Effects of Bacterial and Fungal Inoculants in a Loess Soil Amended with Various Phosphorus Sources on Pea Growth and Phosphorus Uptake
We evaluated the effects of microbial inoculants in a loess soil amended with various phosphorus (P) sources on pea growth and P uptake (PU). Treatments included factorial combinations of three treatments (noninoculation, NI; bacteria, BA; and fungi, FU) and three P sources (no P, NP; calcium superp...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2013-07, Vol.44 (13), p.2008-2018 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2018 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 13 |
| container_start_page | 2008 |
| container_title | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Xie, Y. H Hu, Q. C Hong, J. P Zhang, T. Q |
| description | We evaluated the effects of microbial inoculants in a loess soil amended with various phosphorus (P) sources on pea growth and P uptake (PU). Treatments included factorial combinations of three treatments (noninoculation, NI; bacteria, BA; and fungi, FU) and three P sources (no P, NP; calcium superphosphate, SP; and rock phosphate, RP). Compared with NI, soils inoculated with BA and FU and receiving NP and SP increased pea shoot and total biomass, with greater increases with BA than with FU. Both BA and FU stimulated root growth, regardless of P addition. Compared to NI, PU with BA increased by 26, 59, and 83% in soils amended with RP, SP, and NP, respectively, whereas with FU it increased by 25% with SP and 48% with NP, with no effects with RP. The results indicate that BA can increase bioavailability of soil P, whereas FU may promote plant utilization of bioavailable P existing in soil. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00103624.2012.758280 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1400646948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3022112071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f52b4be6f1311b33bfb6c55f3ab6b3cf28d40c94686f3c1852832bf468478473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LHDEYhQdpQav9B4KBIvRm13xNJnNVVPyChQp2exveySRu7GyyTWZY_AP93WYcFfGmEMgbeM7JeTlFcUjwnGCJTzAmmAnK5xQTOq9KSSXeKfZIyeiMciI-vZt3iy8pPWRFXWG6V_y7sNboPqFg0Rno3kQHHQLfosvB3-fxxgc9dOAz4jwCtAgmJXQXXIdO18a3pkVb16_Qb4guDAndrkLarEIcRmiI2mRrj24NoKsYthkcvd9By00Pf8xB8dlCl8zXl3u_WF5e_Dq_ni1-Xt2cny5mmlWkn9W2pA1vjLCEEdIw1thG6LK0DBrRMG2pbDnWNRdSWKaJLKlktLH5zat82H7xffLdxPB3MKlXa5e06fKCJqdXhDMsy4o8o98-oA95H5_TZQpjwUXNZab4ROkYUorGqk10a4iPimA1lqNey1FjOWoqJ8uOX8whaehsBK9detPSquK1qMYQPybOeRviGrYhdq3q4bEL8VXE_vPT0eRgISi4j1mwvMsAH2lBiWRPB-GrLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1400646948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Bacterial and Fungal Inoculants in a Loess Soil Amended with Various Phosphorus Sources on Pea Growth and Phosphorus Uptake</title><source>Taylor & Francis Online</source><creator>Xie, Y. H ; Hu, Q. C ; Hong, J. P ; Zhang, T. Q</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Y. H ; Hu, Q. C ; Hong, J. P ; Zhang, T. Q</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated the effects of microbial inoculants in a loess soil amended with various phosphorus (P) sources on pea growth and P uptake (PU). Treatments included factorial combinations of three treatments (noninoculation, NI; bacteria, BA; and fungi, FU) and three P sources (no P, NP; calcium superphosphate, SP; and rock phosphate, RP). Compared with NI, soils inoculated with BA and FU and receiving NP and SP increased pea shoot and total biomass, with greater increases with BA than with FU. Both BA and FU stimulated root growth, regardless of P addition. Compared to NI, PU with BA increased by 26, 59, and 83% in soils amended with RP, SP, and NP, respectively, whereas with FU it increased by 25% with SP and 48% with NP, with no effects with RP. The results indicate that BA can increase bioavailability of soil P, whereas FU may promote plant utilization of bioavailable P existing in soil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2416</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0010-3624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2012.758280</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CSOSA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Bacteria ; bioavailability ; Biological and medical sciences ; biomass ; calcium ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; fungi ; General agronomy. Plant production ; loess soils ; Microbial inoculant ; nutrient cycling ; Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries ; peas ; Phosphorus ; rock phosphate ; root growth ; shoots ; Soil sciences ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; superphosphate</subject><ispartof>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2013-07, Vol.44 (13), p.2008-2018</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2013</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f52b4be6f1311b33bfb6c55f3ab6b3cf28d40c94686f3c1852832bf468478473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27749677$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Y. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Q. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, T. Q</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Bacterial and Fungal Inoculants in a Loess Soil Amended with Various Phosphorus Sources on Pea Growth and Phosphorus Uptake</title><title>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</title><description>We evaluated the effects of microbial inoculants in a loess soil amended with various phosphorus (P) sources on pea growth and P uptake (PU). Treatments included factorial combinations of three treatments (noninoculation, NI; bacteria, BA; and fungi, FU) and three P sources (no P, NP; calcium superphosphate, SP; and rock phosphate, RP). Compared with NI, soils inoculated with BA and FU and receiving NP and SP increased pea shoot and total biomass, with greater increases with BA than with FU. Both BA and FU stimulated root growth, regardless of P addition. Compared to NI, PU with BA increased by 26, 59, and 83% in soils amended with RP, SP, and NP, respectively, whereas with FU it increased by 25% with SP and 48% with NP, with no effects with RP. The results indicate that BA can increase bioavailability of soil P, whereas FU may promote plant utilization of bioavailable P existing in soil.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>bioavailability</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>calcium</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>fungi</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>loess soils</subject><subject>Microbial inoculant</subject><subject>nutrient cycling</subject><subject>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</subject><subject>peas</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>rock phosphate</subject><subject>root growth</subject><subject>shoots</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>superphosphate</subject><issn>1532-2416</issn><issn>0010-3624</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><issn>1532-4133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV1LHDEYhQdpQav9B4KBIvRm13xNJnNVVPyChQp2exveySRu7GyyTWZY_AP93WYcFfGmEMgbeM7JeTlFcUjwnGCJTzAmmAnK5xQTOq9KSSXeKfZIyeiMciI-vZt3iy8pPWRFXWG6V_y7sNboPqFg0Rno3kQHHQLfosvB3-fxxgc9dOAz4jwCtAgmJXQXXIdO18a3pkVb16_Qb4guDAndrkLarEIcRmiI2mRrj24NoKsYthkcvd9By00Pf8xB8dlCl8zXl3u_WF5e_Dq_ni1-Xt2cny5mmlWkn9W2pA1vjLCEEdIw1thG6LK0DBrRMG2pbDnWNRdSWKaJLKlktLH5zat82H7xffLdxPB3MKlXa5e06fKCJqdXhDMsy4o8o98-oA95H5_TZQpjwUXNZab4ROkYUorGqk10a4iPimA1lqNey1FjOWoqJ8uOX8whaehsBK9detPSquK1qMYQPybOeRviGrYhdq3q4bEL8VXE_vPT0eRgISi4j1mwvMsAH2lBiWRPB-GrLA</recordid><startdate>20130720</startdate><enddate>20130720</enddate><creator>Xie, Y. H</creator><creator>Hu, Q. C</creator><creator>Hong, J. P</creator><creator>Zhang, T. Q</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130720</creationdate><title>Effects of Bacterial and Fungal Inoculants in a Loess Soil Amended with Various Phosphorus Sources on Pea Growth and Phosphorus Uptake</title><author>Xie, Y. H ; Hu, Q. C ; Hong, J. P ; Zhang, T. Q</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-9f52b4be6f1311b33bfb6c55f3ab6b3cf28d40c94686f3c1852832bf468478473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>bioavailability</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>calcium</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>fungi</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>loess soils</topic><topic>Microbial inoculant</topic><topic>nutrient cycling</topic><topic>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</topic><topic>peas</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>rock phosphate</topic><topic>root growth</topic><topic>shoots</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>superphosphate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Y. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Q. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, T. Q</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Y. H</au><au>Hu, Q. C</au><au>Hong, J. P</au><au>Zhang, T. Q</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Bacterial and Fungal Inoculants in a Loess Soil Amended with Various Phosphorus Sources on Pea Growth and Phosphorus Uptake</atitle><jtitle>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</jtitle><date>2013-07-20</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2008</spage><epage>2018</epage><pages>2008-2018</pages><issn>1532-2416</issn><issn>0010-3624</issn><eissn>1532-2416</eissn><eissn>1532-4133</eissn><coden>CSOSA2</coden><abstract>We evaluated the effects of microbial inoculants in a loess soil amended with various phosphorus (P) sources on pea growth and P uptake (PU). Treatments included factorial combinations of three treatments (noninoculation, NI; bacteria, BA; and fungi, FU) and three P sources (no P, NP; calcium superphosphate, SP; and rock phosphate, RP). Compared with NI, soils inoculated with BA and FU and receiving NP and SP increased pea shoot and total biomass, with greater increases with BA than with FU. Both BA and FU stimulated root growth, regardless of P addition. Compared to NI, PU with BA increased by 26, 59, and 83% in soils amended with RP, SP, and NP, respectively, whereas with FU it increased by 25% with SP and 48% with NP, with no effects with RP. The results indicate that BA can increase bioavailability of soil P, whereas FU may promote plant utilization of bioavailable P existing in soil.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00103624.2012.758280</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1532-2416 |
| ispartof | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2013-07, Vol.44 (13), p.2008-2018 |
| issn | 1532-2416 0010-3624 1532-2416 1532-4133 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1400646948 |
| source | Taylor & Francis Online |
| subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Bacteria bioavailability Biological and medical sciences biomass calcium Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology fungi General agronomy. Plant production loess soils Microbial inoculant nutrient cycling Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries peas Phosphorus rock phosphate root growth shoots Soil sciences Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments superphosphate |
| title | Effects of Bacterial and Fungal Inoculants in a Loess Soil Amended with Various Phosphorus Sources on Pea Growth and Phosphorus Uptake |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A18%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Bacterial%20and%20Fungal%20Inoculants%20in%20a%20Loess%20Soil%20Amended%20with%20Various%20Phosphorus%20Sources%20on%20Pea%20Growth%20and%20Phosphorus%20Uptake&rft.jtitle=Communications%20in%20Soil%20Science%20and%20Plant%20Analysis&rft.au=Xie,%20Y.%20H&rft.date=2013-07-20&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2008&rft.epage=2018&rft.pages=2008-2018&rft.issn=1532-2416&rft.eissn=1532-2416&rft.coden=CSOSA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00103624.2012.758280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E3022112071%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1400646948&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |