An Examination of Stimulus Control in Fluency-Based Strategies: SAFMEDS and Generalization
Fluency-based strategies such as Say All Fast a Minute Each Day Shuffled (SAFMEDS) effectively promote fluent responding (i.e., high rate and accuracy). It is possible, however, that the stimulus control developed through these activities inhibits stimulus generalization. We investigated this concer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of behavioral education 2013-09, Vol.22 (3), p.229-252 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 252 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | Journal of behavioral education |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Meindl, James N. Ivy, Jonathan W. Miller, Neal Neef, Nancy A. Williamson, Robert L. |
description | Fluency-based strategies such as Say All Fast a Minute Each Day Shuffled (SAFMEDS) effectively promote fluent responding (i.e., high rate and accuracy). It is possible, however, that the stimulus control developed through these activities inhibits stimulus generalization. We investigated this concern in a twopart study with college students. Study 1 assessed generalization of rates of responding from training with SAFMEDS to a novel set of equivalent SAFMEDS flashcards. Results indicate that SAFMEDS promoted fluent responding, but rates of responding decreased during generalization probes. Furthermore, higher rates of responding during training were correlated with a greater decrease in rates of responding during generalization probes. This may indicate that students attend to irrelevant stimulus features of SAFMEDS during training. Study 2 examined the effects of embedding multiple-exemplar training within SAFMEDS. Results indicate that multiple-exemplar training can promote generalization of accurate and high-rate responding when incorporated in a SAFMEDS activity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10864-013-9172-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1417402896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A343054843</galeid><ericid>EJ1038191</ericid><jstor_id>41969925</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A343054843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-2adc179265151c7653cd25800185ebb018ef6f1c3d68b717c8a477ebcfa849663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFrFDEUxgdRsNb-AR6EAU8eUvMmySTxtm53a6UiuO3FS8hmMkOWmaQmM9D615vtSOnCguTwQr7f-x4vX1G8A3wOGPNPCbCoKcJAkAReofpFcQKME0QYkJf5jhlBWIB8XbxJaYcxlqKiJ8WvhS9X93pwXo8u-DK05WZ0w9RPqVwGP8bQl86X636y3jygLzrZJhNRj7ZzNn0uN4v199XFptS-KS-tt1H37s-j19viVav7ZM_-1dPidr26WX5F1z8ur5aLa2SolCOqdGOAy6pmwMDwmhHTVExgDILZ7TYX29YtGNLUYsuBG6Ep53ZrWi2orGtyWnyYfe9i-D3ZNKpdmKLPIxVQ4BRXQj6jOt1b5Xwb8hJmcMmoBaEEMyooyRQ6QnXzXsHb1uXnA_78CJ9PYwdnjjZ8PGjIzGjvx05PKamrzc9DFmbWxJBStK26i27Q8UEBVvvU1Zy6yqmrfepqv-b7ucdGZ5741TfAJIcPWa9mPWXNdzY--6z_m-7SGOKTKwVZS1kx8hcwjr3r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1417402896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Examination of Stimulus Control in Fluency-Based Strategies: SAFMEDS and Generalization</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Meindl, James N. ; Ivy, Jonathan W. ; Miller, Neal ; Neef, Nancy A. ; Williamson, Robert L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meindl, James N. ; Ivy, Jonathan W. ; Miller, Neal ; Neef, Nancy A. ; Williamson, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><description>Fluency-based strategies such as Say All Fast a Minute Each Day Shuffled (SAFMEDS) effectively promote fluent responding (i.e., high rate and accuracy). It is possible, however, that the stimulus control developed through these activities inhibits stimulus generalization. We investigated this concern in a twopart study with college students. Study 1 assessed generalization of rates of responding from training with SAFMEDS to a novel set of equivalent SAFMEDS flashcards. Results indicate that SAFMEDS promoted fluent responding, but rates of responding decreased during generalization probes. Furthermore, higher rates of responding during training were correlated with a greater decrease in rates of responding during generalization probes. This may indicate that students attend to irrelevant stimulus features of SAFMEDS during training. Study 2 examined the effects of embedding multiple-exemplar training within SAFMEDS. Results indicate that multiple-exemplar training can promote generalization of accurate and high-rate responding when incorporated in a SAFMEDS activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10864-013-9172-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer Science and Business Media, Inc</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; College Instruction ; College Students ; Educational research ; Generalization ; Instructional Materials ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning Processes ; Medical education ; Mental stimulation ; Observational research ; Original Paper ; Outcomes of Education ; Pedagogy ; Psychology ; Special education ; Statistical analysis ; Stimulus Generalization ; Teaching methods ; Timing devices ; Training ; Undergraduate Study ; Verbal Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of behavioral education, 2013-09, Vol.22 (3), p.229-252</ispartof><rights>2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-2adc179265151c7653cd25800185ebb018ef6f1c3d68b717c8a477ebcfa849663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-2adc179265151c7653cd25800185ebb018ef6f1c3d68b717c8a477ebcfa849663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41969925$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41969925$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1038191$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meindl, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivy, Jonathan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neef, Nancy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><title>An Examination of Stimulus Control in Fluency-Based Strategies: SAFMEDS and Generalization</title><title>Journal of behavioral education</title><addtitle>J Behav Educ</addtitle><description>Fluency-based strategies such as Say All Fast a Minute Each Day Shuffled (SAFMEDS) effectively promote fluent responding (i.e., high rate and accuracy). It is possible, however, that the stimulus control developed through these activities inhibits stimulus generalization. We investigated this concern in a twopart study with college students. Study 1 assessed generalization of rates of responding from training with SAFMEDS to a novel set of equivalent SAFMEDS flashcards. Results indicate that SAFMEDS promoted fluent responding, but rates of responding decreased during generalization probes. Furthermore, higher rates of responding during training were correlated with a greater decrease in rates of responding during generalization probes. This may indicate that students attend to irrelevant stimulus features of SAFMEDS during training. Study 2 examined the effects of embedding multiple-exemplar training within SAFMEDS. Results indicate that multiple-exemplar training can promote generalization of accurate and high-rate responding when incorporated in a SAFMEDS activity.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>College Instruction</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Generalization</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Mental stimulation</subject><subject>Observational research</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Special education</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stimulus Generalization</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Timing devices</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><subject>Verbal Stimuli</subject><issn>1053-0819</issn><issn>1573-3513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFrFDEUxgdRsNb-AR6EAU8eUvMmySTxtm53a6UiuO3FS8hmMkOWmaQmM9D615vtSOnCguTwQr7f-x4vX1G8A3wOGPNPCbCoKcJAkAReofpFcQKME0QYkJf5jhlBWIB8XbxJaYcxlqKiJ8WvhS9X93pwXo8u-DK05WZ0w9RPqVwGP8bQl86X636y3jygLzrZJhNRj7ZzNn0uN4v199XFptS-KS-tt1H37s-j19viVav7ZM_-1dPidr26WX5F1z8ur5aLa2SolCOqdGOAy6pmwMDwmhHTVExgDILZ7TYX29YtGNLUYsuBG6Ep53ZrWi2orGtyWnyYfe9i-D3ZNKpdmKLPIxVQ4BRXQj6jOt1b5Xwb8hJmcMmoBaEEMyooyRQ6QnXzXsHb1uXnA_78CJ9PYwdnjjZ8PGjIzGjvx05PKamrzc9DFmbWxJBStK26i27Q8UEBVvvU1Zy6yqmrfepqv-b7ucdGZ5741TfAJIcPWa9mPWXNdzY--6z_m-7SGOKTKwVZS1kx8hcwjr3r</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Meindl, James N.</creator><creator>Ivy, Jonathan W.</creator><creator>Miller, Neal</creator><creator>Neef, Nancy A.</creator><creator>Williamson, Robert L.</creator><general>Springer Science and Business Media, Inc</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>An Examination of Stimulus Control in Fluency-Based Strategies: SAFMEDS and Generalization</title><author>Meindl, James N. ; Ivy, Jonathan W. ; Miller, Neal ; Neef, Nancy A. ; Williamson, Robert L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-2adc179265151c7653cd25800185ebb018ef6f1c3d68b717c8a477ebcfa849663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>College Instruction</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Generalization</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Mental stimulation</topic><topic>Observational research</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Special education</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stimulus Generalization</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Timing devices</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><topic>Verbal Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meindl, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivy, Jonathan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neef, Nancy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of behavioral education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meindl, James N.</au><au>Ivy, Jonathan W.</au><au>Miller, Neal</au><au>Neef, Nancy A.</au><au>Williamson, Robert L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1038191</ericid><atitle>An Examination of Stimulus Control in Fluency-Based Strategies: SAFMEDS and Generalization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of behavioral education</jtitle><stitle>J Behav Educ</stitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>229-252</pages><issn>1053-0819</issn><eissn>1573-3513</eissn><abstract>Fluency-based strategies such as Say All Fast a Minute Each Day Shuffled (SAFMEDS) effectively promote fluent responding (i.e., high rate and accuracy). It is possible, however, that the stimulus control developed through these activities inhibits stimulus generalization. We investigated this concern in a twopart study with college students. Study 1 assessed generalization of rates of responding from training with SAFMEDS to a novel set of equivalent SAFMEDS flashcards. Results indicate that SAFMEDS promoted fluent responding, but rates of responding decreased during generalization probes. Furthermore, higher rates of responding during training were correlated with a greater decrease in rates of responding during generalization probes. This may indicate that students attend to irrelevant stimulus features of SAFMEDS during training. Study 2 examined the effects of embedding multiple-exemplar training within SAFMEDS. Results indicate that multiple-exemplar training can promote generalization of accurate and high-rate responding when incorporated in a SAFMEDS activity.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer Science and Business Media, Inc</pub><doi>10.1007/s10864-013-9172-6</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-0819 |
ispartof | Journal of behavioral education, 2013-09, Vol.22 (3), p.229-252 |
issn | 1053-0819 1573-3513 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1417402896 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Child and School Psychology College Instruction College Students Educational research Generalization Instructional Materials Learning Learning and Instruction Learning Processes Medical education Mental stimulation Observational research Original Paper Outcomes of Education Pedagogy Psychology Special education Statistical analysis Stimulus Generalization Teaching methods Timing devices Training Undergraduate Study Verbal Stimuli |
title | An Examination of Stimulus Control in Fluency-Based Strategies: SAFMEDS and Generalization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A11%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Examination%20of%20Stimulus%20Control%20in%20Fluency-Based%20Strategies:%20SAFMEDS%20and%20Generalization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20behavioral%20education&rft.au=Meindl,%20James%20N.&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=229-252&rft.issn=1053-0819&rft.eissn=1573-3513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10864-013-9172-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA343054843%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1417402896&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A343054843&rft_ericid=EJ1038191&rft_jstor_id=41969925&rfr_iscdi=true |