IMPLEMENTING A RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD

After risk management “conquered” more and more project managers’ minds and showed its benefits for business and programs, the need to have a global risk management standard has become a crucial issue in the world of risk management. But having a global risk management standard has been a big challe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of defense resources management 2013-01, Vol.4 (1), p.111-120
1. Verfasser: Preda, Constantin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue 1
container_start_page 111
container_title Journal of defense resources management
container_volume 4
creator Preda, Constantin
description After risk management “conquered” more and more project managers’ minds and showed its benefits for business and programs, the need to have a global risk management standard has become a crucial issue in the world of risk management. But having a global risk management standard has been a big challenge, starting from the decision of developing the standard (March-June 2005), to the moment of publishing it, November 2009. So, developing the ISO 31000:2009 standard has been more or less like a bumpy ride. Apparently, the people involved in developing the global risk management standard understood from the very beginning that no challenges are too big, nor any tasks too small and that the task of having a new, comprehensive global risk management standard should be completed with excellence: defining the principles and the framework guiding the risk management process applicable for all type of organizations and for a wide range of activities. Coming up with a global standard should always be based on the real organizations’ needs and should fulfill real risk management requirements. The article is trying to present the pros and cons of risk management standard implementation, challenging the implementation process itself and the added value of implementing the standard due to the lack of implementation enablers, like risk culture, a real problem especially in an international environment.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1372955050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A338602959</galeid><ceeol_id>53926</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2384c8ba899944f0bc3ed638af276988</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>53926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1868-882d5c14217ee4a38a304716bd3f5b309bb37f6b371ff142a8979645f74b3dc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj11LwzAYhYsoOHS_wJuCF3pTyVfzcVm2OYtblW1ehzRNRkfXzHa78N_7ugqCeeFNOJzzHHIRjQhhIuGM80t4Iy4TxRC9jsZ9v0NweIqJYqPoIV--L2bLWbHJi3mcxat8_RovsyKbn8V4vcmKabaa3kZX3jS9G__eN9HH82wzeUkWb_N8ki0SiyWUSEmq1GJGsHCOGSoNRUxgXlbUpyVFqiyp8BwW9h5sRiqhOEu9YCWtLKE3UT5wq2B2-tDVe9N96WBqfRZCt9WmO9a2cZpQyawsAaEUYx6VlrqKQ6UngispgfU4sA5d-Dy5_qj3dW9d05jWhVOvMcMCwgj9WO__WXfh1LXwU42pICpNUYrA9TS4tgb669aHY2csTOX2tQ2t8zXoGaWSI8goCNwNAetcaP6YKVWE02-_6XfT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1372955050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IMPLEMENTING A RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Preda, Constantin</creator><creatorcontrib>Preda, Constantin</creatorcontrib><description>After risk management “conquered” more and more project managers’ minds and showed its benefits for business and programs, the need to have a global risk management standard has become a crucial issue in the world of risk management. But having a global risk management standard has been a big challenge, starting from the decision of developing the standard (March-June 2005), to the moment of publishing it, November 2009. So, developing the ISO 31000:2009 standard has been more or less like a bumpy ride. Apparently, the people involved in developing the global risk management standard understood from the very beginning that no challenges are too big, nor any tasks too small and that the task of having a new, comprehensive global risk management standard should be completed with excellence: defining the principles and the framework guiding the risk management process applicable for all type of organizations and for a wide range of activities. Coming up with a global standard should always be based on the real organizations’ needs and should fulfill real risk management requirements. The article is trying to present the pros and cons of risk management standard implementation, challenging the implementation process itself and the added value of implementing the standard due to the lack of implementation enablers, like risk culture, a real problem especially in an international environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2068-9403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2247-6466</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: Regional Department of Defense Resources Management Studies</publisher><subject>Added value ; Analysis ; Business ; Culture ; Economy ; Enablers ; Enterprise risk management ; Implementation ; ISO ; ISO standards ; Management reviews ; Organizations ; Portfolio management ; Project management ; Resources management ; Risk Culture ; Risk management ; Social responsibility ; Tasks</subject><ispartof>Journal of defense resources management, 2013-01, Vol.4 (1), p.111-120</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Regional Department of Defense Resources Management Studies</rights><rights>Copyright "Carol I" National Defence University 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Preda, Constantin</creatorcontrib><title>IMPLEMENTING A RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD</title><title>Journal of defense resources management</title><addtitle>Journal of Defense Resources Management (JoDRM)</addtitle><description>After risk management “conquered” more and more project managers’ minds and showed its benefits for business and programs, the need to have a global risk management standard has become a crucial issue in the world of risk management. But having a global risk management standard has been a big challenge, starting from the decision of developing the standard (March-June 2005), to the moment of publishing it, November 2009. So, developing the ISO 31000:2009 standard has been more or less like a bumpy ride. Apparently, the people involved in developing the global risk management standard understood from the very beginning that no challenges are too big, nor any tasks too small and that the task of having a new, comprehensive global risk management standard should be completed with excellence: defining the principles and the framework guiding the risk management process applicable for all type of organizations and for a wide range of activities. Coming up with a global standard should always be based on the real organizations’ needs and should fulfill real risk management requirements. The article is trying to present the pros and cons of risk management standard implementation, challenging the implementation process itself and the added value of implementing the standard due to the lack of implementation enablers, like risk culture, a real problem especially in an international environment.</description><subject>Added value</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Economy</subject><subject>Enablers</subject><subject>Enterprise risk management</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>ISO</subject><subject>ISO standards</subject><subject>Management reviews</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Portfolio management</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Resources management</subject><subject>Risk Culture</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><issn>2068-9403</issn><issn>2247-6466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj11LwzAYhYsoOHS_wJuCF3pTyVfzcVm2OYtblW1ehzRNRkfXzHa78N_7ugqCeeFNOJzzHHIRjQhhIuGM80t4Iy4TxRC9jsZ9v0NweIqJYqPoIV--L2bLWbHJi3mcxat8_RovsyKbn8V4vcmKabaa3kZX3jS9G__eN9HH82wzeUkWb_N8ki0SiyWUSEmq1GJGsHCOGSoNRUxgXlbUpyVFqiyp8BwW9h5sRiqhOEu9YCWtLKE3UT5wq2B2-tDVe9N96WBqfRZCt9WmO9a2cZpQyawsAaEUYx6VlrqKQ6UngispgfU4sA5d-Dy5_qj3dW9d05jWhVOvMcMCwgj9WO__WXfh1LXwU42pICpNUYrA9TS4tgb669aHY2csTOX2tQ2t8zXoGaWSI8goCNwNAetcaP6YKVWE02-_6XfT</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Preda, Constantin</creator><general>Regional Department of Defense Resources Management Studies</general><general>"Carol I" National Defence University</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>IMPLEMENTING A RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD</title><author>Preda, Constantin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1868-882d5c14217ee4a38a304716bd3f5b309bb37f6b371ff142a8979645f74b3dc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Added value</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Economy</topic><topic>Enablers</topic><topic>Enterprise risk management</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>ISO</topic><topic>ISO standards</topic><topic>Management reviews</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Portfolio management</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Resources management</topic><topic>Risk Culture</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Preda, Constantin</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of defense resources management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Preda, Constantin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IMPLEMENTING A RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD</atitle><jtitle>Journal of defense resources management</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Defense Resources Management (JoDRM)</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>111-120</pages><issn>2068-9403</issn><eissn>2247-6466</eissn><abstract>After risk management “conquered” more and more project managers’ minds and showed its benefits for business and programs, the need to have a global risk management standard has become a crucial issue in the world of risk management. But having a global risk management standard has been a big challenge, starting from the decision of developing the standard (March-June 2005), to the moment of publishing it, November 2009. So, developing the ISO 31000:2009 standard has been more or less like a bumpy ride. Apparently, the people involved in developing the global risk management standard understood from the very beginning that no challenges are too big, nor any tasks too small and that the task of having a new, comprehensive global risk management standard should be completed with excellence: defining the principles and the framework guiding the risk management process applicable for all type of organizations and for a wide range of activities. Coming up with a global standard should always be based on the real organizations’ needs and should fulfill real risk management requirements. The article is trying to present the pros and cons of risk management standard implementation, challenging the implementation process itself and the added value of implementing the standard due to the lack of implementation enablers, like risk culture, a real problem especially in an international environment.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>Regional Department of Defense Resources Management Studies</pub><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2068-9403
ispartof Journal of defense resources management, 2013-01, Vol.4 (1), p.111-120
issn 2068-9403
2247-6466
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1372955050
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Added value
Analysis
Business
Culture
Economy
Enablers
Enterprise risk management
Implementation
ISO
ISO standards
Management reviews
Organizations
Portfolio management
Project management
Resources management
Risk Culture
Risk management
Social responsibility
Tasks
title IMPLEMENTING A RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A36%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IMPLEMENTING%20A%20RISK%20MANAGEMENT%20STANDARD&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20defense%20resources%20management&rft.au=Preda,%20Constantin&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=111-120&rft.issn=2068-9403&rft.eissn=2247-6466&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E53926%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1372955050&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A338602959&rft_ceeol_id=53926&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2384c8ba899944f0bc3ed638af276988&rfr_iscdi=true