Predicted Effect of Landscape Position on Wildlife Habitat Value of Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Wetlands in a Tile-drained Agricultural Region

Justification for investment in restored or constructed wetland projects are often based on presumed net increases in ecosystem services. However, quantitative assessment of performance metrics is often difficult and restricted to a single objective. More comprehensive performance assessments could...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Restoration ecology 2013-03, Vol.21 (2), p.276-284
Hauptverfasser: Otis, David L., Crumpton, William R., Green, David, Loan-Wilsey, Anna, Cooper, Tom, Johnson, Rex R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 284
container_issue 2
container_start_page 276
container_title Restoration ecology
container_volume 21
creator Otis, David L.
Crumpton, William R.
Green, David
Loan-Wilsey, Anna
Cooper, Tom
Johnson, Rex R.
description Justification for investment in restored or constructed wetland projects are often based on presumed net increases in ecosystem services. However, quantitative assessment of performance metrics is often difficult and restricted to a single objective. More comprehensive performance assessments could help inform decision‐makers about trade‐offs in services provided by alternative restoration program design attributes. The primary goal of the Iowa Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program is to establish wetlands that efficiently remove nitrates from tile‐drained agricultural landscapes. A secondary objective is provision of wildlife habitat. We used existing wildlife habitat models to compare relative net change in potential wildlife habitat value for four alternative landscape positions of wetlands within the watershed. Predicted species richness and habitat value for birds, mammals, amphibians, and reptiles generally increased as the wetland position moved lower in the watershed. However, predicted average net increase between pre‐ and post‐project value was dependent on taxonomic group. The increased average wetland area and changes in surrounding upland habitat composition among landscape positions were responsible for these differences. Net change in predicted densities of several grassland bird species at the four landscape positions was variable and species‐dependent. Predicted waterfowl breeding activity was greater for lower drainage position wetlands. Although our models are simplistic and provide only a predictive index of potential habitat value, we believe such assessment exercises can provide a tool for coarse‐level comparisons of alternative proposed project attributes and a basis for constructing informed hypotheses in auxiliary empirical field studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00898.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1317494100</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2920246281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-57f596b76c5327d40ca6104d0c2b385a223c947dd1ed338751e0db476696b3a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUd1u0zAYjRBIjME7WEJcJvgnjhOJm1GVDamCaowV7cZy7S_FxXU624HuWXhZnHXqNZYlH8nn59P5igIRXJF83m8rwmlTEox_VBQTWmHcdm11eFacnT6eZ4wbUtJOkJfFqxi3GBPetuys-LsMYKxOYNC870EnNPRoobyJWu0BLYdokx08yndlnXG2B3Sl1japhG6VG2HizwYfIfxWj8xrmDCguf-pvIYd-ISWYdgEtUMrSG7yRtYjhW6sg9IEZX1Ov9gEq0eXxqBc9thkq9fFi165CG-e3vPi-6f5zeyqXHy9_Dy7WJS6xm1bctHzrlmLRnNGhamxVg3BtcGarlnLFaVMd7UwhoBhrBWcADbrWjRNVjHF2Xnx9ui7D8P9CDHJ7TAGnyMlYUTUXZ1LzKz2yNJhiDFAL_fB7lR4kATLaRVyK6fG5dS4nFYhH1chD1n67ilA5VpdH3IxNp70VFCaB54G-XDk_cnNPPy3v7yezzLI8vIotzHB4SRX4ZdsBBNcrr5cyvqjuCXf7jp5x_4Bd7Csog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1317494100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicted Effect of Landscape Position on Wildlife Habitat Value of Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Wetlands in a Tile-drained Agricultural Region</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Otis, David L. ; Crumpton, William R. ; Green, David ; Loan-Wilsey, Anna ; Cooper, Tom ; Johnson, Rex R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Otis, David L. ; Crumpton, William R. ; Green, David ; Loan-Wilsey, Anna ; Cooper, Tom ; Johnson, Rex R.</creatorcontrib><description>Justification for investment in restored or constructed wetland projects are often based on presumed net increases in ecosystem services. However, quantitative assessment of performance metrics is often difficult and restricted to a single objective. More comprehensive performance assessments could help inform decision‐makers about trade‐offs in services provided by alternative restoration program design attributes. The primary goal of the Iowa Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program is to establish wetlands that efficiently remove nitrates from tile‐drained agricultural landscapes. A secondary objective is provision of wildlife habitat. We used existing wildlife habitat models to compare relative net change in potential wildlife habitat value for four alternative landscape positions of wetlands within the watershed. Predicted species richness and habitat value for birds, mammals, amphibians, and reptiles generally increased as the wetland position moved lower in the watershed. However, predicted average net increase between pre‐ and post‐project value was dependent on taxonomic group. The increased average wetland area and changes in surrounding upland habitat composition among landscape positions were responsible for these differences. Net change in predicted densities of several grassland bird species at the four landscape positions was variable and species‐dependent. Predicted waterfowl breeding activity was greater for lower drainage position wetlands. Although our models are simplistic and provide only a predictive index of potential habitat value, we believe such assessment exercises can provide a tool for coarse‐level comparisons of alternative proposed project attributes and a basis for constructing informed hypotheses in auxiliary empirical field studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00898.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REECFA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; ecosystem services ; Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration ; Environmental economics ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Landscape ecology ; landscape position ; nitrate removal ; Nitrates ; tile-drained agriculture ; wetland ; Wetlands ; wildlife habitat</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2013-03, Vol.21 (2), p.276-284</ispartof><rights>Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 Society for Ecological Restoration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-57f596b76c5327d40ca6104d0c2b385a223c947dd1ed338751e0db476696b3a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-57f596b76c5327d40ca6104d0c2b385a223c947dd1ed338751e0db476696b3a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1526-100X.2012.00898.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1526-100X.2012.00898.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27221045$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Otis, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crumpton, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loan-Wilsey, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Rex R.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicted Effect of Landscape Position on Wildlife Habitat Value of Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Wetlands in a Tile-drained Agricultural Region</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><description>Justification for investment in restored or constructed wetland projects are often based on presumed net increases in ecosystem services. However, quantitative assessment of performance metrics is often difficult and restricted to a single objective. More comprehensive performance assessments could help inform decision‐makers about trade‐offs in services provided by alternative restoration program design attributes. The primary goal of the Iowa Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program is to establish wetlands that efficiently remove nitrates from tile‐drained agricultural landscapes. A secondary objective is provision of wildlife habitat. We used existing wildlife habitat models to compare relative net change in potential wildlife habitat value for four alternative landscape positions of wetlands within the watershed. Predicted species richness and habitat value for birds, mammals, amphibians, and reptiles generally increased as the wetland position moved lower in the watershed. However, predicted average net increase between pre‐ and post‐project value was dependent on taxonomic group. The increased average wetland area and changes in surrounding upland habitat composition among landscape positions were responsible for these differences. Net change in predicted densities of several grassland bird species at the four landscape positions was variable and species‐dependent. Predicted waterfowl breeding activity was greater for lower drainage position wetlands. Although our models are simplistic and provide only a predictive index of potential habitat value, we believe such assessment exercises can provide a tool for coarse‐level comparisons of alternative proposed project attributes and a basis for constructing informed hypotheses in auxiliary empirical field studies.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>landscape position</subject><subject>nitrate removal</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>tile-drained agriculture</subject><subject>wetland</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>wildlife habitat</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUd1u0zAYjRBIjME7WEJcJvgnjhOJm1GVDamCaowV7cZy7S_FxXU624HuWXhZnHXqNZYlH8nn59P5igIRXJF83m8rwmlTEox_VBQTWmHcdm11eFacnT6eZ4wbUtJOkJfFqxi3GBPetuys-LsMYKxOYNC870EnNPRoobyJWu0BLYdokx08yndlnXG2B3Sl1japhG6VG2HizwYfIfxWj8xrmDCguf-pvIYd-ISWYdgEtUMrSG7yRtYjhW6sg9IEZX1Ov9gEq0eXxqBc9thkq9fFi165CG-e3vPi-6f5zeyqXHy9_Dy7WJS6xm1bctHzrlmLRnNGhamxVg3BtcGarlnLFaVMd7UwhoBhrBWcADbrWjRNVjHF2Xnx9ui7D8P9CDHJ7TAGnyMlYUTUXZ1LzKz2yNJhiDFAL_fB7lR4kATLaRVyK6fG5dS4nFYhH1chD1n67ilA5VpdH3IxNp70VFCaB54G-XDk_cnNPPy3v7yezzLI8vIotzHB4SRX4ZdsBBNcrr5cyvqjuCXf7jp5x_4Bd7Csog</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Otis, David L.</creator><creator>Crumpton, William R.</creator><creator>Green, David</creator><creator>Loan-Wilsey, Anna</creator><creator>Cooper, Tom</creator><creator>Johnson, Rex R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Predicted Effect of Landscape Position on Wildlife Habitat Value of Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Wetlands in a Tile-drained Agricultural Region</title><author>Otis, David L. ; Crumpton, William R. ; Green, David ; Loan-Wilsey, Anna ; Cooper, Tom ; Johnson, Rex R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-57f596b76c5327d40ca6104d0c2b385a223c947dd1ed338751e0db476696b3a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>landscape position</topic><topic>nitrate removal</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>tile-drained agriculture</topic><topic>wetland</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>wildlife habitat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Otis, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crumpton, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loan-Wilsey, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Rex R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Otis, David L.</au><au>Crumpton, William R.</au><au>Green, David</au><au>Loan-Wilsey, Anna</au><au>Cooper, Tom</au><au>Johnson, Rex R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicted Effect of Landscape Position on Wildlife Habitat Value of Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Wetlands in a Tile-drained Agricultural Region</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>276</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>276-284</pages><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><coden>REECFA</coden><abstract>Justification for investment in restored or constructed wetland projects are often based on presumed net increases in ecosystem services. However, quantitative assessment of performance metrics is often difficult and restricted to a single objective. More comprehensive performance assessments could help inform decision‐makers about trade‐offs in services provided by alternative restoration program design attributes. The primary goal of the Iowa Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program is to establish wetlands that efficiently remove nitrates from tile‐drained agricultural landscapes. A secondary objective is provision of wildlife habitat. We used existing wildlife habitat models to compare relative net change in potential wildlife habitat value for four alternative landscape positions of wetlands within the watershed. Predicted species richness and habitat value for birds, mammals, amphibians, and reptiles generally increased as the wetland position moved lower in the watershed. However, predicted average net increase between pre‐ and post‐project value was dependent on taxonomic group. The increased average wetland area and changes in surrounding upland habitat composition among landscape positions were responsible for these differences. Net change in predicted densities of several grassland bird species at the four landscape positions was variable and species‐dependent. Predicted waterfowl breeding activity was greater for lower drainage position wetlands. Although our models are simplistic and provide only a predictive index of potential habitat value, we believe such assessment exercises can provide a tool for coarse‐level comparisons of alternative proposed project attributes and a basis for constructing informed hypotheses in auxiliary empirical field studies.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00898.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-2971
ispartof Restoration ecology, 2013-03, Vol.21 (2), p.276-284
issn 1061-2971
1526-100X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1317494100
source Wiley Journals
subjects Agriculture
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
ecosystem services
Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration
Environmental economics
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agroecology
General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development
Landscape ecology
landscape position
nitrate removal
Nitrates
tile-drained agriculture
wetland
Wetlands
wildlife habitat
title Predicted Effect of Landscape Position on Wildlife Habitat Value of Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Wetlands in a Tile-drained Agricultural Region
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A01%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicted%20Effect%20of%20Landscape%20Position%20on%20Wildlife%20Habitat%20Value%20of%20Conservation%20Reserve%20Enhancement%20Program%20Wetlands%20in%20a%20Tile-drained%20Agricultural%20Region&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=Otis,%20David%20L.&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=276-284&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft.coden=REECFA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00898.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2920246281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1317494100&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true