To be or not to be? Public archaeology as a tool of public opinion and the dilemma of intellectuality

To be or not to be? Public archaeology as a tool of public opinion and the dilemma of intellectuality

Stating the value of archaeology for contemporary society is a very difficult task hardly undertaken by archaeologists. Work with a contemporary record directly linked to local communities, and the approach of public archaeology, have helped to bring society and archaeology closer together. However,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archaeological dialogues 2013-06, Vol.20 (1), p.5-11
1. Verfasser: Sánchez, Jaime Almansa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Archaeology
Discussion
Public opinion
Society
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Archaeological dialogues
container_volume 20
creator Sánchez, Jaime Almansa
description Stating the value of archaeology for contemporary society is a very difficult task hardly undertaken by archaeologists. Work with a contemporary record directly linked to local communities, and the approach of public archaeology, have helped to bring society and archaeology closer together. However, the role of a public intellectual goes beyond archaeology, delving into current social worries. Is it possible to play this game from archaeology? The multiple and complex relations between archaeology and society open the door to participation in public debates, but we stand to lose our essence. We face a Shakespearean dilemma, a choice between having an influential voice in the present, or just an expert opinion.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1380203813000044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1365238798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1380203813000044</cupid><sourcerecordid>2989345011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d64e6fad90059aacf34fc82343bb8ff86d6d9634af58e0ac3b21a0f6fb02a1693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8Bz9Wkk03Tk8jiP1hQcD2XaZrsZsk2NU0P--1tWQ-COJeZ4ffeGxhCrjm75YwXdx8cFMsZKA5sLCFOyIyLQmV5XorTcR5xNvFzctH3O8a4BChnxKwDrQ0NkbYh0TQt9_R9qL3TFKPeogk-bA4Ue4ojDp4GS7sjD51rXWgptg1NW0Mb581-j5PCtcl4b3Qa0Lt0uCRnFn1vrn76nHw-Pa6XL9nq7fl1-bDKNPAiZY0URlpsSsYWJaK2IKxWOQioa2Wtko1sSgkC7UIZhhrqnCOz0tYsRy5LmJObY24Xw9dg-lTtwhDb8WTFQS5yUEWpRhU_qnQMfR-Nrbro9hgPFWfV9M3qzzdHD_x4cF9H12zMr-h_Xd9OaXZ5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1365238798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To be or not to be? Public archaeology as a tool of public opinion and the dilemma of intellectuality</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Sánchez, Jaime Almansa</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Jaime Almansa</creatorcontrib><description>Stating the value of archaeology for contemporary society is a very difficult task hardly undertaken by archaeologists. Work with a contemporary record directly linked to local communities, and the approach of public archaeology, have helped to bring society and archaeology closer together. However, the role of a public intellectual goes beyond archaeology, delving into current social worries. Is it possible to play this game from archaeology? The multiple and complex relations between archaeology and society open the door to participation in public debates, but we stand to lose our essence. We face a Shakespearean dilemma, a choice between having an influential voice in the present, or just an expert opinion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-2038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-2294</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1380203813000044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Archaeology ; Discussion ; Public opinion ; Society</subject><ispartof>Archaeological dialogues, 2013-06, Vol.20 (1), p.5-11</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d64e6fad90059aacf34fc82343bb8ff86d6d9634af58e0ac3b21a0f6fb02a1693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d64e6fad90059aacf34fc82343bb8ff86d6d9634af58e0ac3b21a0f6fb02a1693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1380203813000044/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27903,27904,55607</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Jaime Almansa</creatorcontrib><title>To be or not to be? Public archaeology as a tool of public opinion and the dilemma of intellectuality</title><title>Archaeological dialogues</title><addtitle>Arch. Dial</addtitle><description>Stating the value of archaeology for contemporary society is a very difficult task hardly undertaken by archaeologists. Work with a contemporary record directly linked to local communities, and the approach of public archaeology, have helped to bring society and archaeology closer together. However, the role of a public intellectual goes beyond archaeology, delving into current social worries. Is it possible to play this game from archaeology? The multiple and complex relations between archaeology and society open the door to participation in public debates, but we stand to lose our essence. We face a Shakespearean dilemma, a choice between having an influential voice in the present, or just an expert opinion.</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Discussion</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Society</subject><issn>1380-2038</issn><issn>1478-2294</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8Bz9Wkk03Tk8jiP1hQcD2XaZrsZsk2NU0P--1tWQ-COJeZ4ffeGxhCrjm75YwXdx8cFMsZKA5sLCFOyIyLQmV5XorTcR5xNvFzctH3O8a4BChnxKwDrQ0NkbYh0TQt9_R9qL3TFKPeogk-bA4Ue4ojDp4GS7sjD51rXWgptg1NW0Mb581-j5PCtcl4b3Qa0Lt0uCRnFn1vrn76nHw-Pa6XL9nq7fl1-bDKNPAiZY0URlpsSsYWJaK2IKxWOQioa2Wtko1sSgkC7UIZhhrqnCOz0tYsRy5LmJObY24Xw9dg-lTtwhDb8WTFQS5yUEWpRhU_qnQMfR-Nrbro9hgPFWfV9M3qzzdHD_x4cF9H12zMr-h_Xd9OaXZ5</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Sánchez, Jaime Almansa</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>To be or not to be? Public archaeology as a tool of public opinion and the dilemma of intellectuality</title><author>Sánchez, Jaime Almansa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d64e6fad90059aacf34fc82343bb8ff86d6d9634af58e0ac3b21a0f6fb02a1693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Discussion</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Society</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Jaime Almansa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archaeological dialogues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez, Jaime Almansa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To be or not to be? Public archaeology as a tool of public opinion and the dilemma of intellectuality</atitle><jtitle>Archaeological dialogues</jtitle><addtitle>Arch. Dial</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>5-11</pages><issn>1380-2038</issn><eissn>1478-2294</eissn><abstract>Stating the value of archaeology for contemporary society is a very difficult task hardly undertaken by archaeologists. Work with a contemporary record directly linked to local communities, and the approach of public archaeology, have helped to bring society and archaeology closer together. However, the role of a public intellectual goes beyond archaeology, delving into current social worries. Is it possible to play this game from archaeology? The multiple and complex relations between archaeology and society open the door to participation in public debates, but we stand to lose our essence. We face a Shakespearean dilemma, a choice between having an influential voice in the present, or just an expert opinion.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1380203813000044</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1380-2038
ispartof Archaeological dialogues, 2013-06, Vol.20 (1), p.5-11
issn 1380-2038
1478-2294
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1365238798
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Archaeology
Discussion
Public opinion
Society
title To be or not to be? Public archaeology as a tool of public opinion and the dilemma of intellectuality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A00%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20be%20or%20not%20to%20be?%20Public%20archaeology%20as%20a%20tool%20of%20public%20opinion%20and%20the%20dilemma%20of%20intellectuality&rft.jtitle=Archaeological%20dialogues&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez,%20Jaime%20Almansa&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=5-11&rft.issn=1380-2038&rft.eissn=1478-2294&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1380203813000044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2989345011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1365238798&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1380203813000044&rfr_iscdi=true