Quantum versus Classical Pushdown Automata in Exact Computation
Even though quantum computation is useful for solving certain problems, classical computation is more powerful in some cases. Thus, it is significant to compare the abilities of quantum computation and its classical counterpart, based on such a simple computation model as automata. In this paper we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IPSJ Digital Courier 2005, Vol.1, pp.426-435 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 435 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 426 |
container_title | IPSJ Digital Courier |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Murakami, Yumiko Nakanishi, Masaki Yamashita, Shigeru Watanabe, Katsumasa |
description | Even though quantum computation is useful for solving certain problems, classical computation is more powerful in some cases. Thus, it is significant to compare the abilities of quantum computation and its classical counterpart, based on such a simple computation model as automata. In this paper we focus on the quantum pushdown automata which were defined by Golovkins in 2000, who showed that the class of languages recognized by quantum pushdown automata properly contains the class of languages recognized by finite automata. However, no one knows the entire relationship between the recognitive abilities of quantum and classical pushdown automata. As a part, we show a proposition that quantum pushdown automata can deterministically solve a certain problem that cannot be solved by any deterministic pushdown automata. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2197/ipsjdc.1.426 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1441327778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3096203381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3706-96dc6d599aabecaf81dd4e9445232dbdae123766ac106d4df1d3e7e43a6078643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkNtKAzEQhoMoWKt3PsCCt25NNmmyudKy1AMUVNDrME2ydpc9mYOHt3e1Ur0YZuD_ZgY-hE4JnmVEiotq8LXRMzJjGd9DE0KZTAWb8_1_8yE68r7GmOcykxN0-RihC7FN3qzz0SdFA95XGprkIfqN6d-7ZBFD30KApOqS5QfokBR9O8QAoeq7Y3RQQuPtyW-foufr5VNxm67ub-6KxSrVVGCeSm40N3MpAdZWQ5kTY5iVjM0zmpm1AUsyKjgHTTA3zJTEUCsso8CxyDmjU3S2vTu4_jVaH1TdR9eNLxVhjNBMCJGP1PmW0q733tlSDa5qwX0qgtW3IrVVpIgaFY341RavfYAXu4PBhUo39g_GPzWu7CK9AadsR78AgGlytg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1441327778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantum versus Classical Pushdown Automata in Exact Computation</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Murakami, Yumiko ; Nakanishi, Masaki ; Yamashita, Shigeru ; Watanabe, Katsumasa</creator><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yumiko ; Nakanishi, Masaki ; Yamashita, Shigeru ; Watanabe, Katsumasa</creatorcontrib><description>Even though quantum computation is useful for solving certain problems, classical computation is more powerful in some cases. Thus, it is significant to compare the abilities of quantum computation and its classical counterpart, based on such a simple computation model as automata. In this paper we focus on the quantum pushdown automata which were defined by Golovkins in 2000, who showed that the class of languages recognized by quantum pushdown automata properly contains the class of languages recognized by finite automata. However, no one knows the entire relationship between the recognitive abilities of quantum and classical pushdown automata. As a part, we show a proposition that quantum pushdown automata can deterministically solve a certain problem that cannot be solved by any deterministic pushdown automata.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1349-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-7456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2197/ipsjdc.1.426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Information Processing Society of Japan</publisher><ispartof>IPSJ Digital Courier, 2005, Vol.1, pp.426-435</ispartof><rights>2005 by the Information Processing Society of Japan</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2005</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3706-96dc6d599aabecaf81dd4e9445232dbdae123766ac106d4df1d3e7e43a6078643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3706-96dc6d599aabecaf81dd4e9445232dbdae123766ac106d4df1d3e7e43a6078643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1882,4023,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakanishi, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Katsumasa</creatorcontrib><title>Quantum versus Classical Pushdown Automata in Exact Computation</title><title>IPSJ Digital Courier</title><addtitle>ipsjdc</addtitle><description>Even though quantum computation is useful for solving certain problems, classical computation is more powerful in some cases. Thus, it is significant to compare the abilities of quantum computation and its classical counterpart, based on such a simple computation model as automata. In this paper we focus on the quantum pushdown automata which were defined by Golovkins in 2000, who showed that the class of languages recognized by quantum pushdown automata properly contains the class of languages recognized by finite automata. However, no one knows the entire relationship between the recognitive abilities of quantum and classical pushdown automata. As a part, we show a proposition that quantum pushdown automata can deterministically solve a certain problem that cannot be solved by any deterministic pushdown automata.</description><issn>1349-7456</issn><issn>1349-7456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkNtKAzEQhoMoWKt3PsCCt25NNmmyudKy1AMUVNDrME2ydpc9mYOHt3e1Ur0YZuD_ZgY-hE4JnmVEiotq8LXRMzJjGd9DE0KZTAWb8_1_8yE68r7GmOcykxN0-RihC7FN3qzz0SdFA95XGprkIfqN6d-7ZBFD30KApOqS5QfokBR9O8QAoeq7Y3RQQuPtyW-foufr5VNxm67ub-6KxSrVVGCeSm40N3MpAdZWQ5kTY5iVjM0zmpm1AUsyKjgHTTA3zJTEUCsso8CxyDmjU3S2vTu4_jVaH1TdR9eNLxVhjNBMCJGP1PmW0q733tlSDa5qwX0qgtW3IrVVpIgaFY341RavfYAXu4PBhUo39g_GPzWu7CK9AadsR78AgGlytg</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Murakami, Yumiko</creator><creator>Nakanishi, Masaki</creator><creator>Yamashita, Shigeru</creator><creator>Watanabe, Katsumasa</creator><general>Information Processing Society of Japan</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Quantum versus Classical Pushdown Automata in Exact Computation</title><author>Murakami, Yumiko ; Nakanishi, Masaki ; Yamashita, Shigeru ; Watanabe, Katsumasa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3706-96dc6d599aabecaf81dd4e9445232dbdae123766ac106d4df1d3e7e43a6078643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakanishi, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Katsumasa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>IPSJ Digital Courier</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murakami, Yumiko</au><au>Nakanishi, Masaki</au><au>Yamashita, Shigeru</au><au>Watanabe, Katsumasa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantum versus Classical Pushdown Automata in Exact Computation</atitle><jtitle>IPSJ Digital Courier</jtitle><addtitle>ipsjdc</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>1</volume><spage>426</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>426-435</pages><issn>1349-7456</issn><eissn>1349-7456</eissn><abstract>Even though quantum computation is useful for solving certain problems, classical computation is more powerful in some cases. Thus, it is significant to compare the abilities of quantum computation and its classical counterpart, based on such a simple computation model as automata. In this paper we focus on the quantum pushdown automata which were defined by Golovkins in 2000, who showed that the class of languages recognized by quantum pushdown automata properly contains the class of languages recognized by finite automata. However, no one knows the entire relationship between the recognitive abilities of quantum and classical pushdown automata. As a part, we show a proposition that quantum pushdown automata can deterministically solve a certain problem that cannot be solved by any deterministic pushdown automata.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Information Processing Society of Japan</pub><doi>10.2197/ipsjdc.1.426</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1349-7456 |
ispartof | IPSJ Digital Courier, 2005, Vol.1, pp.426-435 |
issn | 1349-7456 1349-7456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1441327778 |
source | J-STAGE Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Quantum versus Classical Pushdown Automata in Exact Computation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A34%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantum%20versus%20Classical%20Pushdown%20Automata%20in%20Exact%20Computation&rft.jtitle=IPSJ%20Digital%20Courier&rft.au=Murakami,%20Yumiko&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=1&rft.spage=426&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=426-435&rft.issn=1349-7456&rft.eissn=1349-7456&rft_id=info:doi/10.2197/ipsjdc.1.426&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3096203381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1441327778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |