Pediatric radiation dose and risk from bone density measurements using a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner
Summary Effective radiation doses associated with bone mineral density examinations performed on children using a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner were found to be comparable to doses from pencil-beam DXA devices, i.e., lower than 1 μSv. Cancer risks associate...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Osteoporosis international 2013-07, Vol.24 (7), p.2025-2031 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2031 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 2025 |
| container_title | Osteoporosis international |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Damilakis, J. Solomou, G. Manios, G. E. Karantanas, A. |
| description | Summary
Effective radiation doses associated with bone mineral density examinations performed on children using a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner were found to be comparable to doses from pencil-beam DXA devices, i.e., lower than 1 μSv. Cancer risks associated with acquisitions obtained in this study are negligible.
Introduction
No data were found in the literature on radiation doses and potential risks following pediatric DXA performed on GE Lunar DXA scanners. This study aimed to estimate effective doses and associated cancer risks involved in pediatric examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner.
Methods
Four physical anthropomorphic phantoms representing newborn, 1-, 5-, and 10-year-old patients were employed to simulate DXA exposures. All acquisitions were carried out using the Prodigy scanner. Dose measurements were performed for spine and dual femur using the phantoms simulating the 5- and 10-year-old child. Moreover, doses associated with whole-body examinations were measured for the four phantoms used in the current study.
Results
The gender-average effective dose for spine and hip examinations were 0.65 and 0.36 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 5-year-old child and 0.93 and 0.205 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 10-year-old child. Effective doses for whole-body examinations were 0.25, 0.22, 0.19, and 0.15 μSv for the neonate, 1-, 5-, and 10-year old child, respectively. The estimated lifetime cancer risks were negligible, i.e., 0.02–0.25 per million, depending on the sex, age, and type of DXA examination. A formula is presented for the estimation of effective dose from examinations performed on GE Lunar Prodigy scanners installed in other institutions.
Conclusions
The effective doses and potential cancer risks associated with pediatric DXA examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam scanner were found to be comparable to doses and risks reported from pencil-beam DXA devices. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00198-012-2261-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1366364802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2992472101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-79f42bfc6ffbf04447212cfe68440018c462fb3f491a3c07d01cb828a9dcf4913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMotlY_gBcJeI7mn9nNUYpWoWAPCt5CNpuUVDdbk11ov71ZtooXTzPMvPeG-QFwSfANwbi4TRgTWSJMKKJUELQ7AlPCGUNUirtjMMWSFUhy8j4BZyltcPZIWZyCCWUMi5LSKdArW3vdRW9g1EPn2wDrNlmoQw2jTx_QxbaBVRssrG1IvtvDxurUR9vY0CXYJx_WUMPFA1z2QUe4im3t13uYjA7BxnNw4vRnsheHOgNvjw-v8ye0fFk8z--XyLCCdqiQjtPKGeFc5TDnvKCEGmdFyXl-szRcUFcxxyXRzOCixsRUJS21rM0wZDNwPeZuY_vV29SpTdvHkE8qwoRggpeYZhUZVSa2KUXr1Db6Rse9IlgNUNUIVWWoaoCqdtlzdUjuq8bWv44fillAR0HKq7C28c_pf1O_AXHKgro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1366364802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pediatric radiation dose and risk from bone density measurements using a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Damilakis, J. ; Solomou, G. ; Manios, G. E. ; Karantanas, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Damilakis, J. ; Solomou, G. ; Manios, G. E. ; Karantanas, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Effective radiation doses associated with bone mineral density examinations performed on children using a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner were found to be comparable to doses from pencil-beam DXA devices, i.e., lower than 1 μSv. Cancer risks associated with acquisitions obtained in this study are negligible.
Introduction
No data were found in the literature on radiation doses and potential risks following pediatric DXA performed on GE Lunar DXA scanners. This study aimed to estimate effective doses and associated cancer risks involved in pediatric examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner.
Methods
Four physical anthropomorphic phantoms representing newborn, 1-, 5-, and 10-year-old patients were employed to simulate DXA exposures. All acquisitions were carried out using the Prodigy scanner. Dose measurements were performed for spine and dual femur using the phantoms simulating the 5- and 10-year-old child. Moreover, doses associated with whole-body examinations were measured for the four phantoms used in the current study.
Results
The gender-average effective dose for spine and hip examinations were 0.65 and 0.36 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 5-year-old child and 0.93 and 0.205 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 10-year-old child. Effective doses for whole-body examinations were 0.25, 0.22, 0.19, and 0.15 μSv for the neonate, 1-, 5-, and 10-year old child, respectively. The estimated lifetime cancer risks were negligible, i.e., 0.02–0.25 per million, depending on the sex, age, and type of DXA examination. A formula is presented for the estimation of effective dose from examinations performed on GE Lunar Prodigy scanners installed in other institutions.
Conclusions
The effective doses and potential cancer risks associated with pediatric DXA examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam scanner were found to be comparable to doses and risks reported from pencil-beam DXA devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2261-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23306822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - adverse effects ; Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation ; Absorptiometry, Photon - methods ; Bone Density ; Cancer ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Childrens health ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Femur - physiology ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation ; Radiation Dosage ; Rheumatology ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk factors ; Spine - physiology ; Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - methods ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2013-07, Vol.24 (7), p.2025-2031</ispartof><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-79f42bfc6ffbf04447212cfe68440018c462fb3f491a3c07d01cb828a9dcf4913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-79f42bfc6ffbf04447212cfe68440018c462fb3f491a3c07d01cb828a9dcf4913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00198-012-2261-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-012-2261-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23306822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Damilakis, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomou, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manios, G. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karantanas, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Pediatric radiation dose and risk from bone density measurements using a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Summary
Effective radiation doses associated with bone mineral density examinations performed on children using a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner were found to be comparable to doses from pencil-beam DXA devices, i.e., lower than 1 μSv. Cancer risks associated with acquisitions obtained in this study are negligible.
Introduction
No data were found in the literature on radiation doses and potential risks following pediatric DXA performed on GE Lunar DXA scanners. This study aimed to estimate effective doses and associated cancer risks involved in pediatric examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner.
Methods
Four physical anthropomorphic phantoms representing newborn, 1-, 5-, and 10-year-old patients were employed to simulate DXA exposures. All acquisitions were carried out using the Prodigy scanner. Dose measurements were performed for spine and dual femur using the phantoms simulating the 5- and 10-year-old child. Moreover, doses associated with whole-body examinations were measured for the four phantoms used in the current study.
Results
The gender-average effective dose for spine and hip examinations were 0.65 and 0.36 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 5-year-old child and 0.93 and 0.205 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 10-year-old child. Effective doses for whole-body examinations were 0.25, 0.22, 0.19, and 0.15 μSv for the neonate, 1-, 5-, and 10-year old child, respectively. The estimated lifetime cancer risks were negligible, i.e., 0.02–0.25 per million, depending on the sex, age, and type of DXA examination. A formula is presented for the estimation of effective dose from examinations performed on GE Lunar Prodigy scanners installed in other institutions.
Conclusions
The effective doses and potential cancer risks associated with pediatric DXA examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam scanner were found to be comparable to doses and risks reported from pencil-beam DXA devices.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - adverse effects</subject><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</subject><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Spine - physiology</subject><subject>Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - methods</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMotlY_gBcJeI7mn9nNUYpWoWAPCt5CNpuUVDdbk11ov71ZtooXTzPMvPeG-QFwSfANwbi4TRgTWSJMKKJUELQ7AlPCGUNUirtjMMWSFUhy8j4BZyltcPZIWZyCCWUMi5LSKdArW3vdRW9g1EPn2wDrNlmoQw2jTx_QxbaBVRssrG1IvtvDxurUR9vY0CXYJx_WUMPFA1z2QUe4im3t13uYjA7BxnNw4vRnsheHOgNvjw-v8ye0fFk8z--XyLCCdqiQjtPKGeFc5TDnvKCEGmdFyXl-szRcUFcxxyXRzOCixsRUJS21rM0wZDNwPeZuY_vV29SpTdvHkE8qwoRggpeYZhUZVSa2KUXr1Db6Rse9IlgNUNUIVWWoaoCqdtlzdUjuq8bWv44fillAR0HKq7C28c_pf1O_AXHKgro</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Damilakis, J.</creator><creator>Solomou, G.</creator><creator>Manios, G. E.</creator><creator>Karantanas, A.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Pediatric radiation dose and risk from bone density measurements using a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner</title><author>Damilakis, J. ; Solomou, G. ; Manios, G. E. ; Karantanas, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-79f42bfc6ffbf04447212cfe68440018c462fb3f491a3c07d01cb828a9dcf4913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - adverse effects</topic><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</topic><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Spine - physiology</topic><topic>Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - methods</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Damilakis, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomou, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manios, G. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karantanas, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Damilakis, J.</au><au>Solomou, G.</au><au>Manios, G. E.</au><au>Karantanas, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pediatric radiation dose and risk from bone density measurements using a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><stitle>Osteoporos Int</stitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2025</spage><epage>2031</epage><pages>2025-2031</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Summary
Effective radiation doses associated with bone mineral density examinations performed on children using a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner were found to be comparable to doses from pencil-beam DXA devices, i.e., lower than 1 μSv. Cancer risks associated with acquisitions obtained in this study are negligible.
Introduction
No data were found in the literature on radiation doses and potential risks following pediatric DXA performed on GE Lunar DXA scanners. This study aimed to estimate effective doses and associated cancer risks involved in pediatric examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner.
Methods
Four physical anthropomorphic phantoms representing newborn, 1-, 5-, and 10-year-old patients were employed to simulate DXA exposures. All acquisitions were carried out using the Prodigy scanner. Dose measurements were performed for spine and dual femur using the phantoms simulating the 5- and 10-year-old child. Moreover, doses associated with whole-body examinations were measured for the four phantoms used in the current study.
Results
The gender-average effective dose for spine and hip examinations were 0.65 and 0.36 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 5-year-old child and 0.93 and 0.205 μSv, respectively, for the phantom representing the 10-year-old child. Effective doses for whole-body examinations were 0.25, 0.22, 0.19, and 0.15 μSv for the neonate, 1-, 5-, and 10-year old child, respectively. The estimated lifetime cancer risks were negligible, i.e., 0.02–0.25 per million, depending on the sex, age, and type of DXA examination. A formula is presented for the estimation of effective dose from examinations performed on GE Lunar Prodigy scanners installed in other institutions.
Conclusions
The effective doses and potential cancer risks associated with pediatric DXA examinations performed on a GE Lunar Prodigy fan-beam scanner were found to be comparable to doses and risks reported from pencil-beam DXA devices.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23306822</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00198-012-2261-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0937-941X |
| ispartof | Osteoporosis international, 2013-07, Vol.24 (7), p.2025-2031 |
| issn | 0937-941X 1433-2965 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1366364802 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Absorptiometry, Photon - adverse effects Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation Absorptiometry, Photon - methods Bone Density Cancer Child Child, Preschool Childrens health Endocrinology Female Femur - physiology Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology Original Article Orthopedics Phantoms, Imaging Radiation Radiation Dosage Rheumatology Risk Assessment - methods Risk factors Spine - physiology Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - methods X-rays |
| title | Pediatric radiation dose and risk from bone density measurements using a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T20%3A50%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pediatric%20radiation%20dose%20and%20risk%20from%20bone%20density%20measurements%20using%20a%20GE%20Lunar%20Prodigy%20scanner&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=Damilakis,%20J.&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2025&rft.epage=2031&rft.pages=2025-2031&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-012-2261-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2992472101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1366364802&rft_id=info:pmid/23306822&rfr_iscdi=true |