Predicting Positive p53 Cancer Rescue Regions Using Most Informative Positive (MIP) Active Learning: e1000498
Many protein engineering problems involve finding mutations that produce proteins with a particular function. Computational active learning is an attractive approach to discover desired biological activities. Traditional active learning techniques have been optimized to iteratively improve classifie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS computational biology 2009-09, Vol.5 (9) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | PLoS computational biology |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Danziger, Samuel A Baronio, Roberta Ho, Lydia Hall, Linda Salmon, Kirsty Hatfield, G Wesley Kaiser, Peter Lathrop, Richard H |
description | Many protein engineering problems involve finding mutations that produce proteins with a particular function. Computational active learning is an attractive approach to discover desired biological activities. Traditional active learning techniques have been optimized to iteratively improve classifier accuracy, not to quickly discover biologically significant results. We report here a novel active learning technique, Most Informative Positive (MIP), which is tailored to biological problems because it seeks novel and informative positive results. MIP active learning differs from traditional active learning methods in two ways: (1) it preferentially seeks Positive (functionally active) examples; and (2) it may be effectively extended to select gene regions suitable for high throughput combinatorial mutagenesis. We applied MIP to discover mutations in the tumor suppressor protein p53 that reactivate mutated p53 found in human cancers. This is an important biomedical goal because p53 mutants have been implicated in half of all human cancers, and restoring active p53 in tumors leads to tumor regression. MIP found Positive (cancer rescue) p53 mutants in silico using 33% fewer experiments than traditional non-MIP active learning, with only a minor decrease in classifier accuracy. Applying MIP to in vivo experimentation yielded immediate Positive results. Ten different p53 mutations found in human cancers were paired in silico with all possible single amino acid rescue mutations, from which MIP was used to select a Positive Region predicted to be enriched for p53 cancer rescue mutants. In vivo assays showed that the predicted Positive Region: (1) had significantly more (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000498 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1312446504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2901556421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_13124465043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj7sKwjAYhYMoeH0Dh4CLDq2JSbyMUhQFC0UU3CTGKJGa1Pytz28VcXY6F74zHIS6lISUTejw5gpvZRpm6mRCSgjhs2kFNagQLJgwMa3-PD_UURPgRkhZz8YNpBKvz0blxl5x4sDk5qlxJhiOpFXa460GVehSrsZZwHt4g7GDHK_txfm7_Ax-y368TgZ4rj5ho6W3Jd9GtYtMQXe-2kK95WIXrYLMu0ehIT9-D8CRMjrifCwIZ_9RLyIkTh4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1312446504</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Positive p53 Cancer Rescue Regions Using Most Informative Positive (MIP) Active Learning: e1000498</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Danziger, Samuel A ; Baronio, Roberta ; Ho, Lydia ; Hall, Linda ; Salmon, Kirsty ; Hatfield, G Wesley ; Kaiser, Peter ; Lathrop, Richard H</creator><creatorcontrib>Danziger, Samuel A ; Baronio, Roberta ; Ho, Lydia ; Hall, Linda ; Salmon, Kirsty ; Hatfield, G Wesley ; Kaiser, Peter ; Lathrop, Richard H</creatorcontrib><description>Many protein engineering problems involve finding mutations that produce proteins with a particular function. Computational active learning is an attractive approach to discover desired biological activities. Traditional active learning techniques have been optimized to iteratively improve classifier accuracy, not to quickly discover biologically significant results. We report here a novel active learning technique, Most Informative Positive (MIP), which is tailored to biological problems because it seeks novel and informative positive results. MIP active learning differs from traditional active learning methods in two ways: (1) it preferentially seeks Positive (functionally active) examples; and (2) it may be effectively extended to select gene regions suitable for high throughput combinatorial mutagenesis. We applied MIP to discover mutations in the tumor suppressor protein p53 that reactivate mutated p53 found in human cancers. This is an important biomedical goal because p53 mutants have been implicated in half of all human cancers, and restoring active p53 in tumors leads to tumor regression. MIP found Positive (cancer rescue) p53 mutants in silico using 33% fewer experiments than traditional non-MIP active learning, with only a minor decrease in classifier accuracy. Applying MIP to in vivo experimentation yielded immediate Positive results. Ten different p53 mutations found in human cancers were paired in silico with all possible single amino acid rescue mutations, from which MIP was used to select a Positive Region predicted to be enriched for p53 cancer rescue mutants. In vivo assays showed that the predicted Positive Region: (1) had significantly more (p<0.01) new strong cancer rescue mutants than control regions (Negative, and non-MIP active learning); (2) had slightly more new strong cancer rescue mutants than an Expert region selected for purely biological considerations; and (3) rescued for the first time the previously unrescuable p53 cancer mutant P152L.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-734X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000498</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Experiments ; Mutagenesis ; Mutation ; Proteins ; Studies ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>PLoS computational biology, 2009-09, Vol.5 (9)</ispartof><rights>2009 Danziger et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Danziger SA, Baronio R, Ho L, Hall L, Salmon K, et al. (2009) Predicting Positive p53 Cancer Rescue Regions Using Most Informative Positive (MIP) Active Learning. PLoS Comput Biol 5(9): e1000498. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000498</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Danziger, Samuel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baronio, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Kirsty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatfield, G Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lathrop, Richard H</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Positive p53 Cancer Rescue Regions Using Most Informative Positive (MIP) Active Learning: e1000498</title><title>PLoS computational biology</title><description>Many protein engineering problems involve finding mutations that produce proteins with a particular function. Computational active learning is an attractive approach to discover desired biological activities. Traditional active learning techniques have been optimized to iteratively improve classifier accuracy, not to quickly discover biologically significant results. We report here a novel active learning technique, Most Informative Positive (MIP), which is tailored to biological problems because it seeks novel and informative positive results. MIP active learning differs from traditional active learning methods in two ways: (1) it preferentially seeks Positive (functionally active) examples; and (2) it may be effectively extended to select gene regions suitable for high throughput combinatorial mutagenesis. We applied MIP to discover mutations in the tumor suppressor protein p53 that reactivate mutated p53 found in human cancers. This is an important biomedical goal because p53 mutants have been implicated in half of all human cancers, and restoring active p53 in tumors leads to tumor regression. MIP found Positive (cancer rescue) p53 mutants in silico using 33% fewer experiments than traditional non-MIP active learning, with only a minor decrease in classifier accuracy. Applying MIP to in vivo experimentation yielded immediate Positive results. Ten different p53 mutations found in human cancers were paired in silico with all possible single amino acid rescue mutations, from which MIP was used to select a Positive Region predicted to be enriched for p53 cancer rescue mutants. In vivo assays showed that the predicted Positive Region: (1) had significantly more (p<0.01) new strong cancer rescue mutants than control regions (Negative, and non-MIP active learning); (2) had slightly more new strong cancer rescue mutants than an Expert region selected for purely biological considerations; and (3) rescued for the first time the previously unrescuable p53 cancer mutant P152L.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Mutagenesis</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1553-734X</issn><issn>1553-7358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNj7sKwjAYhYMoeH0Dh4CLDq2JSbyMUhQFC0UU3CTGKJGa1Pytz28VcXY6F74zHIS6lISUTejw5gpvZRpm6mRCSgjhs2kFNagQLJgwMa3-PD_UURPgRkhZz8YNpBKvz0blxl5x4sDk5qlxJhiOpFXa460GVehSrsZZwHt4g7GDHK_txfm7_Ax-y368TgZ4rj5ho6W3Jd9GtYtMQXe-2kK95WIXrYLMu0ehIT9-D8CRMjrifCwIZ_9RLyIkTh4</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Danziger, Samuel A</creator><creator>Baronio, Roberta</creator><creator>Ho, Lydia</creator><creator>Hall, Linda</creator><creator>Salmon, Kirsty</creator><creator>Hatfield, G Wesley</creator><creator>Kaiser, Peter</creator><creator>Lathrop, Richard H</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Predicting Positive p53 Cancer Rescue Regions Using Most Informative Positive (MIP) Active Learning</title><author>Danziger, Samuel A ; Baronio, Roberta ; Ho, Lydia ; Hall, Linda ; Salmon, Kirsty ; Hatfield, G Wesley ; Kaiser, Peter ; Lathrop, Richard H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_13124465043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Mutagenesis</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Danziger, Samuel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baronio, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Kirsty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatfield, G Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lathrop, Richard H</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Danziger, Samuel A</au><au>Baronio, Roberta</au><au>Ho, Lydia</au><au>Hall, Linda</au><au>Salmon, Kirsty</au><au>Hatfield, G Wesley</au><au>Kaiser, Peter</au><au>Lathrop, Richard H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Positive p53 Cancer Rescue Regions Using Most Informative Positive (MIP) Active Learning: e1000498</atitle><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>9</issue><issn>1553-734X</issn><eissn>1553-7358</eissn><abstract>Many protein engineering problems involve finding mutations that produce proteins with a particular function. Computational active learning is an attractive approach to discover desired biological activities. Traditional active learning techniques have been optimized to iteratively improve classifier accuracy, not to quickly discover biologically significant results. We report here a novel active learning technique, Most Informative Positive (MIP), which is tailored to biological problems because it seeks novel and informative positive results. MIP active learning differs from traditional active learning methods in two ways: (1) it preferentially seeks Positive (functionally active) examples; and (2) it may be effectively extended to select gene regions suitable for high throughput combinatorial mutagenesis. We applied MIP to discover mutations in the tumor suppressor protein p53 that reactivate mutated p53 found in human cancers. This is an important biomedical goal because p53 mutants have been implicated in half of all human cancers, and restoring active p53 in tumors leads to tumor regression. MIP found Positive (cancer rescue) p53 mutants in silico using 33% fewer experiments than traditional non-MIP active learning, with only a minor decrease in classifier accuracy. Applying MIP to in vivo experimentation yielded immediate Positive results. Ten different p53 mutations found in human cancers were paired in silico with all possible single amino acid rescue mutations, from which MIP was used to select a Positive Region predicted to be enriched for p53 cancer rescue mutants. In vivo assays showed that the predicted Positive Region: (1) had significantly more (p<0.01) new strong cancer rescue mutants than control regions (Negative, and non-MIP active learning); (2) had slightly more new strong cancer rescue mutants than an Expert region selected for purely biological considerations; and (3) rescued for the first time the previously unrescuable p53 cancer mutant P152L.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000498</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1553-734X |
ispartof | PLoS computational biology, 2009-09, Vol.5 (9) |
issn | 1553-734X 1553-7358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1312446504 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cancer Experiments Mutagenesis Mutation Proteins Studies Tumors |
title | Predicting Positive p53 Cancer Rescue Regions Using Most Informative Positive (MIP) Active Learning: e1000498 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A18%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Positive%20p53%20Cancer%20Rescue%20Regions%20Using%20Most%20Informative%20Positive%20(MIP)%20Active%20Learning:%20e1000498&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20computational%20biology&rft.au=Danziger,%20Samuel%20A&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=9&rft.issn=1553-734X&rft.eissn=1553-7358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000498&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2901556421%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1312446504&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |