Legal considerations in mammography
"3 Approximately 5% to 17% of breast cancers are missed on screening mammography,4,5 while 75% of missed cancers can be found on previous mammogram (retrospective analysis).6 Indeed, 5% to 15% of palpable breast cancers are not revealed on mammography.7 However, the perceived risk of malpractic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied radiology (1976) 2013-04, Vol.42 (4), p.15-18 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 18 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 15 |
| container_title | Applied radiology (1976) |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Watson, Jr., Alfred B Sahani, Vivek G |
| description | "3 Approximately 5% to 17% of breast cancers are missed on screening mammography,4,5 while 75% of missed cancers can be found on previous mammogram (retrospective analysis).6 Indeed, 5% to 15% of palpable breast cancers are not revealed on mammography.7 However, the perceived risk of malpractice incidence in 5 years is nearly four times higher than the actual prevalence.8,9 For a number of years, breast cancer was the number one cause of malpractice claims, and it is still among the top 5 errors in radiology claims.10 In the last 10 years, breast cancer case indemnity has significantly increased. [...]mammographic masses and calcifications must be visualized and localized in different views. [...]it is important to go above and beyond when documenting your best practices in breast imaging. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.37549/AR1987 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1346906683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A327236405</galeid><sourcerecordid>A327236405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2d3d5a27d3753175e2367d1a11b2255af1616e77a044f1bb4714288f43b1529d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUE1LAzEQDaJgreJfKPTgaWsm3zmW4hcsCKLnkN0kNaW7W5Ptof_eYAUVZA7zGN6b92YQuga8oJIzfbt8Aa3kCZqAkroiSqvTX_gcXeS8wRiEJnKC5rVf2-2sHfocnU92jAXNYj_rbNcN62R374dLdBbsNvur7z5Fb_d3r6vHqn5-eFot66qlwMeKOOq4JdKVGBQk94QK6cACNIRwbgMIEF5KixkL0DRMAiNKBUYb4EQ7OkXz495dGj72Po9mM-xTXywNUCY0FkLRH1bJ7U3swzAm23Yxt2ZJiSymDPPCWvzDKuV8F8u1PsQy_yO4OQraNOScfDC7FDubDgaw-XqsOT6WfgI1gGXP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1346906683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Legal considerations in mammography</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Watson, Jr., Alfred B ; Sahani, Vivek G</creator><creatorcontrib>Watson, Jr., Alfred B ; Sahani, Vivek G</creatorcontrib><description>"3 Approximately 5% to 17% of breast cancers are missed on screening mammography,4,5 while 75% of missed cancers can be found on previous mammogram (retrospective analysis).6 Indeed, 5% to 15% of palpable breast cancers are not revealed on mammography.7 However, the perceived risk of malpractice incidence in 5 years is nearly four times higher than the actual prevalence.8,9 For a number of years, breast cancer was the number one cause of malpractice claims, and it is still among the top 5 errors in radiology claims.10 In the last 10 years, breast cancer case indemnity has significantly increased. [...]mammographic masses and calcifications must be visualized and localized in different views. [...]it is important to go above and beyond when documenting your best practices in breast imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1879-2898</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0160-9963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37549/AR1987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotch Plains: Anderson Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Litigation ; Mammography ; Medical malpractice ; Physicians ; Practice ; Radiologists</subject><ispartof>Applied radiology (1976), 2013-04, Vol.42 (4), p.15-18</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Anderson Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Anderson Publishing Ltd. Apr 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2d3d5a27d3753175e2367d1a11b2255af1616e77a044f1bb4714288f43b1529d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watson, Jr., Alfred B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahani, Vivek G</creatorcontrib><title>Legal considerations in mammography</title><title>Applied radiology (1976)</title><description>"3 Approximately 5% to 17% of breast cancers are missed on screening mammography,4,5 while 75% of missed cancers can be found on previous mammogram (retrospective analysis).6 Indeed, 5% to 15% of palpable breast cancers are not revealed on mammography.7 However, the perceived risk of malpractice incidence in 5 years is nearly four times higher than the actual prevalence.8,9 For a number of years, breast cancer was the number one cause of malpractice claims, and it is still among the top 5 errors in radiology claims.10 In the last 10 years, breast cancer case indemnity has significantly increased. [...]mammographic masses and calcifications must be visualized and localized in different views. [...]it is important to go above and beyond when documenting your best practices in breast imaging.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical malpractice</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Radiologists</subject><issn>1879-2898</issn><issn>0160-9963</issn><issn>1879-2898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptUE1LAzEQDaJgreJfKPTgaWsm3zmW4hcsCKLnkN0kNaW7W5Ptof_eYAUVZA7zGN6b92YQuga8oJIzfbt8Aa3kCZqAkroiSqvTX_gcXeS8wRiEJnKC5rVf2-2sHfocnU92jAXNYj_rbNcN62R374dLdBbsNvur7z5Fb_d3r6vHqn5-eFot66qlwMeKOOq4JdKVGBQk94QK6cACNIRwbgMIEF5KixkL0DRMAiNKBUYb4EQ7OkXz495dGj72Po9mM-xTXywNUCY0FkLRH1bJ7U3swzAm23Yxt2ZJiSymDPPCWvzDKuV8F8u1PsQy_yO4OQraNOScfDC7FDubDgaw-XqsOT6WfgI1gGXP</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Watson, Jr., Alfred B</creator><creator>Sahani, Vivek G</creator><general>Anderson Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Legal considerations in mammography</title><author>Watson, Jr., Alfred B ; Sahani, Vivek G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2d3d5a27d3753175e2367d1a11b2255af1616e77a044f1bb4714288f43b1529d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical malpractice</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Radiologists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watson, Jr., Alfred B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahani, Vivek G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Applied radiology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watson, Jr., Alfred B</au><au>Sahani, Vivek G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Legal considerations in mammography</atitle><jtitle>Applied radiology (1976)</jtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>15-18</pages><issn>1879-2898</issn><issn>0160-9963</issn><eissn>1879-2898</eissn><abstract>"3 Approximately 5% to 17% of breast cancers are missed on screening mammography,4,5 while 75% of missed cancers can be found on previous mammogram (retrospective analysis).6 Indeed, 5% to 15% of palpable breast cancers are not revealed on mammography.7 However, the perceived risk of malpractice incidence in 5 years is nearly four times higher than the actual prevalence.8,9 For a number of years, breast cancer was the number one cause of malpractice claims, and it is still among the top 5 errors in radiology claims.10 In the last 10 years, breast cancer case indemnity has significantly increased. [...]mammographic masses and calcifications must be visualized and localized in different views. [...]it is important to go above and beyond when documenting your best practices in breast imaging.</abstract><cop>Scotch Plains</cop><pub>Anderson Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.37549/AR1987</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1879-2898 |
| ispartof | Applied radiology (1976), 2013-04, Vol.42 (4), p.15-18 |
| issn | 1879-2898 0160-9963 1879-2898 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1346906683 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Breast cancer Laws, regulations and rules Litigation Mammography Medical malpractice Physicians Practice Radiologists |
| title | Legal considerations in mammography |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T19%3A14%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Legal%20considerations%20in%20mammography&rft.jtitle=Applied%20radiology%20(1976)&rft.au=Watson,%20Jr.,%20Alfred%20B&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=15-18&rft.issn=1879-2898&rft.eissn=1879-2898&rft_id=info:doi/10.37549/AR1987&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA327236405%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1346906683&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A327236405&rfr_iscdi=true |