Recent Work on the Concept of Gratitude in Philosophy and Psychology

This paper constitutes a critical review of the recent philosophical and psychological literatures on the concept of gratitude, literatures which have proliferated in recent years. Indeed, it seems everybody nowadays wants to enthuse about gratitude. In theological circles that is no novelty; ever s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of value inquiry 2013-09, Vol.47 (3), p.285-317
Hauptverfasser: Gulliford, Liz, Morgan, Blaire, Kristjánsson, Kristján
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 317
container_issue 3
container_start_page 285
container_title The Journal of value inquiry
container_volume 47
creator Gulliford, Liz
Morgan, Blaire
Kristjánsson, Kristján
description This paper constitutes a critical review of the recent philosophical and psychological literatures on the concept of gratitude, literatures which have proliferated in recent years. Indeed, it seems everybody nowadays wants to enthuse about gratitude. In theological circles that is no novelty; ever since St Paul's exhortation in Thessalonians 5:18, In every thing give thanks, for this is the will of God, most scholars working within the Christian tradition have accorded gratitude a high value. More surprisingly, however, academics reared in the secular disciplines of psychology and philosophy have recently jumped on the pro-gratitude bandwagon. Gone are the days when gratitude was deemed the emotion most neglected by psychologists and when philosophers could rightly observe that contemporary philosophy has had comparatively little to say about gratitude. Suddenly, eliciting the conceptual contours of gratitude has become a popular endeavor in philosophy, and psychologists have eagerly started to tease out the relationship between gratitude and a number of positive personal and social variables. Many of those psychologists hail from the newly established positive-psychology camp which has shifted attention within social science to a number of understudied topics alongside gratitude, such as forgiveness, hope, and optimism, and even those hot-to-handle-for-empirical-scientists concepts of moral character and virtue, previously banished from the discipline.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10790-013-9387-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1433063210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3073622871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b24f00ae40f0122ad81972d439a6d66a3e644fe84cef8fd76a025c84718ebe313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EEqXwAGyWmA3XP7GdERUoSEhUCMRouYndpJQ42O6QtydVGFiY7nLOd6WD0CWFawqgbhIFVQIByknJtSL6CM1ooTgBUbJjNANgjBRc8lN0ltIWRqegaobuXl3luow_QvzEocO5cXgRusr1GQePl9HmNu9rh9sOr5p2F1LomwHbrsarNFRN2IXNcI5OvN0ld_F75-j94f5t8UieX5ZPi9tnUnEqM1kz4QGsE-CBMmZrTUvFasFLK2spLXdSCO-0qJzXvlbSAisqLRTVbu045XN0Ne32MXzvXcpmG_axG18aKjgHyRmFkaITVcWQUnTe9LH9snEwFMwhlplimTGWOcQyenTY5KSR7TYu_ln-V_oBEH1rYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433063210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recent Work on the Concept of Gratitude in Philosophy and Psychology</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gulliford, Liz ; Morgan, Blaire ; Kristjánsson, Kristján</creator><creatorcontrib>Gulliford, Liz ; Morgan, Blaire ; Kristjánsson, Kristján</creatorcontrib><description>This paper constitutes a critical review of the recent philosophical and psychological literatures on the concept of gratitude, literatures which have proliferated in recent years. Indeed, it seems everybody nowadays wants to enthuse about gratitude. In theological circles that is no novelty; ever since St Paul's exhortation in Thessalonians 5:18, In every thing give thanks, for this is the will of God, most scholars working within the Christian tradition have accorded gratitude a high value. More surprisingly, however, academics reared in the secular disciplines of psychology and philosophy have recently jumped on the pro-gratitude bandwagon. Gone are the days when gratitude was deemed the emotion most neglected by psychologists and when philosophers could rightly observe that contemporary philosophy has had comparatively little to say about gratitude. Suddenly, eliciting the conceptual contours of gratitude has become a popular endeavor in philosophy, and psychologists have eagerly started to tease out the relationship between gratitude and a number of positive personal and social variables. Many of those psychologists hail from the newly established positive-psychology camp which has shifted attention within social science to a number of understudied topics alongside gratitude, such as forgiveness, hope, and optimism, and even those hot-to-handle-for-empirical-scientists concepts of moral character and virtue, previously banished from the discipline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5363</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10790-013-9387-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Conceptual analysis ; Education ; Emotions ; Ethics ; International Political Economy ; Ontology ; Philosophers ; Philosophy ; Psychologists ; Psychology ; Public International Law ; Social psychology ; Social sciences ; Studies ; Theology ; Values</subject><ispartof>The Journal of value inquiry, 2013-09, Vol.47 (3), p.285-317</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b24f00ae40f0122ad81972d439a6d66a3e644fe84cef8fd76a025c84718ebe313</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10790-013-9387-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10790-013-9387-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gulliford, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Blaire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristjánsson, Kristján</creatorcontrib><title>Recent Work on the Concept of Gratitude in Philosophy and Psychology</title><title>The Journal of value inquiry</title><addtitle>J Value Inquiry</addtitle><description>This paper constitutes a critical review of the recent philosophical and psychological literatures on the concept of gratitude, literatures which have proliferated in recent years. Indeed, it seems everybody nowadays wants to enthuse about gratitude. In theological circles that is no novelty; ever since St Paul's exhortation in Thessalonians 5:18, In every thing give thanks, for this is the will of God, most scholars working within the Christian tradition have accorded gratitude a high value. More surprisingly, however, academics reared in the secular disciplines of psychology and philosophy have recently jumped on the pro-gratitude bandwagon. Gone are the days when gratitude was deemed the emotion most neglected by psychologists and when philosophers could rightly observe that contemporary philosophy has had comparatively little to say about gratitude. Suddenly, eliciting the conceptual contours of gratitude has become a popular endeavor in philosophy, and psychologists have eagerly started to tease out the relationship between gratitude and a number of positive personal and social variables. Many of those psychologists hail from the newly established positive-psychology camp which has shifted attention within social science to a number of understudied topics alongside gratitude, such as forgiveness, hope, and optimism, and even those hot-to-handle-for-empirical-scientists concepts of moral character and virtue, previously banished from the discipline.</description><subject>Conceptual analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>International Political Economy</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public International Law</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0022-5363</issn><issn>1573-0492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EEqXwAGyWmA3XP7GdERUoSEhUCMRouYndpJQ42O6QtydVGFiY7nLOd6WD0CWFawqgbhIFVQIByknJtSL6CM1ooTgBUbJjNANgjBRc8lN0ltIWRqegaobuXl3luow_QvzEocO5cXgRusr1GQePl9HmNu9rh9sOr5p2F1LomwHbrsarNFRN2IXNcI5OvN0ld_F75-j94f5t8UieX5ZPi9tnUnEqM1kz4QGsE-CBMmZrTUvFasFLK2spLXdSCO-0qJzXvlbSAisqLRTVbu045XN0Ne32MXzvXcpmG_axG18aKjgHyRmFkaITVcWQUnTe9LH9snEwFMwhlplimTGWOcQyenTY5KSR7TYu_ln-V_oBEH1rYg</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Gulliford, Liz</creator><creator>Morgan, Blaire</creator><creator>Kristjánsson, Kristján</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Recent Work on the Concept of Gratitude in Philosophy and Psychology</title><author>Gulliford, Liz ; Morgan, Blaire ; Kristjánsson, Kristján</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b24f00ae40f0122ad81972d439a6d66a3e644fe84cef8fd76a025c84718ebe313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Conceptual analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>International Political Economy</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public International Law</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gulliford, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Blaire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristjánsson, Kristján</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of value inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gulliford, Liz</au><au>Morgan, Blaire</au><au>Kristjánsson, Kristján</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recent Work on the Concept of Gratitude in Philosophy and Psychology</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of value inquiry</jtitle><stitle>J Value Inquiry</stitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>285-317</pages><issn>0022-5363</issn><eissn>1573-0492</eissn><abstract>This paper constitutes a critical review of the recent philosophical and psychological literatures on the concept of gratitude, literatures which have proliferated in recent years. Indeed, it seems everybody nowadays wants to enthuse about gratitude. In theological circles that is no novelty; ever since St Paul's exhortation in Thessalonians 5:18, In every thing give thanks, for this is the will of God, most scholars working within the Christian tradition have accorded gratitude a high value. More surprisingly, however, academics reared in the secular disciplines of psychology and philosophy have recently jumped on the pro-gratitude bandwagon. Gone are the days when gratitude was deemed the emotion most neglected by psychologists and when philosophers could rightly observe that contemporary philosophy has had comparatively little to say about gratitude. Suddenly, eliciting the conceptual contours of gratitude has become a popular endeavor in philosophy, and psychologists have eagerly started to tease out the relationship between gratitude and a number of positive personal and social variables. Many of those psychologists hail from the newly established positive-psychology camp which has shifted attention within social science to a number of understudied topics alongside gratitude, such as forgiveness, hope, and optimism, and even those hot-to-handle-for-empirical-scientists concepts of moral character and virtue, previously banished from the discipline.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10790-013-9387-8</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5363
ispartof The Journal of value inquiry, 2013-09, Vol.47 (3), p.285-317
issn 0022-5363
1573-0492
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1433063210
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Conceptual analysis
Education
Emotions
Ethics
International Political Economy
Ontology
Philosophers
Philosophy
Psychologists
Psychology
Public International Law
Social psychology
Social sciences
Studies
Theology
Values
title Recent Work on the Concept of Gratitude in Philosophy and Psychology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recent%20Work%20on%20the%20Concept%20of%20Gratitude%20in%20Philosophy%20and%20Psychology&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20value%20inquiry&rft.au=Gulliford,%20Liz&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=285-317&rft.issn=0022-5363&rft.eissn=1573-0492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10790-013-9387-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3073622871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433063210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true