Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case
► Test for vertical collusion based on the evaluation of price–costs margins. ► Two scenarios: one airport–one airline and two airports–two airlines. ► 36 Pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports are tested. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for main national carriers in smal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review Logistics and transportation review, 2013-10, Vol.57, p.3-15 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Barbot, Cristina D’Alfonso, Tiziana Malighetti, Paolo Redondi, Renato |
description | ► Test for vertical collusion based on the evaluation of price–costs margins. ► Two scenarios: one airport–one airline and two airports–two airlines. ► 36 Pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports are tested. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for main national carriers in small airports. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for low cost carriers in secondary airports.
We develop a test for vertical collusion between airports and airlines in the case of two different scenarios. In the first scenario there is one airport and one airline; this intends to depict the case of airports that do not compete with any other one. In the second, we consider two competing airports and one airline that uses the airport as a base or a hub. In the case of non competing airports we find that gross margins are lower when there is vertical collusion. In the case of competing airports, we find that gross margins are equal when both pairs collude or do not collude. But in the case in which only one pair colludes, a merger between them brings a lower margin. We tested 36 pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports and we find evidence for vertical collusion with respect to: (i) main national carriers in small airports (ii) low cost carriers in secondary airports. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1411283757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1366554513000124</els_id><sourcerecordid>3026137751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-903c1654a5e68f50a61e3d61ff8fa385bc1173310b1d01b6f7455e3a631c2c023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYsouK5-AG8Bz62ZpkmzeloW_8GCFxU8hTSdYJZuU5NU8dvb3fXsaWbg_d48XpZdAi2AgrjeFClgUVJgBYWC0vIom4GsZc7rRXU87UyInPOKn2ZnMW4onSBezrL3NwzJGd0R47tujM73pMH0jdgT7cLgQ4pE9-3u6FyP8YYse4LbwYU9lTAmYn0g6QPJ3Rj8gLonRkc8z06s7iJe_M159np_97J6zNfPD0-r5To3lZQpX1BmpiiV5iik5VQLQNYKsFZazSRvDEDNGNAGWgqNsHXFOTItGJjS0JLNs6uD7xD85zjFURs_hn56qaACKCWreT2p4KAywccY0KohuK0OPwqo2jWoNmpqUO0aVBQU3TvfHhic4n85DCoah73B1gU0SbXe_UP_Aru5eI8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1411283757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Barbot, Cristina ; D’Alfonso, Tiziana ; Malighetti, Paolo ; Redondi, Renato</creator><creatorcontrib>Barbot, Cristina ; D’Alfonso, Tiziana ; Malighetti, Paolo ; Redondi, Renato</creatorcontrib><description>► Test for vertical collusion based on the evaluation of price–costs margins. ► Two scenarios: one airport–one airline and two airports–two airlines. ► 36 Pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports are tested. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for main national carriers in small airports. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for low cost carriers in secondary airports.
We develop a test for vertical collusion between airports and airlines in the case of two different scenarios. In the first scenario there is one airport and one airline; this intends to depict the case of airports that do not compete with any other one. In the second, we consider two competing airports and one airline that uses the airport as a base or a hub. In the case of non competing airports we find that gross margins are lower when there is vertical collusion. In the case of competing airports, we find that gross margins are equal when both pairs collude or do not collude. But in the case in which only one pair colludes, a merger between them brings a lower margin. We tested 36 pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports and we find evidence for vertical collusion with respect to: (i) main national carriers in small airports (ii) low cost carriers in secondary airports.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-5545</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRERFW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Exeter: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Airline competition ; Airlines ; Airport competition ; Airports ; Collusion ; Competition ; Gross margins ; Studies ; Vertical collusion</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review, 2013-10, Vol.57, p.3-15</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Oct 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-903c1654a5e68f50a61e3d61ff8fa385bc1173310b1d01b6f7455e3a631c2c023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-903c1654a5e68f50a61e3d61ff8fa385bc1173310b1d01b6f7455e3a631c2c023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barbot, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Alfonso, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malighetti, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redondi, Renato</creatorcontrib><title>Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case</title><title>Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review</title><description>► Test for vertical collusion based on the evaluation of price–costs margins. ► Two scenarios: one airport–one airline and two airports–two airlines. ► 36 Pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports are tested. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for main national carriers in small airports. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for low cost carriers in secondary airports.
We develop a test for vertical collusion between airports and airlines in the case of two different scenarios. In the first scenario there is one airport and one airline; this intends to depict the case of airports that do not compete with any other one. In the second, we consider two competing airports and one airline that uses the airport as a base or a hub. In the case of non competing airports we find that gross margins are lower when there is vertical collusion. In the case of competing airports, we find that gross margins are equal when both pairs collude or do not collude. But in the case in which only one pair colludes, a merger between them brings a lower margin. We tested 36 pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports and we find evidence for vertical collusion with respect to: (i) main national carriers in small airports (ii) low cost carriers in secondary airports.</description><subject>Airline competition</subject><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>Airport competition</subject><subject>Airports</subject><subject>Collusion</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Gross margins</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vertical collusion</subject><issn>1366-5545</issn><issn>1878-5794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYsouK5-AG8Bz62ZpkmzeloW_8GCFxU8hTSdYJZuU5NU8dvb3fXsaWbg_d48XpZdAi2AgrjeFClgUVJgBYWC0vIom4GsZc7rRXU87UyInPOKn2ZnMW4onSBezrL3NwzJGd0R47tujM73pMH0jdgT7cLgQ4pE9-3u6FyP8YYse4LbwYU9lTAmYn0g6QPJ3Rj8gLonRkc8z06s7iJe_M159np_97J6zNfPD0-r5To3lZQpX1BmpiiV5iik5VQLQNYKsFZazSRvDEDNGNAGWgqNsHXFOTItGJjS0JLNs6uD7xD85zjFURs_hn56qaACKCWreT2p4KAywccY0KohuK0OPwqo2jWoNmpqUO0aVBQU3TvfHhic4n85DCoah73B1gU0SbXe_UP_Aru5eI8</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Barbot, Cristina</creator><creator>D’Alfonso, Tiziana</creator><creator>Malighetti, Paolo</creator><creator>Redondi, Renato</creator><general>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case</title><author>Barbot, Cristina ; D’Alfonso, Tiziana ; Malighetti, Paolo ; Redondi, Renato</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-903c1654a5e68f50a61e3d61ff8fa385bc1173310b1d01b6f7455e3a631c2c023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Airline competition</topic><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>Airport competition</topic><topic>Airports</topic><topic>Collusion</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Gross margins</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vertical collusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barbot, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Alfonso, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malighetti, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redondi, Renato</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barbot, Cristina</au><au>D’Alfonso, Tiziana</au><au>Malighetti, Paolo</au><au>Redondi, Renato</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>57</volume><spage>3</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>3-15</pages><issn>1366-5545</issn><eissn>1878-5794</eissn><coden>TRERFW</coden><abstract>► Test for vertical collusion based on the evaluation of price–costs margins. ► Two scenarios: one airport–one airline and two airports–two airlines. ► 36 Pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports are tested. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for main national carriers in small airports. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for low cost carriers in secondary airports.
We develop a test for vertical collusion between airports and airlines in the case of two different scenarios. In the first scenario there is one airport and one airline; this intends to depict the case of airports that do not compete with any other one. In the second, we consider two competing airports and one airline that uses the airport as a base or a hub. In the case of non competing airports we find that gross margins are lower when there is vertical collusion. In the case of competing airports, we find that gross margins are equal when both pairs collude or do not collude. But in the case in which only one pair colludes, a merger between them brings a lower margin. We tested 36 pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports and we find evidence for vertical collusion with respect to: (i) main national carriers in small airports (ii) low cost carriers in secondary airports.</abstract><cop>Exeter</cop><pub>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.002</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-5545 |
ispartof | Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review, 2013-10, Vol.57, p.3-15 |
issn | 1366-5545 1878-5794 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1411283757 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Airline competition Airlines Airport competition Airports Collusion Competition Gross margins Studies Vertical collusion |
title | Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T10%3A16%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertical%20collusion%20between%20airports%20and%20airlines:%20An%20empirical%20test%20for%20the%20European%20case&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20E,%20Logistics%20and%20transportation%20review&rft.au=Barbot,%20Cristina&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=57&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=3-15&rft.issn=1366-5545&rft.eissn=1878-5794&rft.coden=TRERFW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3026137751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1411283757&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1366554513000124&rfr_iscdi=true |