Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications

Many discussions on design theory applications within military contexts often revolve around a small population of design practitioners using complex terms and exclusive language, contrasted by a larger population of design skeptics that routinely demand a universal, scripted, and complete examples...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prism (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2013-03, Vol.4 (2), p.87-104
1. Verfasser: ZWEIBELSON, BEN
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104
container_issue 2
container_start_page 87
container_title Prism (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume 4
creator ZWEIBELSON, BEN
description Many discussions on design theory applications within military contexts often revolve around a small population of design practitioners using complex terms and exclusive language, contrasted by a larger population of design skeptics that routinely demand a universal, scripted, and complete examples for "doing design right. This article aims at moving this discourse toward how several design theory concepts are valuable for strategists and decision makers, and how select design concepts might be introduced and applied in a simple language where military practitioners can traverse from strategic intent into operational applications with tangible results. This article takes three design concepts that do not exist in current military doctrine, provides a brief explanation on what they are, and how military practitioners might apply them in strategic planning and military decision-making efforts drawing from real-world applications in Afghanistan. While major military organizations continue to produce their own versions of design with a variety of monikers, people cannot expect to find any final or complete "design" answer for military planning within a service doctrine.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1441429982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26469813</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26469813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j502-4d451a8ccc1c59df95eb604264dbd1b6f287fb25f27cb8be037b62b60ccd1c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jstqwzAQRUVpoSHNJxQEXRusp61lcF-hgSySvdEztXEtVZIX_fuKpmQ2dw4cZu4NWGHEmqrmDbq97pzcg01KY12GCIEZWYGP02e0Fj7bNJxn2PlZ25AT3M05erNoa6DzER5zlNmeBw3lbOAh2IKDn-UEtyFMg_6j9ADunJyS3fznGhxfX07de7U_vO267b4aWY0raihDstVaI82EcYJZxWuKOTXKIMUdbhunMHO40apVtiaN4rgoWhukEVmDp8vVEP33YlPuR7_E0iX1iFJEsRAtLtbjxRpT9rEPcfiS8acvX7hoESG_td9Uhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1441429982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><creator>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</creator><creatorcontrib>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</creatorcontrib><description>Many discussions on design theory applications within military contexts often revolve around a small population of design practitioners using complex terms and exclusive language, contrasted by a larger population of design skeptics that routinely demand a universal, scripted, and complete examples for "doing design right. This article aims at moving this discourse toward how several design theory concepts are valuable for strategists and decision makers, and how select design concepts might be introduced and applied in a simple language where military practitioners can traverse from strategic intent into operational applications with tangible results. This article takes three design concepts that do not exist in current military doctrine, provides a brief explanation on what they are, and how military practitioners might apply them in strategic planning and military decision-making efforts drawing from real-world applications in Afghanistan. While major military organizations continue to produce their own versions of design with a variety of monikers, people cannot expect to find any final or complete "design" answer for military planning within a service doctrine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2157-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2157-0671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Center for Complex Operations</publisher><subject>Decision making ; FEATURES ; Military strategy</subject><ispartof>Prism (Washington, D.C.), 2013-03, Vol.4 (2), p.87-104</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Defense University Press Mar 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26469813$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26469813$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25354,54524,54530</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26469813$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</creatorcontrib><title>Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications</title><title>Prism (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>Many discussions on design theory applications within military contexts often revolve around a small population of design practitioners using complex terms and exclusive language, contrasted by a larger population of design skeptics that routinely demand a universal, scripted, and complete examples for "doing design right. This article aims at moving this discourse toward how several design theory concepts are valuable for strategists and decision makers, and how select design concepts might be introduced and applied in a simple language where military practitioners can traverse from strategic intent into operational applications with tangible results. This article takes three design concepts that do not exist in current military doctrine, provides a brief explanation on what they are, and how military practitioners might apply them in strategic planning and military decision-making efforts drawing from real-world applications in Afghanistan. While major military organizations continue to produce their own versions of design with a variety of monikers, people cannot expect to find any final or complete "design" answer for military planning within a service doctrine.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>FEATURES</subject><subject>Military strategy</subject><issn>2157-0663</issn><issn>2157-0671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jstqwzAQRUVpoSHNJxQEXRusp61lcF-hgSySvdEztXEtVZIX_fuKpmQ2dw4cZu4NWGHEmqrmDbq97pzcg01KY12GCIEZWYGP02e0Fj7bNJxn2PlZ25AT3M05erNoa6DzER5zlNmeBw3lbOAh2IKDn-UEtyFMg_6j9ADunJyS3fznGhxfX07de7U_vO267b4aWY0raihDstVaI82EcYJZxWuKOTXKIMUdbhunMHO40apVtiaN4rgoWhukEVmDp8vVEP33YlPuR7_E0iX1iFJEsRAtLtbjxRpT9rEPcfiS8acvX7hoESG_td9Uhg</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</creator><general>Center for Complex Operations</general><general>National Defense University Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications</title><author>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j502-4d451a8ccc1c59df95eb604264dbd1b6f287fb25f27cb8be037b62b60ccd1c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>FEATURES</topic><topic>Military strategy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Prism (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications</atitle><jtitle>Prism (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>87-104</pages><issn>2157-0663</issn><eissn>2157-0671</eissn><abstract>Many discussions on design theory applications within military contexts often revolve around a small population of design practitioners using complex terms and exclusive language, contrasted by a larger population of design skeptics that routinely demand a universal, scripted, and complete examples for "doing design right. This article aims at moving this discourse toward how several design theory concepts are valuable for strategists and decision makers, and how select design concepts might be introduced and applied in a simple language where military practitioners can traverse from strategic intent into operational applications with tangible results. This article takes three design concepts that do not exist in current military doctrine, provides a brief explanation on what they are, and how military practitioners might apply them in strategic planning and military decision-making efforts drawing from real-world applications in Afghanistan. While major military organizations continue to produce their own versions of design with a variety of monikers, people cannot expect to find any final or complete "design" answer for military planning within a service doctrine.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Center for Complex Operations</pub><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2157-0663
ispartof Prism (Washington, D.C.), 2013-03, Vol.4 (2), p.87-104
issn 2157-0663
2157-0671
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1441429982
source JSTOR Open Access Journals
subjects Decision making
FEATURES
Military strategy
title Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A48%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%20Design%20Concepts%20Introduced%20for%20Strategic%20and%20Operational%20Applications&rft.jtitle=Prism%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=ZWEIBELSON,%20BEN&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=87-104&rft.issn=2157-0663&rft.eissn=2157-0671&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_JFNAL%3E26469813%3C/jstor_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1441429982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26469813&rfr_iscdi=true