Sources of Process Gain and Loss From Group Interaction in Performance of Analytical Procedures
Many business tasks are performed by people interacting in groups. While research on the effects of group interaction on task performance has been called for, few such studies have been done. Most studies conducted in audit settings stress that group interaction should result in performance gain. Ho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral research in accounting 1998-01, Vol.10, p.207 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Behavioral research in accounting |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Bedard, Jean C Biggs, Stanley F Maroney, James J Johnson, Eric N |
description | Many business tasks are performed by people interacting in groups. While research on the effects of group interaction on task performance has been called for, few such studies have been done. Most studies conducted in audit settings stress that group interaction should result in performance gain. However, psychology literature also indicates that group interaction could result in reduced performance as a result of process loss. This paper explores decision processes of interacting audit groups and individual auditors when conducting analytical procedures. A model of group performance adapted from Steiner (1972) (Steiner's model) helps frame group process gain and loss issues. Decision process data are gathered from groups of auditors using think-aloud verbal protocols. Group decision processes and performance are compared to those of individual auditors from a prior study. Results indicate that groups exhibited some process gain (e.g., from knowledge pooling), which contributed to improved performance. However, process loss caused several groups to fail to select a correct hypothesis that had been considered, thereby preventing them from achieving their full potential. Specific sources of process gain and loss contributing to differential group performance are discussed, along with implications for audit practice regarding maximizing process gain and reducing process loss. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1328059748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2946587211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_13280597483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjk0KwjAUhIMoWH_uEHBdSE1D06WIrYILQfclpCm0tHn1JV14eyN6AFczA98MMyNRIoSMJWP5PHgmWJxmgi_JyrmOMcYTKSJS3WFCbRyFht4QgnO0VK2lytb0CiEVCAMtEaaRXqw3qLRvwdKA3Aw2gIOy2nzqB6v6l2-16r9L9YTGbciiUb0z25-uya44PY7neER4Tsb5qgsHQtNVCd9LJvIslfw_6g1oWkVo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1328059748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sources of Process Gain and Loss From Group Interaction in Performance of Analytical Procedures</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bedard, Jean C ; Biggs, Stanley F ; Maroney, James J ; Johnson, Eric N</creator><creatorcontrib>Bedard, Jean C ; Biggs, Stanley F ; Maroney, James J ; Johnson, Eric N</creatorcontrib><description>Many business tasks are performed by people interacting in groups. While research on the effects of group interaction on task performance has been called for, few such studies have been done. Most studies conducted in audit settings stress that group interaction should result in performance gain. However, psychology literature also indicates that group interaction could result in reduced performance as a result of process loss. This paper explores decision processes of interacting audit groups and individual auditors when conducting analytical procedures. A model of group performance adapted from Steiner (1972) (Steiner's model) helps frame group process gain and loss issues. Decision process data are gathered from groups of auditors using think-aloud verbal protocols. Group decision processes and performance are compared to those of individual auditors from a prior study. Results indicate that groups exhibited some process gain (e.g., from knowledge pooling), which contributed to improved performance. However, process loss caused several groups to fail to select a correct hypothesis that had been considered, thereby preventing them from achieving their full potential. Specific sources of process gain and loss contributing to differential group performance are discussed, along with implications for audit practice regarding maximizing process gain and reducing process loss. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-4753</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-8009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sarasota: American Accounting Association</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Auditing ; Auditors ; Audits ; Budgets ; Built-in gains & losses ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Decision making models ; Decision making units ; Fraud ; Human performance ; Psychological research ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Behavioral research in accounting, 1998-01, Vol.10, p.207</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Accounting Association 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bedard, Jean C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biggs, Stanley F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maroney, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Eric N</creatorcontrib><title>Sources of Process Gain and Loss From Group Interaction in Performance of Analytical Procedures</title><title>Behavioral research in accounting</title><description>Many business tasks are performed by people interacting in groups. While research on the effects of group interaction on task performance has been called for, few such studies have been done. Most studies conducted in audit settings stress that group interaction should result in performance gain. However, psychology literature also indicates that group interaction could result in reduced performance as a result of process loss. This paper explores decision processes of interacting audit groups and individual auditors when conducting analytical procedures. A model of group performance adapted from Steiner (1972) (Steiner's model) helps frame group process gain and loss issues. Decision process data are gathered from groups of auditors using think-aloud verbal protocols. Group decision processes and performance are compared to those of individual auditors from a prior study. Results indicate that groups exhibited some process gain (e.g., from knowledge pooling), which contributed to improved performance. However, process loss caused several groups to fail to select a correct hypothesis that had been considered, thereby preventing them from achieving their full potential. Specific sources of process gain and loss contributing to differential group performance are discussed, along with implications for audit practice regarding maximizing process gain and reducing process loss. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Built-in gains & losses</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Decision making units</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1050-4753</issn><issn>1558-8009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjk0KwjAUhIMoWH_uEHBdSE1D06WIrYILQfclpCm0tHn1JV14eyN6AFczA98MMyNRIoSMJWP5PHgmWJxmgi_JyrmOMcYTKSJS3WFCbRyFht4QgnO0VK2lytb0CiEVCAMtEaaRXqw3qLRvwdKA3Aw2gIOy2nzqB6v6l2-16r9L9YTGbciiUb0z25-uya44PY7neER4Tsb5qgsHQtNVCd9LJvIslfw_6g1oWkVo</recordid><startdate>19980101</startdate><enddate>19980101</enddate><creator>Bedard, Jean C</creator><creator>Biggs, Stanley F</creator><creator>Maroney, James J</creator><creator>Johnson, Eric N</creator><general>American Accounting Association</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980101</creationdate><title>Sources of Process Gain and Loss From Group Interaction in Performance of Analytical Procedures</title><author>Bedard, Jean C ; Biggs, Stanley F ; Maroney, James J ; Johnson, Eric N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_13280597483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Built-in gains & losses</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Decision making units</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bedard, Jean C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biggs, Stanley F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maroney, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Eric N</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Behavioral research in accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bedard, Jean C</au><au>Biggs, Stanley F</au><au>Maroney, James J</au><au>Johnson, Eric N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sources of Process Gain and Loss From Group Interaction in Performance of Analytical Procedures</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral research in accounting</jtitle><date>1998-01-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>207</spage><pages>207-</pages><issn>1050-4753</issn><eissn>1558-8009</eissn><abstract>Many business tasks are performed by people interacting in groups. While research on the effects of group interaction on task performance has been called for, few such studies have been done. Most studies conducted in audit settings stress that group interaction should result in performance gain. However, psychology literature also indicates that group interaction could result in reduced performance as a result of process loss. This paper explores decision processes of interacting audit groups and individual auditors when conducting analytical procedures. A model of group performance adapted from Steiner (1972) (Steiner's model) helps frame group process gain and loss issues. Decision process data are gathered from groups of auditors using think-aloud verbal protocols. Group decision processes and performance are compared to those of individual auditors from a prior study. Results indicate that groups exhibited some process gain (e.g., from knowledge pooling), which contributed to improved performance. However, process loss caused several groups to fail to select a correct hypothesis that had been considered, thereby preventing them from achieving their full potential. Specific sources of process gain and loss contributing to differential group performance are discussed, along with implications for audit practice regarding maximizing process gain and reducing process loss. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Sarasota</cop><pub>American Accounting Association</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-4753 |
ispartof | Behavioral research in accounting, 1998-01, Vol.10, p.207 |
issn | 1050-4753 1558-8009 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1328059748 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Accounting Auditing Auditors Audits Budgets Built-in gains & losses Data collection Decision making Decision making models Decision making units Fraud Human performance Psychological research Studies |
title | Sources of Process Gain and Loss From Group Interaction in Performance of Analytical Procedures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T22%3A51%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sources%20of%20Process%20Gain%20and%20Loss%20From%20Group%20Interaction%20in%20Performance%20of%20Analytical%20Procedures&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20research%20in%20accounting&rft.au=Bedard,%20Jean%20C&rft.date=1998-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=207&rft.pages=207-&rft.issn=1050-4753&rft.eissn=1558-8009&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2946587211%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1328059748&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |