Stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages placed in a hydroelectric reservoir

The Brazilian government has been encouraging fish farming in cages in federal water bodies, including hydroelectric reservoirs. Despite the government support, it is a new activity and the production model still needs some adjustment to reduce the production costs and achieve sustainability. The ai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture 2013-10, Vol.410-411, p.51-56
Hauptverfasser: Garcia, Fabiana, Romera, Daiane M., Gozi, Kátia S., Onaka, Eduardo M., Fonseca, Fernando S., Schalch, Sérgio H.C., Candeira, Pedro G., Guerra, Luis O.M., Carmo, Fernando J., Carneiro, Dalton J., Martins, Maria Inez E.G., Portella, Maria Célia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 56
container_issue
container_start_page 51
container_title Aquaculture
container_volume 410-411
creator Garcia, Fabiana
Romera, Daiane M.
Gozi, Kátia S.
Onaka, Eduardo M.
Fonseca, Fernando S.
Schalch, Sérgio H.C.
Candeira, Pedro G.
Guerra, Luis O.M.
Carmo, Fernando J.
Carneiro, Dalton J.
Martins, Maria Inez E.G.
Portella, Maria Célia
description The Brazilian government has been encouraging fish farming in cages in federal water bodies, including hydroelectric reservoirs. Despite the government support, it is a new activity and the production model still needs some adjustment to reduce the production costs and achieve sustainability. The aims of this study were to determine the appropriate stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages in a hydroelectric reservoir and to evaluate to what extent fish size selection could improve their uniformity. Twelve cages (6m3) were placed at the Fish Farmers' Cooperative of Santa Fé do Sul and Region, Ilha Solteira reservoir, São Paulo, Brazil (20°12′10″S, 50°58′31.15″W). In stage I (initial fish weight, 78g), four stocking densities were tested: D1—800, D2—2000, D3—2500 and D4—3000 fish/cage, with three replicates. At the end of this stage (average fish weight, 255g), the fish were selected into three sizes, except for D1. In stage II, four stocking densities were tested, designed to obtain the following final production: D1—100kg/m3 (800 non-selected fish/cage), D2—80kg/m3 (600 fish/cage), D3—100kg/m3 (800 fish/cage) and D4—120kg/m3 (900 fish/cage). The trial ended when the fish weighed 800g. By reducing the initial stocking density from 2500 to 800 tilapia juveniles per cage, there was no need for selection. The growth performance was higher, the feed conversion rate was better and the time taken to reach harvesting was shorter. Consequently, the production cost reduced and the operating profit increased. Using the lowest initial stocking density, the risk of disease outbreak was also lower, and there was no need to use drugs for disease control since the mortality rate and occurrences of disease and deformity decreased and the dissolved oxygen level inside the cages was higher. •Four stocking densities of Nile tilapia in cages were tested.•At the lowest density, the performance was higher and fish were uniform.•At the highest densities, the prevalence of disease was higher.•At the lowest density, the production cost was reduced.•The lowest density is recommended to Nile tilapia in cages.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.06.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1434154800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0044848613002846</els_id><sourcerecordid>3077408731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-769a937f9db0b1cc893800a7017e0f037928b1abc6e1bc3832c1c46c94de179f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMGO0zAQhi0EEmXhGTBCHBNmYtdOjqhiAWmBw7Jny5lMikuIu3ayUt8eV10hjpxGI33z_6NPiDcINQKa94fa36-e1mlZE9cNoKrB1IDwRGywtaramqZ5KjYAWletbs1z8SLnAwAYs8WN-Hq7RPoV5r0ceM5hOck4ym9hYrmEyR-Dl2GW5Pec5XHyxMN59_LnaUiRJ6YlBZKJM6eHGNJL8Wz0U-ZXj_NK3F1__LH7XN18__Rl9-GmIg1qqazpfKfs2A099EjUdqoF8BbQMoygbNe0PfqeDGNPqlUNIWlDnR4YbTeqK_H2kntM8X7lvLhDXNNcKh1qpXGrS16hugtFKeaceHTHFH77dHII7mzPHdw_9tzZngPjir1y--6xwWfy05j8TCH_DWhsi6Y8VrjXF2700fl9KszdbQnSANgoa7tC7C4EFyEPgZPLFHguKkMq_twQw3_88werO5Rj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1434154800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages placed in a hydroelectric reservoir</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Garcia, Fabiana ; Romera, Daiane M. ; Gozi, Kátia S. ; Onaka, Eduardo M. ; Fonseca, Fernando S. ; Schalch, Sérgio H.C. ; Candeira, Pedro G. ; Guerra, Luis O.M. ; Carmo, Fernando J. ; Carneiro, Dalton J. ; Martins, Maria Inez E.G. ; Portella, Maria Célia</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Fabiana ; Romera, Daiane M. ; Gozi, Kátia S. ; Onaka, Eduardo M. ; Fonseca, Fernando S. ; Schalch, Sérgio H.C. ; Candeira, Pedro G. ; Guerra, Luis O.M. ; Carmo, Fernando J. ; Carneiro, Dalton J. ; Martins, Maria Inez E.G. ; Portella, Maria Célia</creatorcontrib><description>The Brazilian government has been encouraging fish farming in cages in federal water bodies, including hydroelectric reservoirs. Despite the government support, it is a new activity and the production model still needs some adjustment to reduce the production costs and achieve sustainability. The aims of this study were to determine the appropriate stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages in a hydroelectric reservoir and to evaluate to what extent fish size selection could improve their uniformity. Twelve cages (6m3) were placed at the Fish Farmers' Cooperative of Santa Fé do Sul and Region, Ilha Solteira reservoir, São Paulo, Brazil (20°12′10″S, 50°58′31.15″W). In stage I (initial fish weight, 78g), four stocking densities were tested: D1—800, D2—2000, D3—2500 and D4—3000 fish/cage, with three replicates. At the end of this stage (average fish weight, 255g), the fish were selected into three sizes, except for D1. In stage II, four stocking densities were tested, designed to obtain the following final production: D1—100kg/m3 (800 non-selected fish/cage), D2—80kg/m3 (600 fish/cage), D3—100kg/m3 (800 fish/cage) and D4—120kg/m3 (900 fish/cage). The trial ended when the fish weighed 800g. By reducing the initial stocking density from 2500 to 800 tilapia juveniles per cage, there was no need for selection. The growth performance was higher, the feed conversion rate was better and the time taken to reach harvesting was shorter. Consequently, the production cost reduced and the operating profit increased. Using the lowest initial stocking density, the risk of disease outbreak was also lower, and there was no need to use drugs for disease control since the mortality rate and occurrences of disease and deformity decreased and the dissolved oxygen level inside the cages was higher. •Four stocking densities of Nile tilapia in cages were tested.•At the lowest density, the performance was higher and fish were uniform.•At the highest densities, the prevalence of disease was higher.•At the lowest density, the production cost was reduced.•The lowest density is recommended to Nile tilapia in cages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-8486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5622</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.06.010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AQCLAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal aquaculture ; Animal productions ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aquaculture ; Biological and medical sciences ; cages ; disease control ; disease occurrence ; disease outbreaks ; dissolved oxygen ; drugs ; farmers ; feed conversion ; fish ; fish culture ; Fish stocking ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; growth performance ; harvesting ; juveniles ; mortality ; Oreochromis niloticus ; Pathology ; Production cost ; production costs ; Reservoirs ; risk ; stocking rate ; surface water ; Synecology ; Tilapia ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture, 2013-10, Vol.410-411, p.51-56</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Oct 10, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-769a937f9db0b1cc893800a7017e0f037928b1abc6e1bc3832c1c46c94de179f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-769a937f9db0b1cc893800a7017e0f037928b1abc6e1bc3832c1c46c94de179f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848613002846$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27816383$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Fabiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romera, Daiane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gozi, Kátia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onaka, Eduardo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Fernando S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schalch, Sérgio H.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Candeira, Pedro G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Luis O.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmo, Fernando J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Dalton J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Maria Inez E.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portella, Maria Célia</creatorcontrib><title>Stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages placed in a hydroelectric reservoir</title><title>Aquaculture</title><description>The Brazilian government has been encouraging fish farming in cages in federal water bodies, including hydroelectric reservoirs. Despite the government support, it is a new activity and the production model still needs some adjustment to reduce the production costs and achieve sustainability. The aims of this study were to determine the appropriate stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages in a hydroelectric reservoir and to evaluate to what extent fish size selection could improve their uniformity. Twelve cages (6m3) were placed at the Fish Farmers' Cooperative of Santa Fé do Sul and Region, Ilha Solteira reservoir, São Paulo, Brazil (20°12′10″S, 50°58′31.15″W). In stage I (initial fish weight, 78g), four stocking densities were tested: D1—800, D2—2000, D3—2500 and D4—3000 fish/cage, with three replicates. At the end of this stage (average fish weight, 255g), the fish were selected into three sizes, except for D1. In stage II, four stocking densities were tested, designed to obtain the following final production: D1—100kg/m3 (800 non-selected fish/cage), D2—80kg/m3 (600 fish/cage), D3—100kg/m3 (800 fish/cage) and D4—120kg/m3 (900 fish/cage). The trial ended when the fish weighed 800g. By reducing the initial stocking density from 2500 to 800 tilapia juveniles per cage, there was no need for selection. The growth performance was higher, the feed conversion rate was better and the time taken to reach harvesting was shorter. Consequently, the production cost reduced and the operating profit increased. Using the lowest initial stocking density, the risk of disease outbreak was also lower, and there was no need to use drugs for disease control since the mortality rate and occurrences of disease and deformity decreased and the dissolved oxygen level inside the cages was higher. •Four stocking densities of Nile tilapia in cages were tested.•At the lowest density, the performance was higher and fish were uniform.•At the highest densities, the prevalence of disease was higher.•At the lowest density, the production cost was reduced.•The lowest density is recommended to Nile tilapia in cages.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal aquaculture</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cages</subject><subject>disease control</subject><subject>disease occurrence</subject><subject>disease outbreaks</subject><subject>dissolved oxygen</subject><subject>drugs</subject><subject>farmers</subject><subject>feed conversion</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>fish culture</subject><subject>Fish stocking</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>growth performance</subject><subject>harvesting</subject><subject>juveniles</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>Oreochromis niloticus</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Production cost</subject><subject>production costs</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>stocking rate</subject><subject>surface water</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Tilapia</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>0044-8486</issn><issn>1873-5622</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMGO0zAQhi0EEmXhGTBCHBNmYtdOjqhiAWmBw7Jny5lMikuIu3ayUt8eV10hjpxGI33z_6NPiDcINQKa94fa36-e1mlZE9cNoKrB1IDwRGywtaramqZ5KjYAWletbs1z8SLnAwAYs8WN-Hq7RPoV5r0ceM5hOck4ym9hYrmEyR-Dl2GW5Pec5XHyxMN59_LnaUiRJ6YlBZKJM6eHGNJL8Wz0U-ZXj_NK3F1__LH7XN18__Rl9-GmIg1qqazpfKfs2A099EjUdqoF8BbQMoygbNe0PfqeDGNPqlUNIWlDnR4YbTeqK_H2kntM8X7lvLhDXNNcKh1qpXGrS16hugtFKeaceHTHFH77dHII7mzPHdw_9tzZngPjir1y--6xwWfy05j8TCH_DWhsi6Y8VrjXF2700fl9KszdbQnSANgoa7tC7C4EFyEPgZPLFHguKkMq_twQw3_88werO5Rj</recordid><startdate>20131010</startdate><enddate>20131010</enddate><creator>Garcia, Fabiana</creator><creator>Romera, Daiane M.</creator><creator>Gozi, Kátia S.</creator><creator>Onaka, Eduardo M.</creator><creator>Fonseca, Fernando S.</creator><creator>Schalch, Sérgio H.C.</creator><creator>Candeira, Pedro G.</creator><creator>Guerra, Luis O.M.</creator><creator>Carmo, Fernando J.</creator><creator>Carneiro, Dalton J.</creator><creator>Martins, Maria Inez E.G.</creator><creator>Portella, Maria Célia</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131010</creationdate><title>Stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages placed in a hydroelectric reservoir</title><author>Garcia, Fabiana ; Romera, Daiane M. ; Gozi, Kátia S. ; Onaka, Eduardo M. ; Fonseca, Fernando S. ; Schalch, Sérgio H.C. ; Candeira, Pedro G. ; Guerra, Luis O.M. ; Carmo, Fernando J. ; Carneiro, Dalton J. ; Martins, Maria Inez E.G. ; Portella, Maria Célia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-769a937f9db0b1cc893800a7017e0f037928b1abc6e1bc3832c1c46c94de179f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal aquaculture</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cages</topic><topic>disease control</topic><topic>disease occurrence</topic><topic>disease outbreaks</topic><topic>dissolved oxygen</topic><topic>drugs</topic><topic>farmers</topic><topic>feed conversion</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>fish culture</topic><topic>Fish stocking</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>growth performance</topic><topic>harvesting</topic><topic>juveniles</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>Oreochromis niloticus</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Production cost</topic><topic>production costs</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>stocking rate</topic><topic>surface water</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Tilapia</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Fabiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romera, Daiane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gozi, Kátia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onaka, Eduardo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Fernando S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schalch, Sérgio H.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Candeira, Pedro G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Luis O.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmo, Fernando J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Dalton J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Maria Inez E.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portella, Maria Célia</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia, Fabiana</au><au>Romera, Daiane M.</au><au>Gozi, Kátia S.</au><au>Onaka, Eduardo M.</au><au>Fonseca, Fernando S.</au><au>Schalch, Sérgio H.C.</au><au>Candeira, Pedro G.</au><au>Guerra, Luis O.M.</au><au>Carmo, Fernando J.</au><au>Carneiro, Dalton J.</au><au>Martins, Maria Inez E.G.</au><au>Portella, Maria Célia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages placed in a hydroelectric reservoir</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle><date>2013-10-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>410-411</volume><spage>51</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>51-56</pages><issn>0044-8486</issn><eissn>1873-5622</eissn><coden>AQCLAL</coden><abstract>The Brazilian government has been encouraging fish farming in cages in federal water bodies, including hydroelectric reservoirs. Despite the government support, it is a new activity and the production model still needs some adjustment to reduce the production costs and achieve sustainability. The aims of this study were to determine the appropriate stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages in a hydroelectric reservoir and to evaluate to what extent fish size selection could improve their uniformity. Twelve cages (6m3) were placed at the Fish Farmers' Cooperative of Santa Fé do Sul and Region, Ilha Solteira reservoir, São Paulo, Brazil (20°12′10″S, 50°58′31.15″W). In stage I (initial fish weight, 78g), four stocking densities were tested: D1—800, D2—2000, D3—2500 and D4—3000 fish/cage, with three replicates. At the end of this stage (average fish weight, 255g), the fish were selected into three sizes, except for D1. In stage II, four stocking densities were tested, designed to obtain the following final production: D1—100kg/m3 (800 non-selected fish/cage), D2—80kg/m3 (600 fish/cage), D3—100kg/m3 (800 fish/cage) and D4—120kg/m3 (900 fish/cage). The trial ended when the fish weighed 800g. By reducing the initial stocking density from 2500 to 800 tilapia juveniles per cage, there was no need for selection. The growth performance was higher, the feed conversion rate was better and the time taken to reach harvesting was shorter. Consequently, the production cost reduced and the operating profit increased. Using the lowest initial stocking density, the risk of disease outbreak was also lower, and there was no need to use drugs for disease control since the mortality rate and occurrences of disease and deformity decreased and the dissolved oxygen level inside the cages was higher. •Four stocking densities of Nile tilapia in cages were tested.•At the lowest density, the performance was higher and fish were uniform.•At the highest densities, the prevalence of disease was higher.•At the lowest density, the production cost was reduced.•The lowest density is recommended to Nile tilapia in cages.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.06.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0044-8486
ispartof Aquaculture, 2013-10, Vol.410-411, p.51-56
issn 0044-8486
1873-5622
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1434154800
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal aquaculture
Animal productions
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Aquaculture
Biological and medical sciences
cages
disease control
disease occurrence
disease outbreaks
dissolved oxygen
drugs
farmers
feed conversion
fish
fish culture
Fish stocking
Fresh water ecosystems
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
growth performance
harvesting
juveniles
mortality
Oreochromis niloticus
Pathology
Production cost
production costs
Reservoirs
risk
stocking rate
surface water
Synecology
Tilapia
Water quality
title Stocking density of Nile tilapia in cages placed in a hydroelectric reservoir
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A31%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stocking%20density%20of%20Nile%20tilapia%20in%20cages%20placed%20in%20a%20hydroelectric%20reservoir&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture&rft.au=Garcia,%20Fabiana&rft.date=2013-10-10&rft.volume=410-411&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=51-56&rft.issn=0044-8486&rft.eissn=1873-5622&rft.coden=AQCLAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.06.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3077408731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1434154800&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0044848613002846&rfr_iscdi=true