Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace

The mystery cult of the Great Gods of Samothrace offers productive material for theory building with respect to the archaeology of secrecy in ritual contexts. The social practice of secrecy builds political power and relies on communicative strategies that simultaneously conceal and reveal, employin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association 2011-03, Vol.21 (1), p.49
1. Verfasser: Blakely, Sandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 49
container_title Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association
container_volume 21
creator Blakely, Sandra
description The mystery cult of the Great Gods of Samothrace offers productive material for theory building with respect to the archaeology of secrecy in ritual contexts. The social practice of secrecy builds political power and relies on communicative strategies that simultaneously conceal and reveal, employing culturally specific codes involving abstraction, ambiguity, metaphor, and allusion. Samothrace increased its secrecy as it grew in prestige: archaeological materialization of this secrecy includes euphemistic inscriptions and magnetized iron rings used as tokens of initiation. The rings use myth, philosophy, and ritual practice to communicate the initiate's status while emphasizing the rites' resistance to disclosure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1551-8248.2012.01037.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1321495213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2930510691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-c4db9ae32fb94ac103b03cf51be96dfde9e5b1b2d58c39ccf6fa50d787a1f15e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9TlFLwzAYDKLgnP6HgK9rzZc0a-rbGFqFgUMn-Da-JF8sYy4z7dj27y0qu5c7uOPuGOMgcuhxt8pBa8iMLEwuBchcgFBlfjhjg5NxftLq45Jdte1KCKWl0QP2uoh7TJ7jhk-Sa5DiOn4eeQz8jVwid7zn87inNOJzTOjjYdRHPe8a4nUi7Hgdffsbx6_YNQkdXbOLgOuWbv55yN4fHxbTp2z2Uj9PJ7NsC0Z1mSu8rZCUDLYq0PWvrVAuaLBUjX3wVJG2YKXXxqnKuTAOqIUvTYkQQJMastu_3m2K3ztqu-Uq7tKmn1yCklBUWoJSP_FsU7I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1321495213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Blakely, Sandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Blakely, Sandra</creatorcontrib><description>The mystery cult of the Great Gods of Samothrace offers productive material for theory building with respect to the archaeology of secrecy in ritual contexts. The social practice of secrecy builds political power and relies on communicative strategies that simultaneously conceal and reveal, employing culturally specific codes involving abstraction, ambiguity, metaphor, and allusion. Samothrace increased its secrecy as it grew in prestige: archaeological materialization of this secrecy includes euphemistic inscriptions and magnetized iron rings used as tokens of initiation. The rings use myth, philosophy, and ritual practice to communicate the initiate's status while emphasizing the rites' resistance to disclosure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-8248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-8248.2012.01037.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Archaeology</subject><ispartof>Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2011-03, Vol.21 (1), p.49</ispartof><rights>2012 by the American Anthropological Association</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blakely, Sandra</creatorcontrib><title>Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace</title><title>Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association</title><description>The mystery cult of the Great Gods of Samothrace offers productive material for theory building with respect to the archaeology of secrecy in ritual contexts. The social practice of secrecy builds political power and relies on communicative strategies that simultaneously conceal and reveal, employing culturally specific codes involving abstraction, ambiguity, metaphor, and allusion. Samothrace increased its secrecy as it grew in prestige: archaeological materialization of this secrecy includes euphemistic inscriptions and magnetized iron rings used as tokens of initiation. The rings use myth, philosophy, and ritual practice to communicate the initiate's status while emphasizing the rites' resistance to disclosure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><issn>1551-823X</issn><issn>1551-8248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9TlFLwzAYDKLgnP6HgK9rzZc0a-rbGFqFgUMn-Da-JF8sYy4z7dj27y0qu5c7uOPuGOMgcuhxt8pBa8iMLEwuBchcgFBlfjhjg5NxftLq45Jdte1KCKWl0QP2uoh7TJ7jhk-Sa5DiOn4eeQz8jVwid7zn87inNOJzTOjjYdRHPe8a4nUi7Hgdffsbx6_YNQkdXbOLgOuWbv55yN4fHxbTp2z2Uj9PJ7NsC0Z1mSu8rZCUDLYq0PWvrVAuaLBUjX3wVJG2YKXXxqnKuTAOqIUvTYkQQJMastu_3m2K3ztqu-Uq7tKmn1yCklBUWoJSP_FsU7I</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Blakely, Sandra</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace</title><author>Blakely, Sandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-c4db9ae32fb94ac103b03cf51be96dfde9e5b1b2d58c39ccf6fa50d787a1f15e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blakely, Sandra</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blakely, Sandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace</atitle><jtitle>Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association</jtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><pages>49-</pages><issn>1551-823X</issn><eissn>1551-8248</eissn><abstract>The mystery cult of the Great Gods of Samothrace offers productive material for theory building with respect to the archaeology of secrecy in ritual contexts. The social practice of secrecy builds political power and relies on communicative strategies that simultaneously conceal and reveal, employing culturally specific codes involving abstraction, ambiguity, metaphor, and allusion. Samothrace increased its secrecy as it grew in prestige: archaeological materialization of this secrecy includes euphemistic inscriptions and magnetized iron rings used as tokens of initiation. The rings use myth, philosophy, and ritual practice to communicate the initiate's status while emphasizing the rites' resistance to disclosure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Arlington</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1551-8248.2012.01037.x</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-823X
ispartof Archeological papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2011-03, Vol.21 (1), p.49
issn 1551-823X
1551-8248
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1321495213
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Archaeology
title Toward an Archaeology of Secrecy: Power, Paradox, and the Great Gods of Samothrace
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T14%3A04%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20an%20Archaeology%20of%20Secrecy:%20Power,%20Paradox,%20and%20the%20Great%20Gods%20of%20Samothrace&rft.jtitle=Archeological%20papers%20of%20the%20American%20Anthropological%20Association&rft.au=Blakely,%20Sandra&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.pages=49-&rft.issn=1551-823X&rft.eissn=1551-8248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1551-8248.2012.01037.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2930510691%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1321495213&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true