Supreme court stays active in the arbitration arena

Financial industry firms with an interest in seeing arbitration remain viable as a means of individualized dispute resolution should make their voices heard in the regulatory reviews of arbitration and in any subsequent rulemaking process, the author suggests. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The Banking Law Journal 2013, Vol.130 (3), p.234
1. Verfasser:	Snyder, John R
Format:	Newsletterarticle
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Alternative dispute resolution Arbitration Cellular telephone services industry Class actions (Civil procedure) Contracts Financial institutions Negotiation, mediation and arbitration Regulation of financial institutions Securities industry Travel industry
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page
container_issue	3
container_start_page	234
container_title	The Banking Law Journal
container_volume	130
creator	Snyder, John R
description	Financial industry firms with an interest in seeing arbitration remain viable as a means of individualized dispute resolution should make their voices heard in the regulatory reviews of arbitration and in any subsequent rulemaking process, the author suggests. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format	Newsletterarticle
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1328409066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A323659874</galeid><sourcerecordid>A323659874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1036-83b99244c1275de99f758213aab16d2e773927defa9c4a301c0b44e62d1e21f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNjktLxDAUhYMoOI7-h4BbC3mnWQ6DLxhwoa7LbXvTyVDTsUkF_72BcTGbcw-Hj3vOBVkJWfNKai4uyYoxpiutmbkmNykdGBNcarsi8n05zviFtJuWOdOU4TdR6HL4QRoizXukMLchz5DDFIvHCLfkysOY8O7_rsnn0-PH9qXavT2_bje7auBMmqqWrXNCqY4Lq3t0zltdl1qAlpteoLXSCdujB9cpkIx3rFUKjeg5Cu5ruSb3p7_HefpeMOXmUEbGUtlwKWrFHDOmUNWJGmDEJkQ_lbHdgBFnGKeIPpR4I4U02tVWFf7hjG-XFCKmIikM-5wGWFI6x_8AXppfvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>newsletterarticle</recordtype><pqid>1328409066</pqid></control><display><type>newsletterarticle</type><title>Supreme court stays active in the arbitration arena</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Snyder, John R</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder, John R</creatorcontrib><description>Financial industry firms with an interest in seeing arbitration remain viable as a means of individualized dispute resolution should make their voices heard in the regulatory reviews of arbitration and in any subsequent rulemaking process, the author suggests. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-5506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2381-3512</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BLJODA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: LexisNexis</publisher><subject>Alternative dispute resolution ; Arbitration ; Cellular telephone services industry ; Class actions (Civil procedure) ; Contracts ; Financial institutions ; Negotiation, mediation and arbitration ; Regulation of financial institutions ; Securities industry ; Travel industry</subject><ispartof>The Banking Law Journal, 2013, Vol.130 (3), p.234</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 LexisNexis</rights><rights>Copyright Thomson Media Mar 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder, John R</creatorcontrib><title>Supreme court stays active in the arbitration arena</title><title>The Banking Law Journal</title><description>Financial industry firms with an interest in seeing arbitration remain viable as a means of individualized dispute resolution should make their voices heard in the regulatory reviews of arbitration and in any subsequent rulemaking process, the author suggests. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Alternative dispute resolution</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Cellular telephone services industry</subject><subject>Class actions (Civil procedure)</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Financial institutions</subject><subject>Negotiation, mediation and arbitration</subject><subject>Regulation of financial institutions</subject><subject>Securities industry</subject><subject>Travel industry</subject><issn>0005-5506</issn><issn>2381-3512</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>newsletterarticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>newsletterarticle</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNpNjktLxDAUhYMoOI7-h4BbC3mnWQ6DLxhwoa7LbXvTyVDTsUkF_72BcTGbcw-Hj3vOBVkJWfNKai4uyYoxpiutmbkmNykdGBNcarsi8n05zviFtJuWOdOU4TdR6HL4QRoizXukMLchz5DDFIvHCLfkysOY8O7_rsnn0-PH9qXavT2_bje7auBMmqqWrXNCqY4Lq3t0zltdl1qAlpteoLXSCdujB9cpkIx3rFUKjeg5Cu5ruSb3p7_HefpeMOXmUEbGUtlwKWrFHDOmUNWJGmDEJkQ_lbHdgBFnGKeIPpR4I4U02tVWFf7hjG-XFCKmIikM-5wGWFI6x_8AXppfvA</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Snyder, John R</creator><general>LexisNexis</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Supreme court stays active in the arbitration arena</title><author>Snyder, John R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1036-83b99244c1275de99f758213aab16d2e773927defa9c4a301c0b44e62d1e21f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>newsletterarticle</rsrctype><prefilter>newsletterarticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Alternative dispute resolution</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Cellular telephone services industry</topic><topic>Class actions (Civil procedure)</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Financial institutions</topic><topic>Negotiation, mediation and arbitration</topic><topic>Regulation of financial institutions</topic><topic>Securities industry</topic><topic>Travel industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, John R</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, John R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supreme court stays active in the arbitration arena</atitle><jtitle>The Banking Law Journal</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>234</spage><pages>234-</pages><issn>0005-5506</issn><eissn>2381-3512</eissn><coden>BLJODA</coden><abstract>Financial industry firms with an interest in seeing arbitration remain viable as a means of individualized dispute resolution should make their voices heard in the regulatory reviews of arbitration and in any subsequent rulemaking process, the author suggests. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>LexisNexis</pub></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0005-5506
ispartof	The Banking Law Journal, 2013, Vol.130 (3), p.234
issn	0005-5506 2381-3512
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_1328409066
source	HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects	Alternative dispute resolution Arbitration Cellular telephone services industry Class actions (Civil procedure) Contracts Financial institutions Negotiation, mediation and arbitration Regulation of financial institutions Securities industry Travel industry
title	Supreme court stays active in the arbitration arena
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T10%3A22%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supreme%20court%20stays%20active%20in%20the%20arbitration%20arena&rft.jtitle=The%20Banking%20Law%20Journal&rft.au=Snyder,%20John%20R&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=234&rft.pages=234-&rft.issn=0005-5506&rft.eissn=2381-3512&rft.coden=BLJODA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA323659874%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1328409066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A323659874&rfr_iscdi=true