RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750

Studies of rape between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries invariably note that most rape trials end in acquittal. Since the 1970s, when feminist activism and criticism put rape on the political, social and academic agenda, the explanation for this apparently transhistorical phenomenon has bee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Past & present 2013-08 (220), p.115-142
1. Verfasser: Walker, Garthine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 220
container_start_page 115
container_title Past & present
container_volume
creator Walker, Garthine
description Studies of rape between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries invariably note that most rape trials end in acquittal. Since the 1970s, when feminist activism and criticism put rape on the political, social and academic agenda, the explanation for this apparently transhistorical phenomenon has been related to misogyny or, at least, a patriarchal sexual double standard. Rape seemed to have a long, unchanging history in which rape law, the criminal justice system, the attitudes of legal officials, and widely accepted ideas about male and female behavior all mitigated men's sexual violence and brushed aside or punished the women whom they abused. Here, Walker discusses the meanings that early modern people attributed to acquittals.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1431519349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24543623</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24543623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j509-3d385ffd5bda2b493672310ef742f7ae1a18952b9253b0ee8cbe525febbc2fdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjdFKwzAYhYMoWKuPIAS8XSXJnzTrZazdLMSt1kz0qjRtAhZ1s90uvPMdfEOfxI55bs6B83HOEQoolzLiMX8-RgEhQCMmeXyKzoahI6MEgQA9larIJlilD6vcGKWxWtzidKULdZPr3LzgfIGLZbHSqsRpmd9nuMyKZWke90W2mOuRn-DmGtNYkt_vn32SgpyjE1-_De7i30NkZplJ7yK9nOep0lEnSBJBC1PhfStsWzPLE4glA0qcl5x5WTta02kimE2YAEucmzbWCSa8s7Zhvm0hRFeH2U2__ty5YVt1613_MT5WlAMVNIFxNUSXB6obtuu-2vSv73X_VTEuOMQM4A9fvk-m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1431519349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Walker, Garthine</creator><creatorcontrib>Walker, Garthine</creatorcontrib><description>Studies of rape between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries invariably note that most rape trials end in acquittal. Since the 1970s, when feminist activism and criticism put rape on the political, social and academic agenda, the explanation for this apparently transhistorical phenomenon has been related to misogyny or, at least, a patriarchal sexual double standard. Rape seemed to have a long, unchanging history in which rape law, the criminal justice system, the attitudes of legal officials, and widely accepted ideas about male and female behavior all mitigated men's sexual violence and brushed aside or punished the women whom they abused. Here, Walker discusses the meanings that early modern people attributed to acquittals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-464X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acquittals &amp; mistrials ; Criminal justice ; Criminal law ; European history ; Feminism ; Rape</subject><ispartof>Past &amp; present, 2013-08 (220), p.115-142</ispartof><rights>World Copyright: The Past and Present Society 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24543623$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24543623$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walker, Garthine</creatorcontrib><title>RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750</title><title>Past &amp; present</title><description>Studies of rape between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries invariably note that most rape trials end in acquittal. Since the 1970s, when feminist activism and criticism put rape on the political, social and academic agenda, the explanation for this apparently transhistorical phenomenon has been related to misogyny or, at least, a patriarchal sexual double standard. Rape seemed to have a long, unchanging history in which rape law, the criminal justice system, the attitudes of legal officials, and widely accepted ideas about male and female behavior all mitigated men's sexual violence and brushed aside or punished the women whom they abused. Here, Walker discusses the meanings that early modern people attributed to acquittals.</description><subject>Acquittals &amp; mistrials</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>European history</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Rape</subject><issn>0031-2746</issn><issn>1477-464X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjdFKwzAYhYMoWKuPIAS8XSXJnzTrZazdLMSt1kz0qjRtAhZ1s90uvPMdfEOfxI55bs6B83HOEQoolzLiMX8-RgEhQCMmeXyKzoahI6MEgQA9larIJlilD6vcGKWxWtzidKULdZPr3LzgfIGLZbHSqsRpmd9nuMyKZWke90W2mOuRn-DmGtNYkt_vn32SgpyjE1-_De7i30NkZplJ7yK9nOep0lEnSBJBC1PhfStsWzPLE4glA0qcl5x5WTta02kimE2YAEucmzbWCSa8s7Zhvm0hRFeH2U2__ty5YVt1613_MT5WlAMVNIFxNUSXB6obtuu-2vSv73X_VTEuOMQM4A9fvk-m</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Walker, Garthine</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750</title><author>Walker, Garthine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j509-3d385ffd5bda2b493672310ef742f7ae1a18952b9253b0ee8cbe525febbc2fdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acquittals &amp; mistrials</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>European history</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Rape</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, Garthine</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Past &amp; present</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, Garthine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750</atitle><jtitle>Past &amp; present</jtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><issue>220</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>115-142</pages><issn>0031-2746</issn><eissn>1477-464X</eissn><abstract>Studies of rape between the sixteenth and twenty-first centuries invariably note that most rape trials end in acquittal. Since the 1970s, when feminist activism and criticism put rape on the political, social and academic agenda, the explanation for this apparently transhistorical phenomenon has been related to misogyny or, at least, a patriarchal sexual double standard. Rape seemed to have a long, unchanging history in which rape law, the criminal justice system, the attitudes of legal officials, and widely accepted ideas about male and female behavior all mitigated men's sexual violence and brushed aside or punished the women whom they abused. Here, Walker discusses the meanings that early modern people attributed to acquittals.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-2746
ispartof Past & present, 2013-08 (220), p.115-142
issn 0031-2746
1477-464X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1431519349
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Acquittals & mistrials
Criminal justice
Criminal law
European history
Feminism
Rape
title RAPE, ACQUITTAL AND CULPABILITY IN POPULAR CRIME REPORTS IN ENGLAND, c. 1670–c. 1750
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A48%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RAPE,%20ACQUITTAL%20AND%20CULPABILITY%20IN%20POPULAR%20CRIME%20REPORTS%20IN%20ENGLAND,%20c.%201670%E2%80%93c.%201750&rft.jtitle=Past%20&%20present&rft.au=Walker,%20Garthine&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.issue=220&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=115-142&rft.issn=0031-2746&rft.eissn=1477-464X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24543623%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1431519349&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24543623&rfr_iscdi=true