Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review
Background Smoke is generated by energy-based surgical instruments. The airborne byproducts may have potential health implications. This study aimed to evaluate the properties of surgical smoke and the evidence for the harmful effects to the theater staff. Methods Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PubMed,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2013-09, Vol.27 (9), p.3100-3107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3107 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3100 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Mowbray, Nicholas Ansell, James Warren, Neil Wall, Pete Torkington, Jared |
description | Background
Smoke is generated by energy-based surgical instruments. The airborne byproducts may have potential health implications. This study aimed to evaluate the properties of surgical smoke and the evidence for the harmful effects to the theater staff.
Methods
Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase classic and Embase, and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials were searched for studies reporting the constituents found in the smoke plume created during surgical procedures, the methods used to analyze the smoke, the implications of exposure, and the type of surgical instrument that generated the smoke. Studies were excluded if they were animal based, preclinical experimental work, or opinion-based reports. The common end points were particle size and characteristics, infection risk, malignant spread, and mutagenesis.
Results
The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 20 studies. In terms of particle size, 5 (25 %) of the 20 studies showed that diathermy and laser can produce ultrafine particles (UFP) that are respirable in size. With regard to particle characterization, 7 (35 %) of the 20 studies demonstrated that a variety of volatile hydrocarbons are present in diathermy-, ultrasonic-, and laser-derived surgical smoke. These are potentially carcinogenic, but no evidence exists to support a cause–effect relationship for those exposed. In terms of infection risk, 6 (30 %) of the 20 studies assessed surgical smoke for the presence of viruses, with only 1 study (5 %) positively identifying viral DNA in laser-derived smoke. One study (5 %) demonstrated bacterial cell culture (
Staphylococcus aureus
) from a laser plume after surgery. Regarding mutagenesis and malignant spread, one study (5 %) reported the mutagenic effect of smoke, and one study (5 %) showed the presence of malignant cells in the smoke of a patient undergoing procedures for carcinomatosis.
Conclusions
The potentially carcinogenic components of surgical smoke are sufficiently small to be respirable. Infective and malignant cells are found in the smoke plume, but the full risk of this to the theater staff is unproven. Future work could focus on the long-term consequences of smoke exposure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-013-2940-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1427343012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3052708581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-43f54f34b818a6cfb1afd4dc2102644f0c0729667b8f1f4cf2225911e23268523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gBsJuB699ybzWhUpPgoFN7oOmTTpw06nJhml_94po-LG1V3c75wDH2OXCDcIkN8GAJnJBFAkVEpI0iM2RCkoIcLimA2hFJBQXsoBOwthDR1eYnrKBiQySLHEIRtPAw-tX6yM3vBQN2-WL7WvXbvhseFxaXW0noeonRtzzcM-RFvruDLc24-V_TxnJ05vgr34viP2-nD_MnlKZs-P08ndLDEip5hI4VLphKwKLHRmXIXazeXcEAJlUjowkFOZZXlVOHTSOCJKS0RLgrIiJTFi133vzjfvrQ1RrZvWb7tJhZJyIQXggcKeMr4JwVundn5Va79XCOqgTPXKVKdMHZSptMtcfTe3VW3nv4kfRx1APRC613Zh_Z_pf1u_AHiLdG0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1427343012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Mowbray, Nicholas ; Ansell, James ; Warren, Neil ; Wall, Pete ; Torkington, Jared</creator><creatorcontrib>Mowbray, Nicholas ; Ansell, James ; Warren, Neil ; Wall, Pete ; Torkington, Jared</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Smoke is generated by energy-based surgical instruments. The airborne byproducts may have potential health implications. This study aimed to evaluate the properties of surgical smoke and the evidence for the harmful effects to the theater staff.
Methods
Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase classic and Embase, and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials were searched for studies reporting the constituents found in the smoke plume created during surgical procedures, the methods used to analyze the smoke, the implications of exposure, and the type of surgical instrument that generated the smoke. Studies were excluded if they were animal based, preclinical experimental work, or opinion-based reports. The common end points were particle size and characteristics, infection risk, malignant spread, and mutagenesis.
Results
The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 20 studies. In terms of particle size, 5 (25 %) of the 20 studies showed that diathermy and laser can produce ultrafine particles (UFP) that are respirable in size. With regard to particle characterization, 7 (35 %) of the 20 studies demonstrated that a variety of volatile hydrocarbons are present in diathermy-, ultrasonic-, and laser-derived surgical smoke. These are potentially carcinogenic, but no evidence exists to support a cause–effect relationship for those exposed. In terms of infection risk, 6 (30 %) of the 20 studies assessed surgical smoke for the presence of viruses, with only 1 study (5 %) positively identifying viral DNA in laser-derived smoke. One study (5 %) demonstrated bacterial cell culture (
Staphylococcus aureus
) from a laser plume after surgery. Regarding mutagenesis and malignant spread, one study (5 %) reported the mutagenic effect of smoke, and one study (5 %) showed the presence of malignant cells in the smoke of a patient undergoing procedures for carcinomatosis.
Conclusions
The potentially carcinogenic components of surgical smoke are sufficiently small to be respirable. Infective and malignant cells are found in the smoke plume, but the full risk of this to the theater staff is unproven. Future work could focus on the long-term consequences of smoke exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2940-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23605191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects ; Carcinogens ; Electrical Equipment and Supplies ; Energy ; Gases ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Infections ; Lasers ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mutagenesis ; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects ; Operating Rooms ; Particle size ; Proctology ; Review ; Smoke - adverse effects ; Surgery ; Surgical apparatus & instruments ; Surgical Instruments ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2013-09, Vol.27 (9), p.3100-3107</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-43f54f34b818a6cfb1afd4dc2102644f0c0729667b8f1f4cf2225911e23268523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-43f54f34b818a6cfb1afd4dc2102644f0c0729667b8f1f4cf2225911e23268523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-013-2940-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-013-2940-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23605191$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mowbray, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torkington, Jared</creatorcontrib><title>Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
Smoke is generated by energy-based surgical instruments. The airborne byproducts may have potential health implications. This study aimed to evaluate the properties of surgical smoke and the evidence for the harmful effects to the theater staff.
Methods
Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase classic and Embase, and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials were searched for studies reporting the constituents found in the smoke plume created during surgical procedures, the methods used to analyze the smoke, the implications of exposure, and the type of surgical instrument that generated the smoke. Studies were excluded if they were animal based, preclinical experimental work, or opinion-based reports. The common end points were particle size and characteristics, infection risk, malignant spread, and mutagenesis.
Results
The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 20 studies. In terms of particle size, 5 (25 %) of the 20 studies showed that diathermy and laser can produce ultrafine particles (UFP) that are respirable in size. With regard to particle characterization, 7 (35 %) of the 20 studies demonstrated that a variety of volatile hydrocarbons are present in diathermy-, ultrasonic-, and laser-derived surgical smoke. These are potentially carcinogenic, but no evidence exists to support a cause–effect relationship for those exposed. In terms of infection risk, 6 (30 %) of the 20 studies assessed surgical smoke for the presence of viruses, with only 1 study (5 %) positively identifying viral DNA in laser-derived smoke. One study (5 %) demonstrated bacterial cell culture (
Staphylococcus aureus
) from a laser plume after surgery. Regarding mutagenesis and malignant spread, one study (5 %) reported the mutagenic effect of smoke, and one study (5 %) showed the presence of malignant cells in the smoke of a patient undergoing procedures for carcinomatosis.
Conclusions
The potentially carcinogenic components of surgical smoke are sufficiently small to be respirable. Infective and malignant cells are found in the smoke plume, but the full risk of this to the theater staff is unproven. Future work could focus on the long-term consequences of smoke exposure.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Electrical Equipment and Supplies</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mutagenesis</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Operating Rooms</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Smoke - adverse effects</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical apparatus & instruments</subject><subject>Surgical Instruments</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gBsJuB699ybzWhUpPgoFN7oOmTTpw06nJhml_94po-LG1V3c75wDH2OXCDcIkN8GAJnJBFAkVEpI0iM2RCkoIcLimA2hFJBQXsoBOwthDR1eYnrKBiQySLHEIRtPAw-tX6yM3vBQN2-WL7WvXbvhseFxaXW0noeonRtzzcM-RFvruDLc24-V_TxnJ05vgr34viP2-nD_MnlKZs-P08ndLDEip5hI4VLphKwKLHRmXIXazeXcEAJlUjowkFOZZXlVOHTSOCJKS0RLgrIiJTFi133vzjfvrQ1RrZvWb7tJhZJyIQXggcKeMr4JwVundn5Va79XCOqgTPXKVKdMHZSptMtcfTe3VW3nv4kfRx1APRC613Zh_Z_pf1u_AHiLdG0</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Mowbray, Nicholas</creator><creator>Ansell, James</creator><creator>Warren, Neil</creator><creator>Wall, Pete</creator><creator>Torkington, Jared</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review</title><author>Mowbray, Nicholas ; Ansell, James ; Warren, Neil ; Wall, Pete ; Torkington, Jared</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-43f54f34b818a6cfb1afd4dc2102644f0c0729667b8f1f4cf2225911e23268523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Electrical Equipment and Supplies</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mutagenesis</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Operating Rooms</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Smoke - adverse effects</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical apparatus & instruments</topic><topic>Surgical Instruments</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mowbray, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, Pete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torkington, Jared</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mowbray, Nicholas</au><au>Ansell, James</au><au>Warren, Neil</au><au>Wall, Pete</au><au>Torkington, Jared</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3100</spage><epage>3107</epage><pages>3100-3107</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
Smoke is generated by energy-based surgical instruments. The airborne byproducts may have potential health implications. This study aimed to evaluate the properties of surgical smoke and the evidence for the harmful effects to the theater staff.
Methods
Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase classic and Embase, and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials were searched for studies reporting the constituents found in the smoke plume created during surgical procedures, the methods used to analyze the smoke, the implications of exposure, and the type of surgical instrument that generated the smoke. Studies were excluded if they were animal based, preclinical experimental work, or opinion-based reports. The common end points were particle size and characteristics, infection risk, malignant spread, and mutagenesis.
Results
The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 20 studies. In terms of particle size, 5 (25 %) of the 20 studies showed that diathermy and laser can produce ultrafine particles (UFP) that are respirable in size. With regard to particle characterization, 7 (35 %) of the 20 studies demonstrated that a variety of volatile hydrocarbons are present in diathermy-, ultrasonic-, and laser-derived surgical smoke. These are potentially carcinogenic, but no evidence exists to support a cause–effect relationship for those exposed. In terms of infection risk, 6 (30 %) of the 20 studies assessed surgical smoke for the presence of viruses, with only 1 study (5 %) positively identifying viral DNA in laser-derived smoke. One study (5 %) demonstrated bacterial cell culture (
Staphylococcus aureus
) from a laser plume after surgery. Regarding mutagenesis and malignant spread, one study (5 %) reported the mutagenic effect of smoke, and one study (5 %) showed the presence of malignant cells in the smoke of a patient undergoing procedures for carcinomatosis.
Conclusions
The potentially carcinogenic components of surgical smoke are sufficiently small to be respirable. Infective and malignant cells are found in the smoke plume, but the full risk of this to the theater staff is unproven. Future work could focus on the long-term consequences of smoke exposure.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>23605191</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-013-2940-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2013-09, Vol.27 (9), p.3100-3107 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1427343012 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Air Pollutants, Occupational - adverse effects Carcinogens Electrical Equipment and Supplies Energy Gases Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Humans Infections Lasers Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mutagenesis Occupational Exposure - adverse effects Operating Rooms Particle size Proctology Review Smoke - adverse effects Surgery Surgical apparatus & instruments Surgical Instruments Systematic review |
title | Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A18%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20surgical%20smoke%20harmful%20to%20theater%20staff?%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Mowbray,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3100&rft.epage=3107&rft.pages=3100-3107&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-013-2940-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3052708581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1427343012&rft_id=info:pmid/23605191&rfr_iscdi=true |