Erratum to: Cross-Sectional Area of the Anterior Belly of the Digastric Muscle: Comparison of MRI and Ultrasound Measures

Changes in morphometry of head and neck muscles have received little attention in research relative to limb muscles. While recent literature suggests that high-frequency ultrasound transducers can provide superior spatial resolution compared to that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), no studies ha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dysphagia 2013-09, Vol.28 (3), p.381-381
Hauptverfasser: Macrae, Phoebe R., Jones, Richard D., Myall, Daniel J., Melzer, Tracy R., Huckabee, Maggie-Lee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 381
container_issue 3
container_start_page 381
container_title Dysphagia
container_volume 28
creator Macrae, Phoebe R.
Jones, Richard D.
Myall, Daniel J.
Melzer, Tracy R.
Huckabee, Maggie-Lee
description Changes in morphometry of head and neck muscles have received little attention in research relative to limb muscles. While recent literature suggests that high-frequency ultrasound transducers can provide superior spatial resolution compared to that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), no studies have compared these imaging methods for investigating the submental muscle group. This preliminary study sought to compare ultrasound and MRI as a method of quantifying the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the submental muscle group. Measurements were taken from coronal ultrasound and MRI images in 11 healthy participants. Comparisons were limited to the anterior belly of the digastric muscle because of differences in imaging resolution. Ultrasound CSA measurements were smaller than MRI measurements (p = 0.01) by 10 % (95% CI = -18 to -2). Correlations were significant and relatively high (left: r = 0.909, p < 0.001; right: r = 0.776, p = 0.005). Ultrasound imaging has the advantages of natural participant positioning, superior clarity of muscle borders of the submental muscles, requires less acquisition time, and is a less expensive method of imaging compared to MRI. This preliminary study has shown that ultrasound is a viable imaging modality for quantitative measurements of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle and has advantages over MRI beyond cost and accessibility.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00455-013-9477-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1434120197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A712959702</galeid><sourcerecordid>A712959702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3636-56b51aee2b7cc85bdae374089738478f1185e3e252c0711f2cfd4cc9ae373d1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFr3DAQhUVpoNukPyA3Qc9KR5Jl2b1tt0kTyBJIGshNaOXxVsG2tpJ92H8fmU1DAg06SAzfe4zeI-SUwxkH0N8SQKEUAy5ZXWjNyg9kwQspGBQlfCQL4LpmoPjDJ_I5pUcALupSLsj-PEY7Tj0dw3e6iiEldodu9GGwHV1GtDS0dPyDdDmMGH2I9Ad23f7f9Kff2jRG7-h6Sq7D7BH6nY0-hWFm1rdX1A4Nve_GaFOY8nONNk0R0wk5am2X8MvzfUzuL85_ry7Z9c2vq9XymjlZypKpcqO4RRQb7VylNo1FqQuoai2rQlct55VCiUIJB5rzVri2KZyrZ0w2fCOPydeD7y6GvxOm0TyGKebvJZMDKrgAnr1eqK3t0PihDXlh1_vkzFLnrFStQWTq7D9UPg323oUBW5_nbwT8IHBztBFbs4u-t3FvOJi5OHMozuTizFycKbNGHDQps8MW46uF3xU9AfnmmWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1434120197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Erratum to: Cross-Sectional Area of the Anterior Belly of the Digastric Muscle: Comparison of MRI and Ultrasound Measures</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Macrae, Phoebe R. ; Jones, Richard D. ; Myall, Daniel J. ; Melzer, Tracy R. ; Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creator><creatorcontrib>Macrae, Phoebe R. ; Jones, Richard D. ; Myall, Daniel J. ; Melzer, Tracy R. ; Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creatorcontrib><description>Changes in morphometry of head and neck muscles have received little attention in research relative to limb muscles. While recent literature suggests that high-frequency ultrasound transducers can provide superior spatial resolution compared to that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), no studies have compared these imaging methods for investigating the submental muscle group. This preliminary study sought to compare ultrasound and MRI as a method of quantifying the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the submental muscle group. Measurements were taken from coronal ultrasound and MRI images in 11 healthy participants. Comparisons were limited to the anterior belly of the digastric muscle because of differences in imaging resolution. Ultrasound CSA measurements were smaller than MRI measurements (p = 0.01) by 10 % (95% CI = -18 to -2). Correlations were significant and relatively high (left: r = 0.909, p &lt; 0.001; right: r = 0.776, p = 0.005). Ultrasound imaging has the advantages of natural participant positioning, superior clarity of muscle borders of the submental muscles, requires less acquisition time, and is a less expensive method of imaging compared to MRI. This preliminary study has shown that ultrasound is a viable imaging modality for quantitative measurements of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle and has advantages over MRI beyond cost and accessibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-051X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00455-013-9477-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Erratum ; Gastroenterology ; Hepatology ; Imaging ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Radiology</subject><ispartof>Dysphagia, 2013-09, Vol.28 (3), p.381-381</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00455-013-9477-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00455-013-9477-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929,41492,42561,51323</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macrae, Phoebe R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myall, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melzer, Tracy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creatorcontrib><title>Erratum to: Cross-Sectional Area of the Anterior Belly of the Digastric Muscle: Comparison of MRI and Ultrasound Measures</title><title>Dysphagia</title><addtitle>Dysphagia</addtitle><description>Changes in morphometry of head and neck muscles have received little attention in research relative to limb muscles. While recent literature suggests that high-frequency ultrasound transducers can provide superior spatial resolution compared to that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), no studies have compared these imaging methods for investigating the submental muscle group. This preliminary study sought to compare ultrasound and MRI as a method of quantifying the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the submental muscle group. Measurements were taken from coronal ultrasound and MRI images in 11 healthy participants. Comparisons were limited to the anterior belly of the digastric muscle because of differences in imaging resolution. Ultrasound CSA measurements were smaller than MRI measurements (p = 0.01) by 10 % (95% CI = -18 to -2). Correlations were significant and relatively high (left: r = 0.909, p &lt; 0.001; right: r = 0.776, p = 0.005). Ultrasound imaging has the advantages of natural participant positioning, superior clarity of muscle borders of the submental muscles, requires less acquisition time, and is a less expensive method of imaging compared to MRI. This preliminary study has shown that ultrasound is a viable imaging modality for quantitative measurements of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle and has advantages over MRI beyond cost and accessibility.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Erratum</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>0179-051X</issn><issn>1432-0460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFr3DAQhUVpoNukPyA3Qc9KR5Jl2b1tt0kTyBJIGshNaOXxVsG2tpJ92H8fmU1DAg06SAzfe4zeI-SUwxkH0N8SQKEUAy5ZXWjNyg9kwQspGBQlfCQL4LpmoPjDJ_I5pUcALupSLsj-PEY7Tj0dw3e6iiEldodu9GGwHV1GtDS0dPyDdDmMGH2I9Ad23f7f9Kff2jRG7-h6Sq7D7BH6nY0-hWFm1rdX1A4Nve_GaFOY8nONNk0R0wk5am2X8MvzfUzuL85_ry7Z9c2vq9XymjlZypKpcqO4RRQb7VylNo1FqQuoai2rQlct55VCiUIJB5rzVri2KZyrZ0w2fCOPydeD7y6GvxOm0TyGKebvJZMDKrgAnr1eqK3t0PihDXlh1_vkzFLnrFStQWTq7D9UPg323oUBW5_nbwT8IHBztBFbs4u-t3FvOJi5OHMozuTizFycKbNGHDQps8MW46uF3xU9AfnmmWk</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Macrae, Phoebe R.</creator><creator>Jones, Richard D.</creator><creator>Myall, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Melzer, Tracy R.</creator><creator>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Erratum to: Cross-Sectional Area of the Anterior Belly of the Digastric Muscle: Comparison of MRI and Ultrasound Measures</title><author>Macrae, Phoebe R. ; Jones, Richard D. ; Myall, Daniel J. ; Melzer, Tracy R. ; Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3636-56b51aee2b7cc85bdae374089738478f1185e3e252c0711f2cfd4cc9ae373d1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Erratum</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macrae, Phoebe R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myall, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melzer, Tracy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Dysphagia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macrae, Phoebe R.</au><au>Jones, Richard D.</au><au>Myall, Daniel J.</au><au>Melzer, Tracy R.</au><au>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Erratum to: Cross-Sectional Area of the Anterior Belly of the Digastric Muscle: Comparison of MRI and Ultrasound Measures</atitle><jtitle>Dysphagia</jtitle><stitle>Dysphagia</stitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>381-381</pages><issn>0179-051X</issn><eissn>1432-0460</eissn><abstract>Changes in morphometry of head and neck muscles have received little attention in research relative to limb muscles. While recent literature suggests that high-frequency ultrasound transducers can provide superior spatial resolution compared to that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), no studies have compared these imaging methods for investigating the submental muscle group. This preliminary study sought to compare ultrasound and MRI as a method of quantifying the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the submental muscle group. Measurements were taken from coronal ultrasound and MRI images in 11 healthy participants. Comparisons were limited to the anterior belly of the digastric muscle because of differences in imaging resolution. Ultrasound CSA measurements were smaller than MRI measurements (p = 0.01) by 10 % (95% CI = -18 to -2). Correlations were significant and relatively high (left: r = 0.909, p &lt; 0.001; right: r = 0.776, p = 0.005). Ultrasound imaging has the advantages of natural participant positioning, superior clarity of muscle borders of the submental muscles, requires less acquisition time, and is a less expensive method of imaging compared to MRI. This preliminary study has shown that ultrasound is a viable imaging modality for quantitative measurements of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle and has advantages over MRI beyond cost and accessibility.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s00455-013-9477-6</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0179-051X
ispartof Dysphagia, 2013-09, Vol.28 (3), p.381-381
issn 0179-051X
1432-0460
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1434120197
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Comparative analysis
Erratum
Gastroenterology
Hepatology
Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Otorhinolaryngology
Radiology
title Erratum to: Cross-Sectional Area of the Anterior Belly of the Digastric Muscle: Comparison of MRI and Ultrasound Measures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T03%3A17%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Erratum%20to:%20Cross-Sectional%20Area%20of%20the%20Anterior%20Belly%20of%20the%20Digastric%20Muscle:%20Comparison%20of%20MRI%20and%20Ultrasound%20Measures&rft.jtitle=Dysphagia&rft.au=Macrae,%20Phoebe%20R.&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=381-381&rft.issn=0179-051X&rft.eissn=1432-0460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00455-013-9477-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA712959702%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1434120197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A712959702&rfr_iscdi=true