Oral Proficiency Standards and Foreign Language Teacher Candidates: Current Findings and Future Research Directions
The renewed national focus on teacher quality and effectiveness has resulted in more rigorous standards that describe the knowledge and skills required of teacher candidates across all disciplines. In the area of foreign languages, three sets of professional standards address the oral proficiency of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Foreign language annals 2013-06, Vol.46 (2), p.264-289 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 289 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 264 |
container_title | Foreign language annals |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Glisan, Eileen W. Swender, Elvira Surface, Eric A. |
description | The renewed national focus on teacher quality and effectiveness has resulted in more rigorous standards that describe the knowledge and skills required of teacher candidates across all disciplines. In the area of foreign languages, three sets of professional standards address the oral proficiency of teachers in the target languages they teach across the career continuum. For teacher candidates, the ACTFL/NCATE Program Standards for the Preparation of Foreign Language Teachers (2002) establish minimum oral proficiency levels based on the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines—Speaking (2012). Utilizing ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) data, this study examines to what extent candidates are attaining the ACTFL/NCATE Oral Proficiency Standard of Advanced Low in most languages or Intermediate High in Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. Findings indicate that 54.8% of candidates attained the required standard between 2006 and 2012 and that significant differences emerged for language, year tested, and university program results. Further research that takes into account additional contextual information about candidates and programs will inform continuing professional dialogue about the oral proficiency of teacher candidates entering the profession. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/flan.12030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1425423234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1014410</ericid><sourcerecordid>3047426601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-dcf2145ae793675ba5d3c85c40aad1df22069474f00dceba0c32c78e938e996b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1P3DAQxS1UJLbQS--VLHGrFDr-SLzmhrYstFoBpfTjZnmdyWK6dWCcCPa_b7ahHDvSaCS_33uWHmNvBRyJYT40a5-OhAQFO2wirNaFNRJesQmAKAsjpj_32Ouc7wDASiMmLF-SX_MrapsYIqaw4V87n2pPdebD5fOWMK4SX_i06v0K-Q36cIvEZ4Maa99hPuaznghTx-dxeEurZ2ff9YT8GjN6Crf8YyQMXWxTPmC7jV9nfPN899m3-enN7LxYXJ59mp0siqCsgaIOjRS69Gisqky59GWtwrQMGryvRd1ICZXVRjcAdcClh6BkMFO0alhbLdU-Oxxz76l96DF37q7tKQ1fOqFlqaWSSg_U-5EK1OZM2Lh7ir89bZwAty3VbUt1f0sd4HcjjBTDC3j6WYDQWmx1MeqPcY2b_yS5-eLk4l9mMXpi7vDpxePpl6uMMqX7cXHmqu9XEuS1dV_UH5YykrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1425423234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oral Proficiency Standards and Foreign Language Teacher Candidates: Current Findings and Future Research Directions</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Glisan, Eileen W. ; Swender, Elvira ; Surface, Eric A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Glisan, Eileen W. ; Swender, Elvira ; Surface, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><description>The renewed national focus on teacher quality and effectiveness has resulted in more rigorous standards that describe the knowledge and skills required of teacher candidates across all disciplines. In the area of foreign languages, three sets of professional standards address the oral proficiency of teachers in the target languages they teach across the career continuum. For teacher candidates, the ACTFL/NCATE Program Standards for the Preparation of Foreign Language Teachers (2002) establish minimum oral proficiency levels based on the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines—Speaking (2012). Utilizing ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) data, this study examines to what extent candidates are attaining the ACTFL/NCATE Oral Proficiency Standard of Advanced Low in most languages or Intermediate High in Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. Findings indicate that 54.8% of candidates attained the required standard between 2006 and 2012 and that significant differences emerged for language, year tested, and university program results. Further research that takes into account additional contextual information about candidates and programs will inform continuing professional dialogue about the oral proficiency of teacher candidates entering the profession.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-718X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/flan.12030</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FLGAAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview ; Advanced Low ; Arabic language ; Beginning Teachers ; Chinese languages ; Classification ; College Second Language Programs ; Context Effect ; Foreign language learning ; Guidelines ; Interviews ; Japanese language ; Korean language ; Language ; Language Proficiency ; Language Teachers ; Language Tests ; Meetings ; NCATE ; No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US ; Oral Language ; Physical Education ; Professional Associations ; proficiency ; Regression (Statistics) ; Scores ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Second language teachers ; Second Languages ; Success ; Teacher Certification ; Teacher Education ; Teacher Education Programs ; Teacher Effectiveness ; teacher preparation ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>Foreign language annals, 2013-06, Vol.46 (2), p.264-289</ispartof><rights>2013 by American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages</rights><rights>Copyright American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages Summer 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-dcf2145ae793675ba5d3c85c40aad1df22069474f00dceba0c32c78e938e996b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-dcf2145ae793675ba5d3c85c40aad1df22069474f00dceba0c32c78e938e996b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fflan.12030$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fflan.12030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1014410$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glisan, Eileen W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swender, Elvira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surface, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><title>Oral Proficiency Standards and Foreign Language Teacher Candidates: Current Findings and Future Research Directions</title><title>Foreign language annals</title><addtitle>Foreign Language Annals</addtitle><description>The renewed national focus on teacher quality and effectiveness has resulted in more rigorous standards that describe the knowledge and skills required of teacher candidates across all disciplines. In the area of foreign languages, three sets of professional standards address the oral proficiency of teachers in the target languages they teach across the career continuum. For teacher candidates, the ACTFL/NCATE Program Standards for the Preparation of Foreign Language Teachers (2002) establish minimum oral proficiency levels based on the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines—Speaking (2012). Utilizing ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) data, this study examines to what extent candidates are attaining the ACTFL/NCATE Oral Proficiency Standard of Advanced Low in most languages or Intermediate High in Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. Findings indicate that 54.8% of candidates attained the required standard between 2006 and 2012 and that significant differences emerged for language, year tested, and university program results. Further research that takes into account additional contextual information about candidates and programs will inform continuing professional dialogue about the oral proficiency of teacher candidates entering the profession.</description><subject>ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview</subject><subject>Advanced Low</subject><subject>Arabic language</subject><subject>Beginning Teachers</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>College Second Language Programs</subject><subject>Context Effect</subject><subject>Foreign language learning</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Japanese language</subject><subject>Korean language</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Language Teachers</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>NCATE</subject><subject>No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Physical Education</subject><subject>Professional Associations</subject><subject>proficiency</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Second language teachers</subject><subject>Second Languages</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Teacher Certification</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teacher Education Programs</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>teacher preparation</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>0015-718X</issn><issn>1944-9720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1P3DAQxS1UJLbQS--VLHGrFDr-SLzmhrYstFoBpfTjZnmdyWK6dWCcCPa_b7ahHDvSaCS_33uWHmNvBRyJYT40a5-OhAQFO2wirNaFNRJesQmAKAsjpj_32Ouc7wDASiMmLF-SX_MrapsYIqaw4V87n2pPdebD5fOWMK4SX_i06v0K-Q36cIvEZ4Maa99hPuaznghTx-dxeEurZ2ff9YT8GjN6Crf8YyQMXWxTPmC7jV9nfPN899m3-enN7LxYXJ59mp0siqCsgaIOjRS69Gisqky59GWtwrQMGryvRd1ICZXVRjcAdcClh6BkMFO0alhbLdU-Oxxz76l96DF37q7tKQ1fOqFlqaWSSg_U-5EK1OZM2Lh7ir89bZwAty3VbUt1f0sd4HcjjBTDC3j6WYDQWmx1MeqPcY2b_yS5-eLk4l9mMXpi7vDpxePpl6uMMqX7cXHmqu9XEuS1dV_UH5YykrA</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Glisan, Eileen W.</creator><creator>Swender, Elvira</creator><creator>Surface, Eric A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Oral Proficiency Standards and Foreign Language Teacher Candidates: Current Findings and Future Research Directions</title><author>Glisan, Eileen W. ; Swender, Elvira ; Surface, Eric A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-dcf2145ae793675ba5d3c85c40aad1df22069474f00dceba0c32c78e938e996b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview</topic><topic>Advanced Low</topic><topic>Arabic language</topic><topic>Beginning Teachers</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>College Second Language Programs</topic><topic>Context Effect</topic><topic>Foreign language learning</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Japanese language</topic><topic>Korean language</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Language Teachers</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>NCATE</topic><topic>No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Physical Education</topic><topic>Professional Associations</topic><topic>proficiency</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Second language teachers</topic><topic>Second Languages</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Teacher Certification</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teacher Education Programs</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>teacher preparation</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glisan, Eileen W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swender, Elvira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surface, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Foreign language annals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glisan, Eileen W.</au><au>Swender, Elvira</au><au>Surface, Eric A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1014410</ericid><atitle>Oral Proficiency Standards and Foreign Language Teacher Candidates: Current Findings and Future Research Directions</atitle><jtitle>Foreign language annals</jtitle><addtitle>Foreign Language Annals</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>264</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>264-289</pages><issn>0015-718X</issn><eissn>1944-9720</eissn><coden>FLGAAS</coden><abstract>The renewed national focus on teacher quality and effectiveness has resulted in more rigorous standards that describe the knowledge and skills required of teacher candidates across all disciplines. In the area of foreign languages, three sets of professional standards address the oral proficiency of teachers in the target languages they teach across the career continuum. For teacher candidates, the ACTFL/NCATE Program Standards for the Preparation of Foreign Language Teachers (2002) establish minimum oral proficiency levels based on the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines—Speaking (2012). Utilizing ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) data, this study examines to what extent candidates are attaining the ACTFL/NCATE Oral Proficiency Standard of Advanced Low in most languages or Intermediate High in Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. Findings indicate that 54.8% of candidates attained the required standard between 2006 and 2012 and that significant differences emerged for language, year tested, and university program results. Further research that takes into account additional contextual information about candidates and programs will inform continuing professional dialogue about the oral proficiency of teacher candidates entering the profession.</abstract><cop>Alexandria</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/flan.12030</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-718X |
ispartof | Foreign language annals, 2013-06, Vol.46 (2), p.264-289 |
issn | 0015-718X 1944-9720 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1425423234 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview Advanced Low Arabic language Beginning Teachers Chinese languages Classification College Second Language Programs Context Effect Foreign language learning Guidelines Interviews Japanese language Korean language Language Language Proficiency Language Teachers Language Tests Meetings NCATE No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US Oral Language Physical Education Professional Associations proficiency Regression (Statistics) Scores Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Second language teachers Second Languages Success Teacher Certification Teacher Education Teacher Education Programs Teacher Effectiveness teacher preparation Teaching |
title | Oral Proficiency Standards and Foreign Language Teacher Candidates: Current Findings and Future Research Directions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A32%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oral%20Proficiency%20Standards%20and%20Foreign%20Language%20Teacher%20Candidates:%20Current%20Findings%20and%20Future%20Research%20Directions&rft.jtitle=Foreign%20language%20annals&rft.au=Glisan,%20Eileen%20W.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=264&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=264-289&rft.issn=0015-718X&rft.eissn=1944-9720&rft.coden=FLGAAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/flan.12030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3047426601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1425423234&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1014410&rfr_iscdi=true |