Assessment of herbage yield and quality traits of perennial ryegrasses from a national variety evaluation scheme
Perennial ryegrass evaluation schemes categorize varieties into three maturity (early, intermediate and late) and two ploidy (diploid and tetraploid) groups, and compare the relative yield, persistence and nutritive quality of varieties within these groups. The present study compared these groups fo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of agricultural science 2013-06, Vol.151 (3), p.331-346 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 346 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 331 |
| container_title | The Journal of agricultural science |
| container_volume | 151 |
| creator | BURNS, G. A. GILLILAND, T. J. GROGAN, D. WATSON, S. O'KIELY, P. |
| description | Perennial ryegrass evaluation schemes categorize varieties into three maturity (early, intermediate and late) and two ploidy (diploid and tetraploid) groups, and compare the relative yield, persistence and nutritive quality of varieties within these groups. The present study compared these groups for herbage yield, dry matter (DM) concentration and, using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS), four quality characteristics (in vitro content of digestible dry matter (CDDM), water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein (CP) concentrations, and buffering capacity). A total of 1208 plots were sown across 5 years in Irish Recommended List trials and then harvested 6–7 times in each of 2 harvest years. This also allowed an assessment of the effect of sward age. Maturity group had no significant effect on annual herbage yield, quality or DM concentration except for in vitro CDDM (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0021859612000251 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1417514006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859612000251</cupid><sourcerecordid>3036220491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5e6abe9bc9c8c46c23b77a414de37b928b8c7109dfe5e40f9bb41fb32075974f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8_wF1AXI4mM5nJZFmKLyi4UNfDTeamTZlHm0wL_fdmbBFB3Nxccs75uBxCbji754zLh3fGUl7mquApi2vOT8iEi0IleZynZDLKyaifk4sQVtEjmSonZD0NAUNosRtob-kSvYYF0r3DpqbQ1XSzhcYNezp4cEMYPWv02HUOGur3uPAwAqj1fUuBdjC4vovSDrzDGMMdNNvvTxrMElu8ImcWmoDXx_eSfD49fsxekvnb8-tsOk9MJuSQ5FiARqWNMqURhUkzLSUILmrMpFZpqUsjOVO1xRwFs0prwa3OUiZzJYXNLsntgbv2_WaLYahW_dbH00LFBZexFsaK6OIHl_F9CB5ttfauBb-vOKvGYqs_xcbM3ZEMwUBjPXTGhZ9gKrO85EUWfdmRDa32rl7grxP-pX8BiFmI7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1417514006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of herbage yield and quality traits of perennial ryegrasses from a national variety evaluation scheme</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>BURNS, G. A. ; GILLILAND, T. J. ; GROGAN, D. ; WATSON, S. ; O'KIELY, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>BURNS, G. A. ; GILLILAND, T. J. ; GROGAN, D. ; WATSON, S. ; O'KIELY, P.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Perennial ryegrass evaluation schemes categorize varieties into three maturity (early, intermediate and late) and two ploidy (diploid and tetraploid) groups, and compare the relative yield, persistence and nutritive quality of varieties within these groups. The present study compared these groups for herbage yield, dry matter (DM) concentration and, using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS), four quality characteristics (in vitro content of digestible dry matter (CDDM), water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein (CP) concentrations, and buffering capacity). A total of 1208 plots were sown across 5 years in Irish Recommended List trials and then harvested 6–7 times in each of 2 harvest years. This also allowed an assessment of the effect of sward age. Maturity group had no significant effect on annual herbage yield, quality or DM concentration except for in vitro CDDM (P<0·01) but differed significantly for in vitro CDDM (P<0·01), WSC concentration (P<0·01) and buffering capacity (P<0·05) at the first silage harvest. Tetraploid swards had greater annual herbage yields (P<0·001), in vitro CDDM values (P<0·001) and WSC concentrations (P<0·01), but lower CP and DM concentrations (P<0·001) than diploids. Swards in their first full year produced an additional 5·17 t/ha DM (P<0·001) and had a higher (P<0·01) WSC concentration at the second silage harvest than in their second year, but did not differ significantly for in vitro CDDM and WSC, CP or DM concentrations. The present study showed that differences exist in yield, nutritive quality and ensilability indices between maturity and ploidy groups. These observations justify their assessment in variety comparative trials and facilitates particular groups being selected for individual farming systems to increase efficiency.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859612000251</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASIAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cereals ; Crop science ; Crops and Soils Research Papers ; Dry matter ; Farming systems ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Harvesting ; Maturity ; Silage</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2013-06, Vol.151 (3), p.331-346</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5e6abe9bc9c8c46c23b77a414de37b928b8c7109dfe5e40f9bb41fb32075974f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5e6abe9bc9c8c46c23b77a414de37b928b8c7109dfe5e40f9bb41fb32075974f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859612000251/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27358163$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BURNS, G. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLILAND, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GROGAN, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WATSON, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'KIELY, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of herbage yield and quality traits of perennial ryegrasses from a national variety evaluation scheme</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Perennial ryegrass evaluation schemes categorize varieties into three maturity (early, intermediate and late) and two ploidy (diploid and tetraploid) groups, and compare the relative yield, persistence and nutritive quality of varieties within these groups. The present study compared these groups for herbage yield, dry matter (DM) concentration and, using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS), four quality characteristics (in vitro content of digestible dry matter (CDDM), water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein (CP) concentrations, and buffering capacity). A total of 1208 plots were sown across 5 years in Irish Recommended List trials and then harvested 6–7 times in each of 2 harvest years. This also allowed an assessment of the effect of sward age. Maturity group had no significant effect on annual herbage yield, quality or DM concentration except for in vitro CDDM (P<0·01) but differed significantly for in vitro CDDM (P<0·01), WSC concentration (P<0·01) and buffering capacity (P<0·05) at the first silage harvest. Tetraploid swards had greater annual herbage yields (P<0·001), in vitro CDDM values (P<0·001) and WSC concentrations (P<0·01), but lower CP and DM concentrations (P<0·001) than diploids. Swards in their first full year produced an additional 5·17 t/ha DM (P<0·001) and had a higher (P<0·01) WSC concentration at the second silage harvest than in their second year, but did not differ significantly for in vitro CDDM and WSC, CP or DM concentrations. The present study showed that differences exist in yield, nutritive quality and ensilability indices between maturity and ploidy groups. These observations justify their assessment in variety comparative trials and facilitates particular groups being selected for individual farming systems to increase efficiency.]]></description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cereals</subject><subject>Crop science</subject><subject>Crops and Soils Research Papers</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Maturity</subject><subject>Silage</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8_wF1AXI4mM5nJZFmKLyi4UNfDTeamTZlHm0wL_fdmbBFB3Nxccs75uBxCbji754zLh3fGUl7mquApi2vOT8iEi0IleZynZDLKyaifk4sQVtEjmSonZD0NAUNosRtob-kSvYYF0r3DpqbQ1XSzhcYNezp4cEMYPWv02HUOGur3uPAwAqj1fUuBdjC4vovSDrzDGMMdNNvvTxrMElu8ImcWmoDXx_eSfD49fsxekvnb8-tsOk9MJuSQ5FiARqWNMqURhUkzLSUILmrMpFZpqUsjOVO1xRwFs0prwa3OUiZzJYXNLsntgbv2_WaLYahW_dbH00LFBZexFsaK6OIHl_F9CB5ttfauBb-vOKvGYqs_xcbM3ZEMwUBjPXTGhZ9gKrO85EUWfdmRDa32rl7grxP-pX8BiFmI7A</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>BURNS, G. A.</creator><creator>GILLILAND, T. J.</creator><creator>GROGAN, D.</creator><creator>WATSON, S.</creator><creator>O'KIELY, P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Assessment of herbage yield and quality traits of perennial ryegrasses from a national variety evaluation scheme</title><author>BURNS, G. A. ; GILLILAND, T. J. ; GROGAN, D. ; WATSON, S. ; O'KIELY, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5e6abe9bc9c8c46c23b77a414de37b928b8c7109dfe5e40f9bb41fb32075974f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cereals</topic><topic>Crop science</topic><topic>Crops and Soils Research Papers</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Maturity</topic><topic>Silage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BURNS, G. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLILAND, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GROGAN, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WATSON, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'KIELY, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BURNS, G. A.</au><au>GILLILAND, T. J.</au><au>GROGAN, D.</au><au>WATSON, S.</au><au>O'KIELY, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of herbage yield and quality traits of perennial ryegrasses from a national variety evaluation scheme</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>331-346</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><coden>JASIAB</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Perennial ryegrass evaluation schemes categorize varieties into three maturity (early, intermediate and late) and two ploidy (diploid and tetraploid) groups, and compare the relative yield, persistence and nutritive quality of varieties within these groups. The present study compared these groups for herbage yield, dry matter (DM) concentration and, using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS), four quality characteristics (in vitro content of digestible dry matter (CDDM), water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein (CP) concentrations, and buffering capacity). A total of 1208 plots were sown across 5 years in Irish Recommended List trials and then harvested 6–7 times in each of 2 harvest years. This also allowed an assessment of the effect of sward age. Maturity group had no significant effect on annual herbage yield, quality or DM concentration except for in vitro CDDM (P<0·01) but differed significantly for in vitro CDDM (P<0·01), WSC concentration (P<0·01) and buffering capacity (P<0·05) at the first silage harvest. Tetraploid swards had greater annual herbage yields (P<0·001), in vitro CDDM values (P<0·001) and WSC concentrations (P<0·01), but lower CP and DM concentrations (P<0·001) than diploids. Swards in their first full year produced an additional 5·17 t/ha DM (P<0·001) and had a higher (P<0·01) WSC concentration at the second silage harvest than in their second year, but did not differ significantly for in vitro CDDM and WSC, CP or DM concentrations. The present study showed that differences exist in yield, nutritive quality and ensilability indices between maturity and ploidy groups. These observations justify their assessment in variety comparative trials and facilitates particular groups being selected for individual farming systems to increase efficiency.]]></abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859612000251</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8596 |
| ispartof | The Journal of agricultural science, 2013-06, Vol.151 (3), p.331-346 |
| issn | 0021-8596 1469-5146 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1417514006 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Agricultural production Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Cereals Crop science Crops and Soils Research Papers Dry matter Farming systems Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Harvesting Maturity Silage |
| title | Assessment of herbage yield and quality traits of perennial ryegrasses from a national variety evaluation scheme |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T16%3A58%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20herbage%20yield%20and%20quality%20traits%20of%20perennial%20ryegrasses%20from%20a%20national%20variety%20evaluation%20scheme&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=BURNS,%20G.%20A.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=331-346&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft.coden=JASIAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859612000251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3036220491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1417514006&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859612000251&rfr_iscdi=true |