Tsunami Modeling to Validate Slip Models of the 2007 M^sub w^8.0 Pisco Earthquake, Central Peru

Following the 2007, August 15th, M ^sub w^ 8.0, Pisco earthquake in central Peru, Sladen et al. (J Geophys Res 115: B02405, 2010 ) have derived several slip models of this event. They inverted teleseismic data together with geodetic (InSAR) measurements to look for the co-seismic slip distribution o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pure and applied geophysics 2013-03, Vol.170 (3), p.433
Hauptverfasser: Ioualalen, M, Perfettini, H, Condo, S Yauri, Jimenez, C, Tavera, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 433
container_title Pure and applied geophysics
container_volume 170
creator Ioualalen, M
Perfettini, H
Condo, S Yauri
Jimenez, C
Tavera, H
description Following the 2007, August 15th, M ^sub w^ 8.0, Pisco earthquake in central Peru, Sladen et al. (J Geophys Res 115: B02405, 2010 ) have derived several slip models of this event. They inverted teleseismic data together with geodetic (InSAR) measurements to look for the co-seismic slip distribution on the fault plane, considering those data sets separately or jointly. But how close to the real slip distribution are those inverted slip models? To answer this crucial question, the authors generated some tsunami records based on their slip models and compared them to DART buoys, tsunami records, and available runup data. Such an approach requires a robust and accurate tsunami model (non-linear, dispersive, accurate bathymetry and topography, etc.) otherwise the differences between the data and the model may be attributed to the slip models themselves, though they arise from an incomplete tsunami simulation. The accuracy of a numerical tsunami simulation strongly depends, among others, on two important constraints: (i) A fine computational grid (and thus the bathymetry and topography data sets used) which is not always available, unfortunately, and (ii) a realistic tsunami propagation model including dispersion. Here, we extend Sladen's work using newly available data, namely a tide gauge record at Callao (Lima harbor) and the Chilean DART buoy record, while considering a complete set of runup data along with a more realistic tsunami numerical that accounts for dispersion, and also considering a fine-resolution computational grid, which is essential. Through these accurate numerical simulations we infer that the InSAR-based model is in better agreement with the tsunami data, studying the case of the Pisco earthquake indicating that geodetic data seems essential to recover the final co-seismic slip distribution on the rupture plane. Slip models based on teleseismic data are unable to describe the observed tsunami, suggesting that a significant amount of co-seismic slip may have been aseismic. Finally, we compute the runup distribution along the central part of the Peruvian coast to better understand the wave amplification/attenuation processes of the tsunami generated by the Pisco earthquake.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00024-012-0608-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1357148167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2984517861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_13571481673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcFqAjEUAEOp0K32A3p70Guj7212N-tZLL0IQsWjS6yxxqYbzUso9Osr1A_oaQ4zMEI8Eo4JUU8YEctKIpUSG2zlz40oqCpRTkk1t6JAVEpWda3uxD3zEZG0rqeF6Face_PlYBF21rv-A1KAtfFuZ5KFN-9Of4Yh7CEdLJSXGyw2nLfwvWnHCEvH7wHmJqbDOZtP-wwz26doPCxtzCMx2BvP9uHKoXh6ma9mr_IUwzlbTt0x5NhfVEeq1lS11Gj1v-oXblRIlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1357148167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tsunami Modeling to Validate Slip Models of the 2007 M^sub w^8.0 Pisco Earthquake, Central Peru</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ioualalen, M ; Perfettini, H ; Condo, S Yauri ; Jimenez, C ; Tavera, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Ioualalen, M ; Perfettini, H ; Condo, S Yauri ; Jimenez, C ; Tavera, H</creatorcontrib><description>Following the 2007, August 15th, M ^sub w^ 8.0, Pisco earthquake in central Peru, Sladen et al. (J Geophys Res 115: B02405, 2010 ) have derived several slip models of this event. They inverted teleseismic data together with geodetic (InSAR) measurements to look for the co-seismic slip distribution on the fault plane, considering those data sets separately or jointly. But how close to the real slip distribution are those inverted slip models? To answer this crucial question, the authors generated some tsunami records based on their slip models and compared them to DART buoys, tsunami records, and available runup data. Such an approach requires a robust and accurate tsunami model (non-linear, dispersive, accurate bathymetry and topography, etc.) otherwise the differences between the data and the model may be attributed to the slip models themselves, though they arise from an incomplete tsunami simulation. The accuracy of a numerical tsunami simulation strongly depends, among others, on two important constraints: (i) A fine computational grid (and thus the bathymetry and topography data sets used) which is not always available, unfortunately, and (ii) a realistic tsunami propagation model including dispersion. Here, we extend Sladen's work using newly available data, namely a tide gauge record at Callao (Lima harbor) and the Chilean DART buoy record, while considering a complete set of runup data along with a more realistic tsunami numerical that accounts for dispersion, and also considering a fine-resolution computational grid, which is essential. Through these accurate numerical simulations we infer that the InSAR-based model is in better agreement with the tsunami data, studying the case of the Pisco earthquake indicating that geodetic data seems essential to recover the final co-seismic slip distribution on the rupture plane. Slip models based on teleseismic data are unable to describe the observed tsunami, suggesting that a significant amount of co-seismic slip may have been aseismic. Finally, we compute the runup distribution along the central part of the Peruvian coast to better understand the wave amplification/attenuation processes of the tsunami generated by the Pisco earthquake.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-4553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00024-012-0608-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Bathymetry ; Buoys ; Earthquakes ; Harbors ; Seismic activity ; Topography ; Tsunamis</subject><ispartof>Pure and applied geophysics, 2013-03, Vol.170 (3), p.433</ispartof><rights>Springer Basel 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ioualalen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perfettini, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Condo, S Yauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavera, H</creatorcontrib><title>Tsunami Modeling to Validate Slip Models of the 2007 M^sub w^8.0 Pisco Earthquake, Central Peru</title><title>Pure and applied geophysics</title><description>Following the 2007, August 15th, M ^sub w^ 8.0, Pisco earthquake in central Peru, Sladen et al. (J Geophys Res 115: B02405, 2010 ) have derived several slip models of this event. They inverted teleseismic data together with geodetic (InSAR) measurements to look for the co-seismic slip distribution on the fault plane, considering those data sets separately or jointly. But how close to the real slip distribution are those inverted slip models? To answer this crucial question, the authors generated some tsunami records based on their slip models and compared them to DART buoys, tsunami records, and available runup data. Such an approach requires a robust and accurate tsunami model (non-linear, dispersive, accurate bathymetry and topography, etc.) otherwise the differences between the data and the model may be attributed to the slip models themselves, though they arise from an incomplete tsunami simulation. The accuracy of a numerical tsunami simulation strongly depends, among others, on two important constraints: (i) A fine computational grid (and thus the bathymetry and topography data sets used) which is not always available, unfortunately, and (ii) a realistic tsunami propagation model including dispersion. Here, we extend Sladen's work using newly available data, namely a tide gauge record at Callao (Lima harbor) and the Chilean DART buoy record, while considering a complete set of runup data along with a more realistic tsunami numerical that accounts for dispersion, and also considering a fine-resolution computational grid, which is essential. Through these accurate numerical simulations we infer that the InSAR-based model is in better agreement with the tsunami data, studying the case of the Pisco earthquake indicating that geodetic data seems essential to recover the final co-seismic slip distribution on the rupture plane. Slip models based on teleseismic data are unable to describe the observed tsunami, suggesting that a significant amount of co-seismic slip may have been aseismic. Finally, we compute the runup distribution along the central part of the Peruvian coast to better understand the wave amplification/attenuation processes of the tsunami generated by the Pisco earthquake.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Bathymetry</subject><subject>Buoys</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Harbors</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Tsunamis</subject><issn>0033-4553</issn><issn>1420-9136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjcFqAjEUAEOp0K32A3p70Guj7212N-tZLL0IQsWjS6yxxqYbzUso9Osr1A_oaQ4zMEI8Eo4JUU8YEctKIpUSG2zlz40oqCpRTkk1t6JAVEpWda3uxD3zEZG0rqeF6Face_PlYBF21rv-A1KAtfFuZ5KFN-9Of4Yh7CEdLJSXGyw2nLfwvWnHCEvH7wHmJqbDOZtP-wwz26doPCxtzCMx2BvP9uHKoXh6ma9mr_IUwzlbTt0x5NhfVEeq1lS11Gj1v-oXblRIlA</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Ioualalen, M</creator><creator>Perfettini, H</creator><creator>Condo, S Yauri</creator><creator>Jimenez, C</creator><creator>Tavera, H</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Tsunami Modeling to Validate Slip Models of the 2007 M^sub w^8.0 Pisco Earthquake, Central Peru</title><author>Ioualalen, M ; Perfettini, H ; Condo, S Yauri ; Jimenez, C ; Tavera, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_13571481673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bathymetry</topic><topic>Buoys</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Harbors</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Tsunamis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ioualalen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perfettini, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Condo, S Yauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavera, H</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ioualalen, M</au><au>Perfettini, H</au><au>Condo, S Yauri</au><au>Jimenez, C</au><au>Tavera, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tsunami Modeling to Validate Slip Models of the 2007 M^sub w^8.0 Pisco Earthquake, Central Peru</atitle><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>170</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>433</spage><pages>433-</pages><issn>0033-4553</issn><eissn>1420-9136</eissn><abstract>Following the 2007, August 15th, M ^sub w^ 8.0, Pisco earthquake in central Peru, Sladen et al. (J Geophys Res 115: B02405, 2010 ) have derived several slip models of this event. They inverted teleseismic data together with geodetic (InSAR) measurements to look for the co-seismic slip distribution on the fault plane, considering those data sets separately or jointly. But how close to the real slip distribution are those inverted slip models? To answer this crucial question, the authors generated some tsunami records based on their slip models and compared them to DART buoys, tsunami records, and available runup data. Such an approach requires a robust and accurate tsunami model (non-linear, dispersive, accurate bathymetry and topography, etc.) otherwise the differences between the data and the model may be attributed to the slip models themselves, though they arise from an incomplete tsunami simulation. The accuracy of a numerical tsunami simulation strongly depends, among others, on two important constraints: (i) A fine computational grid (and thus the bathymetry and topography data sets used) which is not always available, unfortunately, and (ii) a realistic tsunami propagation model including dispersion. Here, we extend Sladen's work using newly available data, namely a tide gauge record at Callao (Lima harbor) and the Chilean DART buoy record, while considering a complete set of runup data along with a more realistic tsunami numerical that accounts for dispersion, and also considering a fine-resolution computational grid, which is essential. Through these accurate numerical simulations we infer that the InSAR-based model is in better agreement with the tsunami data, studying the case of the Pisco earthquake indicating that geodetic data seems essential to recover the final co-seismic slip distribution on the rupture plane. Slip models based on teleseismic data are unable to describe the observed tsunami, suggesting that a significant amount of co-seismic slip may have been aseismic. Finally, we compute the runup distribution along the central part of the Peruvian coast to better understand the wave amplification/attenuation processes of the tsunami generated by the Pisco earthquake.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00024-012-0608-z</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-4553
ispartof Pure and applied geophysics, 2013-03, Vol.170 (3), p.433
issn 0033-4553
1420-9136
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1357148167
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Bathymetry
Buoys
Earthquakes
Harbors
Seismic activity
Topography
Tsunamis
title Tsunami Modeling to Validate Slip Models of the 2007 M^sub w^8.0 Pisco Earthquake, Central Peru
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A42%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tsunami%20Modeling%20to%20Validate%20Slip%20Models%20of%20the%202007%20M%5Esub%20w%5E8.0%20Pisco%20Earthquake,%20Central%20Peru&rft.jtitle=Pure%20and%20applied%20geophysics&rft.au=Ioualalen,%20M&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=170&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=433&rft.pages=433-&rft.issn=0033-4553&rft.eissn=1420-9136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00024-012-0608-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2984517861%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1357148167&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true