Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace
The mystery cult of the Great Gods of Samothrace offers productive material for theory building with respect to the archaeology of secrecy in ritual contexts. The social practice of secrecy builds political power and relies on communicative strategies that simultaneously conceal and reveal, employin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association 2011-03, Vol.21 (1), p.49 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 49 |
container_title | Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Blakely, Sandra |
description | The mystery cult of the Great Gods of Samothrace offers productive material for theory building with respect to the archaeology of secrecy in ritual contexts. The social practice of secrecy builds political power and relies on communicative strategies that simultaneously conceal and reveal, employing culturally specific codes involving abstraction, ambiguity, metaphor, and allusion. Samothrace increased its secrecy as it grew in prestige: archaeological materialization of this secrecy includes euphemistic inscriptions and magnetized iron rings used as tokens of initiation. The rings use myth, philosophy, and ritual practice to communicate the initiate's status while emphasizing the rites' resistance to disclosure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1551-8248.2012.01037.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1321495213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2930510691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-c4db9ae32fb94ac103b03cf51be96dfde9e5b1b2d58c39ccf6fa50d787a1f15e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9TlFLwzAYDKLgnP6HgK9rzZc0a-rbGFqFgUMn-Da-JF8sYy4z7dj27y0qu5c7uOPuGOMgcuhxt8pBa8iMLEwuBchcgFBlfjhjg5NxftLq45Jdte1KCKWl0QP2uoh7TJ7jhk-Sa5DiOn4eeQz8jVwid7zn87inNOJzTOjjYdRHPe8a4nUi7Hgdffsbx6_YNQkdXbOLgOuWbv55yN4fHxbTp2z2Uj9PJ7NsC0Z1mSu8rZCUDLYq0PWvrVAuaLBUjX3wVJG2YKXXxqnKuTAOqIUvTYkQQJMastu_3m2K3ztqu-Uq7tKmn1yCklBUWoJSP_FsU7I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1321495213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Blakely, Sandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Blakely, Sandra</creatorcontrib><description>The mystery cult of the Great Gods of Samothrace offers productive material for theory building with respect to the archaeology of secrecy in ritual contexts. The social practice of secrecy builds political power and relies on communicative strategies that simultaneously conceal and reveal, employing culturally specific codes involving abstraction, ambiguity, metaphor, and allusion. Samothrace increased its secrecy as it grew in prestige: archaeological materialization of this secrecy includes euphemistic inscriptions and magnetized iron rings used as tokens of initiation. The rings use myth, philosophy, and ritual practice to communicate the initiate's status while emphasizing the rites' resistance to disclosure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-8248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-8248.2012.01037.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Archaeology</subject><ispartof>Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2011-03, Vol.21 (1), p.49</ispartof><rights>2012 by the American Anthropological Association</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blakely, Sandra</creatorcontrib><title>Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace</title><title>Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association</title><description>The mystery cult of the Great Gods of Samothrace offers productive material for theory building with respect to the archaeology of secrecy in ritual contexts. The social practice of secrecy builds political power and relies on communicative strategies that simultaneously conceal and reveal, employing culturally specific codes involving abstraction, ambiguity, metaphor, and allusion. Samothrace increased its secrecy as it grew in prestige: archaeological materialization of this secrecy includes euphemistic inscriptions and magnetized iron rings used as tokens of initiation. The rings use myth, philosophy, and ritual practice to communicate the initiate's status while emphasizing the rites' resistance to disclosure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><issn>1551-823X</issn><issn>1551-8248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9TlFLwzAYDKLgnP6HgK9rzZc0a-rbGFqFgUMn-Da-JF8sYy4z7dj27y0qu5c7uOPuGOMgcuhxt8pBa8iMLEwuBchcgFBlfjhjg5NxftLq45Jdte1KCKWl0QP2uoh7TJ7jhk-Sa5DiOn4eeQz8jVwid7zn87inNOJzTOjjYdRHPe8a4nUi7Hgdffsbx6_YNQkdXbOLgOuWbv55yN4fHxbTp2z2Uj9PJ7NsC0Z1mSu8rZCUDLYq0PWvrVAuaLBUjX3wVJG2YKXXxqnKuTAOqIUvTYkQQJMastu_3m2K3ztqu-Uq7tKmn1yCklBUWoJSP_FsU7I</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Blakely, Sandra</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace</title><author>Blakely, Sandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-c4db9ae32fb94ac103b03cf51be96dfde9e5b1b2d58c39ccf6fa50d787a1f15e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blakely, Sandra</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blakely, Sandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace</atitle><jtitle>Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association</jtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><pages>49-</pages><issn>1551-823X</issn><eissn>1551-8248</eissn><abstract>The mystery cult of the Great Gods of Samothrace offers productive material for theory building with respect to the archaeology of secrecy in ritual contexts. The social practice of secrecy builds political power and relies on communicative strategies that simultaneously conceal and reveal, employing culturally specific codes involving abstraction, ambiguity, metaphor, and allusion. Samothrace increased its secrecy as it grew in prestige: archaeological materialization of this secrecy includes euphemistic inscriptions and magnetized iron rings used as tokens of initiation. The rings use myth, philosophy, and ritual practice to communicate the initiate's status while emphasizing the rites' resistance to disclosure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Arlington</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1551-8248.2012.01037.x</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1551-823X |
ispartof | Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2011-03, Vol.21 (1), p.49 |
issn | 1551-823X 1551-8248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1321495213 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Archaeology |
title | Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T14%3A04%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20an%20Archaeology%20of%20Secrecy:%20Power,%20Paradox,%20and%20the%20Great%20Gods%20of%20Samothrace&rft.jtitle=Archeological%20papers%20of%20the%20American%20Anthropological%20Association&rft.au=Blakely,%20Sandra&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.pages=49-&rft.issn=1551-823X&rft.eissn=1551-8248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1551-8248.2012.01037.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2930510691%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1321495213&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |