, public policy, and law public policy, and law, 2013-11, Vol.19 (4), p.479-497
Hauptverfasser: Jackson, Jonathan, Huq, Aziz Z, Bradford, Ben, Tyler, Tom R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 497
container_issue 4
container_start_page 479
container_title Psychology, public policy, and law
container_volume 19
creator Jackson, Jonathan
Huq, Aziz Z
Bradford, Ben
Tyler, Tom R
description Why do people believe that violence is acceptable? In this article, the authors study people's normative beliefs about the acceptability of violence to achieve social control (as a substitute for the police, for self-protection and the resolution of disputes) and social change (through violent protests and acts to achieve political goals). Addressing attitudes toward violence among young men from various ethnic minority communities in London, the authors find that procedural justice is strongly correlated with police legitimacy, and that positive judgments about police legitimacy are associated with more negative views about the use of violence. They conclude with the idea that police legitimacy has an additional, hitherto unrecognized, empirical property-by constituting the belief that the police monopolise rightful force in society, legitimacy has a "crowding out" effect on positive views of private violence.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0033852
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1442373718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1442373718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-b29a4a7c44f6089b89b56b13f37eb4c21a722de55f4e8e00fa706ec309d2e8bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKfgRwj4Ikg1_7o0TzKGU2HiHqavIU1vZ0ZtapIy6qe3MoUL597Lj3u4B6FLSm4p4fLOEMJ5kbMjNKGKq4zmrDgeeyJnWaEkPUVnMe4IIbmUaoL0i2995xv37dotXvpg4R6vx9kCXsHWJfdp7IBNW-F1X45rPE_Jpb6CiDd-b0KF0wfgubXQJVO6xqUB-xq_O99Aa-EcndSmiXDxp1P0tnzYLJ6y1evj82K-ygxnecpKpoww0gpRz0ihyrHyWUl5zSWUwjJqJGMV5HktoABCaiPJDCwnqmJQlDWfoqvD3S74rx5i0jvfh3a01FQIxiWXtBip6wNlg48xQK27MD4YBk2J_o1P_8c3ojcH1HRGd3GwJiRnG4i2DwHapBuz11RpoYVU_AcEMXHO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1442373718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monopolizing Force? Police Legitimacy and Public Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Violence</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Jackson, Jonathan ; Huq, Aziz Z ; Bradford, Ben ; Tyler, Tom R</creator><contributor>Lamb, Michael E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Jonathan ; Huq, Aziz Z ; Bradford, Ben ; Tyler, Tom R ; Lamb, Michael E</creatorcontrib><description>Why do people believe that violence is acceptable? In this article, the authors study people's normative beliefs about the acceptability of violence to achieve social control (as a substitute for the police, for self-protection and the resolution of disputes) and social change (through violent protests and acts to achieve political goals). Addressing attitudes toward violence among young men from various ethnic minority communities in London, the authors find that procedural justice is strongly correlated with police legitimacy, and that positive judgments about police legitimacy are associated with more negative views about the use of violence. They conclude with the idea that police legitimacy has an additional, hitherto unrecognized, empirical property-by constituting the belief that the police monopolise rightful force in society, legitimacy has a "crowding out" effect on positive views of private violence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-8971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0033852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Fairness ; Human ; Male ; Police Personnel ; Procedural Justice ; Public Opinion ; Trust (Social Behavior) ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Psychology, public policy, and law, 2013-11, Vol.19 (4), p.479-497</ispartof><rights>2013 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2013, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-b29a4a7c44f6089b89b56b13f37eb4c21a722de55f4e8e00fa706ec309d2e8bf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Lamb, Michael E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huq, Aziz Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Tom R</creatorcontrib><title>Monopolizing Force? Police Legitimacy and Public Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Violence</title><title>Psychology, public policy, and law</title><description>Why do people believe that violence is acceptable? In this article, the authors study people's normative beliefs about the acceptability of violence to achieve social control (as a substitute for the police, for self-protection and the resolution of disputes) and social change (through violent protests and acts to achieve political goals). Addressing attitudes toward violence among young men from various ethnic minority communities in London, the authors find that procedural justice is strongly correlated with police legitimacy, and that positive judgments about police legitimacy are associated with more negative views about the use of violence. They conclude with the idea that police legitimacy has an additional, hitherto unrecognized, empirical property-by constituting the belief that the police monopolise rightful force in society, legitimacy has a "crowding out" effect on positive views of private violence.</description><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Police Personnel</subject><subject>Procedural Justice</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Trust (Social Behavior)</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>1076-8971</issn><issn>1939-1528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKfgRwj4Ikg1_7o0TzKGU2HiHqavIU1vZ0ZtapIy6qe3MoUL597Lj3u4B6FLSm4p4fLOEMJ5kbMjNKGKq4zmrDgeeyJnWaEkPUVnMe4IIbmUaoL0i2995xv37dotXvpg4R6vx9kCXsHWJfdp7IBNW-F1X45rPE_Jpb6CiDd-b0KF0wfgubXQJVO6xqUB-xq_O99Aa-EcndSmiXDxp1P0tnzYLJ6y1evj82K-ygxnecpKpoww0gpRz0ihyrHyWUl5zSWUwjJqJGMV5HktoABCaiPJDCwnqmJQlDWfoqvD3S74rx5i0jvfh3a01FQIxiWXtBip6wNlg48xQK27MD4YBk2J_o1P_8c3ojcH1HRGd3GwJiRnG4i2DwHapBuz11RpoYVU_AcEMXHO</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Jackson, Jonathan</creator><creator>Huq, Aziz Z</creator><creator>Bradford, Ben</creator><creator>Tyler, Tom R</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Monopolizing Force? Police Legitimacy and Public Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Violence</title><author>Jackson, Jonathan ; Huq, Aziz Z ; Bradford, Ben ; Tyler, Tom R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a325t-b29a4a7c44f6089b89b56b13f37eb4c21a722de55f4e8e00fa706ec309d2e8bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Police Personnel</topic><topic>Procedural Justice</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Trust (Social Behavior)</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huq, Aziz Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Tom R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Psychology, public policy, and law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, Jonathan</au><au>Huq, Aziz Z</au><au>Bradford, Ben</au><au>Tyler, Tom R</au><au>Lamb, Michael E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monopolizing Force? Police Legitimacy and Public Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Violence</atitle><jtitle>Psychology, public policy, and law</jtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>479-497</pages><issn>1076-8971</issn><eissn>1939-1528</eissn><abstract>Why do people believe that violence is acceptable? In this article, the authors study people's normative beliefs about the acceptability of violence to achieve social control (as a substitute for the police, for self-protection and the resolution of disputes) and social change (through violent protests and acts to achieve political goals). Addressing attitudes toward violence among young men from various ethnic minority communities in London, the authors find that procedural justice is strongly correlated with police legitimacy, and that positive judgments about police legitimacy are associated with more negative views about the use of violence. They conclude with the idea that police legitimacy has an additional, hitherto unrecognized, empirical property-by constituting the belief that the police monopolise rightful force in society, legitimacy has a "crowding out" effect on positive views of private violence.</abstract><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/a0033852</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-8971
ispartof Psychology, public policy, and law, 2013-11, Vol.19 (4), p.479-497
issn 1076-8971
1939-1528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1442373718
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Fairness
Human
Male
Police Personnel
Procedural Justice
Public Opinion
Trust (Social Behavior)
Violence
title Monopolizing Force? Police Legitimacy and Public Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Violence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A22%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monopolizing%20Force?%20Police%20Legitimacy%20and%20Public%20Attitudes%20Toward%20the%20Acceptability%20of%20Violence&rft.jtitle=Psychology,%20public%20policy,%20and%20law&rft.au=Jackson,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=479-497&rft.issn=1076-8971&rft.eissn=1939-1528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0033852&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1442373718%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1442373718&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true