Success in Community College: Do Institutions Differ?

Community colleges are complex organizations and assessing their performance, though important, is difficult. Compared to 4-year colleges and universities, community colleges serve a more diverse population and provide a wider variety of educational programs that include continuing education and tec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in higher education 2013-11, Vol.54 (7), p.805-824
Hauptverfasser: Clotfelter, Charles T., Ladd, Helen F., Muschkin, Clara G., Vigdor, Jacob L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 824
container_issue 7
container_start_page 805
container_title Research in higher education
container_volume 54
creator Clotfelter, Charles T.
Ladd, Helen F.
Muschkin, Clara G.
Vigdor, Jacob L.
description Community colleges are complex organizations and assessing their performance, though important, is difficult. Compared to 4-year colleges and universities, community colleges serve a more diverse population and provide a wider variety of educational programs that include continuing education and technical training for adults, and diplomas, associates degrees, and transfer credits for recent high school graduates. Focusing solely on the latter programs of North Carolina's community colleges, we measure the success of each college along two dimensions: attainment of an applied diploma or degree; or completion of the coursework required to transfer to a 4-year college or university. We address three questions. First, how much variation is there across the institutions in these measures of student success? Second, how do these measures of success differ across institutions after we adjust for the characteristics of the enrolled students? Third, how do our measures compare to the measures of success used by the North Carolina Community College System? Although we find variation along both dimensions of success, we also find that part of this variation is attributable to differences in the kinds of students who attend various colleges. Once we correct for such differences, we find that it is not possible to distinguish most of the system's colleges from one another along either dimension. Top-performing institutions, however, can be distinguished from the most poorly performing ones. Finally, our adjusted rates of success show little correlation either to measurable aspects of the various colleges or to the metrics used by the state.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11162-013-9295-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1440185090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1039167</ericid><jstor_id>24571746</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24571746</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-e9a1d2d3d6a1954d6ea0d51251709626b4e1d0680a8bc57808012f29371bcbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwIOw4Dk6k2ySjReRtmql4MEevIX9ky1b2t2aZA_99k1ZKd68zAy893sDj5BbhAcEUI8eESWjgJxqpgWVZ2SEQnGKWfZ9TkbAJdI4xCW58n4NkYnAiIivviyt90nTJpNuu-3bJuzjtdnYlX1Kpl0yb31oQh-arvXJtKlr656vyUWdb7y9-d1jsnydLSfvdPH5Np-8LGjJJQRqdY4Vq3glc9QiraTNoRLIBCrQkskitViBzCDPilKoDDJAVjPNFRZlUfAxuR9id6776a0PZt31ro0fDaYpYCZAQ3Th4Cpd572ztdm5Zpu7vUEwx3LMUI6J5ZhjOUZG5m5grGvKk3_2gcA1ShV1Nug-au3Kuj-f_w9d-9C5UypLhUKVSn4AslB33Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1440185090</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Success in Community College: Do Institutions Differ?</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Clotfelter, Charles T. ; Ladd, Helen F. ; Muschkin, Clara G. ; Vigdor, Jacob L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clotfelter, Charles T. ; Ladd, Helen F. ; Muschkin, Clara G. ; Vigdor, Jacob L.</creatorcontrib><description>Community colleges are complex organizations and assessing their performance, though important, is difficult. Compared to 4-year colleges and universities, community colleges serve a more diverse population and provide a wider variety of educational programs that include continuing education and technical training for adults, and diplomas, associates degrees, and transfer credits for recent high school graduates. Focusing solely on the latter programs of North Carolina's community colleges, we measure the success of each college along two dimensions: attainment of an applied diploma or degree; or completion of the coursework required to transfer to a 4-year college or university. We address three questions. First, how much variation is there across the institutions in these measures of student success? Second, how do these measures of success differ across institutions after we adjust for the characteristics of the enrolled students? Third, how do our measures compare to the measures of success used by the North Carolina Community College System? Although we find variation along both dimensions of success, we also find that part of this variation is attributable to differences in the kinds of students who attend various colleges. Once we correct for such differences, we find that it is not possible to distinguish most of the system's colleges from one another along either dimension. Top-performing institutions, however, can be distinguished from the most poorly performing ones. Finally, our adjusted rates of success show little correlation either to measurable aspects of the various colleges or to the metrics used by the state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-0365</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-188X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11162-013-9295-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Associate degrees ; College bound students ; College students ; College transfer students ; Colleges ; Community Colleges ; Comparative Analysis ; Correlation ; Education ; Educational Attainment ; Graduation ; Graduation Rate ; High School Graduates ; High school students ; Higher Education ; Mathematical variables ; Measurement ; North Carolina ; Performance evaluation ; School Effectiveness ; Student Rights ; Success ; Success factors ; Transfer students</subject><ispartof>Research in higher education, 2013-11, Vol.54 (7), p.805-824</ispartof><rights>2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-e9a1d2d3d6a1954d6ea0d51251709626b4e1d0680a8bc57808012f29371bcbb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-e9a1d2d3d6a1954d6ea0d51251709626b4e1d0680a8bc57808012f29371bcbb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24571746$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24571746$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1039167$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clotfelter, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladd, Helen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muschkin, Clara G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigdor, Jacob L.</creatorcontrib><title>Success in Community College: Do Institutions Differ?</title><title>Research in higher education</title><addtitle>Res High Educ</addtitle><description>Community colleges are complex organizations and assessing their performance, though important, is difficult. Compared to 4-year colleges and universities, community colleges serve a more diverse population and provide a wider variety of educational programs that include continuing education and technical training for adults, and diplomas, associates degrees, and transfer credits for recent high school graduates. Focusing solely on the latter programs of North Carolina's community colleges, we measure the success of each college along two dimensions: attainment of an applied diploma or degree; or completion of the coursework required to transfer to a 4-year college or university. We address three questions. First, how much variation is there across the institutions in these measures of student success? Second, how do these measures of success differ across institutions after we adjust for the characteristics of the enrolled students? Third, how do our measures compare to the measures of success used by the North Carolina Community College System? Although we find variation along both dimensions of success, we also find that part of this variation is attributable to differences in the kinds of students who attend various colleges. Once we correct for such differences, we find that it is not possible to distinguish most of the system's colleges from one another along either dimension. Top-performing institutions, however, can be distinguished from the most poorly performing ones. Finally, our adjusted rates of success show little correlation either to measurable aspects of the various colleges or to the metrics used by the state.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Associate degrees</subject><subject>College bound students</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>College transfer students</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Community Colleges</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Attainment</subject><subject>Graduation</subject><subject>Graduation Rate</subject><subject>High School Graduates</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Mathematical variables</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>School Effectiveness</subject><subject>Student Rights</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Success factors</subject><subject>Transfer students</subject><issn>0361-0365</issn><issn>1573-188X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwIOw4Dk6k2ySjReRtmql4MEevIX9ky1b2t2aZA_99k1ZKd68zAy893sDj5BbhAcEUI8eESWjgJxqpgWVZ2SEQnGKWfZ9TkbAJdI4xCW58n4NkYnAiIivviyt90nTJpNuu-3bJuzjtdnYlX1Kpl0yb31oQh-arvXJtKlr656vyUWdb7y9-d1jsnydLSfvdPH5Np-8LGjJJQRqdY4Vq3glc9QiraTNoRLIBCrQkskitViBzCDPilKoDDJAVjPNFRZlUfAxuR9id6776a0PZt31ro0fDaYpYCZAQ3Th4Cpd572ztdm5Zpu7vUEwx3LMUI6J5ZhjOUZG5m5grGvKk3_2gcA1ShV1Nug-au3Kuj-f_w9d-9C5UypLhUKVSn4AslB33Q</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Clotfelter, Charles T.</creator><creator>Ladd, Helen F.</creator><creator>Muschkin, Clara G.</creator><creator>Vigdor, Jacob L.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Success in Community College: Do Institutions Differ?</title><author>Clotfelter, Charles T. ; Ladd, Helen F. ; Muschkin, Clara G. ; Vigdor, Jacob L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-e9a1d2d3d6a1954d6ea0d51251709626b4e1d0680a8bc57808012f29371bcbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Associate degrees</topic><topic>College bound students</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>College transfer students</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Community Colleges</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Attainment</topic><topic>Graduation</topic><topic>Graduation Rate</topic><topic>High School Graduates</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Mathematical variables</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>School Effectiveness</topic><topic>Student Rights</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Success factors</topic><topic>Transfer students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clotfelter, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladd, Helen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muschkin, Clara G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigdor, Jacob L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Research in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clotfelter, Charles T.</au><au>Ladd, Helen F.</au><au>Muschkin, Clara G.</au><au>Vigdor, Jacob L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1039167</ericid><atitle>Success in Community College: Do Institutions Differ?</atitle><jtitle>Research in higher education</jtitle><stitle>Res High Educ</stitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>805</spage><epage>824</epage><pages>805-824</pages><issn>0361-0365</issn><eissn>1573-188X</eissn><abstract>Community colleges are complex organizations and assessing their performance, though important, is difficult. Compared to 4-year colleges and universities, community colleges serve a more diverse population and provide a wider variety of educational programs that include continuing education and technical training for adults, and diplomas, associates degrees, and transfer credits for recent high school graduates. Focusing solely on the latter programs of North Carolina's community colleges, we measure the success of each college along two dimensions: attainment of an applied diploma or degree; or completion of the coursework required to transfer to a 4-year college or university. We address three questions. First, how much variation is there across the institutions in these measures of student success? Second, how do these measures of success differ across institutions after we adjust for the characteristics of the enrolled students? Third, how do our measures compare to the measures of success used by the North Carolina Community College System? Although we find variation along both dimensions of success, we also find that part of this variation is attributable to differences in the kinds of students who attend various colleges. Once we correct for such differences, we find that it is not possible to distinguish most of the system's colleges from one another along either dimension. Top-performing institutions, however, can be distinguished from the most poorly performing ones. Finally, our adjusted rates of success show little correlation either to measurable aspects of the various colleges or to the metrics used by the state.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11162-013-9295-6</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-0365
ispartof Research in higher education, 2013-11, Vol.54 (7), p.805-824
issn 0361-0365
1573-188X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1440185090
source EBSCOhost Education Source; JSTOR; SpringerNature Complete Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Associate degrees
College bound students
College students
College transfer students
Colleges
Community Colleges
Comparative Analysis
Correlation
Education
Educational Attainment
Graduation
Graduation Rate
High School Graduates
High school students
Higher Education
Mathematical variables
Measurement
North Carolina
Performance evaluation
School Effectiveness
Student Rights
Success
Success factors
Transfer students
title Success in Community College: Do Institutions Differ?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A12%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Success%20in%20Community%20College:%20Do%20Institutions%20Differ?&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Clotfelter,%20Charles%20T.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=805&rft.epage=824&rft.pages=805-824&rft.issn=0361-0365&rft.eissn=1573-188X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11162-013-9295-6&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24571746%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1440185090&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1039167&rft_jstor_id=24571746&rfr_iscdi=true