Attempts to Increase Vehicle Safety-Belt Use Among Industry Workers: What Can We Learn from Our Failures?
A multiple intervention level hierarchy was evaluated with systematic implementation of successive interventions over a period of two years. Successive applications of written prompts, goal-setting, goal-setting plus feedback, and promise-card commitment interventions did not significantly impact th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of organizational behavior management 1999-11, Vol.19 (3), p.27-44 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 44 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 27 |
| container_title | Journal of organizational behavior management |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Boyce, Thomas E. Geller, E. Scott |
| description | A multiple intervention level hierarchy was evaluated with systematic implementation of successive interventions over a period of two years. Successive applications of written prompts, goal-setting, goal-setting plus feedback, and promise-card commitment interventions did not significantly impact the safety-belt use of 556 employees at a manufacturing plant in southwest Virginia. A modest increase in safety-belt use (from 59% to 68%) occurred only when a promise-card commitment strategy was combined with an incentive/reward strategy. These data support a multiple intervention level hierarchy which suggests that repeated attempts to change behavior with interventions at the same level of intrusiveness will not affect behavior uninfluenced by the first attempt at that level. A flow of behavior change model (Geller, 1999) is used to explain the impact of interventions on people at different stages of readiness for behavior change and to extend the multiple intervention level model. Suggestions are given for selecting the most appropriate behavior change strategy for large-scale applications. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1300/J075v19n03_03 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1416375058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1416375058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-7f905522f084e8583a7dcd58a2932ce4139a4baff42f532e370b8d23913142e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1PwzAMBuAIgcQYHLlXcC44X21zHBMfQ5M4wOAYZa0DHW0zkgzUf0-ncUGCky3rsS29hJxSuKAc4PIecvlJVQdcA98jIyoFpEUGYp-MgGZDDxk9JEchrAAoE8BHZDqJEdt1DEl0yawrPZqAyTO-1WWDyaOxGPv0CpuYLIb5pHXd68CqTYi-T16cf0cfjsmBNU3Ak586Joub66fpXTp_uJ1NJ_O0ZErGNLcKpGTMQiGwkAU3eVVWsjBMcVaioFwZsTTWCmYlZ8hzWBYV44pyKhhKPiZnu7tr7z42GKJeuY3vhpeaKsUyKrMtOv8XCZrxXMLwekzSnSq9C8Gj1Wtft8b3moLehql_hTn4Yufrzjrfmi_nm0pH0zfOW2-6sg6a_736DSkdd6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1416375058</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attempts to Increase Vehicle Safety-Belt Use Among Industry Workers: What Can We Learn from Our Failures?</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Boyce, Thomas E. ; Geller, E. Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyce, Thomas E. ; Geller, E. Scott</creatorcontrib><description>A multiple intervention level hierarchy was evaluated with systematic implementation of successive interventions over a period of two years. Successive applications of written prompts, goal-setting, goal-setting plus feedback, and promise-card commitment interventions did not significantly impact the safety-belt use of 556 employees at a manufacturing plant in southwest Virginia. A modest increase in safety-belt use (from 59% to 68%) occurred only when a promise-card commitment strategy was combined with an incentive/reward strategy. These data support a multiple intervention level hierarchy which suggests that repeated attempts to change behavior with interventions at the same level of intrusiveness will not affect behavior uninfluenced by the first attempt at that level. A flow of behavior change model (Geller, 1999) is used to explain the impact of interventions on people at different stages of readiness for behavior change and to extend the multiple intervention level model. Suggestions are given for selecting the most appropriate behavior change strategy for large-scale applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-8061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1300/J075v19n03_03</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Binghamton, NY [etc.]: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>assigned goal ; Behavior Change ; Behavior Modification ; Change Strategies ; Effects ; Employee attitude ; goal plus feedback ; Goal setting ; Intervention ; Manufacturers ; Manufacturing ; Organizational behavior ; Personal protective equipment ; promise card ; promise card plus incentive/reward ; Safety ; safety belt use ; safety slogans and celebration ; Statistical analysis ; Strategic management ; Studies ; Vehicles ; written prompts</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior management, 1999-11, Vol.19 (3), p.27-44</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1999</rights><rights>Copyright Haworth Press, Inc. 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-7f905522f084e8583a7dcd58a2932ce4139a4baff42f532e370b8d23913142e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J075v19n03_03$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1300/J075v19n03_03$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyce, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geller, E. Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Attempts to Increase Vehicle Safety-Belt Use Among Industry Workers: What Can We Learn from Our Failures?</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior management</title><description>A multiple intervention level hierarchy was evaluated with systematic implementation of successive interventions over a period of two years. Successive applications of written prompts, goal-setting, goal-setting plus feedback, and promise-card commitment interventions did not significantly impact the safety-belt use of 556 employees at a manufacturing plant in southwest Virginia. A modest increase in safety-belt use (from 59% to 68%) occurred only when a promise-card commitment strategy was combined with an incentive/reward strategy. These data support a multiple intervention level hierarchy which suggests that repeated attempts to change behavior with interventions at the same level of intrusiveness will not affect behavior uninfluenced by the first attempt at that level. A flow of behavior change model (Geller, 1999) is used to explain the impact of interventions on people at different stages of readiness for behavior change and to extend the multiple intervention level model. Suggestions are given for selecting the most appropriate behavior change strategy for large-scale applications.</description><subject>assigned goal</subject><subject>Behavior Change</subject><subject>Behavior Modification</subject><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>goal plus feedback</subject><subject>Goal setting</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Personal protective equipment</subject><subject>promise card</subject><subject>promise card plus incentive/reward</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>safety belt use</subject><subject>safety slogans and celebration</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vehicles</subject><subject>written prompts</subject><issn>0160-8061</issn><issn>1540-8604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1PwzAMBuAIgcQYHLlXcC44X21zHBMfQ5M4wOAYZa0DHW0zkgzUf0-ncUGCky3rsS29hJxSuKAc4PIecvlJVQdcA98jIyoFpEUGYp-MgGZDDxk9JEchrAAoE8BHZDqJEdt1DEl0yawrPZqAyTO-1WWDyaOxGPv0CpuYLIb5pHXd68CqTYi-T16cf0cfjsmBNU3Ak586Joub66fpXTp_uJ1NJ_O0ZErGNLcKpGTMQiGwkAU3eVVWsjBMcVaioFwZsTTWCmYlZ8hzWBYV44pyKhhKPiZnu7tr7z42GKJeuY3vhpeaKsUyKrMtOv8XCZrxXMLwekzSnSq9C8Gj1Wtft8b3moLehql_hTn4Yufrzjrfmi_nm0pH0zfOW2-6sg6a_736DSkdd6c</recordid><startdate>19991124</startdate><enddate>19991124</enddate><creator>Boyce, Thomas E.</creator><creator>Geller, E. Scott</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Haworth Press [etc.]</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991124</creationdate><title>Attempts to Increase Vehicle Safety-Belt Use Among Industry Workers</title><author>Boyce, Thomas E. ; Geller, E. Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-7f905522f084e8583a7dcd58a2932ce4139a4baff42f532e370b8d23913142e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>assigned goal</topic><topic>Behavior Change</topic><topic>Behavior Modification</topic><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>goal plus feedback</topic><topic>Goal setting</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Personal protective equipment</topic><topic>promise card</topic><topic>promise card plus incentive/reward</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>safety belt use</topic><topic>safety slogans and celebration</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vehicles</topic><topic>written prompts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyce, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geller, E. Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyce, Thomas E.</au><au>Geller, E. Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attempts to Increase Vehicle Safety-Belt Use Among Industry Workers: What Can We Learn from Our Failures?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior management</jtitle><date>1999-11-24</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>27-44</pages><issn>0160-8061</issn><eissn>1540-8604</eissn><abstract>A multiple intervention level hierarchy was evaluated with systematic implementation of successive interventions over a period of two years. Successive applications of written prompts, goal-setting, goal-setting plus feedback, and promise-card commitment interventions did not significantly impact the safety-belt use of 556 employees at a manufacturing plant in southwest Virginia. A modest increase in safety-belt use (from 59% to 68%) occurred only when a promise-card commitment strategy was combined with an incentive/reward strategy. These data support a multiple intervention level hierarchy which suggests that repeated attempts to change behavior with interventions at the same level of intrusiveness will not affect behavior uninfluenced by the first attempt at that level. A flow of behavior change model (Geller, 1999) is used to explain the impact of interventions on people at different stages of readiness for behavior change and to extend the multiple intervention level model. Suggestions are given for selecting the most appropriate behavior change strategy for large-scale applications.</abstract><cop>Binghamton, NY [etc.]</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1300/J075v19n03_03</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0160-8061 |
| ispartof | Journal of organizational behavior management, 1999-11, Vol.19 (3), p.27-44 |
| issn | 0160-8061 1540-8604 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1416375058 |
| source | Taylor & Francis; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | assigned goal Behavior Change Behavior Modification Change Strategies Effects Employee attitude goal plus feedback Goal setting Intervention Manufacturers Manufacturing Organizational behavior Personal protective equipment promise card promise card plus incentive/reward Safety safety belt use safety slogans and celebration Statistical analysis Strategic management Studies Vehicles written prompts |
| title | Attempts to Increase Vehicle Safety-Belt Use Among Industry Workers: What Can We Learn from Our Failures? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T07%3A15%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attempts%20to%20Increase%20Vehicle%20Safety-Belt%20Use%20Among%20Industry%20Workers:%20What%20Can%20We%20Learn%20from%20Our%20Failures?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior%20management&rft.au=Boyce,%20Thomas%20E.&rft.date=1999-11-24&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=27-44&rft.issn=0160-8061&rft.eissn=1540-8604&rft_id=info:doi/10.1300/J075v19n03_03&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1416375058%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1416375058&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |