Yield Potential of Hulless Versus Hulled Full‐Sib Genotypes in Four Winter Barley Populations

ABSTRACT Determining what factors contribute to the yield difference that exists between hulled and hulless winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is necessary for continued yield improvement in the hulless barley germplasm pool. This yield difference is a major factor limiting the acceptance and produc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crop science 2013-07, Vol.53 (4), p.1276-1287
Hauptverfasser: Berger, G., Green, A., Brooks, W., Vaughn, M., Pitman, R., Thomason, W., Griffey, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1287
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1276
container_title Crop science
container_volume 53
creator Berger, G.
Green, A.
Brooks, W.
Vaughn, M.
Pitman, R.
Thomason, W.
Griffey, C.
description ABSTRACT Determining what factors contribute to the yield difference that exists between hulled and hulless winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is necessary for continued yield improvement in the hulless barley germplasm pool. This yield difference is a major factor limiting the acceptance and production of hulless barley as an alternative to traditional hulled barley. Experiments were conducted in Warsaw, VA, during 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 and in Blacksburg, VA, during 2011/2012. Seedling emergence, plants per square meter, normalized difference vegetative index, heading date, spikes per square meter, plant height, lodging, yield, grain volume weight, 1000 kernel weight, spikelets per spike, seeds per spike, seed weight per spike, ash, crude fiber, fat, protein, and starch were measured. Grain volume weight and protein concentration were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher for hulless genotypes while seedling emergence and grain ash concentration were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher for hulled genotypes. Other traits measured in the study varied by population and environment. On the basis of linear regression analysis, none of the traits explained yield variation in all populations and environments. Before adjustment for hull weight, hulless genotypes yielded significantly (p ≤ 0.05) less than hulled genotypes on average in all populations at Warsaw and for population 1 at Blacksburg during the 2011/2012 growing season. After adjustment for hull weight, yield potential of select hulless genotypes was statistically similar to that of hulled genotypes. Therefore, it is possible to identify hulless genotypes having yield potentials equal to those of their hulled sibs.
doi_str_mv 10.2135/cropsci2012.10.0603
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1419023763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3041179151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3403-179c8d5cd84d6c22b6ff5475cfd6e249a0e4b68dad60bac0c504bc509ffeb7e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIXcLHEObCOYyc5QkQfUqVWlOfJSmxHchWSYCdCvfEJfCNfgkM4cOSyqx3NzO4OQucELkNC2ZW0TeukCYGElx4DDvQATUhEWQCc0UM0ASAkIAl9PkYnzu0AIE5jNkHixehK4U3T6bozeYWbEi_6qtLO4UdtXe_GUeGZb18fn1tT4Lmum27faodNjWdNb_GTqTtt8U1uK733bm1f5Z1paneKjsq8cvrst0_Rw-z2PlsEq_V8mV2vAkkjoAGJU5koJlUSKS7DsOBlyaKYyVJxHUZpDjoqeKJyxaHIJUgGUeFLWpa6iDWhU3Qx-ra2eeu168TO31X7lYJEJIWQxpx6Fh1ZPjDnrC5Fa81rbveCgBiSFH-SHLAhSa-ajap347_7j0Rk2yzM7tabbbYccAI_Rt_TNH_X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1419023763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Yield Potential of Hulless Versus Hulled Full‐Sib Genotypes in Four Winter Barley Populations</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berger, G. ; Green, A. ; Brooks, W. ; Vaughn, M. ; Pitman, R. ; Thomason, W. ; Griffey, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, G. ; Green, A. ; Brooks, W. ; Vaughn, M. ; Pitman, R. ; Thomason, W. ; Griffey, C.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Determining what factors contribute to the yield difference that exists between hulled and hulless winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is necessary for continued yield improvement in the hulless barley germplasm pool. This yield difference is a major factor limiting the acceptance and production of hulless barley as an alternative to traditional hulled barley. Experiments were conducted in Warsaw, VA, during 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 and in Blacksburg, VA, during 2011/2012. Seedling emergence, plants per square meter, normalized difference vegetative index, heading date, spikes per square meter, plant height, lodging, yield, grain volume weight, 1000 kernel weight, spikelets per spike, seeds per spike, seed weight per spike, ash, crude fiber, fat, protein, and starch were measured. Grain volume weight and protein concentration were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher for hulless genotypes while seedling emergence and grain ash concentration were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher for hulled genotypes. Other traits measured in the study varied by population and environment. On the basis of linear regression analysis, none of the traits explained yield variation in all populations and environments. Before adjustment for hull weight, hulless genotypes yielded significantly (p ≤ 0.05) less than hulled genotypes on average in all populations at Warsaw and for population 1 at Blacksburg during the 2011/2012 growing season. After adjustment for hull weight, yield potential of select hulless genotypes was statistically similar to that of hulled genotypes. Therefore, it is possible to identify hulless genotypes having yield potentials equal to those of their hulled sibs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2012.10.0603</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Barley ; Dietary fiber ; Genes ; Genotypes ; Growing season ; Hogs ; Lodging ; Proteins ; Regression analysis ; Seedlings ; Soybeans ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2013-07, Vol.53 (4), p.1276-1287</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Crop Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3403-179c8d5cd84d6c22b6ff5475cfd6e249a0e4b68dad60bac0c504bc509ffeb7e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3403-179c8d5cd84d6c22b6ff5475cfd6e249a0e4b68dad60bac0c504bc509ffeb7e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2135%2Fcropsci2012.10.0603$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135%2Fcropsci2012.10.0603$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitman, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomason, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffey, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Yield Potential of Hulless Versus Hulled Full‐Sib Genotypes in Four Winter Barley Populations</title><title>Crop science</title><description>ABSTRACT Determining what factors contribute to the yield difference that exists between hulled and hulless winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is necessary for continued yield improvement in the hulless barley germplasm pool. This yield difference is a major factor limiting the acceptance and production of hulless barley as an alternative to traditional hulled barley. Experiments were conducted in Warsaw, VA, during 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 and in Blacksburg, VA, during 2011/2012. Seedling emergence, plants per square meter, normalized difference vegetative index, heading date, spikes per square meter, plant height, lodging, yield, grain volume weight, 1000 kernel weight, spikelets per spike, seeds per spike, seed weight per spike, ash, crude fiber, fat, protein, and starch were measured. Grain volume weight and protein concentration were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher for hulless genotypes while seedling emergence and grain ash concentration were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher for hulled genotypes. Other traits measured in the study varied by population and environment. On the basis of linear regression analysis, none of the traits explained yield variation in all populations and environments. Before adjustment for hull weight, hulless genotypes yielded significantly (p ≤ 0.05) less than hulled genotypes on average in all populations at Warsaw and for population 1 at Blacksburg during the 2011/2012 growing season. After adjustment for hull weight, yield potential of select hulless genotypes was statistically similar to that of hulled genotypes. Therefore, it is possible to identify hulless genotypes having yield potentials equal to those of their hulled sibs.</description><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Dietary fiber</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Lodging</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIXcLHEObCOYyc5QkQfUqVWlOfJSmxHchWSYCdCvfEJfCNfgkM4cOSyqx3NzO4OQucELkNC2ZW0TeukCYGElx4DDvQATUhEWQCc0UM0ASAkIAl9PkYnzu0AIE5jNkHixehK4U3T6bozeYWbEi_6qtLO4UdtXe_GUeGZb18fn1tT4Lmum27faodNjWdNb_GTqTtt8U1uK733bm1f5Z1paneKjsq8cvrst0_Rw-z2PlsEq_V8mV2vAkkjoAGJU5koJlUSKS7DsOBlyaKYyVJxHUZpDjoqeKJyxaHIJUgGUeFLWpa6iDWhU3Qx-ra2eeu168TO31X7lYJEJIWQxpx6Fh1ZPjDnrC5Fa81rbveCgBiSFH-SHLAhSa-ajap347_7j0Rk2yzM7tabbbYccAI_Rt_TNH_X</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Berger, G.</creator><creator>Green, A.</creator><creator>Brooks, W.</creator><creator>Vaughn, M.</creator><creator>Pitman, R.</creator><creator>Thomason, W.</creator><creator>Griffey, C.</creator><general>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Yield Potential of Hulless Versus Hulled Full‐Sib Genotypes in Four Winter Barley Populations</title><author>Berger, G. ; Green, A. ; Brooks, W. ; Vaughn, M. ; Pitman, R. ; Thomason, W. ; Griffey, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3403-179c8d5cd84d6c22b6ff5475cfd6e249a0e4b68dad60bac0c504bc509ffeb7e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Dietary fiber</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Lodging</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitman, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomason, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffey, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, G.</au><au>Green, A.</au><au>Brooks, W.</au><au>Vaughn, M.</au><au>Pitman, R.</au><au>Thomason, W.</au><au>Griffey, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Yield Potential of Hulless Versus Hulled Full‐Sib Genotypes in Four Winter Barley Populations</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1276</spage><epage>1287</epage><pages>1276-1287</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Determining what factors contribute to the yield difference that exists between hulled and hulless winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is necessary for continued yield improvement in the hulless barley germplasm pool. This yield difference is a major factor limiting the acceptance and production of hulless barley as an alternative to traditional hulled barley. Experiments were conducted in Warsaw, VA, during 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 and in Blacksburg, VA, during 2011/2012. Seedling emergence, plants per square meter, normalized difference vegetative index, heading date, spikes per square meter, plant height, lodging, yield, grain volume weight, 1000 kernel weight, spikelets per spike, seeds per spike, seed weight per spike, ash, crude fiber, fat, protein, and starch were measured. Grain volume weight and protein concentration were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher for hulless genotypes while seedling emergence and grain ash concentration were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher for hulled genotypes. Other traits measured in the study varied by population and environment. On the basis of linear regression analysis, none of the traits explained yield variation in all populations and environments. Before adjustment for hull weight, hulless genotypes yielded significantly (p ≤ 0.05) less than hulled genotypes on average in all populations at Warsaw and for population 1 at Blacksburg during the 2011/2012 growing season. After adjustment for hull weight, yield potential of select hulless genotypes was statistically similar to that of hulled genotypes. Therefore, it is possible to identify hulless genotypes having yield potentials equal to those of their hulled sibs.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2012.10.0603</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-183X
ispartof Crop science, 2013-07, Vol.53 (4), p.1276-1287
issn 0011-183X
1435-0653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1419023763
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Barley
Dietary fiber
Genes
Genotypes
Growing season
Hogs
Lodging
Proteins
Regression analysis
Seedlings
Soybeans
Winter
title Yield Potential of Hulless Versus Hulled Full‐Sib Genotypes in Four Winter Barley Populations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A07%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Yield%20Potential%20of%20Hulless%20Versus%20Hulled%20Full%E2%80%90Sib%20Genotypes%20in%20Four%20Winter%20Barley%20Populations&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Berger,%20G.&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1276&rft.epage=1287&rft.pages=1276-1287&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2012.10.0603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3041179151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1419023763&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true