Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]

Australia features a highly segregated workforce where certain occupational spaces appear to privilege particular gendered dispositions. While research on gender and work highlights the association between occupational segregation and gender inequality, conventional explanations of why men and women...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.) Vic.), 2013-06, Vol.49 (2-3), p.291-308
Hauptverfasser: Huppatz, Kate, Goodwin, Susan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 308
container_issue 2-3
container_start_page 291
container_title Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.)
container_volume 49
creator Huppatz, Kate
Goodwin, Susan
description Australia features a highly segregated workforce where certain occupational spaces appear to privilege particular gendered dispositions. While research on gender and work highlights the association between occupational segregation and gender inequality, conventional explanations of why men and women continue to be concentrated in different occupations, and in different roles within occupations, can be considered problematic. This article argues that we may be able to achieve a deeper understanding of gendered occupational segregation than previous explanations have offered by appropriating Bourdieu’s concept, ‘capital’. Drawing on qualitative research with Australian workers we explore men’s ‘gender capital experiences’ within masculinised and feminised occupations. The article discusses how male, masculine and feminine embodiments can operate as capitals which may be accumulated and transacted, perpetuating horizontal gender segregation in the workforce but also vertical segregation within occupations. In doing so, we expand the work of feminist Bourdieusian scholars who have reworked Bourdieu’s approach so that gender, as well as class, may be understood as a central form of stratification in the social order.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1440783313481743
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1356576366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.201220579</informt_id><sage_id>10.1177_1440783313481743</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2983353541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d449c25bf592b7b7a9f8d6f6d166d3548b445922eb26f49085ecfbc37183444c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksFv0zAUhwMCiTG4c7TEoUNqRuI4TrKd2oluoAGTGOKAkOU4L6271A5-jsb-e5yWQzWp4mT7_T5_sp8dRW_S5DRNi-J9ylhSlFmWZqxMC5Y9jY7CkMa0KspnYR7ieMxfRC8R10lCE8qroyfRZ4lq6LTRCA1Z2xqnpIXN3ppI05ANmAmSyRJMA44o2WsvuwmBPz04DUYBnpFhzNAHXJslsUoNvfTaGtkRhKWD5XZFtCGzAb2TnZbk540MhrH2rQelA6oRBzgjM-N1bxuQhiw0dE3w_7DubjTfa78iczu4RsNwSuZgDHg_JbfWPJyThbP3U_LJrsw5uZJLmJLLlUQMnvEeX2zdjaVwGnICDb779Sp63soO4fW_8Tj6vvhwe3EVX3-9_Hgxu45VnhQ-bhirFM3rNq9oXdSFrNqy4S1vUs6bLGdlzViIKNSUt6xKyhxUW6usSMuMMaay4-hk5-2d_T0AerHRqKDrpAE7oEgZrTitsor9H804KyitkhF9-whdh8aElo9UzvOCZ5wHKtlRyllEB63ond5I9yDSRIy_Rzz-PWFLvNuCoYd70sP8zY53G-2Fsl0HanxuXEuPAkE6tRLatHabW7cUjdVC1ltl8HARXln2UtAkpTTJiyoo53vKkLX-oOig5C-x2Pj0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1356576366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Huppatz, Kate ; Goodwin, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Huppatz, Kate ; Goodwin, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>Australia features a highly segregated workforce where certain occupational spaces appear to privilege particular gendered dispositions. While research on gender and work highlights the association between occupational segregation and gender inequality, conventional explanations of why men and women continue to be concentrated in different occupations, and in different roles within occupations, can be considered problematic. This article argues that we may be able to achieve a deeper understanding of gendered occupational segregation than previous explanations have offered by appropriating Bourdieu’s concept, ‘capital’. Drawing on qualitative research with Australian workers we explore men’s ‘gender capital experiences’ within masculinised and feminised occupations. The article discusses how male, masculine and feminine embodiments can operate as capitals which may be accumulated and transacted, perpetuating horizontal gender segregation in the workforce but also vertical segregation within occupations. In doing so, we expand the work of feminist Bourdieusian scholars who have reworked Bourdieu’s approach so that gender, as well as class, may be understood as a central form of stratification in the social order.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1440-7833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1440783313481743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Australia ; Australia: Social conditions ; Bourdieu, Pierre ; Capital ; Careers ; Class ; Embodiment ; Femininity ; Feminism ; Gender ; Gender equity ; Males ; Masculinity ; Men ; Occupational factors ; Occupational Segregation ; Occupations ; Qualitative research ; Segregation ; Sex ; Sex discrimination in employment ; Social capital ; Social Order ; Social Stratification ; Sociology ; Women and employment ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.), 2013-06, Vol.49 (2-3), p.291-308</ispartof><rights>2013 The Australian Sociological Association</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jun/Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d449c25bf592b7b7a9f8d6f6d166d3548b445922eb26f49085ecfbc37183444c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d449c25bf592b7b7a9f8d6f6d166d3548b445922eb26f49085ecfbc37183444c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1440783313481743$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1440783313481743$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,33753,33754,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huppatz, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]</title><title>Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.)</title><description>Australia features a highly segregated workforce where certain occupational spaces appear to privilege particular gendered dispositions. While research on gender and work highlights the association between occupational segregation and gender inequality, conventional explanations of why men and women continue to be concentrated in different occupations, and in different roles within occupations, can be considered problematic. This article argues that we may be able to achieve a deeper understanding of gendered occupational segregation than previous explanations have offered by appropriating Bourdieu’s concept, ‘capital’. Drawing on qualitative research with Australian workers we explore men’s ‘gender capital experiences’ within masculinised and feminised occupations. The article discusses how male, masculine and feminine embodiments can operate as capitals which may be accumulated and transacted, perpetuating horizontal gender segregation in the workforce but also vertical segregation within occupations. In doing so, we expand the work of feminist Bourdieusian scholars who have reworked Bourdieu’s approach so that gender, as well as class, may be understood as a central form of stratification in the social order.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Australia: Social conditions</subject><subject>Bourdieu, Pierre</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Class</subject><subject>Embodiment</subject><subject>Femininity</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Occupational factors</subject><subject>Occupational Segregation</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex discrimination in employment</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Social Order</subject><subject>Social Stratification</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Women and employment</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>1440-7833</issn><issn>1741-2978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksFv0zAUhwMCiTG4c7TEoUNqRuI4TrKd2oluoAGTGOKAkOU4L6271A5-jsb-e5yWQzWp4mT7_T5_sp8dRW_S5DRNi-J9ylhSlFmWZqxMC5Y9jY7CkMa0KspnYR7ieMxfRC8R10lCE8qroyfRZ4lq6LTRCA1Z2xqnpIXN3ppI05ANmAmSyRJMA44o2WsvuwmBPz04DUYBnpFhzNAHXJslsUoNvfTaGtkRhKWD5XZFtCGzAb2TnZbk540MhrH2rQelA6oRBzgjM-N1bxuQhiw0dE3w_7DubjTfa78iczu4RsNwSuZgDHg_JbfWPJyThbP3U_LJrsw5uZJLmJLLlUQMnvEeX2zdjaVwGnICDb779Sp63soO4fW_8Tj6vvhwe3EVX3-9_Hgxu45VnhQ-bhirFM3rNq9oXdSFrNqy4S1vUs6bLGdlzViIKNSUt6xKyhxUW6usSMuMMaay4-hk5-2d_T0AerHRqKDrpAE7oEgZrTitsor9H804KyitkhF9-whdh8aElo9UzvOCZ5wHKtlRyllEB63ond5I9yDSRIy_Rzz-PWFLvNuCoYd70sP8zY53G-2Fsl0HanxuXEuPAkE6tRLatHabW7cUjdVC1ltl8HARXln2UtAkpTTJiyoo53vKkLX-oOig5C-x2Pj0</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Huppatz, Kate</creator><creator>Goodwin, Susan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]</title><author>Huppatz, Kate ; Goodwin, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d449c25bf592b7b7a9f8d6f6d166d3548b445922eb26f49085ecfbc37183444c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Australia: Social conditions</topic><topic>Bourdieu, Pierre</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Class</topic><topic>Embodiment</topic><topic>Femininity</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Occupational factors</topic><topic>Occupational Segregation</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex discrimination in employment</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Social Order</topic><topic>Social Stratification</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Women and employment</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huppatz, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huppatz, Kate</au><au>Goodwin, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.)</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>291-308</pages><issn>1440-7833</issn><eissn>1741-2978</eissn><abstract>Australia features a highly segregated workforce where certain occupational spaces appear to privilege particular gendered dispositions. While research on gender and work highlights the association between occupational segregation and gender inequality, conventional explanations of why men and women continue to be concentrated in different occupations, and in different roles within occupations, can be considered problematic. This article argues that we may be able to achieve a deeper understanding of gendered occupational segregation than previous explanations have offered by appropriating Bourdieu’s concept, ‘capital’. Drawing on qualitative research with Australian workers we explore men’s ‘gender capital experiences’ within masculinised and feminised occupations. The article discusses how male, masculine and feminine embodiments can operate as capitals which may be accumulated and transacted, perpetuating horizontal gender segregation in the workforce but also vertical segregation within occupations. In doing so, we expand the work of feminist Bourdieusian scholars who have reworked Bourdieu’s approach so that gender, as well as class, may be understood as a central form of stratification in the social order.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1440783313481743</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1440-7833
ispartof Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.), 2013-06, Vol.49 (2-3), p.291-308
issn 1440-7833
1741-2978
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1356576366
source Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Australia
Australia: Social conditions
Bourdieu, Pierre
Capital
Careers
Class
Embodiment
Femininity
Feminism
Gender
Gender equity
Males
Masculinity
Men
Occupational factors
Occupational Segregation
Occupations
Qualitative research
Segregation
Sex
Sex discrimination in employment
Social capital
Social Order
Social Stratification
Sociology
Women and employment
Workforce
title Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men's 'gender capital' experiences: understanding occupational segregation in Australia [Paper in Special issue: Antipodean Fields: Working with Bourdieu. Bennett, Tony; Frow, John; Hage, Ghassan and Noble, Greg (eds)]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Masculinised%20jobs,%20feminised%20jobs%20and%20men's%20'gender%20capital'%20experiences:%20understanding%20occupational%20segregation%20in%20Australia%20%5BPaper%20in%20Special%20issue:%20Antipodean%20Fields:%20Working%20with%20Bourdieu.%20Bennett,%20Tony;%20Frow,%20John;%20Hage,%20Ghassan%20and%20Noble,%20Greg%20(eds)%5D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sociology%20(Melbourne,%20Vic.)&rft.au=Huppatz,%20Kate&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=291-308&rft.issn=1440-7833&rft.eissn=1741-2978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1440783313481743&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2983353541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1356576366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.201220579&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1440783313481743&rfr_iscdi=true