Who opposes rights for persons with physical and intellectual disabilities?

Who opposes rights for persons with physical and intellectual disabilities?

Research on human and civil rights has only rarely addressed people's attitudes toward disability rights in the context of American society. This study was designed to gain a better understanding of why certain individuals might oppose expanded rights for people who have disabilities. Pearson&#...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied social psychology 2013-06, Vol.43 (S2), p.E307-E318
Hauptverfasser: Crowson, H. Michael, Brandes, Joyce A., Hurst, Rebecca J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Studies
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E318
container_issue S2
container_start_page E307
container_title Journal of applied social psychology
container_volume 43
creator Crowson, H. Michael
Brandes, Joyce A.
Hurst, Rebecca J.
description Research on human and civil rights has only rarely addressed people's attitudes toward disability rights in the context of American society. This study was designed to gain a better understanding of why certain individuals might oppose expanded rights for people who have disabilities. Pearson's correlations revealed that individuals high on social dominance orientation (SDO) and right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA) were more likely to reject rights for persons with intellectual and physical disabilities than individuals scoring lower on these factors. Structural equation analyses indicated that both SDO and RWA are directly implicated in opposition to expanded rights for these groups. Moreover, the effects of SDO on rights attitudes appear to be mediated through internal motivation to respond without prejudice.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jasp.12046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1433108442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3073923631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3396-2866a9990c6e8cd259962aa885c97462be777165a3c06ec0437834048ede95d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf8GCN2Frvjc5SSm2VesXVXoMaTZ1U9dmTbbU_nu3rnp0LsMMzzsDDwCnCPZQUxdLHasewpDyPdBBjMkUCcT3QQdCjFIJsTwERzEum1EyKDrgdlb4xFeVjzYmwb0WdUwWPiSVDdGvYrJxdZFUxTY6o8tEr_LErWpbltbU62aRu6jnrnS1s_HyGBwsdBntyU_vgpfh1fNgnE4eRteD_iQ1hEieYsG5llJCw60wOWZScqy1EMzIjHI8t1mWIc40MZBbAynJBKGQCptbyXJCuuCsvVsF_7G2sVZLvw6r5qVClBAEBaW4oc5bygQfY7ALVQX3rsNWIah2stROlvqW1cCohTeutNt_SHXTnz7-ZtI242JtP_8yOrwpnpGMqdn9SN09DcZDMkWKkS9G8XqZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433108442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who opposes rights for persons with physical and intellectual disabilities?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Crowson, H. Michael ; Brandes, Joyce A. ; Hurst, Rebecca J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crowson, H. Michael ; Brandes, Joyce A. ; Hurst, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><description>Research on human and civil rights has only rarely addressed people's attitudes toward disability rights in the context of American society. This study was designed to gain a better understanding of why certain individuals might oppose expanded rights for people who have disabilities. Pearson's correlations revealed that individuals high on social dominance orientation (SDO) and right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA) were more likely to reject rights for persons with intellectual and physical disabilities than individuals scoring lower on these factors. Structural equation analyses indicated that both SDO and RWA are directly implicated in opposition to expanded rights for these groups. Moreover, the effects of SDO on rights attitudes appear to be mediated through internal motivation to respond without prejudice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-1816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12046</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASPBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied social psychology, 2013-06, Vol.43 (S2), p.E307-E318</ispartof><rights>2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3396-2866a9990c6e8cd259962aa885c97462be777165a3c06ec0437834048ede95d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3396-2866a9990c6e8cd259962aa885c97462be777165a3c06ec0437834048ede95d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjasp.12046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjasp.12046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crowson, H. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandes, Joyce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><title>Who opposes rights for persons with physical and intellectual disabilities?</title><title>Journal of applied social psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>Research on human and civil rights has only rarely addressed people's attitudes toward disability rights in the context of American society. This study was designed to gain a better understanding of why certain individuals might oppose expanded rights for people who have disabilities. Pearson's correlations revealed that individuals high on social dominance orientation (SDO) and right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA) were more likely to reject rights for persons with intellectual and physical disabilities than individuals scoring lower on these factors. Structural equation analyses indicated that both SDO and RWA are directly implicated in opposition to expanded rights for these groups. Moreover, the effects of SDO on rights attitudes appear to be mediated through internal motivation to respond without prejudice.</description><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-9029</issn><issn>1559-1816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf8GCN2Frvjc5SSm2VesXVXoMaTZ1U9dmTbbU_nu3rnp0LsMMzzsDDwCnCPZQUxdLHasewpDyPdBBjMkUCcT3QQdCjFIJsTwERzEum1EyKDrgdlb4xFeVjzYmwb0WdUwWPiSVDdGvYrJxdZFUxTY6o8tEr_LErWpbltbU62aRu6jnrnS1s_HyGBwsdBntyU_vgpfh1fNgnE4eRteD_iQ1hEieYsG5llJCw60wOWZScqy1EMzIjHI8t1mWIc40MZBbAynJBKGQCptbyXJCuuCsvVsF_7G2sVZLvw6r5qVClBAEBaW4oc5bygQfY7ALVQX3rsNWIah2stROlvqW1cCohTeutNt_SHXTnz7-ZtI242JtP_8yOrwpnpGMqdn9SN09DcZDMkWKkS9G8XqZ</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Crowson, H. Michael</creator><creator>Brandes, Joyce A.</creator><creator>Hurst, Rebecca J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Who opposes rights for persons with physical and intellectual disabilities?</title><author>Crowson, H. Michael ; Brandes, Joyce A. ; Hurst, Rebecca J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3396-2866a9990c6e8cd259962aa885c97462be777165a3c06ec0437834048ede95d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crowson, H. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandes, Joyce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crowson, H. Michael</au><au>Brandes, Joyce A.</au><au>Hurst, Rebecca J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who opposes rights for persons with physical and intellectual disabilities?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>E307</spage><epage>E318</epage><pages>E307-E318</pages><issn>0021-9029</issn><eissn>1559-1816</eissn><coden>JASPBX</coden><abstract>Research on human and civil rights has only rarely addressed people's attitudes toward disability rights in the context of American society. This study was designed to gain a better understanding of why certain individuals might oppose expanded rights for people who have disabilities. Pearson's correlations revealed that individuals high on social dominance orientation (SDO) and right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA) were more likely to reject rights for persons with intellectual and physical disabilities than individuals scoring lower on these factors. Structural equation analyses indicated that both SDO and RWA are directly implicated in opposition to expanded rights for these groups. Moreover, the effects of SDO on rights attitudes appear to be mediated through internal motivation to respond without prejudice.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jasp.12046</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9029
ispartof Journal of applied social psychology, 2013-06, Vol.43 (S2), p.E307-E318
issn 0021-9029
1559-1816
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1433108442
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Studies
title Who opposes rights for persons with physical and intellectual disabilities?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A38%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20opposes%20rights%20for%20persons%20with%20physical%20and%20intellectual%20disabilities?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Crowson,%20H.%20Michael&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=E307&rft.epage=E318&rft.pages=E307-E318&rft.issn=0021-9029&rft.eissn=1559-1816&rft.coden=JASPBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jasp.12046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3073923631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433108442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true