Response to Miriam R. Lowi's review of Oil Is Not a Curse: Ownership Structure and Institutions in Soviet Successor States
In her gracious and incisive review, Miriam R. Lowi raises three main questions: 1) whether Russia is indeed a case of private domestic ownership (P1); 2) whether there is a fundamental difference between state ownership with control (S1) and without control (S2); and 3) whether we adequately take i...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Perspectives on politics 2013-06, Vol.11 (2), p.595-596 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 596 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 595 |
| container_title | Perspectives on politics |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Luong, Pauline Jones |
| description | In her gracious and incisive review, Miriam R. Lowi raises three main questions: 1) whether Russia is indeed a case of private domestic ownership (P1); 2) whether there is a fundamental difference between state ownership with control (S1) and without control (S2); and 3) whether we adequately take into account alternative explanations for the variation in ownership structure (OS) across petroleum-rich states over the twentieth century. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1537592713000856 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1353373584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1537592713000856</cupid><jstor_id>43280818</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43280818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c221t-222b0035476db6f8a4ce1a6a82f1df80de9b98301df2016457d4671b11eea2823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxYMoqNU_wIMw4MFTdGc3H1tvUvwoVAtWz2GTTHSLzdadjUX_elMqIoinmeG993swUXSE4gwF5uczTFWeDmWOSgih02wr2sM0wVgMdba93lUer_XdaJ95LoSUSui96POBeOlaJggO7qy3ZgEPZzBxK3vK4Ond0gpcA1P7CmOGexfAwKjzTBcwXbXk-cUuYRZ8V4XOE5i2hnHLwYYu2J4LtoWZ6ykBZl1VEbPzvd0E4oNopzGvTIffcxA9XV89jm7jyfRmPLqcxJWUGGIpZSmESpM8q8us0SapCE1mtGywbrSoaVgOtRL9IQVmSZrXSZZjiUhkpJZqEJ1suEvv3jriUMxd59u-skCVKpWrVCe9CzeuyjtmT02x9HZh_EeBoli_uPjz4j5zvMnMOTj_E0iU1EKj7nX1zTSL0tv6mX5V_0v9Aqmjhqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1353373584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to Miriam R. Lowi's review of Oil Is Not a Curse: Ownership Structure and Institutions in Soviet Successor States</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection</source><creator>Luong, Pauline Jones</creator><creatorcontrib>Luong, Pauline Jones</creatorcontrib><description>In her gracious and incisive review, Miriam R. Lowi raises three main questions: 1) whether Russia is indeed a case of private domestic ownership (P1); 2) whether there is a fundamental difference between state ownership with control (S1) and without control (S2); and 3) whether we adequately take into account alternative explanations for the variation in ownership structure (OS) across petroleum-rich states over the twentieth century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1537592713000856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Critical Dialogue ; Petroleum industry ; Political science ; Privatization ; Public enterprise</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on politics, 2013-06, Vol.11 (2), p.595-596</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013</rights><rights>American Political Science Association 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43280818$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1537592713000856/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,313,314,778,782,790,801,12834,27911,27913,27914,55617,58006,58239</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luong, Pauline Jones</creatorcontrib><title>Response to Miriam R. Lowi's review of Oil Is Not a Curse: Ownership Structure and Institutions in Soviet Successor States</title><title>Perspectives on politics</title><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><description>In her gracious and incisive review, Miriam R. Lowi raises three main questions: 1) whether Russia is indeed a case of private domestic ownership (P1); 2) whether there is a fundamental difference between state ownership with control (S1) and without control (S2); and 3) whether we adequately take into account alternative explanations for the variation in ownership structure (OS) across petroleum-rich states over the twentieth century.</description><subject>Critical Dialogue</subject><subject>Petroleum industry</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Public enterprise</subject><issn>1537-5927</issn><issn>1541-0986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxYMoqNU_wIMw4MFTdGc3H1tvUvwoVAtWz2GTTHSLzdadjUX_elMqIoinmeG993swUXSE4gwF5uczTFWeDmWOSgih02wr2sM0wVgMdba93lUer_XdaJ95LoSUSui96POBeOlaJggO7qy3ZgEPZzBxK3vK4Ond0gpcA1P7CmOGexfAwKjzTBcwXbXk-cUuYRZ8V4XOE5i2hnHLwYYu2J4LtoWZ6ykBZl1VEbPzvd0E4oNopzGvTIffcxA9XV89jm7jyfRmPLqcxJWUGGIpZSmESpM8q8us0SapCE1mtGywbrSoaVgOtRL9IQVmSZrXSZZjiUhkpJZqEJ1suEvv3jriUMxd59u-skCVKpWrVCe9CzeuyjtmT02x9HZh_EeBoli_uPjz4j5zvMnMOTj_E0iU1EKj7nX1zTSL0tv6mX5V_0v9Aqmjhqw</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Luong, Pauline Jones</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Response to Miriam R. Lowi's review of Oil Is Not a Curse: Ownership Structure and Institutions in Soviet Successor States</title><author>Luong, Pauline Jones</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c221t-222b0035476db6f8a4ce1a6a82f1df80de9b98301df2016457d4671b11eea2823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Critical Dialogue</topic><topic>Petroleum industry</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Public enterprise</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luong, Pauline Jones</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luong, Pauline Jones</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to Miriam R. Lowi's review of Oil Is Not a Curse: Ownership Structure and Institutions in Soviet Successor States</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>595</spage><epage>596</epage><pages>595-596</pages><issn>1537-5927</issn><eissn>1541-0986</eissn><abstract>In her gracious and incisive review, Miriam R. Lowi raises three main questions: 1) whether Russia is indeed a case of private domestic ownership (P1); 2) whether there is a fundamental difference between state ownership with control (S1) and without control (S2); and 3) whether we adequately take into account alternative explanations for the variation in ownership structure (OS) across petroleum-rich states over the twentieth century.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1537592713000856</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1537-5927 |
| ispartof | Perspectives on politics, 2013-06, Vol.11 (2), p.595-596 |
| issn | 1537-5927 1541-0986 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1353373584 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection |
| subjects | Critical Dialogue Petroleum industry Political science Privatization Public enterprise |
| title | Response to Miriam R. Lowi's review of Oil Is Not a Curse: Ownership Structure and Institutions in Soviet Successor States |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A42%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20Miriam%20R.%20Lowi's%20review%20of%20Oil%20Is%20Not%20a%20Curse:%20Ownership%20Structure%20and%20Institutions%20in%20Soviet%20Successor%20States&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20politics&rft.au=Luong,%20Pauline%20Jones&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=596&rft.pages=595-596&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1537592713000856&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43280818%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1353373584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1537592713000856&rft_jstor_id=43280818&rfr_iscdi=true |