Philanthropy and Corporate Reputation: An Empirical Investigation
This study investigates how two different forms of conditional corporate charitable support (purchase-based and profit-based) and two different forms of unconditional support (substantial and undisclosed amount) impact a firm’s reputation. Consumer participants were selected randomly by a profession...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Corporate reputation review 2013-12, Vol.16 (4), p.285-299 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 299 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 285 |
container_title | Corporate reputation review |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Morris, Sara A Bartkus, Barbara R Glassman, Myron Rhiel, G Steven |
description | This study investigates how two different forms of conditional corporate charitable support (purchase-based and profit-based) and two different forms of unconditional support (substantial and undisclosed amount) impact a firm’s reputation. Consumer participants were selected randomly by a professional marketing research firm that administered a telephone survey. The results indicate that consumers have favorable attitudes toward all types of corporate giving; however, more consumers have favorable attitudes toward firms that have non-purchase-based giving programs versus other forms of corporate charitable support. The study also found that more consumers have favorable attitudes toward companies that give based on profits as compared with companies that give based on purchases. In addition, if consumers believe that the firm’s primary motivation for the purchase-based giving was to benefit the charity, consumers are significantly more likely to evaluate the firm favorably. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/crr.2013.16 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1438940851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3088103071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5a7b3762bd9b3ad6557c0cc025e682753f31f2056eddf0d0084263713b864da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsnX2DBo25NMpts1lspVQsFRXoP2STbbmmTNdkV-vam1oMHTzMwH__PfAjdEjwhmJWPOoQJxQQmhJ-hESnKKidCVOdpBw45MFFdoqsYtxhTLBiM0PR90-6U6zfBd4dMOZPNfOh8UL3NPmw39KpvvXvKpi6b77s2tFrtsoX7srFv1z-3a3TRqF20N79zjFbP89XsNV--vSxm02WugVZ9zlRZQ8lpbaoalOGMlRprjSmzXNCSQQOkoZhxa0yDDcaioBxKArXghVEwRnen2C74zyHVy60fgkuNkhQgqiL9QxJ1f6J08DEG28gutHsVDpJgeVQkkyJ5VCQJT_TDiY6Jcmsb_mT-g38D9X9nhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1438940851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Philanthropy and Corporate Reputation: An Empirical Investigation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Morris, Sara A ; Bartkus, Barbara R ; Glassman, Myron ; Rhiel, G Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Sara A ; Bartkus, Barbara R ; Glassman, Myron ; Rhiel, G Steven</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates how two different forms of conditional corporate charitable support (purchase-based and profit-based) and two different forms of unconditional support (substantial and undisclosed amount) impact a firm’s reputation. Consumer participants were selected randomly by a professional marketing research firm that administered a telephone survey. The results indicate that consumers have favorable attitudes toward all types of corporate giving; however, more consumers have favorable attitudes toward firms that have non-purchase-based giving programs versus other forms of corporate charitable support. The study also found that more consumers have favorable attitudes toward companies that give based on profits as compared with companies that give based on purchases. In addition, if consumers believe that the firm’s primary motivation for the purchase-based giving was to benefit the charity, consumers are significantly more likely to evaluate the firm favorably.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-3589</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-1889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/crr.2013.16</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Attitudes ; Business and Management ; Charities ; Consumer attitudes ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Corporate Communication/Public Relations ; Corporate image ; Corporate profits ; Donations ; Gifts ; Hypotheses ; Management ; Marketing ; Original Article ; Philanthropy ; Profitability ; Reputation management ; Reputations ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Corporate reputation review, 2013-12, Vol.16 (4), p.285-299</ispartof><rights>Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5a7b3762bd9b3ad6557c0cc025e682753f31f2056eddf0d0084263713b864da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5a7b3762bd9b3ad6557c0cc025e682753f31f2056eddf0d0084263713b864da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/crr.2013.16$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/crr.2013.16$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Sara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartkus, Barbara R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glassman, Myron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhiel, G Steven</creatorcontrib><title>Philanthropy and Corporate Reputation: An Empirical Investigation</title><title>Corporate reputation review</title><addtitle>Corp Reputation Rev</addtitle><description>This study investigates how two different forms of conditional corporate charitable support (purchase-based and profit-based) and two different forms of unconditional support (substantial and undisclosed amount) impact a firm’s reputation. Consumer participants were selected randomly by a professional marketing research firm that administered a telephone survey. The results indicate that consumers have favorable attitudes toward all types of corporate giving; however, more consumers have favorable attitudes toward firms that have non-purchase-based giving programs versus other forms of corporate charitable support. The study also found that more consumers have favorable attitudes toward companies that give based on profits as compared with companies that give based on purchases. In addition, if consumers believe that the firm’s primary motivation for the purchase-based giving was to benefit the charity, consumers are significantly more likely to evaluate the firm favorably.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Charities</subject><subject>Consumer attitudes</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Corporate Communication/Public Relations</subject><subject>Corporate image</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Donations</subject><subject>Gifts</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Philanthropy</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Reputation management</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1363-3589</issn><issn>1479-1889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsnX2DBo25NMpts1lspVQsFRXoP2STbbmmTNdkV-vam1oMHTzMwH__PfAjdEjwhmJWPOoQJxQQmhJ-hESnKKidCVOdpBw45MFFdoqsYtxhTLBiM0PR90-6U6zfBd4dMOZPNfOh8UL3NPmw39KpvvXvKpi6b77s2tFrtsoX7srFv1z-3a3TRqF20N79zjFbP89XsNV--vSxm02WugVZ9zlRZQ8lpbaoalOGMlRprjSmzXNCSQQOkoZhxa0yDDcaioBxKArXghVEwRnen2C74zyHVy60fgkuNkhQgqiL9QxJ1f6J08DEG28gutHsVDpJgeVQkkyJ5VCQJT_TDiY6Jcmsb_mT-g38D9X9nhA</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Morris, Sara A</creator><creator>Bartkus, Barbara R</creator><creator>Glassman, Myron</creator><creator>Rhiel, G Steven</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Philanthropy and Corporate Reputation: An Empirical Investigation</title><author>Morris, Sara A ; Bartkus, Barbara R ; Glassman, Myron ; Rhiel, G Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5a7b3762bd9b3ad6557c0cc025e682753f31f2056eddf0d0084263713b864da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Charities</topic><topic>Consumer attitudes</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Corporate Communication/Public Relations</topic><topic>Corporate image</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Donations</topic><topic>Gifts</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Philanthropy</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Reputation management</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Sara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartkus, Barbara R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glassman, Myron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhiel, G Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Corporate reputation review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Sara A</au><au>Bartkus, Barbara R</au><au>Glassman, Myron</au><au>Rhiel, G Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Philanthropy and Corporate Reputation: An Empirical Investigation</atitle><jtitle>Corporate reputation review</jtitle><stitle>Corp Reputation Rev</stitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>285-299</pages><issn>1363-3589</issn><eissn>1479-1889</eissn><abstract>This study investigates how two different forms of conditional corporate charitable support (purchase-based and profit-based) and two different forms of unconditional support (substantial and undisclosed amount) impact a firm’s reputation. Consumer participants were selected randomly by a professional marketing research firm that administered a telephone survey. The results indicate that consumers have favorable attitudes toward all types of corporate giving; however, more consumers have favorable attitudes toward firms that have non-purchase-based giving programs versus other forms of corporate charitable support. The study also found that more consumers have favorable attitudes toward companies that give based on profits as compared with companies that give based on purchases. In addition, if consumers believe that the firm’s primary motivation for the purchase-based giving was to benefit the charity, consumers are significantly more likely to evaluate the firm favorably.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/crr.2013.16</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1363-3589 |
ispartof | Corporate reputation review, 2013-12, Vol.16 (4), p.285-299 |
issn | 1363-3589 1479-1889 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1438940851 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Alliances Attitudes Business and Management Charities Consumer attitudes Consumer behavior Consumers Corporate Communication/Public Relations Corporate image Corporate profits Donations Gifts Hypotheses Management Marketing Original Article Philanthropy Profitability Reputation management Reputations Studies |
title | Philanthropy and Corporate Reputation: An Empirical Investigation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Philanthropy%20and%20Corporate%20Reputation:%20An%20Empirical%20Investigation&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20reputation%20review&rft.au=Morris,%20Sara%20A&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=285-299&rft.issn=1363-3589&rft.eissn=1479-1889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/crr.2013.16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3088103071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1438940851&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |