THINKING ABOUT THE NATURE AND ROLE OF AUTHORITY IN DEMOCRATIC EDUCATION WITH ROUSSEAU'S EMILE
Educational authority is an issue in contemporary democracies. Surprisingly, little attention has been given to the problem of authority in Jean‐Jacques Rousseau's Emile and his work has not been addressed in the contemporary debate on the issue of authority in democratic education. Olivier Mic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational theory 2012-06, Vol.62 (3), p.287-304 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 304 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 287 |
container_title | Educational theory |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Michaud, Olivier |
description | Educational authority is an issue in contemporary democracies. Surprisingly, little attention has been given to the problem of authority in Jean‐Jacques Rousseau's Emile and his work has not been addressed in the contemporary debate on the issue of authority in democratic education. Olivier Michaud's goals are, first, to address both of these oversights by offering an original reading of the problem of authority in Emile and then to rehabilitate the notion of “educational authority” for democratic educators today. Contrary to progressive readings of Emile, he argues, Rousseau's position on this issue is not reducible to “education against authority.” What appears at first glance to be an education against authority is, in a deeper sense, an education toward and even within authority. Michaud contends that we have to embrace these complexities and contradictions that inform Rousseau's work in order to gain insights into the place and role of authority in democratic education. Michaud sheds light on Rousseau's stance on authority through a close study of specific topics addressed in Emile, including negative education, opinion, one's relation to God, friendship and loving relationships, and, finally, the relation Rousseau established with his reader. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2012.00447.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1314502758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ968692</ericid><sourcerecordid>2907396991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4007-68505a12c211adb39aa5fd6434bdbe733a13a43e060040485de73650b06c67c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxBywssWCVMH4mXbAIiWkCbSK1jgoLZLlpKrU8CgmI8ve4BHWNNx7NvWdGcxHCBHzi3uXKJwEnnuBc-hQI9QE4D_zNHurthH3UAyDMo047REdtuwIAwYD10KNOs_wuywc4ui5KjXWqcB7pcqxwlCd4XAwVLm5wVOq0GGf6AWc5TtSoiMeRzmKskjJ2RZHjaaZTZy8nExWVFxOsRtlQnaCDhX1u69O__xiVN0rHqTcsBlkcDb2KAwSeDAUIS2hFCbHzGetbKxZzyRmfzWd1wJglzHJWg3QHAA_F3DWlgBnISgYVsGN03s19a9bvn3X7YVbrz-bVrTSEES6ABiJ0rrBzVc26bZt6Yd6a5Yttvg0Bsw3TrMw2M7PNzGzDNL9hmo1Dzzq0bpbVDlO3fRnKPnXyVSd_LZ_r73-PNSrRqasc73X8sv2oNzveNk9GBiwQZpoPTErhXsc0MSH7AbMyiI0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1314502758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THINKING ABOUT THE NATURE AND ROLE OF AUTHORITY IN DEMOCRATIC EDUCATION WITH ROUSSEAU'S EMILE</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Michaud, Olivier</creator><creatorcontrib>Michaud, Olivier</creatorcontrib><description>Educational authority is an issue in contemporary democracies. Surprisingly, little attention has been given to the problem of authority in Jean‐Jacques Rousseau's Emile and his work has not been addressed in the contemporary debate on the issue of authority in democratic education. Olivier Michaud's goals are, first, to address both of these oversights by offering an original reading of the problem of authority in Emile and then to rehabilitate the notion of “educational authority” for democratic educators today. Contrary to progressive readings of Emile, he argues, Rousseau's position on this issue is not reducible to “education against authority.” What appears at first glance to be an education against authority is, in a deeper sense, an education toward and even within authority. Michaud contends that we have to embrace these complexities and contradictions that inform Rousseau's work in order to gain insights into the place and role of authority in democratic education. Michaud sheds light on Rousseau's stance on authority through a close study of specific topics addressed in Emile, including negative education, opinion, one's relation to God, friendship and loving relationships, and, finally, the relation Rousseau established with his reader.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-2004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-5446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2012.00447.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EDTHAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Children ; Democracy ; Education ; Educational Philosophy ; Educational Policy ; Equality ; Essays ; Friendship ; Inequality ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Intimacy ; Misconceptions ; Opinions ; Pedagogy ; Persuasive Discourse ; Power Structure ; Progressive Education ; Reading ; Religion ; Role of Education ; Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1712-1778) ; Society ; Swiss literature ; Tocqueville, Alexis de (1805-59)</subject><ispartof>Educational theory, 2012-06, Vol.62 (3), p.287-304</ispartof><rights>2012 Board of Trustees | University of Illinois</rights><rights>Copyright University of Illinois at Urbana. Board of Trustees, on behalf of its Dept. of Educational Policy Studies 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4007-68505a12c211adb39aa5fd6434bdbe733a13a43e060040485de73650b06c67c03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1741-5446.2012.00447.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1741-5446.2012.00447.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ968692$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Michaud, Olivier</creatorcontrib><title>THINKING ABOUT THE NATURE AND ROLE OF AUTHORITY IN DEMOCRATIC EDUCATION WITH ROUSSEAU'S EMILE</title><title>Educational theory</title><description>Educational authority is an issue in contemporary democracies. Surprisingly, little attention has been given to the problem of authority in Jean‐Jacques Rousseau's Emile and his work has not been addressed in the contemporary debate on the issue of authority in democratic education. Olivier Michaud's goals are, first, to address both of these oversights by offering an original reading of the problem of authority in Emile and then to rehabilitate the notion of “educational authority” for democratic educators today. Contrary to progressive readings of Emile, he argues, Rousseau's position on this issue is not reducible to “education against authority.” What appears at first glance to be an education against authority is, in a deeper sense, an education toward and even within authority. Michaud contends that we have to embrace these complexities and contradictions that inform Rousseau's work in order to gain insights into the place and role of authority in democratic education. Michaud sheds light on Rousseau's stance on authority through a close study of specific topics addressed in Emile, including negative education, opinion, one's relation to God, friendship and loving relationships, and, finally, the relation Rousseau established with his reader.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Intimacy</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Persuasive Discourse</subject><subject>Power Structure</subject><subject>Progressive Education</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Role of Education</subject><subject>Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1712-1778)</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Swiss literature</subject><subject>Tocqueville, Alexis de (1805-59)</subject><issn>0013-2004</issn><issn>1741-5446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxBywssWCVMH4mXbAIiWkCbSK1jgoLZLlpKrU8CgmI8ve4BHWNNx7NvWdGcxHCBHzi3uXKJwEnnuBc-hQI9QE4D_zNHurthH3UAyDMo047REdtuwIAwYD10KNOs_wuywc4ui5KjXWqcB7pcqxwlCd4XAwVLm5wVOq0GGf6AWc5TtSoiMeRzmKskjJ2RZHjaaZTZy8nExWVFxOsRtlQnaCDhX1u69O__xiVN0rHqTcsBlkcDb2KAwSeDAUIS2hFCbHzGetbKxZzyRmfzWd1wJglzHJWg3QHAA_F3DWlgBnISgYVsGN03s19a9bvn3X7YVbrz-bVrTSEES6ABiJ0rrBzVc26bZt6Yd6a5Yttvg0Bsw3TrMw2M7PNzGzDNL9hmo1Dzzq0bpbVDlO3fRnKPnXyVSd_LZ_r73-PNSrRqasc73X8sv2oNzveNk9GBiwQZpoPTErhXsc0MSH7AbMyiI0</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Michaud, Olivier</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>THINKING ABOUT THE NATURE AND ROLE OF AUTHORITY IN DEMOCRATIC EDUCATION WITH ROUSSEAU'S EMILE</title><author>Michaud, Olivier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4007-68505a12c211adb39aa5fd6434bdbe733a13a43e060040485de73650b06c67c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Intimacy</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Persuasive Discourse</topic><topic>Power Structure</topic><topic>Progressive Education</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Role of Education</topic><topic>Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1712-1778)</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Swiss literature</topic><topic>Tocqueville, Alexis de (1805-59)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Michaud, Olivier</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Michaud, Olivier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ968692</ericid><atitle>THINKING ABOUT THE NATURE AND ROLE OF AUTHORITY IN DEMOCRATIC EDUCATION WITH ROUSSEAU'S EMILE</atitle><jtitle>Educational theory</jtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>287-304</pages><issn>0013-2004</issn><eissn>1741-5446</eissn><coden>EDTHAD</coden><abstract>Educational authority is an issue in contemporary democracies. Surprisingly, little attention has been given to the problem of authority in Jean‐Jacques Rousseau's Emile and his work has not been addressed in the contemporary debate on the issue of authority in democratic education. Olivier Michaud's goals are, first, to address both of these oversights by offering an original reading of the problem of authority in Emile and then to rehabilitate the notion of “educational authority” for democratic educators today. Contrary to progressive readings of Emile, he argues, Rousseau's position on this issue is not reducible to “education against authority.” What appears at first glance to be an education against authority is, in a deeper sense, an education toward and even within authority. Michaud contends that we have to embrace these complexities and contradictions that inform Rousseau's work in order to gain insights into the place and role of authority in democratic education. Michaud sheds light on Rousseau's stance on authority through a close study of specific topics addressed in Emile, including negative education, opinion, one's relation to God, friendship and loving relationships, and, finally, the relation Rousseau established with his reader.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1741-5446.2012.00447.x</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-2004 |
ispartof | Educational theory, 2012-06, Vol.62 (3), p.287-304 |
issn | 0013-2004 1741-5446 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1314502758 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Children Democracy Education Educational Philosophy Educational Policy Equality Essays Friendship Inequality Interpersonal Relationship Intimacy Misconceptions Opinions Pedagogy Persuasive Discourse Power Structure Progressive Education Reading Religion Role of Education Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1712-1778) Society Swiss literature Tocqueville, Alexis de (1805-59) |
title | THINKING ABOUT THE NATURE AND ROLE OF AUTHORITY IN DEMOCRATIC EDUCATION WITH ROUSSEAU'S EMILE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T15%3A58%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THINKING%20ABOUT%20THE%20NATURE%20AND%20ROLE%20OF%20AUTHORITY%20IN%20DEMOCRATIC%20EDUCATION%20WITH%20ROUSSEAU'S%20EMILE&rft.jtitle=Educational%20theory&rft.au=Michaud,%20Olivier&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=287-304&rft.issn=0013-2004&rft.eissn=1741-5446&rft.coden=EDTHAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2012.00447.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2907396991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1314502758&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ968692&rfr_iscdi=true |