Reducing waste to landfill in the UK: identifying impediments and critical solutions

Purpose - The UK construction industry produces up to one third of all waste to landfill. This study aims to identify specific project practices impeding the reduction of waste in construction projects as well as uncovering potential waste solutions throughout the project delivery process. The ratio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development Technology and Sustainable Development, 2013-01, Vol.10 (2), p.131-142
Hauptverfasser: Oyedele, Lukumon O., Regan, Martin, von Meding, Jason, Ahmed, Ashraf, Ebohon, Obas John, Elnokaly, Amira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development
container_volume 10
creator Oyedele, Lukumon O.
Regan, Martin
von Meding, Jason
Ahmed, Ashraf
Ebohon, Obas John
Elnokaly, Amira
description Purpose - The UK construction industry produces up to one third of all waste to landfill. This study aims to identify specific project practices impeding the reduction of waste in construction projects as well as uncovering potential waste solutions throughout the project delivery process. The rationale being that for such a drastic reduction in waste to landfill, holistic and extensive measures would be required. Design/methodology/approach - A two-way methodological approach was used. This comprised qualitative unstructured interviews and a quantitative questionnaire survey of three major stakeholders in the UK construction industry: clients, architects and contractors. Findings - Design factors remain the major cause of impediments to waste reduction to landfill. Critical impediments include clients making waste prevention a top priority in projects, overly complex designs, waste taking a low priority compared to project time and costs, lack of concerns by designers for buildability, among others. Critical solutions include early supply chain involvement in design process, choosing materials for their durability, early communication of design changes to all parties, longer project programmes and better lead times, among others. Practical implications - In all, the target of halving construction waste to landfill based on the 2008 benchmark is achievable but would require construction companies to take it upon themselves to implement the proposed solutions suggested by this study. Originality/value - The value of this research is to provide UK construction companies with solutions to reduce waste and aid the reaching of the landfill target, as landfill is decreasing as a solution to waste. In addition the cost savings on reducing waste could be crucial for companies in this current economic climate.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/20425941311323136
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1365801642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2990927901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2f8bebfa5a9c178aa65328425bcf10aa7cb773f491c6e2560c6dc2d2b08fc7713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkMtKAzEUhoMoWGofwF3A9WhObpNxJ8UbFgRp10OSSTQyl5pkkL69M1TcuDqHn4__cD6ELoFcAxB1QwmnouLAABhlwOQJWsxZISrBTv92Ls7RKqVgCFG0qiSRC7R9c81oQ_-Ov3XKDucBt7pvfGhbHHqcPxzevdzi0Lg-B3-YwdDtXRO6KUh4QrGNIQerW5yGdsxh6NMFOvO6TW71O5do93C_XT8Vm9fH5_XdprAMeC6oV8YZr4WuLJRKaykYVdMrxnogWpfWlCXzvAIrHRWSWNlY2lBDlLdlCWyJro69-zh8jS7l-nMYYz-drCcJQhGQnE4UHCkbh5Si8_U-hk7HQw2knv3V__yxH-6KYnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1365801642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reducing waste to landfill in the UK: identifying impediments and critical solutions</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Oyedele, Lukumon O. ; Regan, Martin ; von Meding, Jason ; Ahmed, Ashraf ; Ebohon, Obas John ; Elnokaly, Amira</creator><creatorcontrib>Oyedele, Lukumon O. ; Regan, Martin ; von Meding, Jason ; Ahmed, Ashraf ; Ebohon, Obas John ; Elnokaly, Amira</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The UK construction industry produces up to one third of all waste to landfill. This study aims to identify specific project practices impeding the reduction of waste in construction projects as well as uncovering potential waste solutions throughout the project delivery process. The rationale being that for such a drastic reduction in waste to landfill, holistic and extensive measures would be required. Design/methodology/approach - A two-way methodological approach was used. This comprised qualitative unstructured interviews and a quantitative questionnaire survey of three major stakeholders in the UK construction industry: clients, architects and contractors. Findings - Design factors remain the major cause of impediments to waste reduction to landfill. Critical impediments include clients making waste prevention a top priority in projects, overly complex designs, waste taking a low priority compared to project time and costs, lack of concerns by designers for buildability, among others. Critical solutions include early supply chain involvement in design process, choosing materials for their durability, early communication of design changes to all parties, longer project programmes and better lead times, among others. Practical implications - In all, the target of halving construction waste to landfill based on the 2008 benchmark is achievable but would require construction companies to take it upon themselves to implement the proposed solutions suggested by this study. Originality/value - The value of this research is to provide UK construction companies with solutions to reduce waste and aid the reaching of the landfill target, as landfill is decreasing as a solution to waste. In addition the cost savings on reducing waste could be crucial for companies in this current economic climate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2042-5945</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-5953</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/20425941311323136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brighton: World Association for Sustainable Development</publisher><subject>Architects ; Construction industry ; Contractors ; Demolition ; Design ; Landfill ; Materials handling ; Onsite ; Suppliers ; Supply chains ; Tax rates</subject><ispartof>World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 2013-01, Vol.10 (2), p.131-142</ispartof><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2f8bebfa5a9c178aa65328425bcf10aa7cb773f491c6e2560c6dc2d2b08fc7713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2f8bebfa5a9c178aa65328425bcf10aa7cb773f491c6e2560c6dc2d2b08fc7713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,21674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oyedele, Lukumon O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regan, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Meding, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Ashraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebohon, Obas John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elnokaly, Amira</creatorcontrib><title>Reducing waste to landfill in the UK: identifying impediments and critical solutions</title><title>World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development</title><description>Purpose - The UK construction industry produces up to one third of all waste to landfill. This study aims to identify specific project practices impeding the reduction of waste in construction projects as well as uncovering potential waste solutions throughout the project delivery process. The rationale being that for such a drastic reduction in waste to landfill, holistic and extensive measures would be required. Design/methodology/approach - A two-way methodological approach was used. This comprised qualitative unstructured interviews and a quantitative questionnaire survey of three major stakeholders in the UK construction industry: clients, architects and contractors. Findings - Design factors remain the major cause of impediments to waste reduction to landfill. Critical impediments include clients making waste prevention a top priority in projects, overly complex designs, waste taking a low priority compared to project time and costs, lack of concerns by designers for buildability, among others. Critical solutions include early supply chain involvement in design process, choosing materials for their durability, early communication of design changes to all parties, longer project programmes and better lead times, among others. Practical implications - In all, the target of halving construction waste to landfill based on the 2008 benchmark is achievable but would require construction companies to take it upon themselves to implement the proposed solutions suggested by this study. Originality/value - The value of this research is to provide UK construction companies with solutions to reduce waste and aid the reaching of the landfill target, as landfill is decreasing as a solution to waste. In addition the cost savings on reducing waste could be crucial for companies in this current economic climate.</description><subject>Architects</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Contractors</subject><subject>Demolition</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Materials handling</subject><subject>Onsite</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><issn>2042-5945</issn><issn>2042-5953</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkMtKAzEUhoMoWGofwF3A9WhObpNxJ8UbFgRp10OSSTQyl5pkkL69M1TcuDqHn4__cD6ELoFcAxB1QwmnouLAABhlwOQJWsxZISrBTv92Ls7RKqVgCFG0qiSRC7R9c81oQ_-Ov3XKDucBt7pvfGhbHHqcPxzevdzi0Lg-B3-YwdDtXRO6KUh4QrGNIQerW5yGdsxh6NMFOvO6TW71O5do93C_XT8Vm9fH5_XdprAMeC6oV8YZr4WuLJRKaykYVdMrxnogWpfWlCXzvAIrHRWSWNlY2lBDlLdlCWyJro69-zh8jS7l-nMYYz-drCcJQhGQnE4UHCkbh5Si8_U-hk7HQw2knv3V__yxH-6KYnw</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Oyedele, Lukumon O.</creator><creator>Regan, Martin</creator><creator>von Meding, Jason</creator><creator>Ahmed, Ashraf</creator><creator>Ebohon, Obas John</creator><creator>Elnokaly, Amira</creator><general>World Association for Sustainable Development</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Reducing waste to landfill in the UK: identifying impediments and critical solutions</title><author>Oyedele, Lukumon O. ; Regan, Martin ; von Meding, Jason ; Ahmed, Ashraf ; Ebohon, Obas John ; Elnokaly, Amira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2f8bebfa5a9c178aa65328425bcf10aa7cb773f491c6e2560c6dc2d2b08fc7713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Architects</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Contractors</topic><topic>Demolition</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Materials handling</topic><topic>Onsite</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oyedele, Lukumon O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regan, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Meding, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Ashraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebohon, Obas John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elnokaly, Amira</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oyedele, Lukumon O.</au><au>Regan, Martin</au><au>von Meding, Jason</au><au>Ahmed, Ashraf</au><au>Ebohon, Obas John</au><au>Elnokaly, Amira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reducing waste to landfill in the UK: identifying impediments and critical solutions</atitle><jtitle>World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>131-142</pages><issn>2042-5945</issn><eissn>2042-5953</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The UK construction industry produces up to one third of all waste to landfill. This study aims to identify specific project practices impeding the reduction of waste in construction projects as well as uncovering potential waste solutions throughout the project delivery process. The rationale being that for such a drastic reduction in waste to landfill, holistic and extensive measures would be required. Design/methodology/approach - A two-way methodological approach was used. This comprised qualitative unstructured interviews and a quantitative questionnaire survey of three major stakeholders in the UK construction industry: clients, architects and contractors. Findings - Design factors remain the major cause of impediments to waste reduction to landfill. Critical impediments include clients making waste prevention a top priority in projects, overly complex designs, waste taking a low priority compared to project time and costs, lack of concerns by designers for buildability, among others. Critical solutions include early supply chain involvement in design process, choosing materials for their durability, early communication of design changes to all parties, longer project programmes and better lead times, among others. Practical implications - In all, the target of halving construction waste to landfill based on the 2008 benchmark is achievable but would require construction companies to take it upon themselves to implement the proposed solutions suggested by this study. Originality/value - The value of this research is to provide UK construction companies with solutions to reduce waste and aid the reaching of the landfill target, as landfill is decreasing as a solution to waste. In addition the cost savings on reducing waste could be crucial for companies in this current economic climate.</abstract><cop>Brighton</cop><pub>World Association for Sustainable Development</pub><doi>10.1108/20425941311323136</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2042-5945
ispartof World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 2013-01, Vol.10 (2), p.131-142
issn 2042-5945
2042-5953
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1365801642
source Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Architects
Construction industry
Contractors
Demolition
Design
Landfill
Materials handling
Onsite
Suppliers
Supply chains
Tax rates
title Reducing waste to landfill in the UK: identifying impediments and critical solutions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A34%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reducing%20waste%20to%20landfill%20in%20the%20UK:%20identifying%20impediments%20and%20critical%20solutions&rft.jtitle=World%20Journal%20of%20Science,%20Technology%20and%20Sustainable%20Development&rft.au=Oyedele,%20Lukumon%20O.&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=131-142&rft.issn=2042-5945&rft.eissn=2042-5953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/20425941311323136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2990927901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1365801642&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true