Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey

Chemistry departments have felt pressure in recent years to produce quality data on student achievement of learning outcomes. External (e.g., accreditation agencies) and internal (e.g., academic deans) entities are demanding regular review of student achievement. It is thus necessary for the chemist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical education 2013-08, Vol.90 (8), p.981-987
Hauptverfasser: Raker, Jeffrey R, Emenike, Mary E, Holme, Thomas A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 987
container_issue 8
container_start_page 981
container_title Journal of chemical education
container_volume 90
creator Raker, Jeffrey R
Emenike, Mary E
Holme, Thomas A
description Chemistry departments have felt pressure in recent years to produce quality data on student achievement of learning outcomes. External (e.g., accreditation agencies) and internal (e.g., academic deans) entities are demanding regular review of student achievement. It is thus necessary for the chemistry community to develop valid and reliable instruments to assess student learning. With chemistry faculty members’ integration into assessment practices, it is important that these faculty members have a sufficient understanding of the quality of and limitations to the interpretation of assessment data. As part of a larger national survey, 1505 chemistry faculty members from a diverse array of postsecondary institutions and teaching experience responded to a series of questions regarding their familiarity with assessment terminology. Advanced confirmatory factor analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to represent an overall structure of faculty members’ assessment knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ed300636m
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1436252059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1028695</ericid><sourcerecordid>3081524671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-31bb7f79adf4df08c365c7522a16ef9c5bd1f1dbaf764f1ae54bfd1689f75b4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsLf4AQEBcuRpPJZB7uSml94ANsux4yk6RGZiY2NyP0H_izTa0UwdW5cD7OuRyETim5oiSm10oyQlKWtntoQAuWR5TF-T4akGBGBc-TQ3QE8E4IjXmRD9DXAky3xDPv-tr3TjR4suqFN7bDT1aqZmPOLV50UjnwopN4_KZaA96t8VTUfeM32prGCGfCbTUeASiAVnUez5VrTWcbu1zf4FcFAQesnW2xwM8_LaFw1rtPtT5GB1o0oE5-dYgW08l8fBc9vtzej0ePkWBJ4iNGqyrTWSGkTqQmec1SXmc8jgVNlS5qXkmqqayEztJEU6F4UmlJ07zQGa8SwYbofJv74eyqV-DLd9u78AeUNGFpzGPCi0BdbqnaWQCndPnhTCvcuqSk3Axd7oYO7NmWVc7UO27yELA8LXjwL7a-qOFP2b-cb8f-iS0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1436252059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey</title><source>American Chemical Society Publications</source><creator>Raker, Jeffrey R ; Emenike, Mary E ; Holme, Thomas A</creator><creatorcontrib>Raker, Jeffrey R ; Emenike, Mary E ; Holme, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><description>Chemistry departments have felt pressure in recent years to produce quality data on student achievement of learning outcomes. External (e.g., accreditation agencies) and internal (e.g., academic deans) entities are demanding regular review of student achievement. It is thus necessary for the chemistry community to develop valid and reliable instruments to assess student learning. With chemistry faculty members’ integration into assessment practices, it is important that these faculty members have a sufficient understanding of the quality of and limitations to the interpretation of assessment data. As part of a larger national survey, 1505 chemistry faculty members from a diverse array of postsecondary institutions and teaching experience responded to a series of questions regarding their familiarity with assessment terminology. Advanced confirmatory factor analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to represent an overall structure of faculty members’ assessment knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ed300636m</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCEDA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Chemistry ; College Faculty ; Discriminant analysis ; Educational evaluation ; Factor Analysis ; Familiarity ; Knowledge Level ; Learning ; Learning outcomes ; Modelling ; National Surveys ; Organic chemistry ; Polls &amp; surveys ; School faculty ; Structural Equation Models ; Teacher Surveys ; Terminology ; Test Items ; Vocabulary Skills</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2013-08, Vol.90 (8), p.981-987</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 13, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-31bb7f79adf4df08c365c7522a16ef9c5bd1f1dbaf764f1ae54bfd1689f75b4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-31bb7f79adf4df08c365c7522a16ef9c5bd1f1dbaf764f1ae54bfd1689f75b4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed300636m$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed300636m$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1028695$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raker, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emenike, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holme, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><title>Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>Chemistry departments have felt pressure in recent years to produce quality data on student achievement of learning outcomes. External (e.g., accreditation agencies) and internal (e.g., academic deans) entities are demanding regular review of student achievement. It is thus necessary for the chemistry community to develop valid and reliable instruments to assess student learning. With chemistry faculty members’ integration into assessment practices, it is important that these faculty members have a sufficient understanding of the quality of and limitations to the interpretation of assessment data. As part of a larger national survey, 1505 chemistry faculty members from a diverse array of postsecondary institutions and teaching experience responded to a series of questions regarding their familiarity with assessment terminology. Advanced confirmatory factor analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to represent an overall structure of faculty members’ assessment knowledge.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>School faculty</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Teacher Surveys</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Test Items</subject><subject>Vocabulary Skills</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsLf4AQEBcuRpPJZB7uSml94ANsux4yk6RGZiY2NyP0H_izTa0UwdW5cD7OuRyETim5oiSm10oyQlKWtntoQAuWR5TF-T4akGBGBc-TQ3QE8E4IjXmRD9DXAky3xDPv-tr3TjR4suqFN7bDT1aqZmPOLV50UjnwopN4_KZaA96t8VTUfeM32prGCGfCbTUeASiAVnUez5VrTWcbu1zf4FcFAQesnW2xwM8_LaFw1rtPtT5GB1o0oE5-dYgW08l8fBc9vtzej0ePkWBJ4iNGqyrTWSGkTqQmec1SXmc8jgVNlS5qXkmqqayEztJEU6F4UmlJ07zQGa8SwYbofJv74eyqV-DLd9u78AeUNGFpzGPCi0BdbqnaWQCndPnhTCvcuqSk3Axd7oYO7NmWVc7UO27yELA8LXjwL7a-qOFP2b-cb8f-iS0</recordid><startdate>20130813</startdate><enddate>20130813</enddate><creator>Raker, Jeffrey R</creator><creator>Emenike, Mary E</creator><creator>Holme, Thomas A</creator><general>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>Division of Chemical Education, Inc and ACS Publications Division of the American Chemical Society</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130813</creationdate><title>Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey</title><author>Raker, Jeffrey R ; Emenike, Mary E ; Holme, Thomas A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-31bb7f79adf4df08c365c7522a16ef9c5bd1f1dbaf764f1ae54bfd1689f75b4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>School faculty</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Teacher Surveys</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Test Items</topic><topic>Vocabulary Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raker, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emenike, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holme, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raker, Jeffrey R</au><au>Emenike, Mary E</au><au>Holme, Thomas A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1028695</ericid><atitle>Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2013-08-13</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>987</epage><pages>981-987</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><coden>JCEDA8</coden><abstract>Chemistry departments have felt pressure in recent years to produce quality data on student achievement of learning outcomes. External (e.g., accreditation agencies) and internal (e.g., academic deans) entities are demanding regular review of student achievement. It is thus necessary for the chemistry community to develop valid and reliable instruments to assess student learning. With chemistry faculty members’ integration into assessment practices, it is important that these faculty members have a sufficient understanding of the quality of and limitations to the interpretation of assessment data. As part of a larger national survey, 1505 chemistry faculty members from a diverse array of postsecondary institutions and teaching experience responded to a series of questions regarding their familiarity with assessment terminology. Advanced confirmatory factor analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to represent an overall structure of faculty members’ assessment knowledge.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</pub><doi>10.1021/ed300636m</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9584
ispartof Journal of chemical education, 2013-08, Vol.90 (8), p.981-987
issn 0021-9584
1938-1328
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1436252059
source American Chemical Society Publications
subjects Academic achievement
Chemistry
College Faculty
Discriminant analysis
Educational evaluation
Factor Analysis
Familiarity
Knowledge Level
Learning
Learning outcomes
Modelling
National Surveys
Organic chemistry
Polls & surveys
School faculty
Structural Equation Models
Teacher Surveys
Terminology
Test Items
Vocabulary Skills
title Using Structural Equation Modeling To Understand Chemistry Faculty Familiarity of Assessment Terminology: Results from a National Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T14%3A29%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Structural%20Equation%20Modeling%20To%20Understand%20Chemistry%20Faculty%20Familiarity%20of%20Assessment%20Terminology:%20Results%20from%20a%20National%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Raker,%20Jeffrey%20R&rft.date=2013-08-13&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=987&rft.pages=981-987&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft.coden=JCEDA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ed300636m&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3081524671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1436252059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1028695&rfr_iscdi=true