Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey
Chemistry departments have felt pressure in recent years to produce quality data on student achievement of learning outcomes. External (e.g., accreditation agencies) and internal (e.g., academic deans) entities are demanding regular review of student achievement. It is thus necessary for the chemist...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical education 2013-08, Vol.90 (8), p.981-987 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 987 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 981 |
container_title | Journal of chemical education |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Raker, Jeffrey R Emenike, Mary E Holme, Thomas A |
description | Chemistry departments have felt pressure in recent years to produce quality data on student achievement of learning outcomes. External (e.g., accreditation agencies) and internal (e.g., academic deans) entities are demanding regular review of student achievement. It is thus necessary for the chemistry community to develop valid and reliable instruments to assess student learning. With chemistry faculty members’ integration into assessment practices, it is important that these faculty members have a sufficient understanding of the quality of and limitations to the interpretation of assessment data. As part of a larger national survey, 1505 chemistry faculty members from a diverse array of postsecondary institutions and teaching experience responded to a series of questions regarding their familiarity with assessment terminology. Advanced confirmatory factor analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to represent an overall structure of faculty members’ assessment knowledge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/ed300636m |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1436252059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1028695</ericid><sourcerecordid>3081524671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-31bb7f79adf4df08c365c7522a16ef9c5bd1f1dbaf764f1ae54bfd1689f75b4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsLf4AQEBcuRpPJZB7uSml94ANsux4yk6RGZiY2NyP0H_izTa0UwdW5cD7OuRyETim5oiSm10oyQlKWtntoQAuWR5TF-T4akGBGBc-TQ3QE8E4IjXmRD9DXAky3xDPv-tr3TjR4suqFN7bDT1aqZmPOLV50UjnwopN4_KZaA96t8VTUfeM32prGCGfCbTUeASiAVnUez5VrTWcbu1zf4FcFAQesnW2xwM8_LaFw1rtPtT5GB1o0oE5-dYgW08l8fBc9vtzej0ePkWBJ4iNGqyrTWSGkTqQmec1SXmc8jgVNlS5qXkmqqayEztJEU6F4UmlJ07zQGa8SwYbofJv74eyqV-DLd9u78AeUNGFpzGPCi0BdbqnaWQCndPnhTCvcuqSk3Axd7oYO7NmWVc7UO27yELA8LXjwL7a-qOFP2b-cb8f-iS0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1436252059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey</title><source>American Chemical Society Publications</source><creator>Raker, Jeffrey R ; Emenike, Mary E ; Holme, Thomas A</creator><creatorcontrib>Raker, Jeffrey R ; Emenike, Mary E ; Holme, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><description>Chemistry departments have felt pressure in recent years to produce quality data on student achievement of learning outcomes. External (e.g., accreditation agencies) and internal (e.g., academic deans) entities are demanding regular review of student achievement. It is thus necessary for the chemistry community to develop valid and reliable instruments to assess student learning. With chemistry faculty members’ integration into assessment practices, it is important that these faculty members have a sufficient understanding of the quality of and limitations to the interpretation of assessment data. As part of a larger national survey, 1505 chemistry faculty members from a diverse array of postsecondary institutions and teaching experience responded to a series of questions regarding their familiarity with assessment terminology. Advanced confirmatory factor analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to represent an overall structure of faculty members’ assessment knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ed300636m</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCEDA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Chemistry ; College Faculty ; Discriminant analysis ; Educational evaluation ; Factor Analysis ; Familiarity ; Knowledge Level ; Learning ; Learning outcomes ; Modelling ; National Surveys ; Organic chemistry ; Polls & surveys ; School faculty ; Structural Equation Models ; Teacher Surveys ; Terminology ; Test Items ; Vocabulary Skills</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2013-08, Vol.90 (8), p.981-987</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 13, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-31bb7f79adf4df08c365c7522a16ef9c5bd1f1dbaf764f1ae54bfd1689f75b4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-31bb7f79adf4df08c365c7522a16ef9c5bd1f1dbaf764f1ae54bfd1689f75b4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed300636m$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed300636m$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1028695$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raker, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emenike, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holme, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><title>Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>Chemistry departments have felt pressure in recent years to produce quality data on student achievement of learning outcomes. External (e.g., accreditation agencies) and internal (e.g., academic deans) entities are demanding regular review of student achievement. It is thus necessary for the chemistry community to develop valid and reliable instruments to assess student learning. With chemistry faculty members’ integration into assessment practices, it is important that these faculty members have a sufficient understanding of the quality of and limitations to the interpretation of assessment data. As part of a larger national survey, 1505 chemistry faculty members from a diverse array of postsecondary institutions and teaching experience responded to a series of questions regarding their familiarity with assessment terminology. Advanced confirmatory factor analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to represent an overall structure of faculty members’ assessment knowledge.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>School faculty</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Teacher Surveys</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Test Items</subject><subject>Vocabulary Skills</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsLf4AQEBcuRpPJZB7uSml94ANsux4yk6RGZiY2NyP0H_izTa0UwdW5cD7OuRyETim5oiSm10oyQlKWtntoQAuWR5TF-T4akGBGBc-TQ3QE8E4IjXmRD9DXAky3xDPv-tr3TjR4suqFN7bDT1aqZmPOLV50UjnwopN4_KZaA96t8VTUfeM32prGCGfCbTUeASiAVnUez5VrTWcbu1zf4FcFAQesnW2xwM8_LaFw1rtPtT5GB1o0oE5-dYgW08l8fBc9vtzej0ePkWBJ4iNGqyrTWSGkTqQmec1SXmc8jgVNlS5qXkmqqayEztJEU6F4UmlJ07zQGa8SwYbofJv74eyqV-DLd9u78AeUNGFpzGPCi0BdbqnaWQCndPnhTCvcuqSk3Axd7oYO7NmWVc7UO27yELA8LXjwL7a-qOFP2b-cb8f-iS0</recordid><startdate>20130813</startdate><enddate>20130813</enddate><creator>Raker, Jeffrey R</creator><creator>Emenike, Mary E</creator><creator>Holme, Thomas A</creator><general>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>Division of Chemical Education, Inc and ACS Publications Division of the American Chemical Society</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130813</creationdate><title>Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey</title><author>Raker, Jeffrey R ; Emenike, Mary E ; Holme, Thomas A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-31bb7f79adf4df08c365c7522a16ef9c5bd1f1dbaf764f1ae54bfd1689f75b4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>School faculty</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Teacher Surveys</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Test Items</topic><topic>Vocabulary Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raker, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emenike, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holme, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raker, Jeffrey R</au><au>Emenike, Mary E</au><au>Holme, Thomas A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1028695</ericid><atitle>Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2013-08-13</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>987</epage><pages>981-987</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><coden>JCEDA8</coden><abstract>Chemistry departments have felt pressure in recent years to produce quality data on student achievement of learning outcomes. External (e.g., accreditation agencies) and internal (e.g., academic deans) entities are demanding regular review of student achievement. It is thus necessary for the chemistry community to develop valid and reliable instruments to assess student learning. With chemistry faculty members’ integration into assessment practices, it is important that these faculty members have a sufficient understanding of the quality of and limitations to the interpretation of assessment data. As part of a larger national survey, 1505 chemistry faculty members from a diverse array of postsecondary institutions and teaching experience responded to a series of questions regarding their familiarity with assessment terminology. Advanced confirmatory factor analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to represent an overall structure of faculty members’ assessment knowledge.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</pub><doi>10.1021/ed300636m</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9584 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical education, 2013-08, Vol.90 (8), p.981-987 |
issn | 0021-9584 1938-1328 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1436252059 |
source | American Chemical Society Publications |
subjects | Academic achievement Chemistry College Faculty Discriminant analysis Educational evaluation Factor Analysis Familiarity Knowledge Level Learning Learning outcomes Modelling National Surveys Organic chemistry Polls & surveys School faculty Structural Equation Models Teacher Surveys Terminology Test Items Vocabulary Skills |
title | Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T14%3A29%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Structural%20Equation%20Modeling%20To%20Understand%20Chemistry%20Faculty%20Familiarity%20of%20Assessment%20Terminology:%20Results%20from%20a%20National%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Raker,%20Jeffrey%20R&rft.date=2013-08-13&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=987&rft.pages=981-987&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft.coden=JCEDA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ed300636m&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3081524671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1436252059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1028695&rfr_iscdi=true |