RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN APPELLATE ADVOCACY
FIRST AMENDMENT AS A DEFENSE First Amendment defenses will have a growing impact on civil litigation. "14 Alvarez may prove particularly useful to tort defendants who cite that opinion in connection with Snyder v. Phelps,15 a 2010 decision that applied the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendm...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Tort trial & insurance practice law journal 2012-09, Vol.48 (1), p.47-65 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 65 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 47 |
| container_title | Tort trial & insurance practice law journal |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Miller, Brian C. Lee, Joshua D. Deutsch, Daniel R. |
| description | FIRST AMENDMENT AS A DEFENSE First Amendment defenses will have a growing impact on civil litigation. "14 Alvarez may prove particularly useful to tort defendants who cite that opinion in connection with Snyder v. Phelps,15 a 2010 decision that applied the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment as a defense to a state tort suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress.16 Other state tort laws may fall subject to First Amendment defenses as well. [...]even in civil cases, counsel should consider the possible priority of free speech considerations, particularly where a defendant's statements implicate matters of public interest. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1319450022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A325360462</galeid><jstor_id>24374544</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A325360462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1552-723137f3c1d8d8ced378e1a318dbe2acf1bf7c4969a0574dbe5bc535acbf52663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj19LwzAUxYsoOKcfQSj45EOlyU2a9rF0cQ7qVrQOfSppmpSW_pnp9uC3NzJBhHEf7uHwO_dwz5wZigh4CIXv51ZTqwEDuXSupqn1fUAsIjPn_oUnfJ27C77l6SZ7tvrVXa3dOMt4msY5d-PFdpPEyce1c6FFN6mb3z133h55njx56Wa5SuLUqxGl2GMYEDANElVhFUpVAQsVEoDCqlRYSI1KzSSJgkj4lBFr0lJSoEKWmuIggLlzd7y7M-PnQU37oh0PZrCVBQL7EvV9jP-oWnSqaAY97o2QfTPJIgZMIfBJ8EN5J6haDcqIbhyUbqz9j384wdupVN_Ik4HbY6Cd9qMpdqbphfkqMAFGKCHwDS53bh4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1319450022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN APPELLATE ADVOCACY</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Miller, Brian C. ; Lee, Joshua D. ; Deutsch, Daniel R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, Brian C. ; Lee, Joshua D. ; Deutsch, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><description>FIRST AMENDMENT AS A DEFENSE First Amendment defenses will have a growing impact on civil litigation. "14 Alvarez may prove particularly useful to tort defendants who cite that opinion in connection with Snyder v. Phelps,15 a 2010 decision that applied the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment as a defense to a state tort suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress.16 Other state tort laws may fall subject to First Amendment defenses as well. [...]even in civil cases, counsel should consider the possible priority of free speech considerations, particularly where a defendant's statements implicate matters of public interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1543-3234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-118X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section, American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Arbitration ; Dissenting opinions ; Federal court decisions ; First Amendment ; Government regulation ; Immunity ; Insurance regulation ; Plaintiffs ; Religion ; Statutory law ; Supreme Court decisions ; Tort law ; Torts ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Tort trial & insurance practice law journal, 2012-09, Vol.48 (1), p.47-65</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Fall 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24374544$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24374544$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joshua D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><title>RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN APPELLATE ADVOCACY</title><title>Tort trial & insurance practice law journal</title><description>FIRST AMENDMENT AS A DEFENSE First Amendment defenses will have a growing impact on civil litigation. "14 Alvarez may prove particularly useful to tort defendants who cite that opinion in connection with Snyder v. Phelps,15 a 2010 decision that applied the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment as a defense to a state tort suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress.16 Other state tort laws may fall subject to First Amendment defenses as well. [...]even in civil cases, counsel should consider the possible priority of free speech considerations, particularly where a defendant's statements implicate matters of public interest.</description><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Dissenting opinions</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>First Amendment</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Immunity</subject><subject>Insurance regulation</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>Tort law</subject><subject>Torts</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>1543-3234</issn><issn>1943-118X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptj19LwzAUxYsoOKcfQSj45EOlyU2a9rF0cQ7qVrQOfSppmpSW_pnp9uC3NzJBhHEf7uHwO_dwz5wZigh4CIXv51ZTqwEDuXSupqn1fUAsIjPn_oUnfJ27C77l6SZ7tvrVXa3dOMt4msY5d-PFdpPEyce1c6FFN6mb3z133h55njx56Wa5SuLUqxGl2GMYEDANElVhFUpVAQsVEoDCqlRYSI1KzSSJgkj4lBFr0lJSoEKWmuIggLlzd7y7M-PnQU37oh0PZrCVBQL7EvV9jP-oWnSqaAY97o2QfTPJIgZMIfBJ8EN5J6haDcqIbhyUbqz9j384wdupVN_Ik4HbY6Cd9qMpdqbphfkqMAFGKCHwDS53bh4</recordid><startdate>20120922</startdate><enddate>20120922</enddate><creator>Miller, Brian C.</creator><creator>Lee, Joshua D.</creator><creator>Deutsch, Daniel R.</creator><general>Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section, American Bar Association</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120922</creationdate><title>RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN APPELLATE ADVOCACY</title><author>Miller, Brian C. ; Lee, Joshua D. ; Deutsch, Daniel R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1552-723137f3c1d8d8ced378e1a318dbe2acf1bf7c4969a0574dbe5bc535acbf52663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Dissenting opinions</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>First Amendment</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Immunity</topic><topic>Insurance regulation</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>Tort law</topic><topic>Torts</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joshua D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Tort trial & insurance practice law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Brian C.</au><au>Lee, Joshua D.</au><au>Deutsch, Daniel R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN APPELLATE ADVOCACY</atitle><jtitle>Tort trial & insurance practice law journal</jtitle><date>2012-09-22</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>47-65</pages><issn>1543-3234</issn><eissn>1943-118X</eissn><abstract>FIRST AMENDMENT AS A DEFENSE First Amendment defenses will have a growing impact on civil litigation. "14 Alvarez may prove particularly useful to tort defendants who cite that opinion in connection with Snyder v. Phelps,15 a 2010 decision that applied the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment as a defense to a state tort suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress.16 Other state tort laws may fall subject to First Amendment defenses as well. [...]even in civil cases, counsel should consider the possible priority of free speech considerations, particularly where a defendant's statements implicate matters of public interest.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section, American Bar Association</pub><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1543-3234 |
| ispartof | Tort trial & insurance practice law journal, 2012-09, Vol.48 (1), p.47-65 |
| issn | 1543-3234 1943-118X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1319450022 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Arbitration Dissenting opinions Federal court decisions First Amendment Government regulation Immunity Insurance regulation Plaintiffs Religion Statutory law Supreme Court decisions Tort law Torts Trials |
| title | RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN APPELLATE ADVOCACY |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A15%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RECENT%20DEVELOPMENTS%20IN%20APPELLATE%20ADVOCACY&rft.jtitle=Tort%20trial%20&%20insurance%20practice%20law%20journal&rft.au=Miller,%20Brian%20C.&rft.date=2012-09-22&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=47-65&rft.issn=1543-3234&rft.eissn=1943-118X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA325360462%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1319450022&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A325360462&rft_jstor_id=24374544&rfr_iscdi=true |