Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications
Many discussions on design theory applications within military contexts often revolve around a small population of design practitioners using complex terms and exclusive language, contrasted by a larger population of design skeptics that routinely demand a universal, scripted, and complete examples...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prism (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2013-03, Vol.4 (2), p.87-104 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | Prism (Washington, D.C.) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | ZWEIBELSON, BEN |
description | Many discussions on design theory applications within military contexts often revolve around a small population of design practitioners using complex terms and exclusive language, contrasted by a larger population of design skeptics that routinely demand a universal, scripted, and complete examples for "doing design right. This article aims at moving this discourse toward how several design theory concepts are valuable for strategists and decision makers, and how select design concepts might be introduced and applied in a simple language where military practitioners can traverse from strategic intent into operational applications with tangible results. This article takes three design concepts that do not exist in current military doctrine, provides a brief explanation on what they are, and how military practitioners might apply them in strategic planning and military decision-making efforts drawing from real-world applications in Afghanistan. While major military organizations continue to produce their own versions of design with a variety of monikers, people cannot expect to find any final or complete "design" answer for military planning within a service doctrine. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1441429982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26469813</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26469813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j502-4d451a8ccc1c59df95eb604264dbd1b6f287fb25f27cb8be037b62b60ccd1c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jstqwzAQRUVpoSHNJxQEXRusp61lcF-hgSySvdEztXEtVZIX_fuKpmQ2dw4cZu4NWGHEmqrmDbq97pzcg01KY12GCIEZWYGP02e0Fj7bNJxn2PlZ25AT3M05erNoa6DzER5zlNmeBw3lbOAh2IKDn-UEtyFMg_6j9ADunJyS3fznGhxfX07de7U_vO267b4aWY0raihDstVaI82EcYJZxWuKOTXKIMUdbhunMHO40apVtiaN4rgoWhukEVmDp8vVEP33YlPuR7_E0iX1iFJEsRAtLtbjxRpT9rEPcfiS8acvX7hoESG_td9Uhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1441429982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><creator>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</creator><creatorcontrib>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</creatorcontrib><description>Many discussions on design theory applications within military contexts often revolve around a small population of design practitioners using complex terms and exclusive language, contrasted by a larger population of design skeptics that routinely demand a universal, scripted, and complete examples for "doing design right. This article aims at moving this discourse toward how several design theory concepts are valuable for strategists and decision makers, and how select design concepts might be introduced and applied in a simple language where military practitioners can traverse from strategic intent into operational applications with tangible results. This article takes three design concepts that do not exist in current military doctrine, provides a brief explanation on what they are, and how military practitioners might apply them in strategic planning and military decision-making efforts drawing from real-world applications in Afghanistan. While major military organizations continue to produce their own versions of design with a variety of monikers, people cannot expect to find any final or complete "design" answer for military planning within a service doctrine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2157-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2157-0671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Center for Complex Operations</publisher><subject>Decision making ; FEATURES ; Military strategy</subject><ispartof>Prism (Washington, D.C.), 2013-03, Vol.4 (2), p.87-104</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Defense University Press Mar 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26469813$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26469813$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25354,54524,54530</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26469813$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</creatorcontrib><title>Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications</title><title>Prism (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>Many discussions on design theory applications within military contexts often revolve around a small population of design practitioners using complex terms and exclusive language, contrasted by a larger population of design skeptics that routinely demand a universal, scripted, and complete examples for "doing design right. This article aims at moving this discourse toward how several design theory concepts are valuable for strategists and decision makers, and how select design concepts might be introduced and applied in a simple language where military practitioners can traverse from strategic intent into operational applications with tangible results. This article takes three design concepts that do not exist in current military doctrine, provides a brief explanation on what they are, and how military practitioners might apply them in strategic planning and military decision-making efforts drawing from real-world applications in Afghanistan. While major military organizations continue to produce their own versions of design with a variety of monikers, people cannot expect to find any final or complete "design" answer for military planning within a service doctrine.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>FEATURES</subject><subject>Military strategy</subject><issn>2157-0663</issn><issn>2157-0671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jstqwzAQRUVpoSHNJxQEXRusp61lcF-hgSySvdEztXEtVZIX_fuKpmQ2dw4cZu4NWGHEmqrmDbq97pzcg01KY12GCIEZWYGP02e0Fj7bNJxn2PlZ25AT3M05erNoa6DzER5zlNmeBw3lbOAh2IKDn-UEtyFMg_6j9ADunJyS3fznGhxfX07de7U_vO267b4aWY0raihDstVaI82EcYJZxWuKOTXKIMUdbhunMHO40apVtiaN4rgoWhukEVmDp8vVEP33YlPuR7_E0iX1iFJEsRAtLtbjxRpT9rEPcfiS8acvX7hoESG_td9Uhg</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</creator><general>Center for Complex Operations</general><general>National Defense University Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications</title><author>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j502-4d451a8ccc1c59df95eb604264dbd1b6f287fb25f27cb8be037b62b60ccd1c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>FEATURES</topic><topic>Military strategy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Prism (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ZWEIBELSON, BEN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications</atitle><jtitle>Prism (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>87-104</pages><issn>2157-0663</issn><eissn>2157-0671</eissn><abstract>Many discussions on design theory applications within military contexts often revolve around a small population of design practitioners using complex terms and exclusive language, contrasted by a larger population of design skeptics that routinely demand a universal, scripted, and complete examples for "doing design right. This article aims at moving this discourse toward how several design theory concepts are valuable for strategists and decision makers, and how select design concepts might be introduced and applied in a simple language where military practitioners can traverse from strategic intent into operational applications with tangible results. This article takes three design concepts that do not exist in current military doctrine, provides a brief explanation on what they are, and how military practitioners might apply them in strategic planning and military decision-making efforts drawing from real-world applications in Afghanistan. While major military organizations continue to produce their own versions of design with a variety of monikers, people cannot expect to find any final or complete "design" answer for military planning within a service doctrine.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Center for Complex Operations</pub><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2157-0663 |
ispartof | Prism (Washington, D.C.), 2013-03, Vol.4 (2), p.87-104 |
issn | 2157-0663 2157-0671 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1441429982 |
source | JSTOR Open Access Journals |
subjects | Decision making FEATURES Military strategy |
title | Three Design Concepts Introduced for Strategic and Operational Applications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A48%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%20Design%20Concepts%20Introduced%20for%20Strategic%20and%20Operational%20Applications&rft.jtitle=Prism%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=ZWEIBELSON,%20BEN&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=87-104&rft.issn=2157-0663&rft.eissn=2157-0671&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_JFNAL%3E26469813%3C/jstor_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1441429982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26469813&rfr_iscdi=true |