Maximum Rates of Seed Placed Fertilizer for Corn for Three Soils

Fertilizer is placed in the seed row with corn (Zea mays L.) to increase plant growth. Fertilizers contain salts that have the potential for damaging roots and reducing plant emergence. The objective of this study was to determine the rates of fertilizer sources that can safely be placed with the co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2013-07, Vol.105 (4), p.1211-1221
Hauptverfasser: Kaiser, Daniel E., Rubin, John C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1221
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1211
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 105
creator Kaiser, Daniel E.
Rubin, John C.
description Fertilizer is placed in the seed row with corn (Zea mays L.) to increase plant growth. Fertilizers contain salts that have the potential for damaging roots and reducing plant emergence. The objective of this study was to determine the rates of fertilizer sources that can safely be placed with the corn seed for three soils with differing chemical properties. Eleven liquid and dry fertilizer sources were tested at five rates in the greenhouse on three soils: clay loam (CL), fine sand (FS), and silt loam (SiL). After 14 d of plant growth, final stand counts and plant mass were used to develop damage index values using the mean and product of relative plant emergence and plant mass. Predicted rates indicated that 10.6 kg N + K ha–1 could be applied for CL and SiL soils while the rate was 5.7 kg for the FS. Predicted rates using total N plus K agreed with rates predicted when using the salt index of the fertilizer times the rate applied except for ammonium thiosulfate (ATS) and a low‐salt N–P–K fertilizer source. Better predictions were made when N and S were considered for ATS and only N for the low‐salt fertilizer. Both models predicted rates similarly for the FS, but the N plus K model was more conservative for the CL and SiL soils. The data indicate that a single model could be used for predicting seed‐safe rates for multiple fertilizer sources; however, care must be taken because predicted rates may assume optimal soil moisture.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2013.0125
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1416803973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3034775341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3255-6d7c780bffbd94a3aa739564bfb674baf6358c7011bcf3962e9640a93dde31903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1PAjEUbIwmInr22sTzwuvn0pMSIihBMYDnprvb6pKFYstG8de7gIlHTzN5mZk3GYSuCXQoYbxr3oJfLykQ1gFCxQlqEc5EApKLU9QCAJoQJek5uohxCUCI4qSF7p7MV7mqV3hmtjZi7_Dc2gK_VCZvYGjDtqzKbxuw8wEPfFgfyOI9WIvnvqziJTpzpor26hfb6HV4vxg8JJPp6HHQnyQ5o0IkskjztAeZc1mhuGHGpEwJyTOXyZRnxkkmenna1Mpyx5qeVkkORrGisIwoYG10c8zdBP9R27jVS1-HdfNSE05kD5hKWaPqHlV58DEG6_QmlCsTdpqA3s-k_2bS-5kax-3R8VlWdvefXPdHY9ofzabP4_3tkPADNR5tcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1416803973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maximum Rates of Seed Placed Fertilizer for Corn for Three Soils</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kaiser, Daniel E. ; Rubin, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Daniel E. ; Rubin, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>Fertilizer is placed in the seed row with corn (Zea mays L.) to increase plant growth. Fertilizers contain salts that have the potential for damaging roots and reducing plant emergence. The objective of this study was to determine the rates of fertilizer sources that can safely be placed with the corn seed for three soils with differing chemical properties. Eleven liquid and dry fertilizer sources were tested at five rates in the greenhouse on three soils: clay loam (CL), fine sand (FS), and silt loam (SiL). After 14 d of plant growth, final stand counts and plant mass were used to develop damage index values using the mean and product of relative plant emergence and plant mass. Predicted rates indicated that 10.6 kg N + K ha–1 could be applied for CL and SiL soils while the rate was 5.7 kg for the FS. Predicted rates using total N plus K agreed with rates predicted when using the salt index of the fertilizer times the rate applied except for ammonium thiosulfate (ATS) and a low‐salt N–P–K fertilizer source. Better predictions were made when N and S were considered for ATS and only N for the low‐salt fertilizer. Both models predicted rates similarly for the FS, but the N plus K model was more conservative for the CL and SiL soils. The data indicate that a single model could be used for predicting seed‐safe rates for multiple fertilizer sources; however, care must be taken because predicted rates may assume optimal soil moisture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2013.0125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2013-07, Vol.105 (4), p.1211-1221</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3255-6d7c780bffbd94a3aa739564bfb674baf6358c7011bcf3962e9640a93dde31903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3255-6d7c780bffbd94a3aa739564bfb674baf6358c7011bcf3962e9640a93dde31903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2013.0125$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2013.0125$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>Maximum Rates of Seed Placed Fertilizer for Corn for Three Soils</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Fertilizer is placed in the seed row with corn (Zea mays L.) to increase plant growth. Fertilizers contain salts that have the potential for damaging roots and reducing plant emergence. The objective of this study was to determine the rates of fertilizer sources that can safely be placed with the corn seed for three soils with differing chemical properties. Eleven liquid and dry fertilizer sources were tested at five rates in the greenhouse on three soils: clay loam (CL), fine sand (FS), and silt loam (SiL). After 14 d of plant growth, final stand counts and plant mass were used to develop damage index values using the mean and product of relative plant emergence and plant mass. Predicted rates indicated that 10.6 kg N + K ha–1 could be applied for CL and SiL soils while the rate was 5.7 kg for the FS. Predicted rates using total N plus K agreed with rates predicted when using the salt index of the fertilizer times the rate applied except for ammonium thiosulfate (ATS) and a low‐salt N–P–K fertilizer source. Better predictions were made when N and S were considered for ATS and only N for the low‐salt fertilizer. Both models predicted rates similarly for the FS, but the N plus K model was more conservative for the CL and SiL soils. The data indicate that a single model could be used for predicting seed‐safe rates for multiple fertilizer sources; however, care must be taken because predicted rates may assume optimal soil moisture.</description><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1PAjEUbIwmInr22sTzwuvn0pMSIihBMYDnprvb6pKFYstG8de7gIlHTzN5mZk3GYSuCXQoYbxr3oJfLykQ1gFCxQlqEc5EApKLU9QCAJoQJek5uohxCUCI4qSF7p7MV7mqV3hmtjZi7_Dc2gK_VCZvYGjDtqzKbxuw8wEPfFgfyOI9WIvnvqziJTpzpor26hfb6HV4vxg8JJPp6HHQnyQ5o0IkskjztAeZc1mhuGHGpEwJyTOXyZRnxkkmenna1Mpyx5qeVkkORrGisIwoYG10c8zdBP9R27jVS1-HdfNSE05kD5hKWaPqHlV58DEG6_QmlCsTdpqA3s-k_2bS-5kax-3R8VlWdvefXPdHY9ofzabP4_3tkPADNR5tcA</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Kaiser, Daniel E.</creator><creator>Rubin, John C.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Maximum Rates of Seed Placed Fertilizer for Corn for Three Soils</title><author>Kaiser, Daniel E. ; Rubin, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3255-6d7c780bffbd94a3aa739564bfb674baf6358c7011bcf3962e9640a93dde31903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaiser, Daniel E.</au><au>Rubin, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maximum Rates of Seed Placed Fertilizer for Corn for Three Soils</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1211</spage><epage>1221</epage><pages>1211-1221</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>Fertilizer is placed in the seed row with corn (Zea mays L.) to increase plant growth. Fertilizers contain salts that have the potential for damaging roots and reducing plant emergence. The objective of this study was to determine the rates of fertilizer sources that can safely be placed with the corn seed for three soils with differing chemical properties. Eleven liquid and dry fertilizer sources were tested at five rates in the greenhouse on three soils: clay loam (CL), fine sand (FS), and silt loam (SiL). After 14 d of plant growth, final stand counts and plant mass were used to develop damage index values using the mean and product of relative plant emergence and plant mass. Predicted rates indicated that 10.6 kg N + K ha–1 could be applied for CL and SiL soils while the rate was 5.7 kg for the FS. Predicted rates using total N plus K agreed with rates predicted when using the salt index of the fertilizer times the rate applied except for ammonium thiosulfate (ATS) and a low‐salt N–P–K fertilizer source. Better predictions were made when N and S were considered for ATS and only N for the low‐salt fertilizer. Both models predicted rates similarly for the FS, but the N plus K model was more conservative for the CL and SiL soils. The data indicate that a single model could be used for predicting seed‐safe rates for multiple fertilizer sources; however, care must be taken because predicted rates may assume optimal soil moisture.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2013.0125</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2013-07, Vol.105 (4), p.1211-1221
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1416803973
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Maximum Rates of Seed Placed Fertilizer for Corn for Three Soils
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A56%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maximum%20Rates%20of%20Seed%20Placed%20Fertilizer%20for%20Corn%20for%20Three%20Soils&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Kaiser,%20Daniel%20E.&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1211&rft.epage=1221&rft.pages=1211-1221&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2013.0125&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3034775341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1416803973&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true