IF MEN WERE ANGELS
Scott Gerber's "A Distinct Judicial Power" is a wonderful exploration of one of Madison's auxiliary precautions. Gerber traces the evolution of the concept of separation of powers from Aristotle to the creation of the Federal Constitution. In particular, Professor Gerber consider...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Harvard journal of law and public policy 2012-03, Vol.35 (2), p.663 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 663 |
| container_title | Harvard journal of law and public policy |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Castro, William R |
| description | Scott Gerber's "A Distinct Judicial Power" is a wonderful exploration of one of Madison's auxiliary precautions. Gerber traces the evolution of the concept of separation of powers from Aristotle to the creation of the Federal Constitution. In particular, Professor Gerber considers the idea of a judicial branch of government independent from the other branches. The major part of his analysis carefully explores the development of an independent judiciary in each of the original colonies and states. One of the Constitution's primary structural precautions against misuse of government power is the separation of powers. Gerber takes up the issue of judicial review and convincingly details the relationship between judicial independence and the power to enforce a constitution by nullifying unconstitutional actions. The power of judicial review is an important aspect of constitutional governance, but the US modern preoccupation with this power can obscure other, perhaps more important, benefits of judicial independence. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1355855453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2981747681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-c766dbe6deaee80b456f898786260e022442af7d9365127fdf44bd95dafa94b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzb1qwzAUQGFRUqjjZukTGDIL9HOvdDWGoKQBx4UmpaORI2kwpXFj-_1TaKezfeeBFUpb4AatWrBCSKc5kFVPbDmOvRACQFLBXg676uib6tO_-2rT7H19emaPOXyNafXfkn3s_Hn7yuu3_WG7qfkgSU_8Yo2JXTIxhZRIdIAmkyNLRhmRhFIAKmQbnTYolc0xA3TRYQw5OOhIl2z95w6368-cxqntr_Pt-3fZSo1IiIBa3wEeJjMT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1355855453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IF MEN WERE ANGELS</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Castro, William R</creator><creatorcontrib>Castro, William R</creatorcontrib><description>Scott Gerber's "A Distinct Judicial Power" is a wonderful exploration of one of Madison's auxiliary precautions. Gerber traces the evolution of the concept of separation of powers from Aristotle to the creation of the Federal Constitution. In particular, Professor Gerber considers the idea of a judicial branch of government independent from the other branches. The major part of his analysis carefully explores the development of an independent judiciary in each of the original colonies and states. One of the Constitution's primary structural precautions against misuse of government power is the separation of powers. Gerber takes up the issue of judicial review and convincingly details the relationship between judicial independence and the power to enforce a constitution by nullifying unconstitutional actions. The power of judicial review is an important aspect of constitutional governance, but the US modern preoccupation with this power can obscure other, perhaps more important, benefits of judicial independence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0193-4872</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2374-6572</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy</publisher><subject>Bill of Rights-US ; Calvinism ; Constitutional law ; Governors ; Internal controls ; Judges & magistrates ; Judicial reviews ; Judiciary ; Legislatures ; Politics ; Power</subject><ispartof>Harvard journal of law and public policy, 2012-03, Vol.35 (2), p.663</ispartof><rights>Copyright Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy Spring 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castro, William R</creatorcontrib><title>IF MEN WERE ANGELS</title><title>Harvard journal of law and public policy</title><description>Scott Gerber's "A Distinct Judicial Power" is a wonderful exploration of one of Madison's auxiliary precautions. Gerber traces the evolution of the concept of separation of powers from Aristotle to the creation of the Federal Constitution. In particular, Professor Gerber considers the idea of a judicial branch of government independent from the other branches. The major part of his analysis carefully explores the development of an independent judiciary in each of the original colonies and states. One of the Constitution's primary structural precautions against misuse of government power is the separation of powers. Gerber takes up the issue of judicial review and convincingly details the relationship between judicial independence and the power to enforce a constitution by nullifying unconstitutional actions. The power of judicial review is an important aspect of constitutional governance, but the US modern preoccupation with this power can obscure other, perhaps more important, benefits of judicial independence.</description><subject>Bill of Rights-US</subject><subject>Calvinism</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Internal controls</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Judiciary</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><issn>0193-4872</issn><issn>2374-6572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotzb1qwzAUQGFRUqjjZukTGDIL9HOvdDWGoKQBx4UmpaORI2kwpXFj-_1TaKezfeeBFUpb4AatWrBCSKc5kFVPbDmOvRACQFLBXg676uib6tO_-2rT7H19emaPOXyNafXfkn3s_Hn7yuu3_WG7qfkgSU_8Yo2JXTIxhZRIdIAmkyNLRhmRhFIAKmQbnTYolc0xA3TRYQw5OOhIl2z95w6368-cxqntr_Pt-3fZSo1IiIBa3wEeJjMT</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Castro, William R</creator><general>Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>IF MEN WERE ANGELS</title><author>Castro, William R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-c766dbe6deaee80b456f898786260e022442af7d9365127fdf44bd95dafa94b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bill of Rights-US</topic><topic>Calvinism</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Internal controls</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Judiciary</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castro, William R</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Harvard journal of law and public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castro, William R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IF MEN WERE ANGELS</atitle><jtitle>Harvard journal of law and public policy</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>663</spage><pages>663-</pages><issn>0193-4872</issn><eissn>2374-6572</eissn><abstract>Scott Gerber's "A Distinct Judicial Power" is a wonderful exploration of one of Madison's auxiliary precautions. Gerber traces the evolution of the concept of separation of powers from Aristotle to the creation of the Federal Constitution. In particular, Professor Gerber considers the idea of a judicial branch of government independent from the other branches. The major part of his analysis carefully explores the development of an independent judiciary in each of the original colonies and states. One of the Constitution's primary structural precautions against misuse of government power is the separation of powers. Gerber takes up the issue of judicial review and convincingly details the relationship between judicial independence and the power to enforce a constitution by nullifying unconstitutional actions. The power of judicial review is an important aspect of constitutional governance, but the US modern preoccupation with this power can obscure other, perhaps more important, benefits of judicial independence.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0193-4872 |
| ispartof | Harvard journal of law and public policy, 2012-03, Vol.35 (2), p.663 |
| issn | 0193-4872 2374-6572 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1355855453 |
| source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Bill of Rights-US Calvinism Constitutional law Governors Internal controls Judges & magistrates Judicial reviews Judiciary Legislatures Politics Power |
| title | IF MEN WERE ANGELS |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T14%3A33%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IF%20MEN%20WERE%20ANGELS&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20journal%20of%20law%20and%20public%20policy&rft.au=Castro,%20William%20R&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=663&rft.pages=663-&rft.issn=0193-4872&rft.eissn=2374-6572&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2981747681%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1355855453&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |