Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case

► Test for vertical collusion based on the evaluation of price–costs margins. ► Two scenarios: one airport–one airline and two airports–two airlines. ► 36 Pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports are tested. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for main national carriers in smal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review Logistics and transportation review, 2013-10, Vol.57, p.3-15
Hauptverfasser: Barbot, Cristina, D’Alfonso, Tiziana, Malighetti, Paolo, Redondi, Renato
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue
container_start_page 3
container_title Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review
container_volume 57
creator Barbot, Cristina
D’Alfonso, Tiziana
Malighetti, Paolo
Redondi, Renato
description ► Test for vertical collusion based on the evaluation of price–costs margins. ► Two scenarios: one airport–one airline and two airports–two airlines. ► 36 Pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports are tested. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for main national carriers in small airports. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for low cost carriers in secondary airports. We develop a test for vertical collusion between airports and airlines in the case of two different scenarios. In the first scenario there is one airport and one airline; this intends to depict the case of airports that do not compete with any other one. In the second, we consider two competing airports and one airline that uses the airport as a base or a hub. In the case of non competing airports we find that gross margins are lower when there is vertical collusion. In the case of competing airports, we find that gross margins are equal when both pairs collude or do not collude. But in the case in which only one pair colludes, a merger between them brings a lower margin. We tested 36 pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports and we find evidence for vertical collusion with respect to: (i) main national carriers in small airports (ii) low cost carriers in secondary airports.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1411283757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1366554513000124</els_id><sourcerecordid>3026137751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-903c1654a5e68f50a61e3d61ff8fa385bc1173310b1d01b6f7455e3a631c2c023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYsouK5-AG8Bz62ZpkmzeloW_8GCFxU8hTSdYJZuU5NU8dvb3fXsaWbg_d48XpZdAi2AgrjeFClgUVJgBYWC0vIom4GsZc7rRXU87UyInPOKn2ZnMW4onSBezrL3NwzJGd0R47tujM73pMH0jdgT7cLgQ4pE9-3u6FyP8YYse4LbwYU9lTAmYn0g6QPJ3Rj8gLonRkc8z06s7iJe_M159np_97J6zNfPD0-r5To3lZQpX1BmpiiV5iik5VQLQNYKsFZazSRvDEDNGNAGWgqNsHXFOTItGJjS0JLNs6uD7xD85zjFURs_hn56qaACKCWreT2p4KAywccY0KohuK0OPwqo2jWoNmpqUO0aVBQU3TvfHhic4n85DCoah73B1gU0SbXe_UP_Aru5eI8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1411283757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Barbot, Cristina ; D’Alfonso, Tiziana ; Malighetti, Paolo ; Redondi, Renato</creator><creatorcontrib>Barbot, Cristina ; D’Alfonso, Tiziana ; Malighetti, Paolo ; Redondi, Renato</creatorcontrib><description>► Test for vertical collusion based on the evaluation of price–costs margins. ► Two scenarios: one airport–one airline and two airports–two airlines. ► 36 Pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports are tested. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for main national carriers in small airports. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for low cost carriers in secondary airports. We develop a test for vertical collusion between airports and airlines in the case of two different scenarios. In the first scenario there is one airport and one airline; this intends to depict the case of airports that do not compete with any other one. In the second, we consider two competing airports and one airline that uses the airport as a base or a hub. In the case of non competing airports we find that gross margins are lower when there is vertical collusion. In the case of competing airports, we find that gross margins are equal when both pairs collude or do not collude. But in the case in which only one pair colludes, a merger between them brings a lower margin. We tested 36 pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports and we find evidence for vertical collusion with respect to: (i) main national carriers in small airports (ii) low cost carriers in secondary airports.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-5545</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRERFW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Exeter: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Airline competition ; Airlines ; Airport competition ; Airports ; Collusion ; Competition ; Gross margins ; Studies ; Vertical collusion</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review, 2013-10, Vol.57, p.3-15</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Oct 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-903c1654a5e68f50a61e3d61ff8fa385bc1173310b1d01b6f7455e3a631c2c023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-903c1654a5e68f50a61e3d61ff8fa385bc1173310b1d01b6f7455e3a631c2c023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barbot, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Alfonso, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malighetti, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redondi, Renato</creatorcontrib><title>Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case</title><title>Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review</title><description>► Test for vertical collusion based on the evaluation of price–costs margins. ► Two scenarios: one airport–one airline and two airports–two airlines. ► 36 Pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports are tested. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for main national carriers in small airports. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for low cost carriers in secondary airports. We develop a test for vertical collusion between airports and airlines in the case of two different scenarios. In the first scenario there is one airport and one airline; this intends to depict the case of airports that do not compete with any other one. In the second, we consider two competing airports and one airline that uses the airport as a base or a hub. In the case of non competing airports we find that gross margins are lower when there is vertical collusion. In the case of competing airports, we find that gross margins are equal when both pairs collude or do not collude. But in the case in which only one pair colludes, a merger between them brings a lower margin. We tested 36 pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports and we find evidence for vertical collusion with respect to: (i) main national carriers in small airports (ii) low cost carriers in secondary airports.</description><subject>Airline competition</subject><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>Airport competition</subject><subject>Airports</subject><subject>Collusion</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Gross margins</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vertical collusion</subject><issn>1366-5545</issn><issn>1878-5794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYsouK5-AG8Bz62ZpkmzeloW_8GCFxU8hTSdYJZuU5NU8dvb3fXsaWbg_d48XpZdAi2AgrjeFClgUVJgBYWC0vIom4GsZc7rRXU87UyInPOKn2ZnMW4onSBezrL3NwzJGd0R47tujM73pMH0jdgT7cLgQ4pE9-3u6FyP8YYse4LbwYU9lTAmYn0g6QPJ3Rj8gLonRkc8z06s7iJe_M159np_97J6zNfPD0-r5To3lZQpX1BmpiiV5iik5VQLQNYKsFZazSRvDEDNGNAGWgqNsHXFOTItGJjS0JLNs6uD7xD85zjFURs_hn56qaACKCWreT2p4KAywccY0KohuK0OPwqo2jWoNmpqUO0aVBQU3TvfHhic4n85DCoah73B1gU0SbXe_UP_Aru5eI8</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Barbot, Cristina</creator><creator>D’Alfonso, Tiziana</creator><creator>Malighetti, Paolo</creator><creator>Redondi, Renato</creator><general>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case</title><author>Barbot, Cristina ; D’Alfonso, Tiziana ; Malighetti, Paolo ; Redondi, Renato</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-903c1654a5e68f50a61e3d61ff8fa385bc1173310b1d01b6f7455e3a631c2c023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Airline competition</topic><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>Airport competition</topic><topic>Airports</topic><topic>Collusion</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Gross margins</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vertical collusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barbot, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Alfonso, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malighetti, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redondi, Renato</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barbot, Cristina</au><au>D’Alfonso, Tiziana</au><au>Malighetti, Paolo</au><au>Redondi, Renato</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>57</volume><spage>3</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>3-15</pages><issn>1366-5545</issn><eissn>1878-5794</eissn><coden>TRERFW</coden><abstract>► Test for vertical collusion based on the evaluation of price–costs margins. ► Two scenarios: one airport–one airline and two airports–two airlines. ► 36 Pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports are tested. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for main national carriers in small airports. ► Evidence for vertical collusion for low cost carriers in secondary airports. We develop a test for vertical collusion between airports and airlines in the case of two different scenarios. In the first scenario there is one airport and one airline; this intends to depict the case of airports that do not compete with any other one. In the second, we consider two competing airports and one airline that uses the airport as a base or a hub. In the case of non competing airports we find that gross margins are lower when there is vertical collusion. In the case of competing airports, we find that gross margins are equal when both pairs collude or do not collude. But in the case in which only one pair colludes, a merger between them brings a lower margin. We tested 36 pairs of airports–airlines in the case of non competing airports and we find evidence for vertical collusion with respect to: (i) main national carriers in small airports (ii) low cost carriers in secondary airports.</abstract><cop>Exeter</cop><pub>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.002</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1366-5545
ispartof Transportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review, 2013-10, Vol.57, p.3-15
issn 1366-5545
1878-5794
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1411283757
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Airline competition
Airlines
Airport competition
Airports
Collusion
Competition
Gross margins
Studies
Vertical collusion
title Vertical collusion between airports and airlines: An empirical test for the European case
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T10%3A16%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertical%20collusion%20between%20airports%20and%20airlines:%20An%20empirical%20test%20for%20the%20European%20case&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20E,%20Logistics%20and%20transportation%20review&rft.au=Barbot,%20Cristina&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=57&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=3-15&rft.issn=1366-5545&rft.eissn=1878-5794&rft.coden=TRERFW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tre.2013.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3026137751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1411283757&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1366554513000124&rfr_iscdi=true