Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]
Australia features a highly segregated workforce where certain occupational spaces appear to privilege particular gendered dispositions. While research on gender and work highlights the association between occupational segregation and gender inequality, conventional explanations of why men and women...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.) Vic.), 2013-06, Vol.49 (2-3), p.291-308 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 308 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2-3 |
container_start_page | 291 |
container_title | Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.) |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Huppatz, Kate Goodwin, Susan |
description | Australia features a highly segregated workforce where certain occupational spaces appear to privilege particular gendered dispositions. While research on gender and work highlights the association between occupational segregation and gender inequality, conventional explanations of why men and women continue to be concentrated in different occupations, and in different roles within occupations, can be considered problematic. This article argues that we may be able to achieve a deeper understanding of gendered occupational segregation than previous explanations have offered by appropriating Bourdieu’s concept, ‘capital’. Drawing on qualitative research with Australian workers we explore men’s ‘gender capital experiences’ within masculinised and feminised occupations. The article discusses how male, masculine and feminine embodiments can operate as capitals which may be accumulated and transacted, perpetuating horizontal gender segregation in the workforce but also vertical segregation within occupations. In doing so, we expand the work of feminist Bourdieusian scholars who have reworked Bourdieu’s approach so that gender, as well as class, may be understood as a central form of stratification in the social order. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1440783313481743 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1356576366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.201220579</informt_id><sage_id>10.1177_1440783313481743</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2983353541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d449c25bf592b7b7a9f8d6f6d166d3548b445922eb26f49085ecfbc37183444c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksFv0zAUhwMCiTG4c7TEoUNqRuI4TrKd2oluoAGTGOKAkOU4L6271A5-jsb-e5yWQzWp4mT7_T5_sp8dRW_S5DRNi-J9ylhSlFmWZqxMC5Y9jY7CkMa0KspnYR7ieMxfRC8R10lCE8qroyfRZ4lq6LTRCA1Z2xqnpIXN3ppI05ANmAmSyRJMA44o2WsvuwmBPz04DUYBnpFhzNAHXJslsUoNvfTaGtkRhKWD5XZFtCGzAb2TnZbk540MhrH2rQelA6oRBzgjM-N1bxuQhiw0dE3w_7DubjTfa78iczu4RsNwSuZgDHg_JbfWPJyThbP3U_LJrsw5uZJLmJLLlUQMnvEeX2zdjaVwGnICDb779Sp63soO4fW_8Tj6vvhwe3EVX3-9_Hgxu45VnhQ-bhirFM3rNq9oXdSFrNqy4S1vUs6bLGdlzViIKNSUt6xKyhxUW6usSMuMMaay4-hk5-2d_T0AerHRqKDrpAE7oEgZrTitsor9H804KyitkhF9-whdh8aElo9UzvOCZ5wHKtlRyllEB63ond5I9yDSRIy_Rzz-PWFLvNuCoYd70sP8zY53G-2Fsl0HanxuXEuPAkE6tRLatHabW7cUjdVC1ltl8HARXln2UtAkpTTJiyoo53vKkLX-oOig5C-x2Pj0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1356576366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Huppatz, Kate ; Goodwin, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Huppatz, Kate ; Goodwin, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>Australia features a highly segregated workforce where certain occupational spaces appear to privilege particular gendered dispositions. While research on gender and work highlights the association between occupational segregation and gender inequality, conventional explanations of why men and women continue to be concentrated in different occupations, and in different roles within occupations, can be considered problematic. This article argues that we may be able to achieve a deeper understanding of gendered occupational segregation than previous explanations have offered by appropriating Bourdieu’s concept, ‘capital’. Drawing on qualitative research with Australian workers we explore men’s ‘gender capital experiences’ within masculinised and feminised occupations. The article discusses how male, masculine and feminine embodiments can operate as capitals which may be accumulated and transacted, perpetuating horizontal gender segregation in the workforce but also vertical segregation within occupations. In doing so, we expand the work of feminist Bourdieusian scholars who have reworked Bourdieu’s approach so that gender, as well as class, may be understood as a central form of stratification in the social order.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1440-7833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1440783313481743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Australia ; Australia: Social conditions ; Bourdieu, Pierre ; Capital ; Careers ; Class ; Embodiment ; Femininity ; Feminism ; Gender ; Gender equity ; Males ; Masculinity ; Men ; Occupational factors ; Occupational Segregation ; Occupations ; Qualitative research ; Segregation ; Sex ; Sex discrimination in employment ; Social capital ; Social Order ; Social Stratification ; Sociology ; Women and employment ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.), 2013-06, Vol.49 (2-3), p.291-308</ispartof><rights>2013 The Australian Sociological Association</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jun/Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d449c25bf592b7b7a9f8d6f6d166d3548b445922eb26f49085ecfbc37183444c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d449c25bf592b7b7a9f8d6f6d166d3548b445922eb26f49085ecfbc37183444c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1440783313481743$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1440783313481743$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,33753,33754,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huppatz, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]</title><title>Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.)</title><description>Australia features a highly segregated workforce where certain occupational spaces appear to privilege particular gendered dispositions. While research on gender and work highlights the association between occupational segregation and gender inequality, conventional explanations of why men and women continue to be concentrated in different occupations, and in different roles within occupations, can be considered problematic. This article argues that we may be able to achieve a deeper understanding of gendered occupational segregation than previous explanations have offered by appropriating Bourdieu’s concept, ‘capital’. Drawing on qualitative research with Australian workers we explore men’s ‘gender capital experiences’ within masculinised and feminised occupations. The article discusses how male, masculine and feminine embodiments can operate as capitals which may be accumulated and transacted, perpetuating horizontal gender segregation in the workforce but also vertical segregation within occupations. In doing so, we expand the work of feminist Bourdieusian scholars who have reworked Bourdieu’s approach so that gender, as well as class, may be understood as a central form of stratification in the social order.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Australia: Social conditions</subject><subject>Bourdieu, Pierre</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Class</subject><subject>Embodiment</subject><subject>Femininity</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Occupational factors</subject><subject>Occupational Segregation</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex discrimination in employment</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Social Order</subject><subject>Social Stratification</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Women and employment</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>1440-7833</issn><issn>1741-2978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksFv0zAUhwMCiTG4c7TEoUNqRuI4TrKd2oluoAGTGOKAkOU4L6271A5-jsb-e5yWQzWp4mT7_T5_sp8dRW_S5DRNi-J9ylhSlFmWZqxMC5Y9jY7CkMa0KspnYR7ieMxfRC8R10lCE8qroyfRZ4lq6LTRCA1Z2xqnpIXN3ppI05ANmAmSyRJMA44o2WsvuwmBPz04DUYBnpFhzNAHXJslsUoNvfTaGtkRhKWD5XZFtCGzAb2TnZbk540MhrH2rQelA6oRBzgjM-N1bxuQhiw0dE3w_7DubjTfa78iczu4RsNwSuZgDHg_JbfWPJyThbP3U_LJrsw5uZJLmJLLlUQMnvEeX2zdjaVwGnICDb779Sp63soO4fW_8Tj6vvhwe3EVX3-9_Hgxu45VnhQ-bhirFM3rNq9oXdSFrNqy4S1vUs6bLGdlzViIKNSUt6xKyhxUW6usSMuMMaay4-hk5-2d_T0AerHRqKDrpAE7oEgZrTitsor9H804KyitkhF9-whdh8aElo9UzvOCZ5wHKtlRyllEB63ond5I9yDSRIy_Rzz-PWFLvNuCoYd70sP8zY53G-2Fsl0HanxuXEuPAkE6tRLatHabW7cUjdVC1ltl8HARXln2UtAkpTTJiyoo53vKkLX-oOig5C-x2Pj0</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Huppatz, Kate</creator><creator>Goodwin, Susan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]</title><author>Huppatz, Kate ; Goodwin, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d449c25bf592b7b7a9f8d6f6d166d3548b445922eb26f49085ecfbc37183444c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Australia: Social conditions</topic><topic>Bourdieu, Pierre</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Class</topic><topic>Embodiment</topic><topic>Femininity</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Occupational factors</topic><topic>Occupational Segregation</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex discrimination in employment</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Social Order</topic><topic>Social Stratification</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Women and employment</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huppatz, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huppatz, Kate</au><au>Goodwin, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.)</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>291-308</pages><issn>1440-7833</issn><eissn>1741-2978</eissn><abstract>Australia features a highly segregated workforce where certain occupational spaces appear to privilege particular gendered dispositions. While research on gender and work highlights the association between occupational segregation and gender inequality, conventional explanations of why men and women continue to be concentrated in different occupations, and in different roles within occupations, can be considered problematic. This article argues that we may be able to achieve a deeper understanding of gendered occupational segregation than previous explanations have offered by appropriating Bourdieu’s concept, ‘capital’. Drawing on qualitative research with Australian workers we explore men’s ‘gender capital experiences’ within masculinised and feminised occupations. The article discusses how male, masculine and feminine embodiments can operate as capitals which may be accumulated and transacted, perpetuating horizontal gender segregation in the workforce but also vertical segregation within occupations. In doing so, we expand the work of feminist Bourdieusian scholars who have reworked Bourdieu’s approach so that gender, as well as class, may be understood as a central form of stratification in the social order.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1440783313481743</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1440-7833 |
ispartof | Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.), 2013-06, Vol.49 (2-3), p.291-308 |
issn | 1440-7833 1741-2978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1356576366 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Australia Australia: Social conditions Bourdieu, Pierre Capital Careers Class Embodiment Femininity Feminism Gender Gender equity Males Masculinity Men Occupational factors Occupational Segregation Occupations Qualitative research Segregation Sex Sex discrimination in employment Social capital Social Order Social Stratification Sociology Women and employment Workforce |
title | Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)] |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Masculinised%20jobs,%20feminised%20jobs%20and%20men's%20'gender%20capital'%20experiences:%20understanding%20occupational%20segregation%20in%20Australia%20%5BPaper%20in%20Special%20issue:%20Antipodean%20Fields:%20Working%20with%20Bourdieu.%20Bennett,%20Tony;%20Frow,%20John;%20Hage,%20Ghassan%20and%20Noble,%20Greg%20(eds)%5D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sociology%20(Melbourne,%20Vic.)&rft.au=Huppatz,%20Kate&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=291-308&rft.issn=1440-7833&rft.eissn=1741-2978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1440783313481743&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2983353541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1356576366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.201220579&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1440783313481743&rfr_iscdi=true |