Are mouse lens epithelial cells more sensitive to [gamma]-irradiation than lymphocytes?

In this pilot study we compared for the first time the radiation sensitivity of mouse lens epithelial cells (LECs) and mouse lymphocytes. We freshly prepared LECs and lymphocytes and irradiated them with [gamma]-rays (^sup 137^Cs; doses ranging from 0.25 to 2Â Gy). DNA damage and repair were evaluat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation and environmental biophysics 2013-05, Vol.52 (2), p.279
Hauptverfasser: Bannik, Kristina, Rössler, Ute, Faus-kessler, Theresa, Gomolka, Maria, Hornhardt, Sabine, Dalke, Claudia, Klymenko, Olena, Rosemann, Michael, Trott, Klaus-rüdiger, Atkinson, Michael, Kulka, Ulrike, Graw, Jochen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 279
container_title Radiation and environmental biophysics
container_volume 52
creator Bannik, Kristina
Rössler, Ute
Faus-kessler, Theresa
Gomolka, Maria
Hornhardt, Sabine
Dalke, Claudia
Klymenko, Olena
Rosemann, Michael
Trott, Klaus-rüdiger
Atkinson, Michael
Kulka, Ulrike
Graw, Jochen
description In this pilot study we compared for the first time the radiation sensitivity of mouse lens epithelial cells (LECs) and mouse lymphocytes. We freshly prepared LECs and lymphocytes and irradiated them with [gamma]-rays (^sup 137^Cs; doses ranging from 0.25 to 2Â Gy). DNA damage and repair were evaluated by alkaline comet assay and [gamma]H2AX foci assay. Using the comet assay, we observed a dose-dependent increase in DNA damage in both cell types. The faster formation of single- and double-strand breaks in LECs of C57BL/6 mice at doses below 1Â Gy needs to be confirmed in other mouse strains. Immunofluorescence for [gamma]H2AX foci showed a higher degree of lesions in LECs from C57BL/6J mice compared to those of JF1 mice and to lymphocytes of both strains. Correspondingly, repair of DNA damage proceeded faster in LECs of C57BL/6J mice compared to LECs of JF1 mice and lymphocytes of both strains. It is obvious that the lymphocytes of both strains repaired DNA lesions more slowly than the corresponding LECs. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that LECs of C57Bl/6 mice show a steeper doseâ[euro]"response than lymphocytes in both types of experiments. It shows that both test systems are able to be used also at doses below 0.25Â Gy. The observed difference in DNA repair between the LECs from C57BL/6J mice compared to the LECs from JF1 mice and to the lymphocytes of both strains warrants further experiments to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00411-012-0451-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1330877661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2949743821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_13308776613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzsFqAjEUheEgFZyqD9BdwHXaeyfTGWdVRCw-gFBBRIK9dSKZyTQ3I_j2ZtEH6Oosvn9xhHhBeEWA6o0BCkQFmCso3lEtRyLDQucqh7p-EhloQFXqYj8Rz8xXAKzKss7E1yqQbP3AJB11LKm3sSFnjZNnco6TpYAT2WhvJKOXh4tpW3NUNgTzbU20vpOxMZ1097Zv_PkeiT9mYvxjHNP8b6di8bnZrbeqD_53II6nqx9Cl-iEWsOySndQ_696AGmzSLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1330877661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are mouse lens epithelial cells more sensitive to [gamma]-irradiation than lymphocytes?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bannik, Kristina ; Rössler, Ute ; Faus-kessler, Theresa ; Gomolka, Maria ; Hornhardt, Sabine ; Dalke, Claudia ; Klymenko, Olena ; Rosemann, Michael ; Trott, Klaus-rüdiger ; Atkinson, Michael ; Kulka, Ulrike ; Graw, Jochen</creator><creatorcontrib>Bannik, Kristina ; Rössler, Ute ; Faus-kessler, Theresa ; Gomolka, Maria ; Hornhardt, Sabine ; Dalke, Claudia ; Klymenko, Olena ; Rosemann, Michael ; Trott, Klaus-rüdiger ; Atkinson, Michael ; Kulka, Ulrike ; Graw, Jochen</creatorcontrib><description>In this pilot study we compared for the first time the radiation sensitivity of mouse lens epithelial cells (LECs) and mouse lymphocytes. We freshly prepared LECs and lymphocytes and irradiated them with [gamma]-rays (^sup 137^Cs; doses ranging from 0.25 to 2Â Gy). DNA damage and repair were evaluated by alkaline comet assay and [gamma]H2AX foci assay. Using the comet assay, we observed a dose-dependent increase in DNA damage in both cell types. The faster formation of single- and double-strand breaks in LECs of C57BL/6 mice at doses below 1Â Gy needs to be confirmed in other mouse strains. Immunofluorescence for [gamma]H2AX foci showed a higher degree of lesions in LECs from C57BL/6J mice compared to those of JF1 mice and to lymphocytes of both strains. Correspondingly, repair of DNA damage proceeded faster in LECs of C57BL/6J mice compared to LECs of JF1 mice and lymphocytes of both strains. It is obvious that the lymphocytes of both strains repaired DNA lesions more slowly than the corresponding LECs. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that LECs of C57Bl/6 mice show a steeper doseâ[euro]"response than lymphocytes in both types of experiments. It shows that both test systems are able to be used also at doses below 0.25Â Gy. The observed difference in DNA repair between the LECs from C57BL/6J mice compared to the LECs from JF1 mice and to the lymphocytes of both strains warrants further experiments to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-634X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00411-012-0451-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Bioassays ; Cellular biology ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA damage ; Eyes &amp; eyesight ; Gamma rays ; Irradiation ; Lesions ; Lymphocytes ; Rodents</subject><ispartof>Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2013-05, Vol.52 (2), p.279</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bannik, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rössler, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faus-kessler, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomolka, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornhardt, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalke, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klymenko, Olena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosemann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trott, Klaus-rüdiger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulka, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graw, Jochen</creatorcontrib><title>Are mouse lens epithelial cells more sensitive to [gamma]-irradiation than lymphocytes?</title><title>Radiation and environmental biophysics</title><description>In this pilot study we compared for the first time the radiation sensitivity of mouse lens epithelial cells (LECs) and mouse lymphocytes. We freshly prepared LECs and lymphocytes and irradiated them with [gamma]-rays (^sup 137^Cs; doses ranging from 0.25 to 2Â Gy). DNA damage and repair were evaluated by alkaline comet assay and [gamma]H2AX foci assay. Using the comet assay, we observed a dose-dependent increase in DNA damage in both cell types. The faster formation of single- and double-strand breaks in LECs of C57BL/6 mice at doses below 1Â Gy needs to be confirmed in other mouse strains. Immunofluorescence for [gamma]H2AX foci showed a higher degree of lesions in LECs from C57BL/6J mice compared to those of JF1 mice and to lymphocytes of both strains. Correspondingly, repair of DNA damage proceeded faster in LECs of C57BL/6J mice compared to LECs of JF1 mice and lymphocytes of both strains. It is obvious that the lymphocytes of both strains repaired DNA lesions more slowly than the corresponding LECs. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that LECs of C57Bl/6 mice show a steeper doseâ[euro]"response than lymphocytes in both types of experiments. It shows that both test systems are able to be used also at doses below 0.25Â Gy. The observed difference in DNA repair between the LECs from C57BL/6J mice compared to the LECs from JF1 mice and to the lymphocytes of both strains warrants further experiments to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>Eyes &amp; eyesight</subject><subject>Gamma rays</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><issn>0301-634X</issn><issn>1432-2099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzsFqAjEUheEgFZyqD9BdwHXaeyfTGWdVRCw-gFBBRIK9dSKZyTQ3I_j2ZtEH6Oosvn9xhHhBeEWA6o0BCkQFmCso3lEtRyLDQucqh7p-EhloQFXqYj8Rz8xXAKzKss7E1yqQbP3AJB11LKm3sSFnjZNnco6TpYAT2WhvJKOXh4tpW3NUNgTzbU20vpOxMZ1097Zv_PkeiT9mYvxjHNP8b6di8bnZrbeqD_53II6nqx9Cl-iEWsOySndQ_696AGmzSLg</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Bannik, Kristina</creator><creator>Rössler, Ute</creator><creator>Faus-kessler, Theresa</creator><creator>Gomolka, Maria</creator><creator>Hornhardt, Sabine</creator><creator>Dalke, Claudia</creator><creator>Klymenko, Olena</creator><creator>Rosemann, Michael</creator><creator>Trott, Klaus-rüdiger</creator><creator>Atkinson, Michael</creator><creator>Kulka, Ulrike</creator><creator>Graw, Jochen</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Are mouse lens epithelial cells more sensitive to [gamma]-irradiation than lymphocytes?</title><author>Bannik, Kristina ; Rössler, Ute ; Faus-kessler, Theresa ; Gomolka, Maria ; Hornhardt, Sabine ; Dalke, Claudia ; Klymenko, Olena ; Rosemann, Michael ; Trott, Klaus-rüdiger ; Atkinson, Michael ; Kulka, Ulrike ; Graw, Jochen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_13308776613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>Eyes &amp; eyesight</topic><topic>Gamma rays</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bannik, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rössler, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faus-kessler, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomolka, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornhardt, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalke, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klymenko, Olena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosemann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trott, Klaus-rüdiger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulka, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graw, Jochen</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Radiation and environmental biophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bannik, Kristina</au><au>Rössler, Ute</au><au>Faus-kessler, Theresa</au><au>Gomolka, Maria</au><au>Hornhardt, Sabine</au><au>Dalke, Claudia</au><au>Klymenko, Olena</au><au>Rosemann, Michael</au><au>Trott, Klaus-rüdiger</au><au>Atkinson, Michael</au><au>Kulka, Ulrike</au><au>Graw, Jochen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are mouse lens epithelial cells more sensitive to [gamma]-irradiation than lymphocytes?</atitle><jtitle>Radiation and environmental biophysics</jtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><pages>279-</pages><issn>0301-634X</issn><eissn>1432-2099</eissn><abstract>In this pilot study we compared for the first time the radiation sensitivity of mouse lens epithelial cells (LECs) and mouse lymphocytes. We freshly prepared LECs and lymphocytes and irradiated them with [gamma]-rays (^sup 137^Cs; doses ranging from 0.25 to 2Â Gy). DNA damage and repair were evaluated by alkaline comet assay and [gamma]H2AX foci assay. Using the comet assay, we observed a dose-dependent increase in DNA damage in both cell types. The faster formation of single- and double-strand breaks in LECs of C57BL/6 mice at doses below 1Â Gy needs to be confirmed in other mouse strains. Immunofluorescence for [gamma]H2AX foci showed a higher degree of lesions in LECs from C57BL/6J mice compared to those of JF1 mice and to lymphocytes of both strains. Correspondingly, repair of DNA damage proceeded faster in LECs of C57BL/6J mice compared to LECs of JF1 mice and lymphocytes of both strains. It is obvious that the lymphocytes of both strains repaired DNA lesions more slowly than the corresponding LECs. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that LECs of C57Bl/6 mice show a steeper doseâ[euro]"response than lymphocytes in both types of experiments. It shows that both test systems are able to be used also at doses below 0.25Â Gy. The observed difference in DNA repair between the LECs from C57BL/6J mice compared to the LECs from JF1 mice and to the lymphocytes of both strains warrants further experiments to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00411-012-0451-8</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-634X
ispartof Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2013-05, Vol.52 (2), p.279
issn 0301-634X
1432-2099
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1330877661
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Bioassays
Cellular biology
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA damage
Eyes & eyesight
Gamma rays
Irradiation
Lesions
Lymphocytes
Rodents
title Are mouse lens epithelial cells more sensitive to [gamma]-irradiation than lymphocytes?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A44%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20mouse%20lens%20epithelial%20cells%20more%20sensitive%20to%20%5Bgamma%5D-irradiation%20than%20lymphocytes?&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20and%20environmental%20biophysics&rft.au=Bannik,%20Kristina&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.pages=279-&rft.issn=0301-634X&rft.eissn=1432-2099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00411-012-0451-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2949743821%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1330877661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true