WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE POOR OLD DOCTRINE OF NEGOTIABILITY?
The author believes that there is strong historical evidence and strong evidence in actual commercial practice to support the view that the negotiability concept is a valuable commercial principle. It has long endured and, the author argues, it probably will continue to play an important role for th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Banking law journal 2013-02, Vol.130 (2), p.136 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 136 |
| container_title | The Banking law journal |
| container_volume | 130 |
| creator | Dolan, John F |
| description | The author believes that there is strong historical evidence and strong evidence in actual commercial practice to support the view that the negotiability concept is a valuable commercial principle. It has long endured and, the author argues, it probably will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future.. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1318611670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2923397061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_13186116703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNysEKgkAUQNEhCjLrHx60FuY5jLqJMH02A-KIDEUraWELiSwn_78WfUCruzh3xrxQJBgIieGceZxzGUjJoyVbOddzHqKQscd2Z5VaoBM1oNK6popysAasIqiNacCUOeQms42uCEwBFR2N1elBl9pe9mu2uF3vrtv86rNtQTZTwXMcXlPn3m0_TOPjSy0KTCLEKObiv-sDQHQypA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1318611670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE POOR OLD DOCTRINE OF NEGOTIABILITY?</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Dolan, John F</creator><creatorcontrib>Dolan, John F</creatorcontrib><description>The author believes that there is strong historical evidence and strong evidence in actual commercial practice to support the view that the negotiability concept is a valuable commercial principle. It has long endured and, the author argues, it probably will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future..</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-5506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2381-3512</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BLJODA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: LexisNexis</publisher><subject>Commercial paper ; Creditors ; Debtors ; Drafts ; Entrepreneurs ; Merchant banks ; Payment systems</subject><ispartof>The Banking law journal, 2013-02, Vol.130 (2), p.136</ispartof><rights>Copyright Thomson Media Feb 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dolan, John F</creatorcontrib><title>WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE POOR OLD DOCTRINE OF NEGOTIABILITY?</title><title>The Banking law journal</title><description>The author believes that there is strong historical evidence and strong evidence in actual commercial practice to support the view that the negotiability concept is a valuable commercial principle. It has long endured and, the author argues, it probably will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future..</description><subject>Commercial paper</subject><subject>Creditors</subject><subject>Debtors</subject><subject>Drafts</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Merchant banks</subject><subject>Payment systems</subject><issn>0005-5506</issn><issn>2381-3512</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNysEKgkAUQNEhCjLrHx60FuY5jLqJMH02A-KIDEUraWELiSwn_78WfUCruzh3xrxQJBgIieGceZxzGUjJoyVbOddzHqKQscd2Z5VaoBM1oNK6popysAasIqiNacCUOeQms42uCEwBFR2N1elBl9pe9mu2uF3vrtv86rNtQTZTwXMcXlPn3m0_TOPjSy0KTCLEKObiv-sDQHQypA</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Dolan, John F</creator><general>LexisNexis</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE POOR OLD DOCTRINE OF NEGOTIABILITY?</title><author>Dolan, John F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_13186116703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Commercial paper</topic><topic>Creditors</topic><topic>Debtors</topic><topic>Drafts</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Merchant banks</topic><topic>Payment systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dolan, John F</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Banking law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dolan, John F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE POOR OLD DOCTRINE OF NEGOTIABILITY?</atitle><jtitle>The Banking law journal</jtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>136</spage><pages>136-</pages><issn>0005-5506</issn><eissn>2381-3512</eissn><coden>BLJODA</coden><abstract>The author believes that there is strong historical evidence and strong evidence in actual commercial practice to support the view that the negotiability concept is a valuable commercial principle. It has long endured and, the author argues, it probably will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future..</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>LexisNexis</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0005-5506 |
| ispartof | The Banking law journal, 2013-02, Vol.130 (2), p.136 |
| issn | 0005-5506 2381-3512 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1318611670 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Commercial paper Creditors Debtors Drafts Entrepreneurs Merchant banks Payment systems |
| title | WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE POOR OLD DOCTRINE OF NEGOTIABILITY? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A41%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=WHAT%20EVER%20HAPPENED%20TO%20THE%20POOR%20OLD%20DOCTRINE%20OF%20NEGOTIABILITY?&rft.jtitle=The%20Banking%20law%20journal&rft.au=Dolan,%20John%20F&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=136&rft.pages=136-&rft.issn=0005-5506&rft.eissn=2381-3512&rft.coden=BLJODA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2923397061%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1318611670&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |