RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750
Studies of rape between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries invariably note that most rape trials end in acquittal. Since the 1970s, when feminist activism and criticism put rape on the political, social and academic agenda, the explanation for this apparently transhistorical phenomenon has bee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Past & present 2013-08 (220), p.115-142 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | 220 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Past & present |
container_volume | |
creator | Walker, Garthine |
description | Studies of rape between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries invariably note that most rape trials end in acquittal. Since the 1970s, when feminist activism and criticism put rape on the political, social and academic agenda, the explanation for this apparently transhistorical phenomenon has been related to misogyny or, at least, a patriarchal sexual double standard. Rape seemed to have a long, unchanging history in which rape law, the criminal justice system, the attitudes of legal officials, and widely accepted ideas about male and female behavior all mitigated men's sexual violence and brushed aside or punished the women whom they abused. Here, Walker discusses the meanings that early modern people attributed to acquittals. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1431519349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24543623</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24543623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j509-3d385ffd5bda2b493672310ef742f7ae1a18952b9253b0ee8cbe525febbc2fdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjdFKwzAYhYMoWKuPIAS8XSXJnzTrZazdLMSt1kz0qjRtAhZ1s90uvPMdfEOfxI55bs6B83HOEQoolzLiMX8-RgEhQCMmeXyKzoahI6MEgQA9larIJlilD6vcGKWxWtzidKULdZPr3LzgfIGLZbHSqsRpmd9nuMyKZWke90W2mOuRn-DmGtNYkt_vn32SgpyjE1-_De7i30NkZplJ7yK9nOep0lEnSBJBC1PhfStsWzPLE4glA0qcl5x5WTta02kimE2YAEucmzbWCSa8s7Zhvm0hRFeH2U2__ty5YVt1613_MT5WlAMVNIFxNUSXB6obtuu-2vSv73X_VTEuOMQM4A9fvk-m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1431519349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Walker, Garthine</creator><creatorcontrib>Walker, Garthine</creatorcontrib><description>Studies of rape between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries invariably note that most rape trials end in acquittal. Since the 1970s, when feminist activism and criticism put rape on the political, social and academic agenda, the explanation for this apparently transhistorical phenomenon has been related to misogyny or, at least, a patriarchal sexual double standard. Rape seemed to have a long, unchanging history in which rape law, the criminal justice system, the attitudes of legal officials, and widely accepted ideas about male and female behavior all mitigated men's sexual violence and brushed aside or punished the women whom they abused. Here, Walker discusses the meanings that early modern people attributed to acquittals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-464X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acquittals & mistrials ; Criminal justice ; Criminal law ; European history ; Feminism ; Rape</subject><ispartof>Past & present, 2013-08 (220), p.115-142</ispartof><rights>World Copyright: The Past and Present Society 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24543623$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24543623$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walker, Garthine</creatorcontrib><title>RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750</title><title>Past & present</title><description>Studies of rape between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries invariably note that most rape trials end in acquittal. Since the 1970s, when feminist activism and criticism put rape on the political, social and academic agenda, the explanation for this apparently transhistorical phenomenon has been related to misogyny or, at least, a patriarchal sexual double standard. Rape seemed to have a long, unchanging history in which rape law, the criminal justice system, the attitudes of legal officials, and widely accepted ideas about male and female behavior all mitigated men's sexual violence and brushed aside or punished the women whom they abused. Here, Walker discusses the meanings that early modern people attributed to acquittals.</description><subject>Acquittals & mistrials</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>European history</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Rape</subject><issn>0031-2746</issn><issn>1477-464X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjdFKwzAYhYMoWKuPIAS8XSXJnzTrZazdLMSt1kz0qjRtAhZ1s90uvPMdfEOfxI55bs6B83HOEQoolzLiMX8-RgEhQCMmeXyKzoahI6MEgQA9larIJlilD6vcGKWxWtzidKULdZPr3LzgfIGLZbHSqsRpmd9nuMyKZWke90W2mOuRn-DmGtNYkt_vn32SgpyjE1-_De7i30NkZplJ7yK9nOep0lEnSBJBC1PhfStsWzPLE4glA0qcl5x5WTta02kimE2YAEucmzbWCSa8s7Zhvm0hRFeH2U2__ty5YVt1613_MT5WlAMVNIFxNUSXB6obtuu-2vSv73X_VTEuOMQM4A9fvk-m</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Walker, Garthine</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750</title><author>Walker, Garthine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j509-3d385ffd5bda2b493672310ef742f7ae1a18952b9253b0ee8cbe525febbc2fdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acquittals & mistrials</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>European history</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Rape</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, Garthine</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Past & present</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, Garthine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750</atitle><jtitle>Past & present</jtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><issue>220</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>115-142</pages><issn>0031-2746</issn><eissn>1477-464X</eissn><abstract>Studies of rape between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries invariably note that most rape trials end in acquittal. Since the 1970s, when feminist activism and criticism put rape on the political, social and academic agenda, the explanation for this apparently transhistorical phenomenon has been related to misogyny or, at least, a patriarchal sexual double standard. Rape seemed to have a long, unchanging history in which rape law, the criminal justice system, the attitudes of legal officials, and widely accepted ideas about male and female behavior all mitigated men's sexual violence and brushed aside or punished the women whom they abused. Here, Walker discusses the meanings that early modern people attributed to acquittals.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-2746 |
ispartof | Past & present, 2013-08 (220), p.115-142 |
issn | 0031-2746 1477-464X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1431519349 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Acquittals & mistrials Criminal justice Criminal law European history Feminism Rape |
title | RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A48%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RAPE,%20ACQUITTAL%20AND%20CULPABILITY%20IN%20POPULAR%20CRIME%20REPORTS%20IN%20ENGLAND,%20c.%201670%E2%80%93c.%201750&rft.jtitle=Past%20&%20present&rft.au=Walker,%20Garthine&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.issue=220&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=115-142&rft.issn=0031-2746&rft.eissn=1477-464X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24543623%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1431519349&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24543623&rfr_iscdi=true |